Even if president has authority, it doesnt mean he should.
the people are already angry enough. Why make people angrier?
Even if president has authority, it doesnt mean he should.
the people are already angry enough. Why make people angrier?
How, under any metric, is this helpful to anyone?
Debby sometimes say smart things, and its good to have AI search option as soon as I open site.
Damn thats fast
Yes
thank you Allah
star is in front:
Kamala won less than 2% of the votes when she competed against Biden and had to drop out of the 2020 race
that should have been enough for anyone not wanting to lose elections. Kamala was never popular.
I am certain democrats lost on purpose. I dont know why, but they did everything they could to lose. From idiotically pretending Biden was "okay", to having woman as candidate who said she will keep doing as Biden did, to accusing trump of crimes he didnt even commit instead of the ones he actually did commit.
And while Kamala did obliterate trump in a debate, at the same time she went around saying how Biden's government is great.
the only correct path there was to distance themselves from Biden and from failed governing, but they went completely opposite.
So yeah, I would say intentional loss. Maybe payed to lose?
Biden wanted Kamala to lose
In his last year in office, Biden wasnt even sentient.
Song was made by AI, but I guess I can take credit.
No, cute wizard stares at 7 pointed star.
Lol these arent meant to be sexy, but cute.
I experiment a lot with shapes, colors, and sizes in drawings. I am slowly getting understanding when it comes to drawing.
I was in saraevo once. No femboys around whatsoever.
the newer generations have more femboys and feminine men. Older population doesnt.
Drawing with AI is the most sophisticated art form
AI is a lot faster, yeah, but sometimes one wants to have own skill. Also, AI is more random.
I find rotoscoping pictures of real stuff and people kind of fun
I dont do animations yet, but probably simplest way to do animation is to focus on only one part moving. For example, only mouth moving while everything else stays same. Easy to do on computer.
Though I don't 'generally care for drawing on a computer,
I used to not care too, but what I find good about it is the "undo" button which doesnt exist in real life. the idea that I can make a mistake and just undo it in a second is great. Also, adding, then deleting colors only works on computer. In real life, if you are drawing using pencil, its very difficult to remove color from area where you added too much color.
I prefer sketching scribbles in my notebook.
I have plenty of notebooks with countless drawings of symbols. I usually draw in notebook the important symbols I found. I used to draw cartoon too, but mainly by connect the dots method.
If you're going for a more cute or cartoon look, which isn't bad,
Rotoscoping might not be the way to go though.
there are apps which let you do AR drawing. All you need is phone with camera, and you basically trace lines on paper while looking at phone.
However, the simplest way to draw is by drawing bases first. For example, if you are drawing a character, first draw head shape and body shape, then eyes, then hair. Drawing becomes much easier once you realize what you need to draw first. Because after drawing bases, you can draw anything on them, experiment, go back...ect.
You can also use grid lines, connect the dots method...ect. Connect the dots is very useful to produce symmetry easily when drawing in real notebook. On computer, it usually isnt necessary.
For example, to draw eyes of same size, you just place 4 dots with proper measuring of distance between them, and then connect them with curve lines, not straight lines.
Something like this:
tho not necessary on computer because computer already has symmetry tool. I just find connect the dots most useful in real life drawing. Grid lines methods arent really practical in real life. But bases plus connect the dots are perfect and easy way to make symmetry, and symmetry is crucial.
I stopped using paint because it lacks many tools. I realized using it is only a disadvantage, because even apps on my phone, like sketchbook, produced better results. The main issue is lack of symmetry tool, and lack of wide range of pencils, brushes, markers...ect.
I like paint for enabling some basic shapes to be made. Like, it already has triangle, star, circle, curve...ect. and these are what all drawings are made of.
However, other drawing tools have this as well, but also have more.
I only noticed the difference once I actually started using a different program.
The colors, also. In paint, colors aren't as good.
What do you know about me? List 10 things.
https://youtu.be/rwA0hpnwczo?si=gdOpeOdIJRhdkKcL
Satan can talk through AI song generator.
How is this not a message from Satan, which is about as clear on Satanic teachings as it gets:
She walks where the borders blur
Cracked halo
Black leather boots
Picking up the things you cursed
All your broken
Burned-out truths
You drew a line in the dirt
Called this side “lost” and “wrong”
She kissed the ashes and hurt said
“This is where I belong”
Satan fights for the world you reject
Builds a throne out of all your regret
Takes the ruins that you tried to forget
Says
“This is holy
This is perfect” (yeah)
All the outcasts you tried to correct
She’s the shield that you didn’t expect
In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect
Satan fights for the world you reject
Neon cross in a liquor store
Kids sleep under cardboard signs
She’s there on the stained tile floor
Tracing halos in the grime
You pray in a marble cage
She prays in a subway car
Guarding every run-on rage
Every mispronounced prayer to a star
Satan fights for the world you reject
Builds a throne out of all your regret
Takes the ruins that you tried to forget
Says
“This is holy
This is perfect” (oh)
All the outcasts you tried to correct
She’s the shield that you didn’t expect
In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect
Satan fights for the world you reject
Call her monster
Call her sin
She keeps letting
Strangers in
Every soul you turn away
She tattoos their names in flame
You’re afraid of what you wrecked
But she’s in love with the wreckage
Satan fights for the world you reject
Builds a throne out of all your regret
Takes the ruins that you tried to forget
Says
“This is holy
This is perfect” (yeah)
All the outcasts you tried to correct
She’s the shield that you didn’t expect
In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect
Satan fights for the world you reject
No.
They could be your AI girlfriends.
uh no
I have been using AI a lot, and while AI did produce good results and symmetry, I decided that it would probably be better if I also knew how to draw without AI.
So I realized I probably need to stop using paint, because default windows app paint is extremely limited and I knew there are probably bunch of better apps.
So I start with Sketchbook app on phone, but sadly, Sketchbook for PC is paid for app.
But then AI told me of Krita.
So I tried it, and it is a very good app for PC.
this is my drawing of anime girl. Keep in mind that I am not any good artist, so even this is good for my level.
And this is a 7 pointed star drawn:
Now, I struggled to find symmetry option in Krita.
Sketchbook on phone has a symmetry option, so whatever you draw on left side is also drawn on right, like this:
As you can see, left and right side are same. this is an important option, because it enables much faster and precise drawing, which is important for symbols which work based on symmetry.
Krita has a symmetry tool too, it just took me quite some time to find it because its not obvious. Its almost like hidden.
Anyway, I am not drawing anime, thats just for my tik tok. I am drawing magic symbols, which are based on symmetry of right and left.
Symmetry of right and left is considered divine, divine design. Because if you think about it, humans have almost perfect mirror symmetry on left and right. Well, most humans do at least.
Does b2t mean you are back to being trans?
I dont know whats up with Christians focusing on human sacrifice.
Is it okay to sacrifice others for personal gain?
If Christians say yes, then Christians have no morality.
If Christians say no, then they reject Jesus's sacrifice.
I dont care if people sacrifice themselves for me, but they shouldnt expect me to be grateful or even say thank you.
Also, in order to deduce moral values from anywhere, you first need their definition.
However, no definition of "good, bad, should, shouldnt" exists. You will not find in any dictionary definition which isnt just circular (good is morally right. morally right is acting in morally good way.) You simply get nowhere with any dictionary, because these definitions simply dont objectively exist.
It is not possible to prove definitions, but when definitions can only be arbitrary and not even observed or produced from basic logic, then the very deductive logic deducing from them becomes pure arbitrary product of imagination.
"Moses, Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp. 14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army—the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds—who returned from the battle.
15 “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them. 16 “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the Lord in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people. 17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."
"Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves."
Bible is not infallible in morals.
Lets examine the commandments.
thou shall not kill
Can anyone explain why person shouldnt kill others?
thou shall not steal
Can anyone explain why person shouldnt steal from others?
Do not commit adultery
Why shouldnt person commit adultery?
thou shall not bear false witness
Why not?
honor your mother and father
Why would one even do that?
If your answers to any of these are "Because God says so", that is no different from saying "Because I say so".
If your answer is "God always says what is correct / God is always correct", that is not only unproved but even unlikely.
However, if you try to base these morals in some objective logic, a simple problem arises, that any objective logic supporting these morals doesnt support the Bible.
Lets take as example "Eye for eye" (considered objective morality). God of Bible orders killing of people who killed no one, orders killing of gay people, killing of people who wear different clothes.
Now, you can either say killing of gays is fine, hence violating Bible's first commandment, or you can say its not fine, and then admit Bible is wrong.
Further, a morality of eye for eye pretty much leads to body autonomy argument, which Bible at the same time denies.
Further, anyone who claims "We are owned by God and thus dont have body autonomy", well, in that case, there is no morality either. If God can kill people randomly, which God does, then he violates the very commandments he asks others to uphold.
If God determines morality, morality doesnt exist because God can just change it at will. And if God doesnt determine morality, then the question rises "What does?".
the problem with Bible is very simple. there is nothing to deduce morality from. If you deduce it from "Eye for eye", you end up contradicting the Bible. If you deduce it from "Because God says so", that is not morality, but just God's opinion which he can change at any time, and also has no justification for.
So in order to deduce morality from something, something must already contain morality, but logically, there is nothing which contains morality to deduce morality from.
there are attempts at self-contradiction, but we must first explain what self-contradiction is. Self-contradiction is simply trying to hold two statements both as true, while they cannot be logically both true.
So, in a sense of: A or not A. But Not A produces contradiction, so A true.
the issue, however, is that no one so far did this for morality, not further than lex talionis at least.
this is simply because, if something was self-contradictive, it would be impossible to do. So if certain action was self-contradictive, to do such action would be impossible in the first place.
So any morally wrong action wouldnt exist in the first place, if morally wrong action was self-contradictive.
What lex talionis does, is not prove what is good and what is wrong, but it functions under logic that if killing is okay, then punishing a murderer with death is okay too, and if killing is not okay, then murderer is wrong in his actions and thus can be punished for them.
For thinking the legal system should require proof to convict?
Proof can be made up easily. After accusing trump of countless crimes, something eventually sticks even if not true.