Shoresy

It's not a pool party. She fucked around being casual and found out.


Maybe in your country, you can have a pussy and fuck around in front of your leader with the same level of seriousness as this lady with zero consequences. To be fair, all of American media constantly fucks with Trump, so I really dgaf what happens to them. Karma is real, and predictable.

Shoresy

Home Owner Associations (HOA) already build and maintain roads. Way faster and cheaper than the city does, I imagine.


It's amazing how good a service you can get when you don't have to pay a finder's fee to the least qualified person.

Shoresy

Maybe she should have been a kind of woman like his wife, then she would have been treated like that.


Trump is just bringing reality to American politics. You fuck around, you find out. It doesn't matter if you have a pussy or a cock.

I think it's kind of funny his MAGA tribe 1st rule of the club is FAFO. And that lady in your video definitely looked like she was fucking around, not being serious, and then she found out.

Shoresy

He probably wanted to let his enemies know he doesn't care about words. I guess getting shot at can do that to a man.


Edit: I saw that video, what does having a vagina to do with having a justified immunity for criticism? Simp much? Maybe if she got shot at like he did, then words wouldn't matter so much.

Shoresy

It's probably distracting the media from doing what it normally does, which is to undermine the actual candidate the media does not approve of for that upcoming election, I assume.

Shoresy

I read this article.

https://nypost.com/2025/10/16/us-news/justice-ketanji-brown-jackson-argues-for-race-based-redistricting-citing-the-americans-with-disabilities-act-theyre-disabled/


Is this the real reason why you Americans cannot verify the votes of your democracy? Does your country still believe skin color is a disability?

Shoresy
No where else in the "trans agenda" do the rights of women come into conflict.

There’ve been women in shelters, prisons, and hospital wards who’ve spoken up about losing access to female-only spaces or feeling unsafe when biological men were placed there.

https://patriotproject.sitecenter.us/3rd-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-in-womens-prison/

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/19/the-radical-transformations-of-a-battered-womens-shelter

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/sep/13/edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-boss-resigns-review


Go ahead and viciously mock and dehumanize the women who "obsess" over wanting male-free spaces. You are not the first or the last misogynist disguised as a virtue signaler.

Shoresy
Chill out? I'm not the one whose politics revolves around other people's genitals.

Obviously not since you (probably?) are not a woman. It's biological women getting thrown under the bus with all the "human rights" rhetoric to disguise biological men dismantling spaces once reserved for biological women. Blame women for being obsessed with wanting dick-free spaces and XY free sports. This issue isn't about denying anyone dignity. It’s about recognizing that rights often compete, because life is always a series of trade-offs, and pretending they don’t is intellectual laziness dressed up as compassion via virtue signaling.

Shoresy

There will be no surviving culture willing to preserve anything American. All that can happen is for a different America to evolve, one that doesn't feel the need to destroy itself in the future, hundreds of years from now.

Shoresy

You’ll notice that when people use the phrase “clever-stupid,” they are almost never talking about themselves. It’s a rhetorical condom. A way to handle intelligence without ever risking contact with it. It implies that there’s a kind of brilliance so refined, so rarefied, that it loops back around into paradoxical foolishness. Which is, of course, a marvelous way to excuse one’s own dullness.


It’s the small man’s revenge on thought itself. If a scientist tells you something complicated, like the basis of evolution and conflict in a world of defined entropy, or a philosopher asks an uncomfortable question describing that conflict, you needn’t bother engaging with the argument. You can simply declare him “clever-stupid,” and magically poof! you’re the wise one again. The irony, if you’ll pardon the word, is that real stupidity is precisely the refusal to think beyond one’s own comfort and control zone. The “clever-stupid” trope is projection: a plea for the world to remain simple enough that one’s ignorance still feels like insight, as if comfort is the same as wisdom. So yes, in that light, there is cleverness without wisdom, but there is also increasingly ignorance with arrogance, and that, I suspect, is the true epidemic.


It takes a special kind of delusion to imagine that war and stupidity are aberrations in a universe forever ruled by entropy. The cosmos itself is a theater of collapse and renewal, stars tearing themselves apart so that we might one day argue about peace. To demand a world without conflict is to demand one without motion, without thought, without life. The very code of our being, our DNA, is written on the field of struggle; it is how intelligence sharpens itself. To pretend otherwise isn’t moral, it’s intellectual cowardice dressed as virtue. A refusal to see that change, however bloody, is also a part of that cosmic struggle, and stupidity will have to play its part on the world's stage, fretting to and fro, full of sound and fury, so that wisdom can earn a part too.

Shoresy

As you Americans sit back to celebrate a day entirely built around the last vestiges of Western civilization, namely, a unique obsession since the Renaissance to preserve things, including conquered cultures, I would like to remind you fellas of one thing. Your own culture is dying, and there will be no museum built for it.

Shoresy

I wish I knew why. The states seemed to get along fine with their federal government, but that all changed about 20 years ago. I guess they think it just got too big after 9/11.

Shoresy
And hopefully you underestimate Americas aversion to tyrants.


It's the opposite for America if you look at Lincoln. Americans are definitely not like Canada or the UK!

Shoresy

A lot of people in America think Trump is too soft and should crush the rebellious states decisively, like Lincoln did. People who hated Lincoln called Lincoln a tyrant for doing that back in his day because Hitler wasn't born yet, and ironically, Lincoln is still the most popular president in American history, so there is that. It's possible Trump is a wannabe Lincoln, but he only has 3 more years to get there. I remember seeing a t-shirt an American tourist wore up here saying, "Well-behaved women seldom make history."

In today's age, I suppose it goes for American men as well...

Shoresy
The closer we get to social equality, the more that will change; sexism will more and more be something that can go either way and racism could one day be the same.


Races don't exist, so neither should racism. Sexism will only end when men can grow and raise their own children, and women can find the perfect cat, hangover-free wine, and perfect mental therapy. AI-assisted artificial births will be the next step after AI companions. And men will be the ones to create it in a response to "gender-equality"

Men are nothing if not masters of innovation.

Shoresy

You can’t legislate virtue in a system that rewards evasion. It would be like a code of honor among thieves. Basically non-existent. Either Americans need to collectively decide that their country and culture is worth preserving, or to decide (like I hear a lot) that America is evil and needs to import people from wildly different cultures to save (replace?) it somehow.