What happened was a person broke the law by standing too close to a federal agent during an arrest. That's a felony.
Nonsense, “standing too close to a federal agent during an arrest” is not illegal, you just made that up. Obstruction, interference, or disobedience of a command to move back are illegal, and Alex Pretti did none of those things. Even if he did, none of those things are punishable by execution.
The person who brought a gun to a place and knowingly committed a felony escalated the situation.
Nonsense, it is not illegal that he “brought a gun to a place” and Alex Pretti did not escalate the situation, ICE did, which is precisely what they are doing there.
Victim blaming the ICE agents
Oh please, the ICE agents executed an innocent man and you think the ICE agents are the victims? Such blatant rhetorical hyperbole eliminates any reason to take you seriously.
dealing with a felon doesn't change the fact that laws need to be defined and enforced in a lawful society,
Thanks for that insight Captain Obvious, of course it’s irrelevant since they were not “dealing with a felon”.
regardless of whether or not you feel you can get up in an arresting officer's face armed with a camera and a Sig Sauer.
More nonsense, Alex Pretti was completely within his rights to record ICE agents with his phone, recording ICE agents lawlessness is seen as a matter of civic duty and protestor self-defense. He had a concealed weapon which was licensed and accompanied by a concealed weapon permit, again, not illegal.
The situation didn’t begin with ICE enforcement. It began when someone chose to insert themselves into an active arrest zone.
Nonsense, ICE was the aggressor in this situation, it was an unlawful response to a legal and peaceful protest.
Proximity rules around arrests aren’t vibes-based. They exist precisely because chaos spikes fast when crowds compress a crime scene.
You obviously don’t even have a clue what “Proximity rules” are, they have nothing to do with proximity to agents, proximity rules apply to search and seizure during an arrest, in general proximity rules allow an arrest if an officer witnesses a crime in their immediate vicinity, and defines the perimeter of the legal search zone, it establishes the immediate area within the suspects control (typically wingspan), which can be searched and secured.
Standing too close to a law-controlled scene isn’t symbolic 1st amendment speech; it’s physical interference. Because your law defines that as a felony, it’s no longer a gray area. It's FAFO.
Nonsense, you have completely made up your absurd “Standing too close” law, and "standing too close" is not physical interference, physical interference during an arrest involves using force, blocking, or obstructing law enforcement, which did not occur, and even if it did occur, physical interference typically results in charges of resisting arrest or obstruction, neither of which are punishable by execution.