It's a symbolic gesture, and it comes with a commitment to land, sea, and air support.
If Trump invades Greenland, it won't be NATO military that stops him, it will be the 25th Amendment,
Enough is enough.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
It's a symbolic gesture, and it comes with a commitment to land, sea, and air support.
If Trump invades Greenland, it won't be NATO military that stops him, it will be the 25th Amendment,
Enough is enough.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
His Military medals are too many to list.





Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Trump has won multiple awards recently, his response to all of them, "Nobody deserves this honor more than me". Trump supporters are so proud!









Sidewalker · 8 months ago
A child would probably run USA better. At least most children arent as evil.
Good point, I think Double R owes children an apology for the thread title.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
I believed that was the case, but I never thought he would actually admit it. I also believe he attacked Venezuela because they gave it to María Corina Machado.
I didn't believe that racism runs deep enough in this country to elect a psychopath President, I was naive on that account..
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Trump wants Greenland because he was denied the Nobel Peace Prize. He took Venezuela even after Maria Corina Machado gave him her Nobel Peace Prize. Maybe NATO should come up with a better prize.
No, he took Venezuela before she gave him her prize.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
No idea what a discord handle is nor what a secret number is.
Same here, a couple of times I have gone to a discord server link somebody is sending us to, either couldn't get in or couldn't figure out WTF once I was in. I'm pretty sure the whole discord thing is just for young people.
Are you ICE agents.
Good point, we never see their faces, why else would they be hiding their identity?
AI is either the future or not, and people who persistently post bible based religious nonsense are no more or less spammers in my opinion...And others would say that I am an atheist spammer.
Hmmm, very good point, I hadn't thought of it that way. I guess we are all spammers in some respect.
So my suggestion would be, that if you want this site to flourish, then drop the Trumpian style tyranny and allow people to post information as they see fit.
Good point, you have convinced me, she's still going aggravate the shit out of me, but I vote we let her continue to aggravate the shit out of us.
Instead of banning her, we should just imagine that she is super-hot and typing naked when she posts, that will make her posts much less aggravating.
"Trial of Debbie"...What some authoritarian bullshit....Boys that cant even spell Debby correctly.
ICE disinformation maybe.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
So, we can estimate the age of individual galaxies...Fair enough...And therefore assume their potential to support sentient civilisations.
Though why would it be that our super telescopes only see super-distant younger galaxies.
I would have assumed that relative to the speed of light, we would be less likely to spot super-distant newer objects and more likely to detect older super-distant light sources.
Perhaps the telescope is pointing in the wrong direction, and we're missing all the galaxies that are a similar age to the Milky Way.
Because it takes about eight minutes for light to travel from the sun to the earth, when we see the sun, we are actually seeing the sun as it was eight minutes ago.
When we are looking at the light of an older galaxy that is "super-distant", let's say it's ten billion light years away, we are seeing that galaxy as it was ten billion years ago, so when we see super distant old galaxies, what we see is old galaxies when they were young , and when we look at a super-distant young galaxies, we don't see anything because they weren't there yet.
That's why, to our super telescopes, it looks like all the super-distant galaxies are young galaxies, when actually, all we are seeing are super-distant old galaxies, but we are seeing them when they were young.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
I'm glad you came back alive.
Thanks man, it sure felt like I was going to freeze to death, I'm getting too old for days like today.
I blame you guys by the way; I know Canada is where the cold comes from.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Please remember not to FAFO. You can let ICE know you are pissed from a healthy distance.
Nah, it's ICE that doesn't want to FAFO. I'm thinking the reason they are in Milwaukie, is they are afraid to come to Atlanta.
What do you think, true, or is it just the THC gummies talking?
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Yes, I just think it slightly arrogant to assume that human cosmological observations and assumptions are the only ones...Especially when it is widely assumed that life must exist elsewhere in the universe.
I agree with your above and always have thought what you state above.
My thoughts were about how someone living in galaxey that exists only 150 milllion years after the BIG WOW!, seeing redshifted light from us 13 Bil after the Big WOW!, how do cosmologist from each perspective who exists where on that time line. See what I mean Sarge.
Maybe they think were early Universe, even tho we think were older Universe. What is the mechanism by which each can determine the time line from Big W! that they each exist along?
If they existed only 150 million years after the Big Bang, they aren’t gonna see redshifted lights from us 13 Billion years after, they are going to see the light coming from us 150 million years after, minus the time it takes it to travel from here to there. But 150 million years after the Big Bang, there wasn’t any light coming from us yet, the Milky Way Galaxy didn’t even exist, the universe was still in its "Dark Age", and there is no light to see. We were on the verge of the “cosmic dawn" (Let there be light”. Gravity was causing clouds of hydrogen and helium to start to contract on their way to forming stars, so it's still the "Dark Age", no light to see.
But that's just a technicality, your question is really about how two different frames of reference see each other considering the time it takes light to travel. In 1905 Einstein was thinking about your question and that is what allowed him to develop the Special Theory of Relativity.
The question he asked himself was, “What does it mean to say two things happened at the same time”. He knew light traveled fast, but it was a finite speed, so if we observe something distant occurring at the same time something local occurs, then we know they didn’t actually happen at the same time, the distant thing happened earlier, it only appeared to occur simultaneously when the light arrived,
At the time, experimental evidence was that the speed of light was constant no matter how fast the source of the light \was traveling. This was perplexing, nothing else ever worked like that. Standing still with a train coming toward you at 60 miles an hour, you measure its speed as advancing by 60 miles an hour, if you are moving towards it a 60 mph, you measure it as advancing at 120 mph. With light though, it didn’t matter how you were moving relative to the thing being measured, light was simply defying the laws of physics.
Everybody else was thinking the measurements must be wrong (Albert Michelson got a noble prize for getting it right btw), maybe it was ether, maybe it was something else, but it just can’t be right. But nobody could understand how the speed of light could possibly be constant, no matter what the frame of reference was, except for this patent clerk with funny hair, While everyone else was thinking the experimental evidence must be wrong, Einstein was thinking that because every measurement said it was constant, let’s make that a principle of nature and see what happens. Then he mathematically worked through the physical ramifications of that new principle of nature.
He imagined two people at the front and back of an airplane that is moving very fast, a flash of light occurs in the center of the plane, the light traveled the same distance to both of them, and consequently, both observed the flash to have happened at the same time. But Einstein realized that somebody on the ground, with a stationary frame of reference, will necessarily observe it very differently.
Because the plane is moving fast, as the light travels, the front of the plane is moving away from the flash and the back of the plane is moving towards it, so the light traveling at a constant speed, travels a greater distance to the guy in the front of the plane and a shorter distance to the guy at the back of the plane. The guy on the ground observes the light arrive to the guy in the back before it arrives to the guy in the front, so to the person on the ground the light did not arrive to both guys simultaneously. WTF
He decided the solution to WTF was to simply accept the experimental evidence and consider the constant speed of light to be a principle of nature. When he applied that new principle to the traditional physics formulas, out popped the Special Theory of Relativity. If the speed of light stays the same in all frames of reference, then in the physical formulas, it’s the "distances" and "times" that have to change, hence, you get the Special Theory with its “length contraction” and “time dilation”. The mathematics is hard, but the idea is simple and straightforward, and it all happened because Einstein asked the kind of question you are asking ebuc.
He was a theoretical physicist; other scientists did the experiments and produced the evidence for him to work with. What made Einstein so great is that he had an insightful knack for asking the right questions about the evidence the experimental physicists were producing.
To come up with the General Theory of Relativity, the question he was trying to answer was “Why are gravitational mass and inertial mass equal”. Experimentally, the two were always measured to be precisely the same, other physicists didn’t wonder about it, it was just the case, but Einstein asked “why” that is the case. Once again, he accepted the experimental evidence, considered it a principle of nature, and worked through the physical formulas.
He reasoned that, since a guy falling in an elevator appears to be weightless in the elevator, and how much he weighs in that elevator depends on how fast he is accelerating or decelerating, that gravity (gravitational mass) and acceleration (inertial mass) must be two aspects of the same thing. He made the equivalence of gravity and acceleration a principle of nature, worked through the physical ramifications, and out popped the General Theory of Relativity.
So, there you go ebuc, it’s obvious to everyone that you don’t think like the rest of us, but in the end, it turns out you do think like Einstein :)
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
I don’t think ICE or the protesters can extend the life of planet earth by their actions alone. Nor will Venezuelan oil.
Maybe not, but maybe we can extend the life of democracy in the US.
It's up to us; Trump can't be stopped unless we stop him.
The people need to rise up and take back the country.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Hey man, I'd love to give you my thought on the subject, but later, right now I have to go protest, maybe you can tell from my posts that I'm not happy about what is going on, anyway, I'm fighting the good fight, even today when it's too damn old to be out in such freezing weather, Here's the two signs I made for this one, front and back.


I'll come back and respond later if I don't get shot in the face by some fascist thugs.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
US is the biggest military power in NATO
Not if he attacks Greenland, then we join Russia and China as the big military powers NATO is pledged to defend against.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
You speak for them?
Regarding your assholiness ratman, I speak for everyone.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Cool, now go tell a SCOTUS judge what exactly makes you a certain race and how a Law Enforcement Officer can legally know for certain what race you are by eyesight.
It has to be an exact legal definition that drives specific law enforcement. It can’t be vibes, assumptions, or ‘most people use skin color.’
You aren't referring to ICE as "Law Enforcement" are you? Don't be ridiculous, ICE is Trump's personal "Lawlessness Enforcement" organization.
In September Trump's personal SCOTUS ruled that ICE could engage in racial profiling, and his SCOTUS has also determined that Trump personally determines what exactly makes you a certain race.
Trump has determined that the primary racial categories that ICE and his personal Justice Department can target are "black", "brown", "LGBTQ", "protestor", and "Democrat".
The primary "protected" categories are "MAGA", "felons", "pedophiles", and "billionaires", and since Trump falls into all four categories, he is exempt from all US and International laws.
That is how today's American Justice System works.
Suffering is a natural part of human life.
There was a quote, but I forgot who it was from, "Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one." Which was particularly profound in its meaning and application.
Optimism is acceptable, but it has the potential to do more harm than good. Same with pessimism. (I know cynicism is the more common word, but it has a different meaning. Using it in this context would be misusing the word.)
"Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement; nothing can be done without hope and confidence," - Helen Keller
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Would they be fine with what yoy said?
Yes, they would.
You know, the people of Greenland have a word for people like you.
It's "asshole".
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
You guys can't define race, but that still doesn't stop you from invoking your 15th amendment
Race doesn't define biologically, DNA wise they just blend into each other with over 90% of human diversity occurring within the races, turns out race is only a social construct, but races exist and can be defined.
Racists are fond of saying that because race doesn't exist biologically, this means racism doesn't exist, but that is just a manifestation of the stupidity of racists. Hell, stupidity is a social construct, but that doesn't mean racists aren't stupid.
Just because something is a social construct doesn't mean it doesn't exist, time is a social construct, language is a social construct, but they certainly exist.
Intelligence and beauty are social constructs, but that certainly doesn't mean I'm not smarter and better looking than all of you, social construct or not, those are just the facts.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
I don't think you realise how vile this was to say, towards the Greenland native people.
I'm sure the people of Greenland want Trump to shut his piehole about it more than I do.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
If they change the name of Greenland to "Epstein Island", he will stop talking about it.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
pat him on the head
That's what the guillotine will be for.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
When he is assassinated, It would be advisable to demand a full bone spur examination to establish if it would be necessary to strip him of his purple heart.
I advise that you should consider making such a demand your holiness.
I will demand both, the assassination and the bone spur examination.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
See, all you had to do was give him medals, and he would have just retired quietly.
Trump never has, and never will, do anything quietly.
And he showed us how he feels about retirement on January 6, 2021. Trump's position is, "I'll retire over my dead body".
I really want to be at that retirement party; I'll bring the guillotine.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Like, far out man.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Maybe he earned it for his bone spurs injury
There are valid things to criticize Trump for, but getting out of the Vietnam draft was one of the most justified things he's done.
Much more honorable than all those "suckers" and "losers" that went over there and died.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
See, all you had to do was give him medals, and he would have just retired quietly.
Once he invokes the Insurrection Act, he can deploy the military to California, think of all the Oscars he can take.
If they take the Academy Award Headquarters, he could even be up for a Lifetime Athiefment Award.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
Maybe he earned it for his bone spurs injury
There are valid things to criticize Trump for, but getting out of the Vietnam draft was one of the most justified things he's done.
Must be, since he was awarded the Purple Heart.
Once he invades Greenland he can take another Nobel Prize in Chemistry, and there are multiple Olympic Medals he can grab.
I bet there's sainthood in it for him if he attacks Vatican City.
Wow, your guy is so "accomplished", I understand the personality cult thing now.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
For years Trump has been open about his desire to receive the Purple Heart and the Nobel Peace Prize.
On Thursday, Trump got Venezuela’s María Corina Machado to give him her Nobel Peace Prize and back in 2016 he took the Purple Heart from Lt. Col. Louis Dorfman (Maybe he earned it for his bone spurs injury).
What an honor, you Trumper's must be soooo proud of him.
Sidewalker · 8 months ago
"I cant really imagine any great catastrophe happening unless someone becomes stupid enough to give AI control over nukes."
You really cant imagine that given all the things people trust govt to do. Also there is no limit to human stupidity. Those two combined make it almost a sure bet AI will be put in control of nukes.
Pretty much the plot of WarGames, an oldie but a goodie.