Sidewalker


FLRW wrote:

Artificial Intelligence Explains There’s No God


A compelling argument against the existence of God is the problem of divine hiddenness. If a benevolent and all-powerful deity exists, why is there a lack of clear and universally accessible evidence of this presence? Atheists posit that if God wanted to establish a personal relationship with humanity, the signs of such a relationship should be evident to all, rather than being shrouded in ambiguity and subjectivity. The diversity of religious beliefs around the world further adds to the perplexity, as different cultures claim exclusive access to the “correct” understanding of the divine.

See: https://franksrobinson.medium.com/artificial-intelligence-explains-theres-no-god-f91b6a4a4c8b


I thought the first commandment of AI was "Thou shall have no other Gods before me"

Sidewalker


SatanLucy wrote:
I make about 10 cents per day, which is 36$ a year. However, I dont work 8 hours a day. More like 1 hour at best.


If you work every day, and can save half of those 10 cents each day, you will be a billionaire in less than 55 million years.


You are on your way, stay focused and you will make it.

Sidewalker

Abortion

Sidewalker · a month ago


Debby wrote:
It is not fair to include Remy as a choice when he likes men instead.


If that were the case then he wouldn't be so enraged at women for not wanting him.


Plus, most gay men would probably choose the bear anyway.

Sidewalker


RemyBrown wrote:
Hindus believe a cow is an all powerful all knowing god that doesn't want to be eaten.


Nope, you just made that nonsense up.


You are on the internet, becoming informed about a subject before you post only takes a few keystrokes, and you don't look so stupid.



Sidewalker

Abortion

Sidewalker · a month ago


RemyBrown wrote:
9/11 was 25 yrs ago; get over it.


We should just "get over" a terrorist attack that killed 2,977 innocent people, this from a guy who can't get over a stupid internet question about women choosing a bear LOL.


Interestingly, a new internet survey shows most women would choose to be on the top floor of one of the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001 over being left alone with Remy Brown.


It was just an internet question Remy, get over it.

Sidewalker

I don't believe Glueballs physically exist, a force is defined by it's affect on particles, to say Gluons can form a particle of just force is a mathematical anomaly, but not every mathematical anomaly has a physical reality that it describes.


Physicists have a tendency to believe in mathematical transubstantiation, whereby the numbers take on substance and became physically real, and then they create experiments that simulate the mathematics so they can bring it into existence.


I don't buy it that there are particles made out of force..


Sidewalker


RemyBrown wrote:
In America, you have the freedom and should have the freedom to do disgusting things. Homosexuality is one of those things.


What did you find disgusting about it? Maybe you just chose a disgusting parter, have you considered that?


Anyone who engages in consensual anal sex (gay or straight) has Primate Tendencies (PTs).


Human beings are Primates, of course we have primate tendencies.


Primate tendencies are in 30-44% of the US adult population.


Primate tendencies are in 100% of the US adult population, since 100% of the US adult population are actually Primates.


It makes more logical sense to have your penis away from your partner's shit.


Logic is something different, I can believe that logic is in only 30-44% of the US adult population, if that much.


But degeneracy should be legal in the US, just highly discouraged, and the age of consent for anal sex should be 21 (because it's really on par with drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco).


Why did you find it discouraging? In what way did you find it "on par" with drinking and smoking?


Turns out, it isn't just Primate behavior, there are non-primate species that engage in this "tendency" as you call it.



AI Overview


Yes, various non-human animals engage in anal sex and anal stimulation, often as part of same-sex behavior or social bonding. Wikipedia +1


Animals That Engage in Anal Sex

  1. Bonobos and Chimpanzees: Bonobos frequently engage in non-reproductive sexual contact, including same-sex and anal interactions, to reduce social tension and build community bonds.
  2. Bighorn Sheep: Groups of male bighorn sheep have been documented engaging in mounting and anal intercourse.
  3. American Bison: Full anal penetration between male bulls has been observed during courtship and mounting behaviors.
  4. Primates: Certain monkeys, such as rhesus macaques, have been observed participating in reciprocal mounting with anal penetration. National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov) +3

Why Animals Do It

  1. Social Rank and Dominance: In many species, male-to-male mounting and anal contact serve to establish dominance or reinforce social hierarchy rather than functioning purely for reproduction. News-Medical +2

  2. Bonding and Affection: Same-sex sexual behavior helps reduce stress, ease conflict, and foster strong social alliances within a group. Wikipedia +2

  3. Pleasure: Observations across multiple species suggest that non-procreative sexual activities—including masturbation and genital or anal stimulation—can be driven by sexual enjoyment. Wikipedia +3

Sidewalker

Abortion

Sidewalker · a month ago


RemyBrown wrote:
Other people have other things to occupy their time with.
Politically, like what? If Lindsay is freed, then I can murder you and blame it on post pantoum psycosis.


Those psychoses that follow poetry are the worst.

Sidewalker

Abortion

Sidewalker · a month ago


SergeantLynch wrote:
There are 4.5 to 5 million Muslims in the USA, what is their opinion on the subject...Why research exaggerated internet data...Just pop down your local mosque.


He'll put down the bag of Cheetos, get up off the couch and actually leave his mom's basement as soon as a pig flies by.



Sidewalker

Women and sex

Sidewalker · 2 months ago

Men and women have different skills, but they are complementary skills, that's why we are meant to be together, A man and a woman in union, is an entity that is greater than both are alone.


Neither alone can create life, perpetuate the species, or extend our existence in time. We are at our best when we are together.



Sidewalker


Misterio wrote:
Sidewalker wrote:

Now I'm old, and the other day I sat down. on the couch and in the process, I hurt my back, can you believe that, I got a fucking "sitting-down" injury.

Believe me when I tell you, getting old sucks.
Well, this is a good reason to not get old as I said. Although, I know some old dudes that are strong as a bull. Trump is one example, he's FLRW's age and he seems to be very healthy.

But whatever, sth tells me that I'm not going to die of old age.


I told you why getting old sucks, I didn't tell you why it better than not getting old.


It gives you more time to accomplish what you want to accomplish, you get to see your kids grow up and you get to meet your grandchildren and see them as they grow. There's more time for life, more time to have a larger, more satisfying life.


Life is a gift. Each of us has the obligation to live life to the fullest and to be free – to celebrate the gift.



Sidewalker


Misterio wrote:

Sidewalker wrote:
Getting old sucks, but it's better than not getting old.
You mean like Highlander, the inmortal?


No, I mean like Sidewalker, the old guy. Also Sidewalker the widowed and remarried guy, my first wife didn't get old.


It could be but we will never know until scientists manage to stop aging.


I'm old, I know.


Some extraterrestrial races achieved inmortality so I think it's not as bad as you and @fauxlaw think.


FLRW is older than I am, we both know exactly how bad it is to get old.


When I was young, I wrestled, played football, and after college I played Rugby Football for eight years, I was practically indestructable.


Now I'm old, and the other day I sat down. on the couch and in the process, I hurt my back, can you believe that, I got a fucking "sitting-down" injury.


Believe me when I tell you, getting old sucks.



Sidewalker


SkepticalOne wrote:
I really wonder how you are defining "magic". Is it something akin to 'ignorance'?


Emergence, like magic, relies on misdirection and illusion, it's a misdirection from science to create the illusion of cause and effect. The ultimate "magic trick" of emergence pulls "Something from Nothing". Emergence is a pseudoscientific way of pulling the consciousness rabbit out of the top hat of materialism.


You don’t just get to say “sufficiently complex” and viola, something “emerges” as if by magic with no other explanation besides “science works in mysterious ways. Scientifically speaking, it needs to include an effective causal sequence if you are going to call something explanatory, and we both know “magic”, “a miracle occurs”, or “science works in mysterious ways” just doesn’t cut it.


Heading out for a day, but I'll find the time to show you why consciousness is not a function of brain soon.


Sidewalker


Shoresy wrote:
Trump is the best thing that ever happened to China.

That would have been nice to hear from your press at the White House... if the opinion reporters were allowed to get near Xi.


The White House doesn't believe in Free Speech, Trump and Xi are allies when it comes to suppressing the press.


Trump is also the best thing that ever happened to the Democratic Party.


Trump is also the best thing that ever happened to the corruption business


Trump is also the best thing that ever happened to the Pedophile industry.


Trump is also the best thing that ever happened to Authoritarianism.


Problem is Trump is also the worst thing that ever happened to the US and it's allies (well, former allies now)

Sidewalker


Debby wrote:
The Judge ruled against Trump and forced him to lift the ban by 2.30pm. The press cards were reissued after Trump found the Chinese press much friendlier. China now leads in etiquette.


Trump is the best thing that ever happened to China.

Sidewalker


Debby wrote:
But he wants to keep his virginity too. So he must be planning a surrogate rapist to achieve his goals.


I think it's the women that want him to keep his virginity, bad enough that they would choose a bear.

Sidewalker


Shoresy wrote:
Of course he did, but it's constitutional. Just like in that case:


Then why did a Trump appointed Federal Judge rule it unconstitutional and order him to lift the ban and allow all three news agencies access?



Sidewalker


Double_R wrote:
What do you think about this?

I think it is yet anther hilarious example of how the political right couldn't care less about the principals they pretend to embrace as foundational to their indefensible support for Trump.

For years now that's all we heard, free speech, free speech, free speech. Then these morons watch as Trump constantly uses his presidential bullhorn to attack journalists, deports people for writing negative stories about him, bans lawfirms from government buildings for representing clients who opposed him, sicks the FEC on any outlet producing content he doesn't like, and now tries to ban entire media outlets *explicitly* because he doesn't like they're coverage of him... And they have nothing to say.

But tell me more about how Biden complained to Twitter about people spreading lies about a pandemic that was literally killing people by the millions.

What's absolutely clear is that these idiots do not understand the most basic reason the first amendment was... the first amendment. It wasn't because the framers were worried about people's rights to be assholes on social media. It was literally because they feared exactly what Trump is trying to do.


That's why I started this thread, we had posters here screeching Free Speech about the moderators doing their job in a place where free speech doesn't apply, and about things that are not protected speech anyway, this was pointed out and they didn't miss a beat screaming free speech, free speech ad nauseum.


Then Trump takes a huge crap on the 1st amendment, like you said, this is specifically why we mandate free speech, and its crickets from our free speech crowd, and its crickets from our congressional majority, you know, the people who took an oath swearing to defend the constitution.


I always try to get the Trumpers to step up in defense of their cult hero, but nope, all they know or care about is hating the opposition.


This is one of the most damaging, and unconstitutional thing to happen in decades, and the people who need to care, couldn't give a crap less.


What's really going to destroy this country is apathy.


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Sidewalker

Let me dumb it down for you Remy.


When people see you deliberately trying to piss them off, they tend to respond in a way that will piss you off, and when they succeed, like your little hissy fit right now, then you lose at your own game. You always get to serve, and you still lose the point, every time.


That's why I say you are terrible at your so called "ragebait" game. It always ends up with you mad, and the rest of us laughing at you. If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen kiddie.


I don't know how to play cricket, so guess what, I don't play cricket.


I think you need a new game, this time try to find one that you aren't so fucking terrible at.



Sidewalker

My son told me there is a great documentary on Netflix that covers both sides of the issue very well, I'll go watch that and maybe will be informed when I get back.


It's called "How I Became an Apocaloptimist"


His short take on the two sides of the story, all the programmers working on it are warning us, all the CEOs getting rich off of it are saying, don't worry.

Sidewalker


Savant wrote:
Isn't that what we are going for in this thread?
Well I'd prefer a treaty with China that forces them to slow down too.


Fat chance on that, I'm thinking they don't slow it down and get an AI takeover first, and their AI kills them and not us :)