Originally Posted by Lunatic on 8/27/2026 at 11:23 PM (post #167)
Originally Posted by Thoth on 8/27/2026 at 10:22 PM (post #164)
Originally Posted by Lunatic on 8/27/2026 at 10:48 PM (post #135)
Also there arguably another player in this game he isn’t pushing who is known for fucking up worse as scum, so it’s interesting he’s pressing Thoth over that player.
Kohai?
Right
Pie fucked over Kohai in that MAGA game where they asked if there was a Cop and were told no. Joe Arpaio's 1x Cop should have registered for that question.
Originally Posted by Lunatic on 8/27/2026 at 11:18 PM (post #161)
Wylteds justification is like half right is the problem. The specificity of Sarah “killing everyone” is what he uses to tie the justification into PGO. That specificity is false though, since Sarah only intends to kill a select few people based on voices in her head telling her do, and she doesn’t want to, basically just does it under duress of being threatened to have her brother killed if she doesn’t do it. Which spoiler alert ends up happening when she doesn’t fulfill that task.
I see your concern, but I think it's plausible, especially if Banana wanted to include a PGO for whatever reason. I don't think this alone is worth lynching wylted over, but it's worth keeping on the back burner.
Originally Posted by wylted on 8/27/2026 at 11:18 PM (post #159)
Your role makes mine less likely supposedly. Not sure how anything outside of vigilante would match that
I've been thinking about it more and I'm not as convinced as I was that my role makes yours less likely. I still think your justification sounds reasonable, so I'm net townreading you.
I am townreading Mag1c pretty hard. It's hard to explain, but I think I have a strong gutread sense on him.
I am a town power role and I assumed the game was probably rolemad, as usual on here
Originally Posted by Lunatic on 8/27/2026 at 11:14 PM (post #151)
I can say this, based on what Thoth had already said and what I remember from season 1 there’s probably like 2 characters and roles I can think he’d be. Both would be town roles. Unless I am severely misinterpreting what I think he is putting down.
You said in post #6 of the previous thread that you only watched one season of this show. Did Banana say she stopped at the same time? I could be a character from season 1. Just wondering.
If someone wants to tell me that wylted's justification is horrible assuming that Banana knows From inside and out, please be my guest
That was in response to post #116
I was going to get chapter and verse of my posts about wylted, so thanks for saving me the time. Those posts are not flip-flopping. I said that I saw one fact as a likely point against wylted, and later I said that I saw something else as a tentative point in wylted's favor. In case you did not know this, it's possible to see a point in favor of something and another point against it without leaning strongly one way or the other.
I was going to get chapter and verse of my posts about wylted, so thanks for saving me the time. Those posts are not flip-flopping. I said that I saw one fact as a likely point against wylted, and later I said that I saw something else as a tentative point in wylted's favor. In case you did not know this, it's possible to see a point in favor of something and another point against it without leaning strongly one way or the other.
That's not pure OMGUS. I don't think town!Pie tunnels me for suggesting the same idea that he apparently thought he came up with and then demands everyone vote me over inactives.
That's not pure OMGUS. I don't think town!Pie tunnels me for suggesting the same idea that he apparently thought he came up with and then demands everyone vote me over inactives.
VTL: ILikePie5
Pie out here tryna distract us from getting a Sensor
NoW cLaIm Or IlL gEt FoUr VoTeS oN yOu
Why don’t you start by making a case for voting me? A real case, not a retarded one.
I can negotiate by refusing to claim and letting you lynch me to set an example for future games.
If I claim my character I claim my role too. So lynch me if you want. I aint handing over my lunch/lynch money
Why Kohai?
The question isn't whether or not we should do it. It's just whether we should popcorn it by making specific people vote Yes or randomize it.
Originally Posted by ILikePie5 on 8/26/2026 at 9:41 PM (post #35)
Originally Posted by Kohai on 8/25/2026 at 10:50 PM (post #7)
I do like Thoth's early initiative to get people to claim how they voted.
Why?
Possibly because it's a good idea and there's no reason for me to believe anyone else would have thought of it. Call me arrogant, but Casey, Kohai, Lunatic, Magoroth, and wylted had posted before I brought it up.
I tentatively townread him because his claim sounds less absurd to me than Lunatic was making it sound.
Jesus fuck can we get some activity in here
I suppose that ipse dixit is the cardinal sin of debating, but some arguments are so logically or ethically deformed that the only proper response is a flat no like Kyle and Stan in the South Park NAMBLA episode. "Dude, you have sex with children!" Like that video on Debatecraft's Youtube channel where Bullish advocated for eleventh-trimester abortion. "Dude, you are advocating for making it legal to kill children!"
Those same women will call a miscarriage a tragedy because the mother wanted the baby, as though being wanted by your parents decides whether or not you are human.
