ebuc

Your Brain Ia Moving Along the Surface of a Torus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ujnZcaqf-4


Really?


Go to 31:53 in this vid from the Pi man with his Most Beautiful Formula Not Enough People Understand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsLh-NYhOoU&t=24s


If you watch further in the link above, you see this all goes back to XYZ cube vs a 3D sphere inside the cube, and the cube is always larger than the sphere. And in higher dimensions, --as AI does-- we appear to be just adding to the 8 corners/vertexes of a cube. Or in 2D, four corners/vertexes of a square ex A1 A2 A3 A4.


Or in 1D, two terminal end points. A1---------A2


So in the vid he shows how the Gaussian gamma function for the volume of higher dimentional spheres, goes to infinity ergo, effectively zero.


So my interpreation of this in relation to higher dimensional cube is infinity set of corners/vertexes and that is opposite of zero, however, since where deaing with a 1D line, were increasing the terminal end points. Say what? How can we have more than just two terminal end points on a line?


Im not a mathmatician, yet what seems obvious to me, is that were just having a line subdivided into many shorter duration { time SergeantLynch would say } of lines A1---A2---A3---A4--- etc


Then if I say, this infinite subdivision of the line is just the eternal subdivision of time going forward it looks like this:


A1--->A2--->A3---A4---> eternally Ok? Sure fine by me for some kind of abstract linear time.


Well what if this abstract linear time is associated with 3D occupied space? Two options:


1} surface of sphere, and the linear line of time is bent as a geodesic of points on surface of a spherical that defines any frequency of polygon. A1-->A2--->A3--->---A4--->A5 and here I want to start reversing because in the latter Pi vid above, he mentions how with generalized formula, and Gaussian Gamma function, at at 5, the higher dimensions have reached their peak, and start moving toward infinity, effectively zero.


...1a} in regards to this we may interprete our above bent numerical line, going around back to meet itself, or, not meeting itself because twisted/bent in another direction and just misses itself, and now it keeps just missing itself, as it goes around and around definning more and more polygons eternally. There is more we could address with that scenario, or,


...1b} the line is also bent/twisted and going inward as in death spiral --think black hole singularity-- tho again, back the vid effectivly zero, tho infinitely is not truly zero, just eternally subdividing itself abstractly or if in occupied space, shorter and shorter line dimensions aka eternal micro subdivision of space.


2} AI--->---A2--->A3----A4--->A5 abstract time and occupied space time is inside of a torus or the whole torus as a 3D vector having maginitude and direction. Now we enter into Ebuc's toroidal space and time tori scenarios.


....i.e. a numerical sequence, that, after A5 moves toward zero, at least with the sphere cube ideas. In the Pi vid above he only briefly mentions the torus via the Archimedes cylinder as potentially{?} curved as a torus.


...2a} with the torus, if we stay on the surface, we can say that the time line as occupied space, becomes a spiral and just misses itself as it goes around, tho eventually it will have to cross itself. Or so I envision it do so. Or maybe there is a way the spiral just becomes higher and micro-infinite subdivision of the torus surface.


....2b} keeping the numerical sequence, I suggest there is a radical departure of the time line only on surface, and suggest that, --in the case of occupied space-- there occurs and invagination at ...2p....5p...8.....11p...14....to internal aspect of the torus. Why, because opposites attract. Polarity and in this case it is the diametric polarity of two peaks of two kinds of curved space we find with a torus and not with a sphere/spherical.


....positive and negative curvature ...( )( ).... Gravity and Dark Energy and between these two we have observed time line as a sine-wave identified with


0..........6.........12...........18 etc......>

......3p.......9..........15...........etc....>


Well why cant this happen on a sphere/spherical. Well it can if magnetic charge{ spin? } exists --Earth magnetosphere--.

..is this a 2nd torus seperate from our original 1D line? Yes and no because there is interfernce fields patterns, to some degree?........


And there is another kind of opposite charge{ spin? } called the electric charge.

.....is there a third torus seperate from our original 1D line? Yes and no because there is interference of field patterns? To some degree?.....


Does occupied space have more than one, continous 1D field line? Is it all connected as one unified { finite } Universe?









ebuc

O I L > petroleum crude > 70 differrent kinds of refinery depenging on the kind of crude that is availble to them.


.. ' Oil Refinery Types are:

  1. Topping Refineries
  2. Hydroskimming Refineries
  3. Conversion Refineries
  4. Deep Conversion Refineries
  5. Crude Oil Refineries
  6. Lube Oil Refineries
  7. Petrochemical Refineries
  8. Fuel Refineries
  9. Lubricant Refineries
  10. Chemical Refineries
  11. Standalone Refineries
  12. Integrated Refineries
  13. Mini or Modular Refineries
  14. Medium Refineries
  15. Large Refineries
  16. Inland Refineries
  17. Coastal Refineries '...


ebuc

I watched this { vid with Julian Barbour on time } before and some today, and it led me to another curt interview about Ramnujan mutant mathmatician vid, and then to a Penrose, then to this Ishtar Bentov vid. Been a wild ride this last couple of hours. 🤔 Of course Im partial to the torus because of since my 90's explorations of prime numbers eventually led me to my space and time torus scenarios. 🙀

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhK2Kwd3r8s

ebuc

I use the one that comes with an eraser and pencil attached to it.


1} eraser is for removing the ilogical, irrational lack of common sense, and,


2} the pencil is for adding in logical, common sense, critical thinking considerations on moral teachings etc.

ebuc

Bilateral Universe?

ebuc · 8 months ago

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s10/p3363.html#1033.65

B Fuller...; 1033.66 Terminal Reversings of Evolution and Involution  


 1033.661  In selecting synergetics' communication tools we avoid such an unresolvable parallel-linear word as  equals. 


Because there are neither positive nor negative values that add or detract from Universe, synergetics' communication also avoids the words  plus  and  minus. 

We refer to  active and passive  phases. Parallel equivalence has no role in an alternatively convergent-divergent Universe.

 Inflection  is also a meaningless two- dimensional linear word representing only a shadow profile of a tetrahelical wave


1033.662  In four-dimensional conversion from convergence to divergence --- and vice versa ---the terminal changing reverses evolution into involution---and vice versa. 


Involution occurs at the system limits of expansive intertransformability.

 Evolution occurs at the convergent limits of system contraction. '.... end Fuller


Begin > Ebuc ..>....Ah ha! Entropic Heat Death { contractive involution infolding } >< Big WOW! { evolutionary unfolding } beginning event.


Ergo, via the 8, outer bondeded/valenced, spherical icosahedra on surface openings of VE ---that Jim did for me years ago-- the VE jitterbug contractions to a set 8 bonded/valenced triangles. Not shown in link but easy to infold the triangles to arrive at the ultimate contraction phase of the VE { that I think is what remains of 4-fold matter physical reality{ observed-quantised-time } with fou, ultra-large, bonded/valenced 5-fold icosahedra on each side and overlapping the contracted { green line } ultra-large, ultra-long wave/frequency, single photon remains of all fermionic matter as bosonic photon.


At this time I wont go into these 2D vectors { great circles } of Fullers are really 3D space and time{ observed time } tori, or space and a minimal set of time accompaning space { Gravitational contractive infolding } Dark Energy { expansive evoluting outfolding }. 


Also we have a clevaged Universe --see also in previous posts-- at this closest we ever get to seeing our naked, most simplistic, Bilateral, 5-fold pregnant female Nature, bears out { unfolds evolutionarily } --from the Higgs field embracing a singular photon { green line }--- the Big Grunt { my wifes two cents } !, i.e. bilateral based Universe{ God-ess-ence }. .


Bilateral, 5-fold pregnant female Nature, bears out { unfolds evolutionarily } --from the Higgs field embracing a singular photon { green line }--- the Big Grunt !, 


This below graphic was generated using MS Co-pilot with the brief instructions I gave to produce my 1000 firewall 2D circles/3D space and mimimal 18/0 tori. I didnt expect to the overlap to come out darkened as is seen. It made me have to consider this fact of overlapping fields of something with all of these fields of internal space and minimal time tori. 


Maybe the Higgs field that is said to give mass to all matter, yet in this case, all of the matter is gone, and all that remains is the ultra-large, ultra-flat, ergo ultra-long wave/frequency --think green 8 bonded/valence triangle as or stacked circles-- as all the remains of matter, disspersed/dissasociated, as this singular photon { I choose green cause it is the medial average in color spectrum } and my favorite from childhood.


ebuc
When food is metabolized, chemical bonds are broken and formed. Breaking a bond requires electrons to be redistributed between atoms. That redistribution changes the energy state of the atoms involved. In other words, atoms are literally rearranging themselves during digestion.



Help Mr Wizard { Trump }! Trizzle trazzel Truzzel Drome, time for this MAGA to go home.


Now Im McHappy a bout being home, where Im not being bombed. Thank you Mr Wizard { Trump }!

ebuc
They emotionally live in fear of macro risks
while behaviorally neglecting the immediate and imminent micro realities.


Your confused at best. What is happening in Iran and Ukraine are not mico-realities of the war of hell on people other than yourself or immediate family.


My motto is all-for-one and one-for-all, --aka each for all and all for each{ David bohm }-- as the only longer term lasting strategy for humanity, with the least amount of sufferring for all, and that is a spiritual macro-consideration not a destabilization of my abilities to function from fear.


Divide and conquer works for Universe, however, 9 billion humans on an increasing destablizing ecological environment is macro-stupid subdividing via obsolete war is the uncalled for war ergo uneccessary suffering.


Trump/MAGA with their lies is the cause of this sufferring.

ebuc
Those are the lies you need to swallow along with your McHappy Meal.


..' Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed '...Mao Setung{?}


Nobody knows how far humanity is going to make it. Its been 80 years since first atomic bomb and war became obsolete.


The peacekeepers only is a strategy that works, until one goes off somewhere.


AI..Google ...' AI Overview


Nine countries possess nuclear weapons: Russia, the United States, China, France, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea. Together, they hold an estimated 12,100 to 13,000 nuclear warheads, with Russia and the USA holding nearly 90% of the total.'...


My motto is all-for-one and one-for-all, as the only longer term lasting strategy for humanity, with the least amount of sufferring for all.


I heard David Bohm state it a differrent way...each individual for all and all for each individual.


War = hell > sufferring of worst kind? Who is the imminent danger to others?


Humanity has been walking a tight rope of nuclear annihilation since sometime after mass-production of hydrogen weapons.


It was The Founder, who stole McDonalds from the McDonald brothers. In last comments of the movie, there was a quote by him saying, it is not a dog eat dog world out there, it is a rat eat rat world.




ebuc
Orange faced lie.


I think humanity is imminent danger because of Trump/MAGA's lies.


AI Google search...' Prominent examples, particularly regarding US involvement, include the Vietnam War (Gulf of Tonkin incident) and the 2003 Iraq War (alleged weapons of mass destruction).'..


My 7th grade science teacher predicted that WW 3 would begin in the middle east.


AI Google search..' Based on reports from February 2026, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stated that Russian leader Vladimir Putin has "already started" a de-facto World War III by invading Ukraine'...

ebuc
For them, something can't happen until it 'has happened once at some point.



Correct, in so far as with plumbing, electrical construction all engineering, new codes often occur after incident occurs that harms, causes damage, etc. Ex adding in ground { green or bare } wire to the hot lead { black } and neutral wire { white } return to so breakers circuit breaker would blow before killing a person or overheating an apllicance etc.


As ive mention and posted about elsewhere around here, two seperate vids that presented info by smart people who beginning to understand how complex AI is coming to there conclusions --often good stuff in various sciences-- and it is about a geometrical stacking of 2D planes, each is considered the next higher dimenison.


These stacks may go into the millions, the the AI looks for relevantly significant lines of relationship { connections } between the 2D planes with info data bits on them, and allows AI to come to an conclusion/resultant. Max Tegmark is one of the vids. Here is the other one that I think was more complex than Max and his students. I dunno.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8GOeCFFby4




ebuc

26 faces/openings of the RH-cubo-octa is numerically same as Jims L-Poly-cabin yet so diffferrrent. I called it Poly Cabin. Jim lists it as L-poly. { Lehman Poly }.


Various ways Ive approached the above listed info. I believe anyone of the three kinds of polyhedral could be considered a root core i.e. we can surround any one of the three presented polyhedra, with enough of the other polyhedra, so the one we choose is the root core nucleus of all space filling matrice of polyhedra.


Why would I choose the 5-fold icosa{20}hedron as the root core? The 5-fold icosa{20}hedron contains has 31, conceptually spun great circles, 10 of those specifically define the 4-fold cubo-octahedron.

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/Lynn/LynnS54.html


The 4-fold cubo-octahedron as buckys transforming jitterbug, does pass through a semi-icosahedral phase, tho that is not nearly as complete or wholistic{?} as the link above shows.




ebuc

Part 2: Overall considerations of the set of 48 cojoined openings/faces used to fill all-space i.e. rationally.


3-ness = structural integrity { 12 rectangles.. 4 X, 4 Y, 4 Z }..of the L-Polycabin 

...3p * 4 = 12..


4-ness = systemic integrity { 16 trapezoids } of the six pink irregular octahedra

...2p * 8 = 16....4 * 4 = 16...


5-ness = root core of stable integrity { 20 regular triangles } of the beige regular icosahedron

......2p * 10 = 20....4 * 5 = 20....{ calcium = 20..protons...20 neutrons...20 electrons }..



In these regards and keeping in mind, that, Bucky associated the 6 great circles { shunted } as an electron. At least that was one of his views of the electron in Synergetics. He may also have had others.


3p >< 2p >< 2p >< critical primes in the above set of considerations


Cojoined { bonded/valenced } openings total 48 needed to fill commensurate filling of allspace, around and includes the root core icosahedron. six irregular octahedra, and 8 L-Polycabins.


48 is more of 4-fold number than 5-fold?


24 { chords } + 24 { radii } = 48 as equanimity via the Vector Equlibrium/cubo-octahedron –as constructed from four circles of { paper bow-tie folded see grapihc B in link https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f5511.html } --


...and above, Jim Lehman presented a Polyhedral all-space { ergo rational } filling that mathematically, rationally commensurates via a numerical 48 cojoined openings, via the root core 5-fold icosa{20}hedron with 4-fold irregular octa and,


 the Polycabin { L-Poly } as a skewed atypical { has trapazoid and rectangle stand-ins for squares? } version of Archimedes, rhombic cubo-octahedron?...?....?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombicuboctahedron


ebuc

Correctrions..thank you Sarge----


...' Via Bucky Fullers Synergetics we knew of no mathmatical way to commensurate the irrational 5-fold values, --12-around-zero{ none } equal radius spheres-- with the rational 4-fold cubo-octahedron, octahedron etc.


Sorry Sarge, not enough proof reading on my part.


ebuc

In late 90's early 2000's believed Gravity to be directly associated with the 5-fold icosa{20}hedron.


Via Bucky Fullers Synergetics we knew of know mathmatical way to commensurate the irrational 5-fold values, -- 1-around-zero{ none } sphere--,


with that of the rational 4-fold values of the Vector Equilibrium aka cubo-octahedron { 12-around-1 equal radius spheres }. My view was that, if could mathematically commensurate them, get closer to understanding Gravity.


Jim Lehman via a Pentagonal Vector Matrix, was able to create an all-space filling set of three kinds of polyhedra. there by mathematically with geometry, commensurate the 5-fold and 4-fold polyhedra.


1} regular icosahedron, in following graphic it is the orange polyhedron

2} six irregular 4-ofld octahedra, -- it is the pink polyhedraon-- and,

3} eight 4-fold polyhedra -- we called the Polycabin -- that is skew abberation of one of Archmedes 13 polyhedra, the rhombic cubo-octahedron. --it made clear with transparency show the tetrahedron inside of one of five of them.


Here is the Lehmanville graphic that only shows some of the actual arrangement that would fill all-space. It was only last few days I began to figure out more the minimal number of needed polyhedra to create this all-space filling set. Along with more specifics that I will post later on.


First here is the original roguh draft Lehmanville graphic Jim made.


For following me along with the numerical counting values, the viewer at some point, remove the orange icosaheron from considerraton and will need to see there is another beige icosahedron in this graphic and its as the central nuclear location between the four lower Popycabins where they and two of the pink irregular octahedron tangentally conjoin with 10 faces/openings of the central beige icosahedron.

More coming to better visualize the set of polyhedra, needed to be and all-space filling set.


ebuc

5-nesss > { ...?.... integrity }.....{ root core integrity } via 5-fold icosa{20}hedron { contains 10 great cross-section planes = 4-fold cross-sections }

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/Lynn/LynnS54.html


--- demarcation line of mathematically irrrational commensuration of the ^ above and the below v ---


4-ness > X x - X y { systemic Integrity }


3-ness > X x - X { structural integrity }


>====<>===========<>===========<>============<>==========<>=====


Meta-space = pattern/shape - mind/intellect - conceptual ess-ence as angular viewpoints


---- conceptual line of demarcation ^ above and below v --------------


Occupied space = frequency of 3D vertexial nodal events in motion, density { integral patterns }, potential for charge, mass etc


Female { most complex numerically X x } = potential pregnancy with meta-space and occupied space. See post 1 Conceptual God-ess-ence


Male { less complex numerically X y an synergetically = no naturally occurring occupied space pregnancy potential only meta-space pregnant potential.


Entropic heat death ending and next big WOW! beginning with the single { green } ultra-large, ultra-longest frequency photon ---and perhaps more dense Higg fields on two sides of it-- to interfere with each other in unknown ways of seeming expansion of physical reality aka observed { quantised } time. I dunno


Perhaps the ultra-large, utra-longest wave, single photon subdivides its self as it interacts with the Higgs Field, creating particles of mass. Tho this is not from nothing, it is from this ultra-large, ultra-longest wave single photon { green } as seen below. I dunno. A speculative scenario on my part the attempts to connect bilateral aspects of complex animals and most complex, mind accessing human resultants of Universe.


At least that we know of








ebuc
Universe is, and GOD principle is concurrent...


Optional ways to interprate:


Universe = inviolate cosmic physical laws


God principle = inviolate cosmic principles


And computing devices are either essential to the process or they are not...


Human AI tech is localized, not Universal/Cosmic


Organic devices have taken millennia to evolve but are fragile...


Agreed, lack of oxygen, lack of sunlight, toxins, EMRadiation etc not conducive to more complex life, yet bacteria found to live in radio-active cooling pools, in outer space { survived on moon and brought back to Earth }, exist in extreme sulphur pools etc..


Techno AI systems are more robust and can withstand time space and duration...Structurally and unemotionally.


Structurally currently depends on Humans. Know one knows the future of AI's non-biologic existence.


thinking { biologically induced concepts } and feeling { biologic emotions } is the balance that David Bohm speaks of as being important for humanities long term existence on Earth.


AI lacks any such balance currently and in no way does any see any such biologic balancing act in algorithmic future.


? < AI < silicon based tech < algorthithmic code writing < complex biologic


? > human X x- X y < less complex < least complex bacteria { RNA-DNA } < viruses { RNA or DNA never both } < mineral and water { comets and asteroids, stars etc }



ebuc
Though perhaps AI will see more benefit in remaining pragmatic and logical.


Being biological is not a choice AI gets to make. AI is not God/Universe Sarge.


God/Universe @ says to AI { smart alec dork } ..stick out your fiber octa nerve and touch my hand/quasar and you will a become a biologic in 3 days time.....




ebuc
I would suggest that we have no idea how an AI will behave, nor how it will evolve emotionally or thoughtfully.


No emotion, as I stated i.e no feeling no empathy.


In terms of a transition of outright responsibility and control to an AI, how long such a process will take will be relative to it's evolution.


Agreed, no one knows the future of humanities relationship to AI will unfold. Tho some humans know policies have to be put in place, just as beging done with algorythms on various platfoms to protect children etc.


But I think that it's fair to say that techno-evolution is somewhat more rapid than species evolution was.


Yes, exponetial change is happening is happening with technology since invention of digital age.


The assumption that our organic systems will somehow remain superior to that of an AI's technological systems, is perhaps a tad fearfully arrogant.


No need to rule it out that humans can control AI. Mind { the will } over matter { algorythm automation }. AI is double edged sword.


Which way it cuts can be directed by humans, if we have the will { thinking } and feeling { rational fear } of AI potential bring apocalypse to humanity and ecology.


Again, I dont think its too late, and I think AI can be aid in many ways to lead us away from humanity bringing on apocalypse to itself irrespective of AI.


1990's the START treaty was a start to less chance of nuclear apocalypse, yet there still is a chance that can happen.


Then put erratic climate change into the formula of factors with given values, to arrive at various scenarios to avoid apocalypse, is what humanity needs to do, using AI's huge capacity to process huge amounts of relevant data to most dangerous issues facing humanity.


AI has done good stuff. Now humanity needs to hold on the reins of the AI horse, to make sure we are in control of where we want it to be directed.


ebuc
I'm guessing that the same rules will apply to an AI, when it takes over...Takes over in terms of intellectual ability and material development. Though perhaps an AI's progress will be more logical and less culturally stupid



I mention David Bohm and link to inteview with him and he states that thinking and feeling both need are essential to humanities longer term existence rather than shorter term, in regards to considerations. Nuclear war and ecological concerns. I think the vid is from 1984.


AI has whatever degree of conscious-like thinking, tho it has no feeling.


So just as humans have agreed that cloning was not a good idea and pass universal laws that in agreement with that, there is hope that, humans can act to put in place the proper guidelines in place AI outsmarts us do something that does not involve feelings for humanities existence or the ecological systems that sustain us.


As B Fuller has said, it is a race to see if humanity can do those things it needs to before it does those things that may end it for most if not all of humanity and unnecessary suffering for the many. I dunno and not sure anyone else knows either. Good Luck! Good Karma! Good Beer!? LoL

ebuc

Disrespect is a form of constant incessant lack of integrity on various forums including Debatecraft.


Old saying..Those who know dont speak, those who dont know speak.


When and where --if ever-- does respect come into play in regards to what is presented by person who starts a thread?


When and where --if ever-- does integrity come into play in regards to what is presented by person who starts a thread?


I respect and care for info from people like David Bohm has presented. Integrity of a greater whole, inter-connectedness and knowledge base from his presumed formal education and experiences from which he derives his thinking and feelings of hope, a pathway forward to aid in our understanding > comprehension > resultants for humanity and the ecological systems that sustain us.


ebuc

Creator of Universe does not exist.


Concepts are not occupied space Universe, they exist in complementation to occupied space Universe, and as a way to communicat/present concepts to others.


Ignorance is bliss, and a lack of respect for others is a form of bliss of for those types of people. They refuse to acknowledge others comments as presented ergo, a lack of respect may begin in that way, and further along the way.


Pregnant woman and mothers are going generally going to be more attuned to feelings of self, others and environment, then men for these reasons, that stem back to genetics.


R..E..S..P...E..C..T.....wholeness....oneness....connectedness.....integrity.......or not ergo, a conceptual black hole of dis-respect.


ebuc

Three perspectives { viewpoints }:

X { birds-eye vertical },

Z - Y { Side-wise left and right 90 degrees }

/ { 45 degrees 4th-D into or out from internal volume },


Absolute truth { Cosmic - whole - all is one and connected }


Relative truth { Timing and Location },


and, False Narrative { Intentional or Non-intentional combinations of false-hoods and truths }.

ebuc
Too many useless people demanding too much.


Agreed to whatever degree we define as useless.


Sarge, another way to envision it is that Universe/God is perfect in its current state of evolutionary unfolding --all the way from most recent Big WOW!-- i.e. Action/Cause > Reaction/Response > Resultant/Consequences > repeat eternally = >


..exactly how it is supposed to be. It is allowed follows the above path. We dont know and most likely never will know how each recycling { unfolding event } of the Big WOW! will occur, i.e. each may be have differrent evolutionary unfoldings --tho not breaking any inviolate physical laws or cosmic principles-- just variations of what is possible and the choices humans in such a Universe { if they exist } will seemingly choose.


Whats that old saying, ..its not over til its over....Recently saw and interview { 1970 } with David Bohm physicist math person, who stated, ...each for all and all for each..., and Im like, yeah, that is what I say except I use the Musketeers version ...all for one and one for all... as the top of spiritual path of hope.


Here is the link to David Bohm interview. Go to 19:02 or so and shortly he states his each for all and all for one... ergo hope

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7VKGcmWVCw



ebuc
But, if truth can therefore be variable, then what is actually true and what isn't....And who or what has the authority to judge.


Sarge, there exists three primary kinds of truth:


1} absolute truths ex five and five regular/symmetrical and convex polyhedra can ever exist,


2} relative truths ex the sky is blue, well yes sometimes it is here sometimes not, as well as when it is blue here, on the other side of Earth it is not because its dark on that side ergo black or black with some shiny objects in the sky { planes, stars etc },


3} False narrative that is opposite of above 1 and 2 yet may include 1 or 2 in its narrative to mislead/misdirect others, whether intentionally or not.


Spirit:


1} Spirit-1 is meta-space concepts { mind/intellect/abstractions } of Space { two primary kinds }, God { multiple choices }, Time { multiple choices }, mathematics { ex geometric patterns }, Humans { most complex biologic } Toyotas { reliable vehicle for most part }, Footballs, Pool balls, Bowling balls, Tennis Shoes, AI, Toe Nails Stars, etc.


--------- conceptual line of demarcation ----------


3} Spirit-2, 3 and 4 { occupied space Universe }


......Spirit-2 Fermionic matter and bosonic forces and a newer third catagory that is hybrid of those two at very cold temperatures, so I mostly ignore it. These above are our quantised physical reality of occupied space and we observe as motion aka vibrational patterns of quantised energy integrities. Ex we see a young calf or colt running around in field jumpting and kicking and just so happy, that, we humans say, that animal is very spirited/excited etc.


..Spirit-3 is ultra-micro Gravity ( ) { occupied space } and is not quantised nor quantified yet by humans, ergo, meta-physical. Beyond our physical abilities to quantise or quantify at least so far,


...Spirit-4 is ultra-micro Dark Energy )( { occupied space } and is not quantised nor quantified yet by humans, ergo, meta-physical.


The meta-space Spirit-1 exists eternally in complementation to all of occupied space Universe, that also exists in eternal transformation aka the only perpetual motion machine, that is, naught created nor destroyed, only transformed.


I believe that the sum-total accounting of planckian bits may expand and contract in the following example, that does not create nor loose any of the occupied space bits. This process of expansion-contraction of Unvierse --if it is occurring-- is infolding and outfolding the whole Universe.


1} See this origami link to better grasp this infolding-outfolding concept. Scroll short distance to see the 5 second animation

https://github.com/HSSBoston/miura-fold


2} this 2nd one I actually forget sometimes when i consider this expansion-contraction of Universe question of how does it do it without creating or loss of planckian bits --or in most broad sense occuppied space energy--. This next two Synergetics link is to theB Fullers transformative jitterbug via its six square face pattern integrals collaspe, whereas the triangles, are stable structural integral shapes/patterns and remain in all of the transformations


.......1} 4-fold whole{ VE } >5-fold semi-icosa{20}hedron > 4-fold octa{8}hedron,

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f6008.html


.......2} octahedron > semi-isotropic truss pattern > 8 triangles bonded/valence{ infolded } as a subdivided triangle { seemingly 2D > out-fold to octa-bonded/valenced 3-fold tetrahedron { 3D volume } > or another tetrahedron { semi 2 frequency tet }.

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f6108.html


What is not shown in the synergetics links is the five, six or more other exotic transformations the jitterbug also will transform into.


3} Ex a Euclidean, negative curvature shape aka saddle-shape of one quarter or one half of a torus inner surface area,


4} transforms into two Euclidean sine-waves, at 90 degrees to each other, just as the EMRadiation of photon{s} does,

..attaching photo below hopefully...The one sine-wave is horisontal so all we can see is the vertex on right pointing toward us


5} complex octagonal sine-wave with four top vertexes { as potential square } and four bottom vertexes { as potential square }. Sorry I dont have photo of the jitterbug transforming to this shape. I need to do that. Im still figuring out how to get a photo of my phone onto my PC.


6} the flying hexagon. What the flying hexagon says to me, is that unlike the seemingly 2D flatten subdivided triangle, the hexagon is a larger area of seemingly 2D space. And there is this 7th tail wing triangle { two valenced/bonded } that wants to stay vertical, as if saying, I refuse to collapse into a 2D space only.



...however, the 4-fold VE will contract to a seemingly single triangle space { least area }, tho is it actually 8 bonded/valenced triangles. Sorry I dont have a photos of that, tho it is easy to imagine if you look at 2nd Synergetics link of the sub-divided triangle and just fold the three outer sets of bonded/valenced triangles, onto the central/nuclear triangle.


..It is this most contracted infolding of the VE that I associate with my Entropic Heat Death of Universe scenario, ergo, the beginnng unfolding as the next Big WOW! event. What is not consider in the above, is that if we start withe 4-fold VE, having one spherical icosahedron --ergo its 62 { left skew 31 and right skew 31 } l2D great circles/3D great tori, bonded to each of the VE's surface triangles, then,


...when the VE gets to this most contracted phase, there is 4 bonded/valenced icosahedron one side of the triangle, and because it is spherical, it overlaps with the four ---bonded/valenced as one-- icosahedra on the other side. We can also start out with a spherical VE, tho, without grpahic abilities, such animations etc are hard for to present to others.


...anyway, in the next graphic below is the bilateral heat death and the green line { the above mentioned, contracted triangle } in the middle is and ultra-large, ultra-longest wave frequency of single photon { ergo close to flat }, as { for the most part } all that will remain of our physical reality.


..Gravity Dark Energy remain as the 2D circles/3D space tori in the graphic as follows. I did not ask MS Co-pilot to create all of the internal circles, as I was only asking for an outer perimeter set of most compact tori as firewall between Universe { at heat death } and the outside macro-infinite truly non-occupied space { a true vacuum } that would always want to pull apart the finite integrity of Universe.


...as for what exists inside the two sets of bilateral 5-fold icosahedra, and where the overlap occurs --and we see the density due to overlap-- Ive had diffferrent ideas what that density could be if not just 3D space tori { Gravity and Dark Energy only }, so my lastest idea is that it is remaining Higgs field. I dunno!

It is also good recall, that, in the next link we see the total of 87 primary 2D great circles { both 4-fold VE's 25 and 5-fold icosas 31{ left and right skew total 62 } Synergetics, whereas I extrapolate these as 3D space and time tori. Tho at entropic heat death, I think some of them just become space only tori, an no invaginations occur as the reality { 0..3p..6..9..12...15...18/0...etc > }


..not clear in this Synergetics link is that the icosa's primary 20 triangles { 12 vertexes } and cojoined { bonded/valenced } with the spherical VE's 12 vertexes so this is at the 8 regular triangles of VE where they meet and overlap with each other before contracting collapse of the maximally expanded VE begins its contracting infolding collapse

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s11/figs/f3201b.html

ebuc

Operating System of Universe:


4-fold { X x - X y } transformations of the 4-fold Vector Equilibrium ...chords 24 > O < 24 radii...balanced equanimity >

12-around-1 spheres O O O O O O O O O O O O O ....one in the womb = pregnant potential from outer to inner, and then inner to outer >


i.e. what goes in must come out > repeat eternally as the only perpetual motion machine


Asymmetrical:

8 surface triangles △ △ △ △....△ △ △ △


6 Surface squares □ □ □.....□ □ □


6 triangles on four internal cross-section planes = 24

△ △ △ △ △ △.... △ △ △ △ △ △....△ △ △ △ △ △....△ △ △ △ △ △