"if the opponent shows signs of moral superiority towards me I won't finish the debate"
😂😂😂
Please see DavidAz's vote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRnXs9AGELM
Don't worry. This time the debate actually matters.
Christianity claims the opposite to this.
Tail between legs
Framework was probability.
In faxt my.opponent messes up badly saying it was Christianity vs atheism. I knew he'd weasel out of that claim.
I agreed to that framework. He struggled to establish one.
He kept defining intelligence like an AI or animal instead of a theistic deity.
I addressed all of this in the debate.
He basicallynhad 0 shot at winning in the end. He contradicted.his own god model with others.
0 theists are deists.
The difference between deities paying attention and judging vs next to 0 attention or 0 sentience deities is irreconcilable.
Younwould never say to Pro of this debate that he had to address my definition in Round 1.
Instead youd let him flesh out his semantic rebuttals like he tried in Round 2 and count all of them.
I did address the definition of intelligence inside Theism in my Round 1. I thene xpanded on it in Roubd 2 and clarified that mynopponent is describing Deism which is not Theism.
The only added thing was I clarified there is Deism. Even without that, my Round 1 pushed on that active attention and knowing a huge amount or even everything are necessary facets of theistic intelligence on a deity.
I expanded on this heavily in Round 2. Roind 1 Ibused almost all available characters as I had a lot of constructive to get out.
I want you to tell menwhat I should habe conpletely deleted in order to flesh out the semantics just in case a voter fixated harder on that.
The fact you believe I am the same as way back is your own lack of perception.
I blatantly tackled the exact thing Whiteflame says I failed to address.
He just dislikes that I wanted equality and use my Round 1 for constructive just like you did, leaving rebuttals for Round 2 just like you did.
That is Whiteflame's sole justification for his incorrect vote.
You are so obsessed with them thay you dehumanise me every single time you notice others will allow you to.
First for being autistic and a presumed incel.
Second for apparently nobody liking me or respecting me.
Thid for being a dog that fails to be a good bitch for its owner.
I remember all the abuse.
You have behaved disgustingly and do it the moment someone seems powerless to defend themselves.
You are predatory and sided with evil.
😂😂😂
So instead of admitting you were sycophantic you pretend you were this mastermind puppeteer who made me rise and fall.
Yet you yourself have been incapable of gaining any power here.
Why is that?
Hahahahaha!
Making alts and votebombing, degrading, abusing and manipulating...
Not to mention turning into a bootlicker the millisecond RM was modded vs abusing him s soon as his position was removed.
That is how YOU habdle defeat and lack of power.
The ONLY reason you arent permabanned is your meltdowns and sycophancy got you sympathy.
I will debate either way or agree to delete this.
Your rule 1 is said 3 paragrapghs deep into your debate description. Kind of unfair to have it lowercase and no other warning.
This conversation is over.
You are the single most overrated voter ever on this platform.
That is all.
I noticed you ignored how I exposed that he is backing Deism not Theism.
I dedicated 2 Roubds to exposing that flaw and you.ignored that a non-interventionalist non-involved deity is Deistic, not Theistic.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2012%3A17-23&version=NCB
I can say it is lying, agreed.
It is lying.
Mockery of voting.
You lie in your rfd, I heavily addres why his definition of intelkiuence is wrong, out of cotnext and nothinng at all to do with the word inside the context of a god.
I provided muktiple sources and religions backing me.
You lie that I didnt takcle his application, I did. He applied a wrong definition of intelkigence that made it a false truism that an unintelligent deity instantly is intelligent.
So what is he?
So hard-separation Theism vs Pantheism?
Which side is Panentheism on?
Due to holy spirit Judaism may he classified as Panentheistic, Christianity too but theyre borderline since Father himself (as Father) doesnt truly come down here as far as we know and intermingle with his creation fully.
i am doing the wf vs savant one atm
The lowercase 'a' is both 'A' and not 'A'.
Are you sure you want me to vote
I am an annihilationism advocate. I have heretical.theories even on how the pre-secodn coming Hell works due to OT clues.
I strongly believe the Heavenly exist eternally and the Hellbound get annihilated eventually, not tortured forever.
Heresy or not, I have heard even MORE heresy from a priest and deacon I spoke to (that Hell is merely a state of being that can chanfe at any time someone accepts God).
I am convinced that Mal is an undercover Jehovah's Witness. His debates where he takes anti-JW stances always seem to result in him asking questions instead of actively making a case. In contrast, when he argues for JW-supported stances like this, he tends to make stronger cases.
Never mind, it lets me vote the normal way, lol.
I tried to vote on this but it won't let me even via the badges button.
I wont vote today necessarily but was curious if I could.
Ty for the vote.
