Please vote, thanks in advance.
That is the problem I foresee.
Sikhism comes with the clause that other relgions can find their way to the God anyway because you can get reincarnated and stuff even if yoyr religion was very wrong the 1st 2nd 3rd etc life.
Because it has this type of other-religion-friendly clause, Pro can play that card and look at Christian history.
Then I am forced to prove Christianity is objectively true which will become nitpicking my case while my opponent can play it safe.
It is called Sikhism btw.
please vote on this Ultrarated debate when you have the time (one Round from each remains), I will appreciate it.
I have so much poetry there. It is extremely a poem not a rap battle against the opponent or the goddess.
"My blood your pool" etc were extrmerly rich with poetic elements.
I have legitimately ranked (extremely) high in irl poetry contests that I wont specify to hide my identity.
This website is largely.full of poetry illiterates. I knew this for a while even back on DART.
Anyone who believes Pro had better poetry than me is delusional. Its not even subjective. I cannlist elements of poetry he had almost 0 of.
with voters like these, i'll chicken out ty. your rating loss to me is brutal. I know for a fact I can write a much better poem than you, it isn't ego it's educated confidence.
I will not do this again Rated against you. It's too risky. I am grateful to the one who voted for me for caring.
yes that's one of the 2 or 3 I thought of, not the sports.
ty now we must ask someone to vote on behalf of the AI. :)
ask chatgpt to Contrast our poems and rate them across categories.
Pay to Caesar and being good earthly slaves to unjust, cruel masters implies Yeshua wanted us to be good to even tyrants. No revolutions, just hung on a cross obediently.
No, he never once implied it. It is Paul you are referring to. Yeshua chose only Jews as Apostles. Luke is the only Goy of the extended 70-72.
Paul consistently said Jews first, Goyim/Gentiles second in being judged and doing the right thing.
He even had racist undertones at times especially to a pagan woman but even how he described he is there 1st for Jews and only 2nd for Gentiles, repeatedly.
I am not sure you realise that if the Bible is taken sola scriptura, Jews are then superior to Goyim (to a degree, not saying absolutely but partly).
I am not saying this to stir antisemitism. I just don't understand how anyone reads the Bible and sees it as solving issues of society.
It doesn't really and maybe that is why Christ conceded 'pay to Caesar what is owed to Caesar' and Peter+Paul said to be good slaves to our earthly masters even if they are unjust.
Clearly God did not come to solve all our issues. He merely gave a path to individual salvation.
The same Christians that use Leviticus to justify being very anti LGBTQ ignore massive parts of OT and say old law does not apply anymore.
How about this, justify to me how insignificant most women except Eve (and that did not go well) were in the Bible and then explain to me 1 logical reason that is not sexist, why Mary Magdalene was not an apostle but Paul (who was not in the 12) was.
The society definitely was and Christ barely changed that part.
I will assume God did, since if Satan did tgen it begs more questions I dont fancy answering
I can think of 2 or 3 ways to make this into a truism that benefits Pro, however I will stay silent to be fair to both sides.
the only real way I can win this debate is the 'intelligence' angle.
that is blasphemy.
I am different to some with regards to Devil's Advocate (aptly named by the Catholics by the way).
In a situation where we both are DA what exactly is gained by forcing it?
So he has to argue against his core beliefs and I have to argue against mine... Fantastic.
It is a literal fact that God exists by the way, it's not an opinion. All I can do is evade, gaslight and thus be evil to win.
can we agree to swap sides?
I am pretty sure this is a sin if I debate it especially if I am debating against a basic truth of God like that.
I oppose this debate's semantics.
It is lying in semantics.
Theism entails a morally concerned deity that commands things via a doctrine.
It cannot solely be loose deism and spirituality which is included in the definition.
The semantics also contradict themselves later. It defined god as intelligent which rejects Brahman of Hinduism and any such variant of Theism.
Well that is fine to celebrate.
However, also celebrate Christ's birthday soon (it is a false date, he was born in September most likely).
Yeshua the Christ. Please celebrate.
It is about 2028 years ago he was born.
Its estimated to be 4 BC but not year 0 existed. So 4 BC is actually -3 not -4 from what yoy assume is year 0 (it is year -1)
Remember to attend Mass today.
So whats his rhyme scheme and flow?
Show the flow please.
So far I have been 2 - 0 vs you.
It is blatant you faked your vote reasoning.
You voted poetry based on flow yet now admit poetry is not about flow primarily.
Run me through the more obvious rhyme schemd of Pro please, stanza by stanza.
please vote if you have any time in the next 18 days, thank you in advance.
Ill see it later
do you think you are winning it so far
Would you prefer to improve as a debater or to emotionally manipulate a win artificially here?
Which of the 2 would benefit you in the long run?
are you suggesting I should vote with corrupt motive?
