Mikal wrote:
Initial impression is I wonder if this is a creative way to do innocent child since it's triggered by a specific day
Noted. Potentially.
Mikal wrote:
Initial impression is I wonder if this is a creative way to do innocent child since it's triggered by a specific day
Noted. Potentially.
Bullish wrote:
Do you think Mago could be over compensating?
As in, trying to be more active because he got lynched for being less active last game? Has crossed my mind but the reason he posts less in the first place is to not attract early attention. Indicates low confidence in his own scum play, which shouldn’t change any time soon.
So my assumption here is that he’ll stick to his meta.
Magoroth wrote:
Ok with a Mag1cman vote at this point. Reasonable arguments
🤦♂️
Helz wrote:
Mag1cman wrote:
Again, you weren’t there for for last game, where we lynched Magoroth on the basis of him being less active as scum. And I did do the MAGA Mafia ISO on Magoroth. I’m not seeing any damning similarities.
Yeah, I was not in that game and I have not read it. Im just saying its really sus for you to be pushing a meta comparison referenced as their behavior for an entire game that apparently in reality is 4 individual posts.
It gives the impression as being something it certainly is not to the point I question if this was a fake read and you were throwing vague shade but forgot that detail and got called on it.
You’re framing it like I could not have extracted a meta read when he only gave four posts last game. But that is the meta. He posts less when mafia. I’m not saying he posts as little as four posts every scum game he’s ever played, but look at this game: He’s one of the early drivers of activity this far. Contrasts his scum meta, therefore an early town read is warranted.
This is not a hip fire read. It’s observable and proven.
Again, you weren’t there for for last game, where we lynched Magoroth on the basis of him being less active as scum. And I did do the MAGA Mafia ISO on Magoroth. I’m not seeing any damning similarities.
Mag1cman wrote:
Not seeing what Kohai is wrong here with Magoroth
Not seeing what Kohai is seeing here*
Not seeing what Kohai is wrong here with Magoroth
So, in what way does Magoroth feel like scum Magoroth from MAGA Mafia?
Thoth wrote:
Kohai wrote:
RexFavilla wrote:
VTL Magoroth
Automated bot wint catch this vote. Remember to use VTL:
Is there some programming reason why you could not make it catch votes without a colon?
+1
Also, is there a way, by chance, to do something about the anonymous accounts in the ISO feature? Like maybe attach them to the players, or just remove them from the ISO feature?
Mag1cman wrote:
Whiteflame feels for a reason I can't quite put my finger on...
feels off*
Rex is doing the same thing he did last game. Please give me at least a blurb to read every now and then, please?
Whiteflame feels for a reason I can't quite put my finger on...
Thoth wrote:
Mag1cman wrote:
@Thoth, are you able to extract an answer of Pie here? As in, does your role activate DP4, or is it revealed DP4 and has been active since Dp1?
I already asked. Pie said he could not tell me when it activates.
alr
Kohai wrote:
Thoth wrote:
Bullish wrote:
It's still ambiguous to me if your role is active right now, or if you only receive a role at DP4
It's ambiguous to me too. I asked Pie if my ability is already extant, and he said he could not tell me. I say 'extant' because 'active' can also mean the opposite of passive.
Which is a bit weird. My role is very clear and unambiguous
It looks like the whole point of the role is to be ambiguous
@Thoth, are you able to extract an answer of Pie here? As in, does your role activate DP4, or is it revealed DP4 and has been active since Dp1?
sure, I'll take a look
last game we lynched off being less active as scum
assuming thoth does have the role he's claimed, his behavior with it makes sense tbh
any hidden role can be a sign of negative utility. Whilteflame and I have put hidden negative utility in his games on multiple occasions; not sure if Pie would do that, but I don't see why he wouldn't.
Magoroth feels night and day from the last game. thinking he's town atm
Thoth's justification is great. only weird thing is the DP4 reveal/activation(?). I'd think from a mod psych standpoint, Pie would want such a role to have a decent chance of being activated later
also on my mind: Two games ago (the anon game), I suggested to Thoth he should be the last person to enter the thread, and SoP miller if no one else does. Simply to get DP1 pressure off him. He didn't do it that game, but I can see him adapting the idea.
however, Pie is quite creative. Behaviorally, Thoth doesn't seem to strike me as either towny or scummy yet. Just note there is a scum Thoth incentive to do this.
Sure
Gg
time's up
VTL: Thoth
die scum
wylted wrote:
Are there any restrictions on your ability to lie detect?
Essentially they need to lay out their abilities and if the abilities or character are wrong it comes up as a lie
So a lie detector that only works for claims?
that's my fake claim from two games ago let's goooo
ILikePie5 wrote:
wylted wrote:
Are there any restrictions on your ability to lie detect?
Essentially they need to lay out their abilities and if the abilities or character are wrong it comes up as a lie
Ok so there’s no scenario where Thoth is town unless he lied about being Vanilla for some reason, which in itself was a dumb move
yup. see #124
that's the most imma do I can tell he's hiding
I'm giving Thoth until midnight EST
ILikePie5 wrote:
Mag1cman wrote:
Note: Banana cannot vote this DP nor be voted herself. The game would still automatically register her votes and votes against her, but I will not count those votes in the final vote count.
Can the person responsible for this please claim?
Why? What’s the benefit of knowing this
it doesn't matter anymore bc lie detector can't be interfered with
I responded with question marks on this earlier, but this is the type of thing that can only be spotted by people who are PR hunting