Pro's reasons for wanting me to be permanently banned are:
"As curators of content Remy should be permanently banned. His body of work shows that he operates via identity-based provocation and rage baiting. "
2 things are his main arguments: Identity based provocation and Rage Baiting.
The issue with doing this is if I scroll to his forums, he hasn't made a political post in the past 9 months or so.
But he has posted political posts before:
https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/politics/posts/ho/zohran-mamdani-should-be-a-wakeup-call-for-the-left - Here, there is Identity rhetoric and Rage Baiting, "should serve as a wakeup call for how deeply unpopular the far left lunatics actually are". The left after all is an identity, just like Jews, Gays, Blacks, etc.
Now, I'm certain while the host hates me, he approves of people like Double R. Double R's posts:
https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/politics/posts/wz/trump-will-be-removed-from-office-before-2029. He says, "MAGA cult"; Identity Rhetoric And Rage Bait (IRARB).
https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/politics/posts/w7/trump-corruption-thread. The IRARB present here, "Trumper"
Recent posts, all political speech somebody does can be argued to be IRARB. You say abortion should be legal, it can be perceived as IRARB to the unborn and to pro-lifers (whose identity you're attacking by telling them to become pro-choice).
The Prosecution's reasons for wanting me to be permanently banned are present in every single person who posts any political views on the internet. All political views can be argued to be IRARB. You can say weed should be legal, it's IRARB to those who want it banned because you're threatening their identity as anti-drug (as there will be times when you are forced to smell weed, such as being in a classroom with a stoner).
Therefore, I vote con.
