Ummm....
It is an unwritten requirement to be able to read a written ballot in order to vote. Non human animals can't read.
I've changed my abortion position since this debate.
Can you delete this debate? It's not because I'm expected to lose; it's because I changed my mind on this issue and I don't want it to reflect my current ideology.
Good.
->If my behavior were such that my ban were warranted, you should vote for me to get banned.
That's the problem with you. You deny being vague, but you're vague and it's unchangeable because the moment you're specific, you end up feeling a painful pressure to concede your position. White flame and I won for a reason.
->The site gets the participation it deserves. Enjoy your trolling and rage baiting.
You just did that. I wouldn't get you banned, so I have the moral high ground.
->deciding what consequences someone should face for their actions
Don't worry; I wouldn't say this at work. This website is NSFW. Endorsing nuclear power is NSFW. But because I won, the obvious consequences are zero.
->That's life in some parts of Europe.
Yeah, but left America likes them because they're, "part of the free world", "bastions of democracy", "human rights" (just other ways of saying, "White and left wing").
For now, off the hook.
"Almost all major social media and major web platforms, hosting providers, and online forums maintain zero-tolerance policies for hate speech, calls for violence and justifying or advocating non-consensual sexual assault that typify Remy’s posts. "
You haven't been on YouTube recently.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qM67sYo5fX8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkX5n6k0kDI
I'm TAME compared to mainstream YouTube in 2026, sport.
Also, I don't support legalizing rape.
I agree with limiting Supreme Court Justice terms.
It's funny how you think Europe is the role model for the world. America is the role model for the world. Europe can't even unite in the same nation; how can they unify the world?
->Just because that’s how your brain operates doesn’t mean it works that way for the rest of us. Some of us actually do care about logic and reason, one way to tell the difference is that those people do what you did not, provide a substantive response instead to just pointing at someone else and saying “you’ll never get it because of your identity…”
Left wingers only use words like, "logic and reason" because it makes them feel good.
->provide a substantive response
I did that; you're unable to comprehend.
->“you’ll never get it because of your identity…”
I see the pattern you're unable to.
The predicted pattern unless you jinx it:
1. With, "Left wingers only use words like, "logic and reason" because it makes them feel good.", you will deny it and replace this platitude with another one or dish a vague insult at me.
2. With, "I did that; you're unable to comprehend.", you're going to say that you're able to comprehend, but my arguments are (insert vague insult here).
3. You are only on this site because as much as you hate me, you really enjoy talking to me. I live rent free in your head. If not, then just quit the site. You can't. You're addicted to me.
What would you replace Hinduism with?
-> Why is this so hard for you?
It's hard for me to accept leftist talking points because it violates my conservative identity.
-> You still don’t get it, wow.
I never will. And you will never get how you're wrong because doing so violates your leftist identity (and I'm expecting you to deny that it's from identity, but that's something that your identity subconsciously calls on you to do, so no use in you making that argument).
Yeah because I know what I'm talking about. Jason Lamar says, "If you need information to be said NICELY, then you're a bitch".
https://www.youtube.com/@thejasonlamar. Watch some of his videos.
Wylted's vote should be taken down, as his RFD I can't think of how it would be worse.
All of your arguing is in bad faith whether you admit to it or not.
I think this debate acquired 2x as many votes as the debate that is #2 for most # of votes:
https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/d/ae/resolved-on-balance-abortion-is-immoral is #2 I think.
I'd have to see. I thought just one post got me banned for the month.
Kohai brought it up.
I have a comfterable lead saying this, so you know it's me being honest.
The post that got me banned for 1 month that Kohai cited, I no longer agree with what I wrote there.
-> That being said, I suspect Kohai and Whiteflame would not vote because of an obvious conflict of interest...which is also applicable to RB.
We ALL have conflicts of interest; some are more honest than others. Anyone that votes pro has a conflict of interest against me.
What I don't respect about you is you want me banned and are too afraid to comment on the following form:
https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/politics/posts/11i/to-the-people-that-dont-like-me
What if someone refuses to get vaxxed?
In the broad sense, you're correct. I support the legalization of both incest and gay sex. Incest I would discourage because you can get an unplanned pregnancy, but this is also true for premarital straight sex. I'd discourage both.
->I very much do not appreciate you acting like I was telling you to kill yourself and I really do not even slightly believe you think that is the case.
All you had to do was clarify yourself and I'll take you at your word. I'm not used to others taking me at my word. Savant would be a good role model for you.
-> But this is exactly the sort of toxic behavior which makes me believe this community would be better off without you.
This comment you just made was toxic. I'm willing to take you at your word and you can't do that for me? Does that really sound right?
-> I will flatly say even interacting with you right now in this moment makes me want to spend less time on this site.
Your last forum comment was 18 days ago. Had it not been for this debate, I wouldn't be talking to you because you don't comment much to begin with. You don't spend a lot of time here.
Be like Savant. Savant doesn't think I'm toxic. The reason? He asks questions, and he learns the truth (and Savant's politics are probably closer to yours).
This debate already has more votes than any other debate in the history of this website.
I get that. I'll do my best to incorporate that.
->Why are so many people caught up on free speech? Its a very different thing to say "This position is unacceptable" vs "Taking a position with intent to cause harm is unacceptable."
All political speech causes emotionally physical harm to someone out there. If you don't believe me, then give a counter example.
Because of that, emotional harm is irrelevant for political dialogue, even if it's telling someone to kill themselves (which you did to me). You can tell me to kill myself; I don't have to obey.
I think you should advocate to take your vote down.
Please vote. I voted and you can use my RFD as a guide to vote. I analyzed the prosecution's arguments because they have the BoP here.
