SatanLucy
Some of them also just want your Lucky Charms


Being a hot person is so difficult. Ugly people have it so easy. If I was ugly, those women wouldnt kiss me and I wouldnt get herpes as a kid.

SatanLucy
Hot men don’t get free sex.


When a hot man touches a girl, she immediately orgasms. People's desire towards sex is dictated entirely by looks. this is why a woman can never reject a hot guy. It wouldnt make logical sense if she did.

SatanLucy
Their earthly rewards is permission to marry upto 4 wives.


thats impossible. If each man had 4 wives, 75% of men would be single.

SatanLucy
Why would incels even care about rape?


Incel cannot want to rape women. If he wanted to rape women and thought it was okay, then choosing not to rape women would make him voluntary celibate and not incel (involuntary celibate).

SatanLucy

Alright, so I pretended to be a girl on instagram and I got like 30 guys hitting on me and messaging me first and giving me all sorts of compliments and love in like first few days of making account.


But I never get this when I pretend to be a boy. Women simply wont give you love and send you disturbing messages, if you are a guy. Thats reality. Women dont make moves and they arent as aggressive in having you. They dont care for you enough.

SatanLucy

Lets start from basic definitions.


Hot people are people who all other people want to have sex with.


If a man is hot, and he approaches a woman, she starts wanting him. She cannot not consent because he is hot.


Now lets take into consideration ugly people.

Ugly people are people no one wants to have sex with, really. So they can never get "true consent" because woman will only agree to sex with them if she has no other options. Its like me eating spinach when I want a chocolate. I dont want spinach, and if I had chocolate, I would throw spinach away. In this sense, spinach is like ugly person no one wants to have sex with in a true sense. People just stop resisting because they have no other options.

SatanLucy

You literally cannot think without definitions. It is not possible to make a deductive argument without a definition. If definitions arent agreed to, there is nothing to even debate about. Its like me debating about apples while you debate about oranges.

SatanLucy

there are things true by definition and things which arent true by definition. If a debater fails to establish a priori definition premises, it should count as a loss. there is simply no logical way a debater can lose a debate proved true by definitions, as well as no logical way a debater can win a debate without establishing truth by definition. In simple terms, if debater doesnt win semantics, he has lost a debate because without semantics, nothing is true.

SatanLucy
A specific subset within the community adheres to a "rape pill" ideology, which explicitly advocates for the legalization of rape


that would seriously backfire on them, because it would mean people can rape them too.