SatanLucy

I am incel too. It is not a choice. thats why its called involuntary celibate.

I appreciate your opinion.

If you were my kid, then I'd probably get the belt out.

I like that.

You identify as 13; do what your parents tell you to do.

No, I am spoiled and disobedient.

Agree to disagree.

25 years old but identifies as 17

I am 30, but my mental age is stuck at 13. Being trans age is difficult because people always judge you just because you play games all day and watch cartoons at age 30.

It sounds like a good deal for anyone that is trans-age

I am trans age. I dont vote, so I dont mind losing voting rights. I dont use them anyway. But I am not fine with doing chores. that seems morally wrong.

I prefer a strong well developed central muscle.

I need big arms. I do 100 repetitions of 10 KG dumbbells in one day, which is bad. I see people do much more. And my arms arent big enough to be a scary debater. My chest and shoulders are fine, but I need big arms to be able to be a scary debater.

Sperm cells aren't people.

Sounds like unproved claim.

“I do not agree” =/= “I agree with the negation”.

You have to agree with something if you want to have a position, because logically either A is true either negation of A is true. If you dont agree with anything, then you dont even think.

It is my duty to donate 20$ a month to Palestine. I also pray to Satan that Palestinians dont suffer anymore. But in the end, it will be Satan's will which decides.

What's worse though?

Murder is worse than gooning, in my opinion. But some people say gooning is worse because it kills millions of persons in sperm.

You're getting worse Lucy.

No, I am still young and hot. What about you?

so why if I say the opposite with proofs theists gets mad

I dont get mad. You can ask for proof as much as you want. You wont get any proof from me. I will never prove my God to you. My belief doesnt depend on evidence, because divine belief isnt contingent on anything.

I do not agree

Oh great, then you concede to unmoved mover argument.

Apparently both will keep you out of heaven, so they’re equal.

If you cant be gooning in heaven, then why would one even want to go there?

Reference to porn (which I don't watch anymore; I quit the habit to remove a need

there is no shame in gooning.

I want to be a debater with big muscles. So I bought dumbbells and started lifting. Before this, I only did chair dips and push ups because I lacked proper weights to lift and had to train with body weight exercises.

I think having muscles is an advantage in a debate because it could make other person too scared to make argument. My only issue is that I look like a 15 year old, so people still assume I am young and shy.

I have also ordered some supplements online, such as protein, creatine, sugar and whatever else comes in that mass gainer.

But its not exactly fun for me, because I am starting to miss days when I was skinny and couldnt lift more than 20 KG.

I hate that you cant be a skinny body builder unless you go with Bruce Lee style of training, but even that one makes your shoulders and chest big.

I hope my arms dont grow too big.

I am eating a lot of sugar because sugar is fuel for muscles. Most people dont know that muscles use sugar to make movement. I can do a lot of repetitions with low weight thanks to high sugar diet which is my invention. Everyone else wants to keep sugar in diet low, but that is actually impossible because the only other option is to take lots of fat, and that is less useful for muscles and brain. Both muscles and brain use sugar as primary fuel source.

Burden of proof is the millstone that hangs around the neck of all theists.

Not really. There is no rule which says I need to prove my claims.

Is it worse to commit suicide or jerk off?

Some people do both.

Uh, yeah, because you defined it that way

No, its because things can come into existence out of nothing. Do you disagree?

a non-existent being holding any kind of power is a logical contradiction

Sounds like another unproved claim.

What is it about Satan that clicked over other deities?

I was muslim for 14 years and Christian for a year or so, cant even remember. But it was only Satan and other Gods who worked for me, not Jesus or Alah.

Atheists say "I dont believe in God because there is no evidence for God".

But do you believe in evidence?

Evidence is information which makes some other information true. By that nature, it is circular or a belief.

Simply:

A proves B.

But what proves A?

C?

What proves C?

Evidence works in such way that you always end up believing in something you cant prove, or you cannot prove anything.

So atheists are wrong. Holding position that belief requires evidence is illogical, because evidence requires belief.

I like how you try to attack an argument, and somehow still fail to disprove a single premise in it.

And by tautology, that makes it meaningless

It is called a deductive argument.

"Divine being which comes into existence out of nothing" - must exist logically, to say that "a divine being which comes into existence out of nothing" doesnt exist is a logical contradiction.

Your only argument could be that something cannot come from nothing, but that is unproved rule. Also, a divine being capable of overcoming such rule even from position of non-existance would still be capable of overcoming it.

There is no such thing as the "Law of equation", you made it up

Really?

It is logically incoherent to assign a time and place to "nothing", if it is located in time and place it isn't "nothing".

Sounds like unprovable claim. I am sure you are aware that we had "non-smartphones" before.

Hmm alright, so you cant prove your claims, but you want me to just "believe them without proof". How very religious of you.

Fine, dont prove your claims.

The law of identity is A=A, it is not A=B or B=C

Law of equation.

The law of identity also says "A" does not equal "not A", but you are saying nothing = something, which violates the law of identity.

Nothing can become something, just as "Not A" can become "A". this isnt same as saying "nothing is something". Law of identity and law of non-contradiction talk specifically of same time and same place. I can both "walk" and "not walk". Just not at same time.

There are only two possibilities; we accept what people tell us unless given a reason not to, or we accept what people tell us only when it is proven

Also, these are not even two separate possibilities. A reason not to accept a claim can be that claim wasnt proved. But since you accept just about any claim, you can accept a claim that I observed God, and thus God exists. Well, this was easy.

His satanism lead to severe psychological issues

Satan rejected him.