Japan isn't even one of the top ten safest countries on Earth
It is by homicide rates.
Japan isn't even one of the top ten safest countries on Earth
It is by homicide rates.
Safest country on Earth is Japan. All guns banned. It has about 50 times less rate of homicides than USA. But dont confuse USA with Japan. Japan is polytheist and atheist, but atheists in Japan arent insane Communists like atheists in USA. When you look at women in Japan and women in USA, the difference becomes very obvious. Same with men. Japanese people care about their looks, which is why you will rarely see fat Japanese woman or unshaved Japanese man with full beard. I keep telling you, it is related to self-care. You cant have society of fat and ugly people and expect it to work well.
Looks are everything in life. If you dont look good, all your achievements are reduced.
Anthropologists estimate that at least 18,000 different gods, goddesses, and various animals or objects have been worshipped by humans
Damn I only worship 300 Gods. I need to catch up.
I have heard countless times from dumb people that "time" can be speed up and slowed down and is relative, because if you move at light speed, time speeds up.
So there are actually people who are clueless about what time even is, but most importantly clueless about theory of relativity.
Some will even be as dumb to claim theory of relativity disproves A theory of time.
But sadly, not everyone is born with 160 IQ, and many who are, are still unable to understand basic things. For them, time is some magical dimension.
What is time?
time is movement of matter.
there is no way to meassure time other than movement of matter.
Does light speed speed up time?
No.
Light speed slows you down.
this isnt difficult to understand. Moving at light speed means every atom in your body moves significantly slower. Your thoughts become thousand times slower. Your vision becomes thousands of times slower.
If someone who was standing still observed you while you were moving at light speed, to him, you would be frozen in place.
And thats what basically happens. Light speed does not speed up time or defeat A theory of time.
What happens is that objects moving at light speed become significantly slower (probably due to their extreme speed clashing with gravity which slows them down considerably).
So there is still one present moment, and not multiple "presents". A time theory isnt disproved.
there are truly no multiple present moments, and anyone who concludes that from theory of relativity should probably quit science and do something more suitable for his brain, for example playing with LEGO.
I have been spending time basically obliterating modern day debate with modal logic, definition arguments, undisprovable assumptions counter argument...
It is funny watching people try to argue against claim which is true by definition. It is like watching people try to disprove math.
But I decided I should make things more difficult for me, and argue for observable facts instead.
But then, it was like Zeus himself willed it, a Christian came and said that Christianity gave women their rights.
First I spent about 30 seconds laughing at the absurd claim, then I moved quickly to obliterate it.
First I posted this image:
Yes, for those who dont know, nuns in Christianity for 2000 years were used as "prostitutes".
But to make matters worse for my Christian opponent, his lack of ancient world knowledge made him ultimately unprepared for what came next.
In Sparta, In Rome, and in Ancient Egypt, women had both property rights and rights to divorce, and rights of religious freedom.
In Sparta, woman had as much property as a man. She would inherit equal amount of land as man. She had same education as man. She had complete divorce rights, she could divorce any time she wished. She could change religion.
In Ancient Egypt, women had even more rights than in Sparta.
In Rome, women could also easily divorce and had property rights.
And then came Christianity...
Christianity banned women from having any significant property. In fact, women themselves became property in Christianity. Christianity banned divorce for women. Women could not divorce their husbands, and husbands could legally rape them. If women tried to change religion, they were burned as witches.
So all rights which women enjoyed in Sparta, Rome, and Ancient Egypt, Christians completely eradicated. For next 2000 years, women had less rights in Christianity than they did in Sparta, Rome, ancient Egypt.
Ancient polytheism truly placed high value on women, where Christianity reduced women to property of husband for next 2000 years.
So when someone says Christianity gave women their rights, I can only laugh at that. In fact, women in Ancient Egypt had more rights than women in many Christian countries today.
This is how Trump thinks:
"She was married. I grabbed her by the pussy. She let me do it because I am rich and famous."
So if some woman comes and says that Trump raped her, she needs to first prove that she didnt just let him do it because he is rich and famous.
In other words, she needs to prove that she didnt consent.
I agree.
When I had a job, some workers got fired for something they posted online (talked against boss).
Its a stupid reason to lose a job, tho job was crap anyway so maybe for them it was a blessing.
But finding job is super easy in my country. People just refuse to work because job itself is crap and anyone who works here only lives a worse life.
My chicken farm which is free range and no-kill farm, as well as my magic system which is moving towards omni magic (to include all beneficial magic).
To person below me:
What is something you have created that you are proud of?
Here are logically most successful Gods by Bible's own logic (successful tree gives successful fruit:
So of course I worship Satan (Dajjal), Zeus, Odin, Ra, Venus, Mars, Thor, Loki, Aphrodite...
Basically, even if Christianity/islam is true, it changes nothing.
I would be stupid not to worship Gods most correlated with success.
Jesus isnt correlated with any success. Neither is islam. They both contradicted God's omnipresence by saying God doesnt live in statues, and they both made each society worse. There is no society which accepted islam and became better. Same with Christianity.
Why must the most successful civilizations necessarily have the correct gods?
I prefer to copy the successful. Only an idiot copies failure. So if most successful person in history says "I worship Zeus", I will copy that.
No, they gave themselves
If I can mention good things my religion is correlated with, surely Christians can mention bad things their religion is correlated with.
If they want to force person A to call them a woman solely based on how they identify, then they aren't leaving others alone
Thats the issue. Calling them different gender counts as bullying. No one is forcing you, but they dont misgender you so why misgender them?
Because their personalities suck. They are so petty that they will block you if you play a Metallica song.
Have you considered the possibility that 70% of people bullying them forces them to block people online in order to create safe space for themselves? While other people find safe spaces easily, trans people dont.
Christianity gave us dudes such as Stalin and Hitler. As for experiences, those claims arent scientifically observable. Otherwise, you could claim Zeus raped half of Greece. As for miracle healings, those happen everywhere. People beat cancer even when doctors give low chances. If Christians have miracle healings, maybe you can prove it by curing cancer?
Zeus > Christianity
Do you know who Alexander the Great is? The greatest conqueror in whole history!
But do you know which God he worshipped?
He worshipped Zeus!
So the most successful person in history worshipped Zeus.
What does that tell you? You could say "correlation causation bla bla bla".
But then look at ancient Greece. It is a very tiny part of ancient world. Yet that tiny part of the world is responsible for greatest scientific and philosophical discoveries of ancient world.
Who did they worship? Zeus!
Now, you may say "okay, coincidence can happen twice".
But then comes the political systems which Greeks invented, including Communism (implied by Plato) and Capitalism (implied by Aristotle).
Ancient Greece is also most famous place from ancient world.
So a God from some tiny country in ancient world is correlated with:
And someone tells me that Zeus doesnt exist?
Okay, lets see what happens when Greece abandoned belief in Zeus and accepted Christianity: No any glory, successes, discoveries or conquests followed.
What is unique about me is that I worship Gods who have proven high success rate.
Jesus had no success rate. Other than the parody called Proslogion, Christians invented nothing for 2000 years. All countries which accepted Christianity fell apart. Rome fell apart. Vatican fell apart. Even Christianity itself fell apart on multiple denominations who fought because they couldnt agree who reads Bible right. Christianity today is mostly abandoned.
And you compare that nonsense to Zeus, who is correlated with many greatest achievements in history?
Lets talk Roman Empire. Julius Ceasar is probably among most famous and most glorious persons in history. No Christian in history achieved his greatness.
Who did Julius Ceasar worship? Did he worship Jesus? No. He worshipped Venus.
When Roman soldiers were forced to accept Christ, they said they were afraid Mars will destroy Rome. And indeed, Rome was destroyed after accepting Christianity.
Now lets take a step further.
Ancient Egypt, responsible for greatest wonders in history, including pyramids and statues which go beyond possibility. It was also extremely wealthy.
Who did ancient Egypt worship?
Ra, Sun God!
I dont need to say that territory of ancient Egypt, after accepting Islam and Christianity, never made another wonder.
So when someone tells me that Christianity and Islam, who on their own in 2000 years of existence only invented terrorism and genocides, and it was only when countries moved away from Christianity and separated Church from state that they made any advancement in anything.
Zeus, Ra, Venus, Mars, are correlated with greatest wonders in history.
Allah and Jesus are only correlated with stupidity and severe delusions of mass population.
I would rather not say.
To person below me:
If there’s any be thing you wish you had the genetics to do, what would it be?
Trans people have wishes, like everyone else. Even tho their wishes dont affect others, other people bully them for their wishes.
I dont see why "I leave you alone and you leave me alone" is something people refuse to do when it comes to trans people.
If you cant support them, at least leave them alone. They have enough issues with 70% of people mocking them. Why do you have to be one of 70%?
Do you care about how I dress or how I call myself? Will the quality of your life be affected by clothes I wear? Now, why would you care what trans person wears?
I challenge any Trump supporter to watch it and then try to tell us that man is fit to be President
The leftists claimed Biden is fit to be president, when he had biggest inflation in recent history, couldnt even speak in any sense, touched women and girls inappropriately in public and said things like:
"He gave me permission to touch him" - Biden talking about little boy.
"She was 12, I was 30. The woman helped me get a lot done." - Biden in public speech.
"No serious guys until you are 30." - Biden saying to little girl in public.
"They rubbed my leg and watched the hair come back up again... So I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I love kids jumping on my lap." - Biden talking to kids in public
"President of Ukraine is Putin" - Biden
"Obama/Trump is president of USA" - Biden saying while being president of USA
"We need to stop Putin from brutally invading Russia." - Biden
"Biden did a fantastic job as president and I will keep doing same!" - Kamala
If you are still wondering why Trump won, then you are suffering from same brain disorder as Biden.
There are leftists out there who hate capitalism. That doesn't = leftists hate capitalism
It does, when there are virtually no leftists who support Capitalism. And truly, you can either support capitalism or oppose it. I support Capitalism, so I cant be leftist.
The belief that God is possible is a belief, not a lack of belief. So when I say I believe God is possible, should atheist reject such belief, he would be unjustified in rejecting it. There were atheists who claimed God is impossible, but that is incorrect, and also:
This is your brain on propaganda
Its not the propaganda to say leftists hate Capitalism. At this point, it would be propaganda to say they dont hate it.
No, he proves that Satan is God.
Ontological argument is based on premise that God is possible (exists somewhere).
Many misunderstand modal logic, but it is based on logical axiom that:
A. "God exists everywhere" - if accepted as claim, if accepted without proof, results in logical contradictions.
B. "God exists nowhere" - if accepted as claim, if accepted without proof, results in logical contradictions
C. "God exists somewhere" - no logical contradiction happens if accepted without proof
And then premises logically follow:
P1. God is defined as maximally great being
P2. Maximally great being, if exists somewhere, exists everywhere
P3. God exists somewhere
C. God exists everywhere
There is no way to disagree with modal logic, because it is one of basis of logic regarding existence.
The counter-ontological is basically:
P1. Maximally great being, if doesnt exist somewhere, doesnt exist anywhere
P2. God doesnt exist somewhere
C. God doesnt exist anywhere
So it would seem exactly same logic results in two opposite conclusions.
This is because "God doesnt exist somewhere" is in equal amount of proof as "God exists somewhere", but the claim "God doesnt exist somewhere" is exactly same as saying "God doesnt exist anywhere".
The flaw of ontological argument is this:
God can either exist everywhere or nowhere. To claim he exists at some place and doesnt in another contradicts with definition, which is why modal logic of possibility doesnt actually apply to maximally great being.
Instead, what applies is argument of modal necessity:
To claim that "there is no thing which exists everywhere" is a self contradicting claim, because it by its own logic cannot exist everywhere as truth.
To claim "there is thing which exists everywhere" is a consistent claim.
This argument is shorter than ontological, and still proves maximally great being by showing opposite is impossible and self-contradictive.
This means "God doesnt exist somewhere" is likewise self contradicting claim.
P1. It is logically justified to say "I believe God is possible".
P2. Lacking belief that God is possible isnt logically justified, but is ignorance.
P3. Choosing ignorance when presented with logically justified belief is unjustified
C. Atheist's lack of belief is unjustified
By modal logic, claims are divided on 4 categories:
God cannot be impossible by modal logic, because saying that "unproved" means "God exists" is impossible would mean "God doesnt exist" is impossible too, a contradiction.
So if saying "God exists somewhere" is not impossible, and "God doesnt exist anywhere" is not impossible (counter ontological), what remains is that God is possible.
However, a belief "God doesnt exist" cannot be logically justified, but is self-contradictive. To say that lack of proof means something doesnt exist would mean nothing can exist, because something must exist first in order to be proof for it. In other words, claim commits circular contingency where existence depends on proof and proof depends on existence. We generally dont say that atoms didnt exist before we had proof for them. To claim that would be absurd.
But for every Muslim the Jews kill it does keep atleast that one from coming to the west, does it not?
There are millions of muslims in USA. 99.99% of them dont commit terrorist attacks. And judging a group by their 0.01% of population only works if that 0.01% is capable of destroying the world, which it isnt. Anyone can launch a nuke, if we assume such possibility. A Christian fanatic, anarchist, leftist... there is no group in the world which doesnt have crazy people.
Problems of definitions and degrees pop their heads for me.
In Sparta, there was no dictatorship, but was simply a rule of group, not majority rule. Majority of people were slaves, no voting rights. Large minority were warrior class who had privileges. They had their representatives, and representatives were basically able to veto kings, which was actually a huge disadvantage for Sparta where at some points in history, kings were prevented from making rational decisions. So it was dictatorship of a group, basically. There was truly no majority vote in whole society, just in specific ruling group. The today's version of Sparta is North Korea, with basically copy pasted political system with difference being lack of diarchy. North Korea has dictator, but also has ruling party. And has privileged warrior class. The ordinary citizens who vote literally decide nothing, not even on elections. Elections are "formal". Its impossible for ruling party to lose on them, when citizens arent even aware of other political parties because other political parties are literally banned from suggesting their candidates. There are elections, but there is no candidate running against Kim Jong Un 🤷♀️