Sure, but your argument also uses word "loving", which is similar to benevolent, I think. I dont know what you mean by "loving".
Sure, but your argument also uses word "loving", which is similar to benevolent, I think. I dont know what you mean by "loving".
Do you really get a sense that the Democratic Party cares about progress over power at this point???
Government is about power. So it only does progress when necessary to keep power, and sometimes not even then.
Yes, I was dumb for most of my life, so I know its very difficult when you are dumb.
I like Bones argument more, tho actually, problem of evil has bunch of solutions, one of most popular being that God is not omnibenevolent, or that people before being born agree.
It doesn’t get better, it only gets worse
That is just US politics generally. After Trump, you won't get Jesus. Just another incompetent idiot, probably a democrat.
FLRW wrote:
The adult human brain contains an estimated 86 billion neurons (the cells that transmit electrical and chemical signals). Additionally, there are roughly 86 billion glial cells—the non-neuronal cells that support, protect, and nourish your neurons—bringing the total to approximately 170 to 172 billion brain cells.
Hmmmm, what could go wrong?
A lot. It's reason why people with 70 IQ are as unequal as it gets to others. Low IQ isn't a choice not even one bit, but it sure as hell makes life of a person much worse and even makes person's decision making much worse, so despite person being able to choose, person is not able to choose with any high level of thinking. It's like a cat trying to figure out how TV remote works.
There is no such thing as gender equality.
Saying that men and women are equal would mean men = women, which is blatantly false.
It is also not true that people generally are equal. Someone with better abilities is much more valued than mentally ill person who can't function. These aren't equal.
Equal rights also don't exist, because no one is treated equally in any area or any statistic of life.
Is there a single thing where all people are equal at? I don't think there is. Not even in living itself, as not all even get to live or live for same amount of time.
Those who dream of equality set before themselves a goal which is logically impossible to achieve, and thus, they can only end up disappointed.
It is only moving towards equal rights which makes a bit more sense, but equal rights are also logically unachievable because you can't achieve them retroactively and you can't achieve them in present universally. A person who gets killed doesn't have equal rights as person who doesn't get killed.
The idea of equal rights sounds nice in theory. In practice, it cannot happen as long as there is even one person who doesn't want it, and those who don't want it count in far greater number than one.
If there is a God, he is perfectly loving.
Unproved premise.
If a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur.
Unproved premise.
Reasonable nonbelief occurs
Unproved premise, existence of non-belief doesn't mean it's reasonable.
Sex with other people isnt a right
Its still a privilege which women are much more likely to enjoy.
Men have societal advantages over women and much more ability to change it. For starters, they could hold other men accountable for pedophilia, child abuse, trafficking, etc. Thats not happening enough, and many abusers are being protected by the men around them.
this isnt privilege for men. Its actually opposite of a privilege for boys who get abused, and opposite of privilege for all men who have their family members abused.
Right, because inequality and abuse is the hallmark of privelege
Men face a lot of abuse too, especially physical abuse which is most common towards boys.
As for inequality, men have it much more difficult to get sex, which is why much more men are involuntary virgins and lonely.
Damn, my rapping is bad, sowwy >.<
Whats it gonna be bitch
You just turned on the no limits switch
Crybaby
Cry Cry Cry
Watching you cry till your tears dry
You say you gonna get me
I say try
It aint gonna be happening
Now go back to what you were doing
crying and fapping
you suck at rapping
Unlike your dick sucking skills
Your words are forced crapping
Thats not the whole picture.
Its still a privilege.
women consistently have to face gender wage gaps, underrepresentation in leadership role (corporate and political), and unequal unpaid expectation of care of others.
these are small disadvantages.
Not to mention, nearly 1 out of every 2 women (44%) have experienced sexual assault.
they still live longer than men, and generally have easier lives.
Incels are *voluntarily* celibate because they value undesirable traits (like misogyny and entitlement to sex) over a relationship.
this is not a necessary truth. Women have higher standards than men. there are plenty of crazy women out there, and abusive women, who still get relationships. And funny enough, abusive men also get relationships if they are good looking.
It has nothing to do with man's mentality as much as it has to do with women's mentality. A standard of average woman literally excludes over 30% of men as potential partners, and for traits which are unchangeable or very difficult to achieve. Also, boys are about 4 times more likely to have autism or other conditions which make social interactions difficult, while women generally dont even need to try much in social interactions.
So yes, if women set standards which most men cant reach, its not really man's fault that woman controls access and sets standard which excludes him.
How does men being murdered more translate into female privelege?
Women have lower chance of being murdered. That's a privilege.
Between 70% and 90% of women struggle with body dissatisfaction.
A lot of men struggle with body dissatisfaction too, and penis size. But the difference is, women are generally more desirable than men. It's men who are most often incels.
Satan Lucy the case against you is growing mr 'Ex Pedo'. You will be found out.
Oh shut up and get a job
I haven't done a rap battle in a long time. Could do it tho.
Caused by man...where is the disagreement?
In self-imposed part.
Being undesirable as a mate is a personal problem.
It is a privilege not to be undesirable. And incels are caused by women's insane standards.
Boys are encouraged to be aggressive, tough, dominant, etc. As a result, boys are involved in more risk-prone behaviours and more accidents.
So women have privilege.
Yeah, I think debates shouldnt be finished until they get at least 3 votes. I dont think 1 vote should determine outcome in rated debates, because it greatly reduces quality of experience for debaters.
It's not self-imposed if the men doing the murdering aren't the same as the men being murdered.
Even if it was self imposed, it wouldnt negate privilege.
Maybe suicide is self-imposed, but its still a privilege not to be a suicidal person.
Maybe poor choices are self-imposed, but it is still a privilege not to be a person who makes poor choices.
But almost nothing I mentioned was entirely self-imposed by individual experiencing it.
If I shoot myself in the foot, my idiocy doesnt make you privileged.
If someone is dumb enough to shoot himself in the foot willingly, surely not being that someone is a privilege.
Everything you listed is generally caused by men, not women.
No, it is caused by some men to all other men. And the incel part is pretty much caused by women. As for accidents, parents protect girls more than boys.
thank you, well wisher. I wish you well too.
Hey, buddy - comics are not reality.
Being a female is a privilege by almost all statistics. Boys live shorter lives, have more suicides, are much more likely to die in accidents, are more likely to get murdered, are more likely to be incels, more likely to experience physical abuse, getting circumcised...ect.
And this is not something to be upset about. Women are supposed to live better lives. Its sexism.
If youre speaking as a gay man, I will defer to your firsthand experience. If not, my point stands.
I am perfectly straight white male. I used to be gay, but I cured myself because it wasnt logical for me to be gay.
If its easier work, more money or same money, and more free time, then its right call.
If its more money but more work and less free time, then its meh.
You describe a solution to a 'problem' which exists mostly in the minds of people who aren't gay.
I guess we have to agree to disagree here.
Make a list of necessary improvements. But if its banning trolling, I cant support that. I can support limiting free speech to some degree, and I can provide education on how to deal with trolling, but I cant approve of banning trolling because thats like 75% of forum activity as well as majority of activity on virtually any site where chats exist.
But if its site design, that is gonna get improved over time.
Female privilege is very real
I support sexism, so I support females having privilege.
those arent feelings, but a way for gay people to avoid acting on their urges.