SatanLucy

SergeantLynch wrote:

Perhaps that which dictates social order and more importantly progress rather than anarchy and chaos, is reliant up on a natural selection of Hitler's, Sub-Hitler's and various tiers of obeyant underlings.

I dont blame Hitler for being Hitler. tho I do find it amazing how general population keeps falling for same scam over and over for thousands of years. You would think that 12 years of education will make them at least a tiny bit smarter, but no. they are literally still on level of cavemen when it comes to power play.

And its not really any benefit for them. the government will literally fuck them in every way it can, because they dont get it. Its in government's full interest to have a fully obedient population to prevent rebellion, and all governments will do anything to make that happen, as their power depends on it.

In this sense, there is not much difference between USA and North Korea. North Korea brainwashes its population through education and propaganda, and US does exactly same just on much greater deeper level.

Its why average American cant figure out why he goes to elections every time to vote, and gets screwed every time, and instead of making a better choice next time, he just gets screwed again each next time.

Government doesnt follow people's interests. It uses people's interests to control people. thats what average American doesnt understand. When trump says he is against abortion, its not because he actually cares about what his voter base wants. Its because he wants their vote so he can do corruption in other areas.

It sort of works like "Here is some candy while I violate your butt".

thats what politics is. Politicians give some candy to population so that they can fuck them later.

Its candy politics.

I am sure you are not aware of this, but people can actually say things they dont agree with. Amazing, right? Well, you learned something new, thanks to free education I provide here.

This is a direct violation of the third law of logic. You might want to google it.

No, its not. For example, my one txt file on computer can contain both claims "God exists" and "God doesnt exist". Its not a logical contradiction. Is your brain less advanced than txt file on my laptop? If so, then its a problem with your brain. Your brain doesnt have capacity like my txt file does.

Not knowing whether you accept a proposition is by definition, not accepting a proposition.

this is likewise a false claim. Its like saying "I dont know if Double_R has herpes, so Double_R has herpes.".

Not knowing if something is true or not true, cannot at the same time be knowing that its not true.

"I dont know if this is not true, so its not true" - is a logical contradiction.

Now, it seems that even tho you believe that logic exists, you are still very bad at it. I dont believe that logic exists, but it seems that everyone who believes that logic exists at same time greatly suck at that same logic, which is very embarrassing to be honest.

You would think that after Hitler, people would learn to doubt the government more, but sadly, it didnt happen and now we have trump, Putin, Kim and Xi who are also Hitler.

8 people out of 9 in charge are completely qualified and normal.

that joke is funny because people actually believe its true.

Its like those people who believe that government is benevolent and well meaning, and that law is ultimate moral authority.

People believe a lot of silly things, and there is a significant portion of population who literally believe whatever government tells them.

Its like some terrible parody in a cartoon, except its reality.

That's about $3 more than you have donated

Nope

I can understand the frustration but overall it protect children from engaging with pedophiles.

It doesnt protect anyone from anything. It just makes roblox lose players.

Probably same idea was in Australia about social media ban for those under 16, and guess what? Most people under 16 in Australia still use social media.

And whats funny is that people only support bans which dont affect them. People over 16 in Australia generally support the ban. People under 16 oppose it.

So the very ones which are supposed to be most benefited by the ban are the ones opposing it the most.

I assume same is gonna happen to UK lifetime smoking ban.

People are generally hypocrites and would support banning anything for others but banning nothing for themselves.

Actually, that’s incorrect. You can only be for or against a proposition (you accept it or you do not accept it)

thank you for correcting yourself, but sadly, you are still incorrect, so the "self-correct" was actually just one mistake replaced by another. Its like saying "Oh I made a mistake, 2 plus 2 isnt 5, its actually 7". So yeah, self-correcting only works if its actually correcting and not just one dumb thing replaced by another.

So, the first problem in your claim is a false dichotomy. One can actually both accept and not accept a proposition, and not just at different times. Also at same time, it is possible to both accept and not accept a proposition. Or you can just say that you dont know if you should accept it or not accept it.

the second problem in your logic is a contradiction, because if we go by your false dichotomy, one can not accept a proposition that God doesnt exist. So to claim your false logic is unique to claim "God exists" is just silly logic.

the third problem is that what you are saying is irrelevant yapping. You not accepting the claim that "God doesnt exist" is entirely irrelevant to if God exists or doesnt. So its literally just yapping.

Simply not accepting a proposition is no different than asserting it’s false.

this is false claim too. Asserting something is false means saying its false. Not accepting a proposition doesnt require saying its false, or saying anything in fact.

Either way, you do not think or behave as if the proposition were accepted as true.

this is likewise logical fallacy of "similarity = same". Its like saying "humans and ducks both drink water, so humans are ducks".

Now, do you have more logical fallacies and yapping which you need to vent here? I am a professional psychologist. I am happy to tell people their mistakes.

When it comes to what we believe about a proposition, you can hold one of three options; for, against or neutral.

this is incorrect. You can also not think about a proposition at all. No need to hold anything. You can also be both for and against. Or you can just be neither, or you can be slightly more for than against, or you can just say that you dont know which option you should hold.

When it comes to your approach and your actions, there’s only two; for or against. Natural doesn’t exist

this seems like unproved claim. Also, you said "natural" instead of "neutral". So yeah, that was embarrassing.

Think of any scenario in real life where the word default comes in; like the settings on your phone. Notice how when you go to reset, default doesn’t mean “duh I don’t know”… instead it means we’re going to choose certain settings for you and you can adjust them if you want

Irrelevant yapping about phone settings. I am sure you are not aware that the word "default" doesnt have same meaning in phone settings as it does in question on if God exists.

In the course of everyday life we have to choose how to live. Whether to pray before we go to sleep, whether to go to church on Sundays, whether to burden ourselves with knowing what the Bible says. There’s no neutrality there.

Your actions are irrelevant to question of if God exists or not. So yeah, more irrelevant yapping.

You either do or you don’t

False dichotomy. Person can both do and not do something. I can both drink water and not drink water at different times.

But other than being a terribly false dichotomy, it is also a very irrelevant yapping. Yap Yap Yap. What you do or dont do is pretty much irrelevant on the question of if Gods exists or dont. Even if you acted your whole life as if God didnt exist, it wouldnt prove that God doesnt exist.

OMG, you have a big hooked nose, don't you?

Yes.

Jews are smart to control the world. Its a good idea on their part. Its the Americans who are stupid.

I heard an average American needs two jobs to make ends meet

Person who works two jobs isnt a person. Just a worker bee. the best way to destroy a nation is to make people work a lot. No time for thinking. What great future awaits a nation who doesnt think!

Free market is best with proper protections. Its the government programs which usually suck.

Chatgpt is just general AI. It is not specialized in anything other than giving answers to some wide range of questions.

It sucks in areas such as gaming, chess, and even some areas of logic. its image generation is generally decent but nowhere near top tier.

Atheists cannot see the unseen God, but God sees them. In same way I can see the blind man, but he cannot see me.

The position doesn’t require evidence because that’s the default position

No, the default position is that God is unknown. But at this point, I am not sure if you are even sentient.

I mean, rapists who are women almost always get better treatment, even in prison.

At some point you have to accept that world is based on sexism.

There is no "equality" of any kind between men and women.

Even their brains aren't same on brain scans.

Occam’s razor states that the simplest explanation is often the most likely

Occam's razor isn't about "simplest explanation", but about number of unproved assumptions. And sadly, any non-God explanation, in order to be true, depends on assumption that God doesn't exist. Assumptions actually go both ways, which is why Occam's razor is actually a pretty dumb assumption itself.

God cannot be placed in category of true or false without evidence, because it renders categories self contradictive.

"God exists" and "God doesn't exist" are both claims without evidence. To label them both as false due to no evidence would yield a logical contradiction.

God is in neither of two categories.

God is unknown, and what is unknown cannot at same time be known and explained.

China is one of rare countries to be worse than USA, except in homicide rates and homelessness rates, USA is still king there among all developed nations.

Nevermind, I checked and China actually has probably 50 million homeless, even tho their home ownership rate is much higher than in USA.

EU is a scam, excellent way to lose control over own country's currency by joining EU.

Bosnia will never join EU tho. We are just pretending to want to, to get aid from EU.

Allah clearly wanted to paint the pool green, and he did. Praise be to Allah, the best of painters.

Give your criminal neighbor who runs "Greenwater Services" a $20 million no-bid contract to paint the pool.

20 million to paint the pool? I would do it for 1 million.

Donations to Palestine from private donations in USA are 100 million in total in year 2025.

that is less than 0,5$ per adult, and about 3$ per each leftist.

this means that in entire year 2025, average leftist couldnt even give up on 4$ in entire year to donate to Palestine, even if we assume all private donations in 2025 were by leftists alone.

"We support Palestine, except not really".

Compared to that, Israel got about 12 billions in aid from US government, and about 3 billion dollars in aid from private donors in USA.

"Various academic and policy institutions, including the Costs of War Project at Brown University, tracked total U.S. security assistance and arms transfers to Israel as exceeding $21.7 billion between October 2023 and the close of the 2025 fiscal cycle."

Gloves with long fingers?

No.

Democracy doesn't work because youth is most important part of population of the country, and at same time they are minority so their interests get out voted by majority of elderly who won't even exist in future.

Yeah, I can see new threads thing at phone, but not on laptop for some reason.

Yeah, I was assigned to debate on civil liberties vs national security. Whiteflame was already assigned to death penalty debate. I am already almost done with 2 rounds. What remains is one and a half round for me to complete arguments and then weigh them. I should get my vote up by tomorrow, or if I try maybe by end of today. Its a fun debate, I was just reluctant to vote on it cuz its too much work to be honest, and I dont like voting on debates where the very definitions and win conditions are debated, because it is more difficult to establish a standard for judging arguments.

I am working on a vote for that debate, because I assume when I click the vote badge, I gonna get assigned to that debate because other seems taken.

Sure, I guess I can give ultrarated another try. I anyway have 1 vote badge just sitting there, and getting 2 more should be relatively easy especially if no debates to vote on.