SatanLucy
Happy Christmas.


Happy Christmas to you too.



Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels


I agree with that a lot, but I am too addicted to quarrels.

SatanLucy

Ok, I did a short IQ test from a different site, and I got 9 out of 10 questions correctly.




I would have answered all questions correctly, but one question I misread the answer due to rush. Still, even with that unfortunate misread, it places my IQ above 125 in this IQ test too.

SatanLucy

The moment you ditch some group is the moment where everyone in that group likes you less. There is a reason to tolerate certain comments just so that you can keep relations as they are and not become worse.

SatanLucy

Gay men don't usually reproduce. Abortion is evil, but not reproducing is evil too. Tho I can see how someone being born gay has that misfortune to be attracted to person he cannot reproduce with. But when women get abortion, it is their choice to destroy their offspring.

SatanLucy
S.L. , how are you?


I am good. Due to being theist, I am less likely to suffer from mental health issues than an atheist is.




This installment is an introduction to the atheist experience on social media. Tells us first from experience, what is the definition of atheism, the definitions that atheists typically give?


Definition of atheism is: lack of belief in God. This is the definition atheists usually give. However, atheists believe that God doesn't exist, and here we will explore atheism further when this point is concerned.



Tell us about some of the arguments you get from atheists on discord?


I don't get good arguments from atheists. There is simply no any evidence or logic which could tell us that God doesn't exist. So atheism as a starting point is already a disadvantage. Usual argument I hear from atheists, and this is probably their only somewhat slightly decent argument:


"There is no evidence for God"


And this argument atheists stick to like crazy.


However, argument is terrible, because the conclusion is not supported by the premise. Lack of evidence is not proof for lack of existence, nor proof that lack of belief is a good position. If you think about it, you cannot prove reality with any evidence, you cannot prove goals with any evidence, you cannot prove morality with any evidence. Should we just reject all these things, and live like atheists who have no morality or purpose?




What do you suggest in how to articulate an argument to counter an atheist that makes positive claims?


Atheists will often say that Gods of theism are imaginary. But when I ask for proof for that claim, I don't get it.




If you have a book written, such as a go-to guide, if someone that has maybe been unable to overcome the argument from an atheist, what would the table of contents look like in that book, the chapter and page number, what would it say?


My book, titled "How I make atheists cry like babies", in chapter "failure of atheist science", on the very first page describes that atheists use logic to prove logic, and for this reason, any reasoning atheist does is circular reasoning. This is usually enough to make most atheists cry.




What are the common arguments from atheists that the gods of theism don't exist?


The most common argument is problem of evil, which is a terrible argument.


It fails for 2 reasons:

1. It depends on assumption that evil exists

2. It depends on assumption that God cannot do evil.


These are unproved claims.




Talk about some of the common positive claims they make while claiming their position is totally neutral that doesn't make any claims?


The most common positive claim an atheist makes is "I am an atheist.". When I ask proof for that claim, they get upset because they can't prove it.




Are all atheists poor at their argumentation against the gods of theism?


Yes, very poor.




What do you suggest from your book so to speak or in your book, how theists should go about arguing for theism?


Theists should argue for theism on 3 core principles:

1. Theism as a goal is no more arbitrary than any other goal

2. Theism is on equal proof as any science, due to Munchausen trilemma.

3. God doesn't require evidence in order to exist, and belief in God doesn't require evidence either.



Is atheism another religion?


Yes, but it would be wrong to make atheism equal to religions such as Christianity. These religions teach compassion and mercy. Atheism doesn't teach anything.

SatanLucy

I thank you Mal, for inviting me and giving me opportunity to talk about this serious topic.


But first, I must introduce myself. I am SatanLucy, also known as Cute Channel of Cuteness on discord, and UltimateDarkMagician on tik Tok.


I am the expert in all fields of logic and science, and I have a certified IQ of over 140, as you can see here:





https://iqtest.net/share-result?score=MTQw


I have written many books, such as "Evolution: fairy tale story from childlish atheist imagination and not reality", "Science and all the logical problems scientific atheism faces before it even starts talking of God".


As I am done introducing myself, I will proceed to answer your questions with precision of pure logic and experience I have on the subject matter.

SatanLucy

"This study evaluated the rape fantasies of female undergraduates (N = 355) using a fantasy checklist that reflected the legal definition of rape and a sexual fantasy log that included systematic prompts and self-ratings. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, which is somewhat higher than previous estimates. For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14% of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. In contrast to previous research, which suggested that rape fantasies were either entirely aversive or entirely erotic, rape fantasies were found to exist on an erotic-aversive continuum, with 9% completely aversive, 45% completely erotic, and 46% both erotic and aversive."


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19085605/

SatanLucy

Yeah, IQ tests are scams, because many people who have 160 IQ and over are literal idiots. I mean, Bobby Fischer thought the Jews were chasing him. I am not that stupid. I know that Jews dont chase me, but magical people do.

SatanLucy

Also, these IQ tests discriminate against people with poor vision. Some questions literally require very good vision due to images being too similar to each other or drawn in blatantly complicated way where people with more blurry vision fail for sure.

SatanLucy
You have an online space created to share info among hobbyists to help navigate the world of crypto and scammers ruin it by lying about new coins and then dumping their stock once the price rises



You sound like a smart person. tho I think scammers are important people because the only way to remove incompetence from society is to create lies and punish people who believe them. Safe space where you cant fail is just breeding zone of incompetence.

SatanLucy
Competency isnt something that the more one has the better?


You would think, but no. When person becomes too competent, he also becomes surrounded by much less competent people. Sort of like being so tall that everyone around you looks like a dwarf.

SatanLucy

Most women have rape fantasies, so I can believe that desalination plants are more likely to be a deal breaker there.