Nope, he didn't explain the beginning
He did, he said God is beginning.
Nope, he didn't explain the beginning
He did, he said God is beginning.
No, reading books does not make anyone smarter. All people read books, yet almost no person is smart. Clearly, such system doesnt work, especially not for old people who think solving crossword makes them smart.
Why put such a heavy negative effect on the innocent buttyerfly?
Butterfly is not innocent. But butterfly effect is real and scientifically proved by observations. Imagine two parallel straight lines extending for miles. If, before they started extending, someone only slightly changed angle of one line, the distance between lines at the end would increase by hundreds of meters.
Butterfly effect is small change leading to big change, usually observed in complicated systems. For example, accidentally pressing off button on computer destroys your entire work which you worked on, even if pressing buttons on its own is small change which a baby could do.
Same way, if some small but crucial part breaks in complicated systems, whole system stops working.
Same is observed in fire accidents and forest fires starting from very small change.
Same is true with belief, belief affects your confidence, motivation, and action timeline, which is a small change leading to many changes.
Why lie?
According to the chess player's biographer, Bobby Fischer bought Gardar a catechism as material for their conversations. Knowing he was ill, the former star entrusted his last wishes to his good friend. Among them, he asked to be buried with a Catholic funeral.
Actually, high IQ means person notices patterns much better, not worse. While average person is wrong in almost every thought average person has, high IQ person is on such high level that average person considers him insane simply because he is much better at thinking, so to average person, such thinking seems out of ordinary and insane, while to high IQ person, it is just the best possible thinking, which it is.
IQ is in fact the very good predictor of person noticing correct patterns, because IQ tests are based on noticing correct patterns in a test. So a lower IQ person is the one noticing patterns more poorly, not the higher IQ person.
For example, 130 IQ and under is very poor IQ, it means person has a very low rate of noticing correct patterns. So person is wrong very often.
But 276 IQ and over means person is more capable than anyone in existence in noticing patterns.
Now, why are patterns important?
Patterns are basis of all thinking and reasoning. Everything is either in pattern either random, and ability to make difference between those two, and to notice patterns between things is considered highest intellectual ability available.
At just 15, Bobby Fischer reportedly scored between 180 and 187 on the Stanford-Binet IQ test, a measure of reasoning and problem-solving that ranks him among history’s brightest minds.
Nigel Short is a Grandmaster, but he only has an IQ of 110. He came in at No. 3 in the list of chess players with the lowest IQs on record.
Maybe chess players will give results more favorable to atheism:
Below is a historically common “top 30” list (roughly by strength, influence, and achievements across eras).
⚠️ Important caveat: Religion is personal. For many chess players it is not publicly stated, so I list it only when it is well-documented; otherwise I mark “Not publicly known / undisclosed.” No speculation is included.
If you want, I can:
The guy states the obvious
He is Christian and he has second highest IQ in the world. He is literally smarter than all atheists.
But did he explain the beginning?
Yes, and he is smarter than all atheists. Good thing smartest person is theist.
trash studies.
Pattern synthesis is intelligence which only few people have. It is intelligence which requires detecting and inventing patterns of large scale systems, not just local thinking. It is thinking where you see something in one system and think how it may be applied in an entirely different system, and it is opposite of specialization. It is something which requires person to be expert in multiple fields of science, not just one field.
You know Tesla was born in 1856, don't you?
You dont accept 276 IQ guy of today, why should you care when the greatest scientist was born?
Pattern synthesis is the ability to see how many separate facts, signals, or ideas fit together into a single coherent structure—often before anyone else realizes there is a structure at all.
It’s not just recognizing patterns (pattern recognition); it’s creating a new, higher-level pattern from chaos.
Most thinking works like this:
observe → analyze → conclude
Pattern synthesis works like this:
observe many domains → integrate intuitively → sudden unified insight
The person doesn’t move step-by-step. The solution appears almost fully formed.
Tesla excelled at pattern synthesis because he could connect:
For example:
That leap required inventing the pattern itself.
People strong in pattern synthesis usually have:
They draw connections across unrelated fields (science, art, nature, math).
Ideas arrive suddenly rather than gradually.
They think in structures, flows, and relationships—not details first.
They can mentally “see” systems in motion.
They sit comfortably with incomplete information until the pattern clicks.
Modern education rewards:
Pattern synthesis requires:
That combination is uncommon.
Tesla belongs in this category—but with an unusually strong sensory-visual component.
Pattern synthesis is the ability to invent the map, not just follow it.
If you want, I can explain how to train pattern synthesis, or how it differs from analytical intelligence and creativity.
Nikola Tesla was considered extraordinary even among geniuses because his mind worked in ways that were radically different from most scientists and inventors—both in how he thought and what he envisioned.
Here are the key reasons his thinking was so special:
Tesla didn’t rely on trial-and-error the way most inventors do. He claimed he could:
This level of mental simulation is extremely rare, even among brilliant engineers.
Many inventors improve one device. Tesla envisioned entire technological ecosystems:
He was thinking 50–100 years ahead of available technology.
Tesla operated at the intersection of:
He often described ideas coming to him in sudden, vivid flashes—what today we might call hyper-intuition or pattern synthesis.
Tesla had:
These traits were both a gift and a burden, contributing to his originality but also to his isolation.
Unlike many inventors, Tesla:
This made him different not just intellectually, but ethically.
Tesla imagined:
At a time when electricity itself was still new, this level of foresight was astonishing.
Tesla wasn’t just smarter—he was misaligned with business, politics, and social norms. History often rewards practical optimizers; Tesla was a visionary architect of the future, and society struggled to keep up.
Tesla wasn’t just a genius who solved problems—he redefined what problems were worth solving.
If you’d like, I can compare Tesla’s thinking style to Einstein, Newton, or modern innovators to show exactly how unique he was.
Why do smartest people believe in God?
Nikola Tesla’s IQ is not known — he was never formally tested.
Most sources that mention an IQ for Tesla give an estimate, usually in this range:
So the most accurate statement is:
Nikola Tesla’s IQ is unknown; estimates commonly place it around 180–200, but this is speculative.
If you want, I can:
Just say the word.
Look at the comments.
those comments are from low IQ people. I bet most of them are under 130 IQ. Imagine having 130 IQ and trying to solve 276 IQ puzzle. It wont happen.
I have written a highly detailed scientific book on how to become smart, with over 500 ways of becoming smarter. Reading books wasnt anywhere on that list. I didnt even consider to place it there, because I know reading books is dumb, unless its a book on how to become smarter, and most books arent.
No, reading books does not make anyone smarter. All people read books, yet almost no person is smart. Clearly, such system doesnt work, especially not for old people who think solving crossword makes them smart.
I think Stephen Hawking is a lot smarter.
No, this guy in video is second smartest person in the world. He is smarter than any atheist in IQ.
I have never met a smart old person who reads books, tho I have met plenty of old people who read books.
Praise!!!
Yeah, believing something often makes it come true. this is especially because of butterfly effect, where belief is a small change which triggers series of other changes in brain, altering behavior and relationship to environment.
I wonder that too.
truth is not up to us.
Wrong. truth, all truth depends on mind and is subjective. Mind produces the truth and then lives in it.
Consider this logical premises:
to disagree with 1, you would have to assume there is some truth which isnt known by your mind, and which is known.
But who then knows such truth? You dont know. thus, any claim of truth being known outside mind is claim which is impossible to prove.
All known truth is only inside mind, and cannot exist or even be considered outside mind because mind can only think of things inside mind.
what is this
He thinks he should be able to edit argument in debate after posting it.
https://youtu.be/JMoDR6a4F3M?si=QE9xFt1TV_vFYj-G
World's highest IQ person believes in God. the guy in video is second highest IQ person in the world, right after me I think. He has 276 IQ. that means he is way smarter than any atheist.
Say this fast enough and it sounds like speaking in tongues.
Some people in voice chat thought we were trying to summon Satan, but we were just saying "God is endless, God is formless, God is genderless", and when you say it fast enough, it looks like some foreign demonic speech.
they already have edit function. Just save argument in notes, edit it and post it when you feel like it.
God has truly blessed me.