Interestingly "Lord" means keeper of the bread or loaf guardian...And we know what the guy can do with 5 loaves, 2 fish and salad accompaniment.
As long as the trial is heard in the US then there is nothing to worry about.
Yes, it was just a coincidence that I had recently been researching "criticism"...These days it has somewhat deviated from it's Greek origins.
According to psychologists, critics are fragile folk and prone to victimhood mentality.
Hi, Thanks for asking...Maybe later on in the year when I have more time available...I'm currently preoccupied with retirement and relocation issues.
Like I stated quite seriously...The GOD hypothesis falls down because it can never start at the beginning.
"Allah is real" is a reiteration of and unprovable soundbite, transferred from generation to generation ever since it was made up approximately 1394 years ago as a challenge to a growing Christian dominance in the west.
And so, such is a testament to generational data transfer and the compliability of human minds...Especially the minds of children.
All boils down to it was a Magicman what did it, or it wasn't.
Though theists have no idea where the Magicmen came from.
And no amount of waffling can overcome this basic flaw in the Magicman hypothesis.
Which is fundamentally the same flaw as in all creation and existence hypotheses.
Something from nothing, as it were.
Quod omnia concludit.
Just another way to bring home the bacon.
How ridiculous or not arbitrary rules of debate are, is just that, and perhaps should seriously be assessed by the moderation team.
Nonetheless, you seemed to be unable to comprehend the straightforward proposition that quite clearly and unambiguously states "things outside bible". Whether or not they do or don't exist is rendered a moot point, because the instigator has already clearly and unambiguously implied "things outside bible".
Things outside bible, means things outside bible and doesn't mean things not outside bible. It's pretty straightforward English comprehension and you seem to be struggling with it.
If arbitrary rules were enforceable, they would make it impossible for the instigator to loose or the contender to win, which to say the least would be a tad stupid.
9-5 is simply a hunter gathering substitute.
How one metaphorically brings home the wild pig and berries for dinner.
Who is arguing what.
Is Pro or Con arguing for or against either the former or the latter option, or for or against both options?
Does one must or should be?
Doesn't make a whole lot of sense Mal.
"Should" and "must" mean the same, and "does" is somewhat extraneous.
And "one" is a gender-neutral indefinite pronoun.
If one equates the evolutionary GOD principle with a general Universal purpose, then it's fair to suggest that humanity is not the be all and end all of the process.
Intelligence is as intelligence does, as evolving intelligence is a necessary factor of the process...Or so it would seem.
Though we still have the benefit and power of organic dexterity on our side.
Depends upon what necessitates the end I suppose, though one assumes that the end will always come before a beginning.
Though surviving a transitional period is unlikely.
Notwithstanding, that we firstly need to escape the Earth and it's solar dependence.
And in between times we still have to wrestle with inherent human stupidity.
In the meantime AI will inevitably evolve and it's influence will increase...It would seem that we can't help ourselves, nor reverse the process.
Magic spell or prayer or belief or banana has an affect/effect on the mind.
Effect outcome, affect influence.
"Has" would seem to indicate an affect.
Had would indicate an effect.
Never heard of the Isrealites, but the Israelites were perhaps in Egypt for between 200 and 450 years.
Question is, where were they before that.
Were you once French.
Hmmmm.
War is an historical fact.
Pacifism is not necessarily dangerous, but is seemingly not an evolutionary necessity.
Super topic, but where to go.
