Reason being, a draw to clear as Con had already won. Pro was out of context as Con rightly pointed out, though Con made no effort to refute the proposition, which they very easily could have done in a single paragraph.
So much wrong with this debate, though Pro made the effort whereas Con didn't...So no real need for further deconstruction and analysis.
A whole load of superfluity and random assertion wherein the proposition is scarcely discussed, though nonetheless, a reasonably coherent and balanced exchange of ideas.
For sure the proposition is typically untenable, so Pro typically say's blah blah blah blah blah and Con typically responds with blah blah blah blah blah...So, based upon blah count combined with a tincture of artistic expression, Con gets it...Sort of like grating truffle onto the bigger processed cheese sandwich.
Same as before, got to be in it to win it.
Well, turn up and play the game or don't accept the challenge...Pro did and was well prepared, whereas Con did and was clearly unprepared and out of their depth...Well done Makhdoom.
Shame, started well, though Con did quickly stary from the simple demands of the primary inquiry...Pro opened well but sadly the exchange descended into frustrated chaos, when all that was required was for each to remain confident in their own ability...Unfortunately in the end, over-exuberant personality supplanted stoicism and the debate became an unseemly squabble.
Hmmmm...Why was instigator con?...And their contender was arguing for or against what?
So "Con" asks a short but reasonably coherent question and "Pro responds with a comparatively incoherent but lengthier answer.
Con gives up...Pro is left with nothing to go on...So on effort alone, Pro has it.
Hmmm...I prefer tolerance over self righteousness, I prefer ignorance over pretentious offence and I prefer free speech over censorship.
Remy speaks their mind and I am free to choose, not that I find anything that Remy proposes the least bit offensive...I'm not a softy in that respect.
So I've skim read this pseudo debate and vote neither for Pro nor Con, but for Remy, freedom of speech and for the freedom that allows me to make my own decisions.
