I see you are wanting me to be more specific. Sometimes I speak in nuance when I should be clearer.
Feminism tells me to be nice and put the woman on a pedestal (who then resents me for not being more "manly" per se.)
That's not what feminism tells you. That's feminism as seen through a patriarchal lense. Feminism tells you to treat women as equals.
What you said is feminism, I agree. The current feminist views have enabled women to feel a sense of superiority and entitlement over men. Unless this is propaganda, but I do see examples everywhere.
How can I find a virgin (which btw is practically and biologically the best kind of wife with children in mind)?
Unimportant. Virginity is not a prerequisite of pregnancy. If it were, multiple children with the same partner would be impossible! 😉
I know that virginity is not a prereq. What I'm saying is practicality in the instance that perhaps the woman waited and thus respects the concept of marriage more thus having a more secure, unified relationship with the husband.
When I said biologically with children in mind, there is a theory--that I believe in and has been tested--that the sperm from males in previous sexual encounters still affects the development of the child that a woman has with the father. I want my children to have only my genes and my wife's genes to protect the bloodline. I want to develop habits that affect the genetics of my children thus affecting the habits and genetics of their children and so forth. Ideally, my descendants will have better and better genetics as time goes on, and this is best executed by mothering a virgin.
How do I find a woman who does not think marriage is slavery?
Don't be a domineering partner.
Tying into what feminism has enabled women to do and think, I have noticed how there are people who think that if a man says that a woman should change something about herself or corrects her, this is automatically seen as overbearing control and abuse of power. It's a silly double standard because the women will then demand change of the man.
Historically, females are followers so this is not a sustainable idea.
What do you mean by "domineering"? Men are by nature the dominant counterpart, so if you are telling me I should act like the weaker counterpart that is stupid.
Is their reluctance because they have a hard time trusting me as a man because they know the ideas I am exposed to?
You are kinda giving off a vibe that you might be in demand to a smaller select group.
Let's not discriminate here. I love Catholics and those door-to-door salesmen Christians.
If you destroy the men you destroy the society. That's what the bad societies truly want.
Societies that want to destroy society are indeed bad...and non-existent.
When I said destroy, I meant ruin and degrade the statutes and ideals of the community. If men are weakened and misguided and un-confident, which is what certain forces are trying to manifest, then the whole society suffers greatly.
The feminist movement has brought about terrible outcomes, and we can talk about that if you're interested
