Historically men may have become more visual oriented, if they were out in a long distance viewing landscape, in search of meat/protein.
Of course this would not apply as much to humans living in forested or jungle landscape.
Men may become more visual in making distinctions between rock, trees, shadow etc and a sabbath tooth tiger or mammoth, or giant sloth etc. Im sure motion made this easier to make the distinction also. Does motion apply to man becoming more visually stimulated by curves of woman?
Women were more likely to stay closer to home finding those local things of value to their community living. Women more likely to hang out making fabrics, clothing etc type neccessities. Long distance visual acuity may have been less of use to them. I dunno.
...' Women often have better peripheral vision than men. This is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation that allowed women to be more aware of their surroundings while performing tasks such as gathering food or watching over children. Women’s brains are wired to process visual information from a wider field of view, giving them a broader awareness of their environment.
... Men, in contrast, tend to have better distance vision and depth perception. This may be linked to historical roles that required precise vision for activities like hunting, where focusing on distant objects was crucial. As a result, men are generally better at tasks that involve tracking moving objects or gauging distances. '..
https://www.shadygroveophthalmology.com/womens-and-mens-vision-understanding-the-differences/