melcharaz

Underlined words represents kingdom of darkness under satan (this includes all other gods,goddesses,spirts NOT of Jesus/Yahweh[Yahuah] )

Bold Words

represent God, Yahweh[Yahuah] Jesus Christ and all angels/spirits completely subserviant to him.

In part 1 i mentioned How Jesus knocks on our hearts and minds and what he offers.

But what do the other gods/spirits offer?

This wont be a complete break down of every religion or god, here i will just expose the motivation and the royal (dominant, most important laws) of the kingdoms of light vs darkness.

Jesus tells us that on 2 commandments to love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, soul, mind and strength. And to love our neighbor as ourselves.

The royal law of Jesus is about making him first, then to love others as our selves.

What is the royal law of darkness?

First we must understand the main goal of the kingdom of darkness is to keep you from God, to keep you from obeying his royal laws.

1. The royal laws of darkness must then be. "Do as thou wilt" which i believe is the best representation, which was coined by alister crowley.

Because then, you do not serve Jesus, you serve your own ambitions, desires, thoughts and morality as you see fit.

What then does the kingdom of darkness offer that Jesus cannot?

1. This is the most pivotal thing, the kingdom of darkness offers everything not like Jesus.

1. It can give pleasures that are temporary
2. it can give love for things temporary.

Jesus is eternal and timeless.

1. It can give despair and lies

Jesus is The truth and Our hope of salvation from sin.

1. It can give you your heart's desire as you serve sin but it cannot eternally satisfy.
2. It can give you temporary promotion and fame for the earth

God promised eternal promotion and honor in the world to come.

1. It can give you riches that another will get, or that fade away

Jesus gives riches that no man can steal, that moth and rust cannot corrupt.

1. It can give temporary peace, that is dependent on feelings

Jesus gives eternal peace dependent on his unchanging word.

1. It can give cleverness and wisdom to operate in this world.

Jesus gives heavenly wisdom and cunning borne of patience.

1. It can give community that is dependent on your works.

Jesus gives everlasting fellowship dependent on his works, and you accepting you cant meet his standards.

1. It can give healing from physical and mental problems, which demand services and dedications, or will take something else from you, as its law is destruction and thievery.

Jesus can heal you and not demand a thing from you, but it may return if you refuse him, as his law is restoration and salvation.

There are more laws on each side, but suffice to say.

1. The kingdom of darkness will demand from you for you to get a reward for this world.

The Kingdom of Jesus will ask you to surrender everything that you may gain the eternal.

Many people have tried to explain, wether by zeal, emotion or multitudes of verses, Why is christianity the best way, or how can a person be saved by a book over 1800 years old.

So lets lay a foundation and precepts that perhaps can help someone understand the logic and the precepts of the bible.

First of all, there must be faith that there is a God, and he rewards those that seek him.

If you dont believe he will reward those that seek him, why believe in him? Surely any other god can be sought and give nothing of value.

What rewards does he give that we should seek after the God of abraham, issac and jacob?

The Lord, according to his word, offers not only eternal life to all those who serve him and make him their God, he also brings gifts and relationship to those who desire him.

Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

What kind of a reward is it to have a spirit or to have Jesus to abide in you?

Consider being in your house or residence, when someone comes to the door you know they want something from you. depending on who it is, you may or may not answer the door, or you may tell them to leave.

If its a person that cares about you and you enjoy your time with them, it is more likely you will let them in.

The intention of whoever knocks on the door is known in 3 ways.

1: who it is.

2: what they say.

3: what they bring/dont bring.

So when Jesus wishes to abide with you, you have to see who he is and what he brings, then you have to listen to his words to understand why he comes.

So why does jesus come?

John 10:10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

Immediately the character or words of Jesus is opposite of a thief, he comes to bring life to you, and if you already have life, then he promises to give more abundant life.

The heck is life? Is it breathing? If so, is jesus saying he will offer more breath?

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

So he supposes himself to be the life. If he is indeed life, then why does he have to ask to come into your life?

2 Corinthians 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

Psalms 8:4-6 4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?

5 For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.

6 Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:

Psalms 51:12 Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation; and uphold me with thy free spirit.

God is a free spirit, and he gave man dominion over all the works of God. Including his own body

So he cannot enter in unless you allow him, that is why he knocks at the door of your mind, your heart, your awareness.

Debate idea: should we redo age of

Consent

Driving

Drinking

Citizenship

Joining military

Voting

the voting was established in 1971. Age 18

Selective services was ages 21-36 in 1940.

Military age was lowered during ww2 draft was 18.

17 is now enlistment age.

Consent was 1920's

and is still between 16-18 depending on states.

Driving in 1921 and age is 16.

Drinking was made 21 in 1988

As time goes on, our society becomes more lax in responsibilities and thus the age slowly rises. except in combat.

Should we increase the ages or leave them as they are?

Discuss/debate

History has shown in ddo and dart that people leave when they feel harassed.

This isnt a website to test the emotional resolve or to train them to deal with arguement outside the debate, this isnt a purist website to let in only the most qualified or the most base of people,

This is a website for debating ideas, and throughout history of DDO and DART i see most of the same people harassing others and using mocking language to create their own echo chamber and to dismiss ideas.

This is not a matter of how you or i feel, its a matter of preserving a website from failing. I am giving suggestions that i believe will help people to be intrested in this website and to hang around longer.

Purist mentality doesnt pay the bills, we must learn to be kind and respect each other, or my perdiction SHALL come to pass. The discord is sufficient if you desire an echo chamber, discord can host people for free, websites however, cannot.

It is in everyone's best intrest to be civil and respect the wishes of others. If this cannot be done, then this place shall be defunct.

This doesnt mean agree in debates, it doesnt mean always say flowery words. But when someone says stop, it means stop.

It is my hope that with a new owner, we can help create a climate of decency in this website, we can implement new rules without personal bias or for the sake of someone's approval or some person lining the pockets if rules are changed to fit their needs.

A whale is never satisfied, neither is an egotistical person, they will always want more dominion, authority and recognition. Do not be foolish and follow the money.

Create a good enviroment, then more people will come, honest debaters who care about their ideas, rather than getting a win.

For over the past decade the muslims in nigeria have been killing christians, burning down their churches, starving them.

But why? What does islam have to fear from christians? Did they mount an assault against them? Did they try to take over their government? Did christians persecute the muslims in northern nigeria?

No. Far worse, the christians sent evangelists to them to try to turn them to christ. And they FEARED the christian movement of converting the muslims.

In DART restraining orders were a problem for most people, the reason they were a problem was because mods got to decide if interactions between 2 people were worth a restraining order, however this is a flawed concept for 3 reasons

1: This is an online website, not a actual real life situation where there is provable and real world evidence of need to restrain a person from physical and emotional contact from another person.

2: Conflicts are only verbal, not physical. There can be escalation of verbal assault, abuse and harrassment to the point of potential doxxing or real world consequences. But in general a restraining order is not made in concept to restrain words, but physical contact.

3: bias dependent on moderators. And no, its not suppose to be, humans are naturally biased, why would a person have to contact a moderator to let them know they dont want someone talking to them? You introduce a human element that affects bias and communications that dont need to be had, and will shape their opinions of others, because they do not have the same training and neutrality as a real life judge has.

That being said, blocking someone should be more inclusive to fulfilling these needs, by simply writing the code to make it where you dont see the posts of the other person. This is a website under free speech (supposedly) so it doesnt dictate that a person MUST speak to people they disagree with, much less to have that disagreement to be interpreted by a 3rd party.

My suggestion is just to make blocking all inclusive, where you cant debate with them, cant private message them, and cant see their comments on forums. This will remove the need for bias and judgement on both sides, and you wont have as many complaints regarding spamming, trolling and other issues, as the people can block them.

And if they feel like its a personal attack, they can choose to be more civil and kind, or choose to leave.

Do feminists push pornography or publically support it? There is evidence of porn activism, some by former porn stars, others by people who identify as left leaning or lgbtqi.

But do feminists ACTUALLY support it?

Discuss/debate

I recommend a new stand and revision of voting policy for debatecraft, we arent DART, this is a new website, new leadership, new inspiration for debates due to recent death of charlie kirk. Doesnt matter if 90% are ddo or DART members.

This also should be discussed in discord.

I will list my PERSONAL recommendations to voting policy.

1: as of right now standard of sufficiency is not usable due to lack of ability to vote considering conduct, and categorical voting to weigh an arguement is more simplified by 3 choice mark. ASSUMING there will be conduct and other weights in the future: conduct should consider derogatory language more considerably than DART did, in both forums and debates. Too much favortism and time occupation hindered fair reviews. Utilization must be clearly referenced to bop in description of debate to weigh the necessary requirements to meet bop.

Sources are similar, but due to rise in ai and anti ai policy by this website, we have harder time verifying links are non ai associated, how do we know you didnt go to a website gemni referred? Or grok? Or chatgpt or others? We cannot. We have to compare language of ARGUMENTATION to what ai would say. I recommend decreasing future weight of links.

2: judicial decison. Same as conduct weigh, not applicable as of right now. But ASSUMING it will be introduced later: allow at minimum 1 week of membership and testing for judicial voting before affirming. I know a guy who simply had a guy to make an account on DART and within a few days would rule in favor of the person who asked them. Judical votes should be subject to vote removal and we should disallow lower standards for judical votes.

3:"outside" content must be clearly defined in weighing votes. If it is contained in link or argumentation of debate, it should NOT be considered outside content.

4: ASSUMING larger audience and volume of debates, there has to be a consideration to multiple mods to consider debates and vote content. There is nothing wrong with there being disagreement, infact it opens people up to alternative points of views. Seniority should be determined by merit, not by faithfulness to a former website.

That being aside, i still urge more comprehensive tests and revising of tests for topic posting and voting.

The state of tests offer a very easy 5 question with 4 answer method. This however can be simply retook over and over and cause the person who passed to forget what they learned.

I suggest adding a total of 15-25 questions with multiple points, and introduce broader applications to the standards and rules. Have the missed answers explain why the answers are wrong and define them for less experienced people.

Screenshots can be done regardless, but repetition helps people to absorb information. Maybe have it to be redone monthly.

Which Ai do you

1:Trust

2:Prefer

3:Expect development

4:Would financially invest in

I prefer using chat gtp for story creation (despite memory buffering) but i use grok for more indepth theory crafting or research in philosophical concepts and coding.