---Qudit.Machine15's former vote---
Voted for: con
The pro, at times, can be incoherent and needs to work on subject verb agreement. The con exhibited good use of logic and application. I found, at times, that it was difficult to ascertain the pro's position or reasoning.
+1
+1. I think this was a much needed debate.
The moderator team considers the community vote on this debate as a binding resolution. This, of course, will not give him carte blanche to act however he wants in the future. It will just aquit him of the current charges and the controversies surronding his posting. It also gives moderators a guidance on how to view similar content going forward
Not ideal but it's the same reason moderators and admins can also vote.
please vote
Thanks for voting!
Thanks for voting
Thank you for voting
Thank you for voting
Thank you for voting
Please do vote on this debate. Your voice matters even though I know how you’re gonna vote
Thank you for your votes and in depth RFD
Thank you for your in depth RFD
That's a wrap on my end. Hopefully I did not disappoint y'all
>Reported Vote: XSET..SHANE // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/vote-rubric
>Voted for: tie
>Reason for Decision: vote-rigging
>Reason for Mod Action:
Insufficient RFD + Multi accounting
---XSET..SHANE's former vote---
Voted for: tie
what is this debate???
>Reported Vote: XSET.SHANE // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/vote-rubric
>Voted for: pro
>Reason for Decision: other
>Reason for Mod Action:
Insufficient RFD + Multi accounting
---XSET.SHANE's former vote---
Voted for: pro
N/a
>Reported Vote: XSET..SHANE // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/vote-rubric
>Voted for: con
>Reason for Decision: vote-rigging
>Reason for Mod Action:
Insufficient RFD + Multi accounting
---XSET..SHANE's former vote---
Voted for: con
r
>Reported Vote: XSET.SHANE // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/vote-rubric
>Voted for: pro
>Reason for Decision: other
>Reason for Mod Action:
Insufficient RFD + Multi accounting
---XSET.SHANE's former vote---
Voted for: pro
I agree that debatecraft should add that
>Reported Vote: XSET..SHANE // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/vote-rubric
>Voted for: pro
>Reason for Decision: other
>Reason for Mod Action:
Insufficient RFD + Multi accounting
---XSET..SHANE's former vote---
Voted for: pro
I totally agree with the pro in this situation
I’ll take care of this. Thanks for reporting
Breaks are always important. I'd be down to debating some time
Thank you. Please vote once this debate is finished. We want as many votes as possible.
Sounds good. This looks like an interesting debate
I'm totally down. How about Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? I'll take a rationalism approach and you'll take empiricism
