This challenge is open to anyone at this point.
The coward End time teacher7486 and presumably hypocrite is a no show. Has time to make a discord server and engages over there but can't defend his position here.
The wicked flee where no wise man pursue.
People don't have much going on in a day if anything making the time for arguments so short.
Many of these people aren't really serious or are bored by arriving at these times for arguments.
People should be voting on the scriptures teaching one God and that one God never stops being the Father. Not on how much combativeness there is.
Anybody, that has any disagreement or questions for me, directly send me a message or we can open up a debate . That's it .
I'll do the comparisons all day like clockwork.
It's the same way with the LGBT. If you don't support incest, but the LGBT, it's antitheitcal.
Even with people who are physically attracted to very very very young individuals as well as animals non persons.
Wasn't any debate. Person forfeited and ran. If you gonna defend what you believe, you can't be running for what needs protection. (Apollo Creed voice) What's da matta wit chu?
Voter knows nothing about scripture.
Case closed on a dead site like I said.
Debate.org was more jumping than this.
The fight for atheism is dead here.
To the audience, here are my remaining responses to the opposite side .
I try to be fair and respond to any new points. Due to the character limit, I couldn't respond to all the numerous points from the opposing side.
" Also, why can't infertile people practice homosexuality since they already can't have kids?"
If they're homosexual, they sure can. Not really up for the topic.
You derail very easily.
"Isn't picking one's nose unhealthy? Sometimes having an urge to do something doesn't mean that thing is good. For example, picking at scabs or bug bites harm more than help. The urge can actually be toxic. Sex drive can also be toxic."
You don't know the answer. Just say so. Instead of this filibustering.
"I thought you said marriage is nature but divorce is legal. If marriage is legal, why can't it be legally dissolved?"
Depends on who you ask. You ask religious folks, marriage is until you die. According to the body, marriage is a given right .
"It's not just a random definition. It's from a legal site. You just made up your definition on the spot."
Ok your basis is from whatever somebody put on a legal site. There you go.
The definition I get is from our bodies. We can observe our bodies and see what it allows us to do with capabilities to survive ourselves.
So you can lie to yourself that the body is making it up.
Check this out. Everything I'm basing is from our bodies.
So your onus is to disprove it is not what our bodies are allowing us to do according to them or it is.
Thus far , you've continued to go in circles on red herrings , irrelevant and moot points.
"I thought you said we weren't going to be getting into metaphysics. Which is it?"
You misunderstood. I was saying you're getting into metaphysical territory.
"That's different. You can eat whenever you want, but specific food requires money and law."
Another example you try to waffle but end up agreeing with the main point.
Both ways pertaining to survival has been legislated.
"Nowadays, you can legally have sex whenever you want, as long as both parties can and do consent, but marriage can have plenty of legal issues."
It worked out that this are in the comments.
These points aren't really stacking your case in any kind of way.
Moving on.
"My point is that humans just have sex. There's no way to put an end to sex. Also, what right does a species have to keep living? We humans have made other animals go extinct for our own survival."
What right? The right or allowance of living. Apparently organisms entitled themselves to live as they do what?
Live. They permit themselves to live.
The body itself is its own government with laws, do's and don'ts buddy.
"So? There are many people who also have the desire to form polyamorous groups, have sex casually, cheat on their partners, and enter same-sex relationships. You can't appeal to desire since people also desire the opposite of your definition of marriage."
Another question you ducked . I asked you to explain the "what" just like you asked me "what " right and I told you what the right was, you again deflect as you can't defend yourself.
You just ramble with red herrings.
So awesome for the comments. This wasn't even needed in the actual debate rounds. Enough was said to prove my point.
Debate is finished.
Christianity was man invented.
SL called it.
Everybody agrees there is justification.
So nobody can argue that God of the scriptures is actually the christian God.
A lot of this is man made.
Looks like nobody disagrees. Smart.
Is anybody bold as a lion to defend his position?
Got all these comments and not one to accept the challenge, no not one.
If you think you have a defense, get out of the comments and take the challenge.
Don't be scared. It's not a gladiator colosseum but coded cyberspace.
One round knockout.
If you think you have a defense, accept the debate challenge, rather than trying to argue from the comments.
Some topics are too nuanced, goes over people's heads.
That's why you see a lot of the same topics over and over.
It's what people are accustomed and rehearsed to engaging in.
I can see the logic in this. Somebody you are heavily attracted sexually is next to impossible for that person to not be received willingly. However, what if that person attempts to engage at an inappropriate time and place?
If you can't put up, shut up.
Playing that jeopardy theme. Nobody.
Will the real atheists step forward.
Not debatable.
Here's a nuanced topic : Atheists will NEVER be convinced of the existence of the gods of theism.
We live completely under the system of monetary supremacy. There is absolutely nothing you can do in a world of commerce without it having anything to do with money.
For instance , just sitting in the park, reading a book in a library, waving hello to someone. Just you pay for all that. You are always in debt.
I think you're right. Nobody will step up to challenge this. Good job.
