Man, we got a debate in the comments. If you feel you can back up your position with bible, come on in.
I have to find a non secular platform for this if one exist.
Bad and poor bang up job by these folks.
A bunch of cowards. Scared of the lion. Very smart to stay out of the lion's den. Lion bites with questions and your so called answers can't even defend you.
I guess it was worth it missing a round. The opposing side didn't answer the questions but made responses to suit the opposing position.
Of course atheists are not going to agree so the bias is there like how I told another individual from another debate.
We could not have debate if we didn't have you folks that lack understanding.
People have been successfully brainwashed to believe a law enforcement officer is the same as a law breaker.
People don't get that colloquial oxymorons exist. That's the point.
The person provided no evidence. If evidence is just what you can read pertaining to an event versus the reality of the event itself, just about anybody can do that.
It's called popular vote. That's what voting at the least demonstrates.
For those that are confused, this is agnostics versus atheists. We're not combining the two together. There's a separation of the two that makes a difference. Let's not give into folly.
Testing 123
