That is definitely not a man.
That is definitely not a man.
Also, I am making food supplies in case war starts in my country, which at this point most probably will.
Survival in nature isnt just about survival in nature. Think of it also like way to reduce food expenses in real life. It does come with risks, but dandelion is a plant which grows everywhere on its own and it is edible. I know the ones growing on my land are probably healthy because I dont spray any chemicals. However, turning them into edible food requires a process, usually blending, cooking or making paste by grinding. They truly cannot be eaten raw in any effective way.
If you are cooking a paste, it could taste better due to being warm, but it would lose some nutrition due to cooking if cooked on too high temperature. If cooked at low temperature, then it could have higher nutrition. But paste itself is already in great amount a broken down food and easy to eat and digest. Cooking wouldnt add much, it is just nice if available.
Effectively, just about anything we eat of an originally solid nature [not soup broth, for example] that actually requires chewing, ends up being a paste before swallowing.
Yes, but chewing is much slower. Especially for dandelion leaves and root. Not to mention how much energy it takes to chew raw dandelion root. The jaw starts to hurt. Maybe cooked is easier, but raw is definitely too difficult.
The easiest way is just put leaves in blender.
I see many people talking about flour in nature and how they dry food and grind it into flour for survival.
But flour itself is more difficult to make than paste, due to drying process.
Paste, is very easy to make.
Tools needed are just flat solid surface and something to grind the leaves with.
So it has 4 very simple steps:
It is very easy to make it from leaves. I think it can be made from dandelion roots too.
The reason why you want the paste and not just eat raw leaves is in the fact that anyone who ever ate dandelion leaves knows what bother it is to chew them. Paste tho, is eaten easily.
Power.
Satanists were correct in this sense. The true morality is power.
Think about it. What rights could you possibly have, if it wasnt for some power protecting them? Power protects rights, enables rights, creates rights. Rights which dont have power are indeed self-defeating.
World works on power. Think about it. Wolf eats sheep. Frog eats butterfly. Why does this happen? Because wolf has more power than sheep. If sheep was stronger than wolf, would wolf be able to eat it? No.
The same law applies to humans. Some human groups are far stronger than others, and they of course get more resources and are better able to secure their desires.
What is power?
Power is ability to achieve one's will.
The ones who lack power and who arent protected by any power cannot achieve their will.
In this sense, and this is true by definition, the only way in which any morality can work is with power.
If morality doesnt have power, it cannot realize itself.
So primary goal of every morality must be power, or such morality cannot even exist.
Taoists did try to make a response to this by saying if a man has no desires, he doesnt need power, because he doesnt need to realize anything, and will have no unrealized desires.
But the main problem for Taoists is that such man would always be at mercy of powerful ones, and his existence would still depend on powerful ones sparing him.
Further, such man never realizes any desire, as he has none. So he has no any power (ability to realize desire).
So such man would not be most powerful, but most weak.
World is truly a competition between powerful ones. Think about it. If it wasnt for US and Europe military, China and Russia would own Europe and USA. The only thing which prevents them from conquering USA and Europe is the opposite power which would defeat them and prevent them from achieving their desire.
So there are indeed two types of power: First one is ability to achieve own desire, and second one is ability to prevent someone else from achieving their desire. The second can be included in first.
This world works on these laws, and human power is always finite, but some humans have more power than other humans, some groups have more power than other groups.
Power is not earned. Often it is given by mere luck, by mere position or place of birth.
Power is what all rights and laws rest upon. Think about it, if law had no power, how would law be enforced? If rights had no power on their side to protect them, what would protect them?
Power indeed is divided on protection and destruction.
Creation and transformation can be considered powers too.
In magic, likewise, spells are divided on protection, destruction, creation, transformation. This is the universal division of spells. There is no spell which isnt one of these.
I dont complain, my life is good. I dont work and still have more than those who do.
God has never controlled outcome
So you think universal human weakness happened by accident.
What dos it take to become a certified psychologist?
Probably not much. All psychologists I ever talked to were way below in intelligence than what you would expect from a scientist. Psychologists which you see in movies are one thing. In reality, most are just trash.
ChatGPT is made to support whatever you tell it.
morons who are fiscally irresponsible and have no understanding of basic economics do.
Who made them morons? God did! It isnt really a coincidence that every country is governed by morons. Its a curse by God.
Psychology has already embarrased itself enough as a science.
I like women with the personalities of Danielle Smith and AOC.
Some apps let you create your own AI character. So just describe character as "personality of Danielle Smith" or something.
Now ask ChatGPT to make argument against covid vaccines.
Dreams are window into the other world.
If you cant include Gods, then yes, you can do other rituals. I didnt say Gods were the only way. I just personally really prefer to have them included, as they are most powerful. Tho I am guessing even without Gods, you can still use herbs, symbols, magic squares (these exist in math too), sator square, writings, invocations, magic circles, protective amulets, making altars, drawings, numbers, sounds, crystals...ect. So yes, there is plenty to work with.
How is this different from Chat GPT?
AI girlfriend has personality of a girlfriend. It is much different from Chat GPT.
Offerings to Gods and spirits are usually food. Tho one can offer many things to try to make a trade deal with Gods. For example, giving to charity, or feeding hungry animals, is one of ways. It is just to improve chances that Gods and spirits will help you.
No, I get knowledge in my dreams.
Its just to include everything what can be reasonably included. One doesnt need to include Gods, but what would one gain by not including them?
I draw my methods from the religion of the Sun. Sun starts from center and extends in all directions. Likewise, when it comes to spells, I like to extend in all directions and include everything decent which can be included in the work with spells. Just like in chess, there is a limited nuumber of combinations and trying all combinations usually leads to best ones, same principle applies to everything, even spells. Just as you need to see every direction to compare and learn the best direction among them, extending in all directions is logically necessary. So to be like the Sun which extends everywhere.
What I do is simply connection with Gods and spirits. Since I believe in those, of course I would involve them in the spells directly.
I simply believe in magical triad of:
Now, what action is, is up for interpretation. I think it is true that herbs have energy, and collecting them and using them is action which achieves some effect. Drawing symbols, especially symmetrical symbols, is likewise action which achieves effect. Science says effect is psychological, I of course disagree because in the world of complete interconnection, smallest change can cause butterfly effect to a whole world.
Likewise, offering to Gods is an action which achieves desired effect. I just find atheism limited because it cannot do offerings to Gods, and if atheist doesnt believe in spirits, he cannot give them offerings either.
The fool says "There is no God", but when asked to imagine the most powerful being, the fool imagines God. But when asked "What power could stop the most powerful being from existing", suddenly the fool has no logical answer. So if God is most powerful being, the only thing able to prevent it from existing would be a more powerful being, which cannot even exist without entering into a contradiction with the definition of God. So the only way one can argue that something can prevent God from existing is if we assume God isnt the most powerful being, but that is false by definition.
The fool says "I know there is no God" and fool also says "I only know less than 1% of what there is to know. I will never know everything.". So fool both concedes to almost complete ignorance and thinks he has some good knowledge at the same time.
Truly, atheist can only debate if he says "I dont know", and that is the beginning and the end of his wisdom.
God logically must exist, and while intelligence isnt most important, it is nice to have.
Do you only prefer bad news? Yes, the world will fall apart unless you guys elect me as world dictator. This is because Gods favor me, and anyone else elected as leader will fail by default. This is why no country has good leader, and every country is a failure, because God hates them. God hates everyone except me.
I like it. I believe in infinite number of Gods and yes, one probably took that form at some point.
There is no one answer to everything.