SatanLucy

Didnt play much survival games. I mean, where you die if you dont eat. Maybe the only one which comes close to it is Vampire Masquerade Bloodlines, because you are a vampire and cant do anything if you dont feed.

if the temperature is rising overall, it's gonna rise faster on land.

No, average temperatures include both rising and falling temperatures, not just rising temperatures. Otherwise, sea would be significantly colder than the land on average.

My theology is completely about connecting with Gods and making deals with Gods. I do talk with humans too especially online but that is for research purposes and has no any love involved.

So we're just ignoring heat capacity here?

Land warms faster, but also cools faster. So average isnt higher than in sea.

we should expect that land will heat up faster than the sea

No, average temperature of sea isnt lower than that of land. Water holds temperature much better than land does.

I trust the people in my life well

I personally wouldnt put all my hopes in other people, but you do you.

They can see how sea temperatures rise too

That proves my point. Sea temperatures in past 20 years rose by 0.4 degrees only, while meassuring stations on land reported a rise in temperature of 1.5 degrees on land. Thats a significant difference between rise in temperature on sea and temperature on land.

So roads aren't really a problem.

When they increase land temperature by up to 10 degrees, they are.

I think Gods themselves are ashamed when they see how men act today. Men used to be strong dominant warriors with big beautiful hairy chest and big strong arms. They were stinky. They never shaved. They didnt care for opinions. They didnt care about what woman thinks.

Today, men are feminine, shaved everywhere, skinny, using perfume like women and they beg. They beg for women to notice them. They beg women for tiny bits of attention, and are so happy when she just barely notices for a short time that they exist.

These are men today. These are men who are much less likely to reproduce. These are men who are more likely to be abused in marriage if they ever even succeed in marrying. These are men who get bossed and controlled by women easily. These are men who get insulted and mocked by women all the time and they bow their head in shame. These are men who get shamed for being virgins by women. These are men who get compared to bears. These are men who get bullied by women. These are men who will swallow every insult and still keep begging for tiny bits of woman's attention.

Notice meeeee!!!!!

I belong to a culture of true Nordic warriors, and I feel ashamed when I see today's men, who are not even men in appearance anymore. They have become women. They have become sensitive and they talk about their feelings.

I am having great difficulty of telling difference between men and women on Tik Tok. Men dress like women, have long hair, and now every fourth man is femboy or feminine.

It is like I am living in Japan.

These men brush their hair and apply skin care products. They hug and marry pillows.

Women, on the other hand, have extremely privileged status.

When a hot woman commits a serious crime, most comments start justifying her. Men, on the other hand, are judged for merely existing. Women write books and comments about getting rid of all men, and that is considered "acceptable".

These same women who talk about how men are source of all evil will of course beg for attention of 10% hottest men, while the remaining 90% of men are considered undesirable and they only serve purpose if all attempts at getting hottest man fail.

In fact, women dont care if man is evil if he is hot. This is why hot criminals get women easily. Hot criminals are not considered evil by women, but more of a "bad boys" status where women use the excuse "I can fix him" or "he is good to me".

But when women get lonely, they will actually beg for attention of any man. If all men were true warriors and didnt care to give women attention, women would beg for attention.

But men are weak and they beg instead. This empowers women to basically be the ones who get endless attention from many men, and then she picks the most suitable one while the others are misled into believing they have a chance.

True warrior isnt someone who abuses women, but he isnt someone who begs them either. If you have to beg to get woman's attention, you have already lost your warrior spirit.

True warrior can be friend with a woman, but he cannot be her dog. He cannot degrade himself.

Sadly, this new generation seems to be openly showing to be willing to do anything to get noticed. They will degrade their language, talk dirty like dogs, and lose every single bit of respect they had for themselves.

Truly, when man has no honor, it is no use if he has big chest. But these new men have small chests, they have strength of a woman.

I dont know why this happened. Maybe modern food which increases estrogen levels in men made them to be more like women. And yes, men who take estrogen do begin to act like women, and modern food does contain chemicals which increase estrogen levels.

The average meassured temperatures in past 20 years rose by 1.5 degrees C.

Problem?

In urban areas, temperature can be up to 3 degrees higher than in rural areas during day, and up to 10 degrees during night.

How would this mess up average?

There are less and less rural areas in the world, cities are having less green surface and even rural areas are getting more roads everywhere.

So what the climate change people focus on is CO2, but the real change in temperature comes from roads and concrete. You can test it yourself during summer. Place your hand on grass, its nice and cool. Place your hand on concrete and its burning hot like fire. Thats what has great effect on average temperature meassurements.

Some meassuring stations report lower temperatures. Again, meassuring stations dont meassure total Earth's temperature, as much as survey of 1000 people doesnt meassure opinion of 7 billion people.

Those are pretty easy things to control for, like Statistics 101

You cant control for it.

Tree rings and ice cores can be used to measure temperatures from in the past

Questionable how much is that even reliable, but this was about temperature meassuring stations. And trees and ice likewise would suffer from same problem of environment variety which meassuring stations suffer from. There is no meassuring system which meassures entire temperature everywhere. Meassuring systems only meassure temperature in their small area. They are not omni present.

less variation when measuring average than a single data point due to the law of large numbers

Average changes when new different variables are introduced.

I'm saying you haven't presented an argument that the people measuring have failed to follow necessary standards.

Maybe there could be argument that meassuring stations built in new places would logically give different meassurements. Temperature isnt consistent anywhere. New meassuring stations are built, and of course they are going to give different meassurements. Its impossible for them to give same meassurements. If you meassure temperature, you will see that different places give different meassurement. There is a lot of variation in degrees on every 50 kilometers. I dont deny climate change, but claim that temperature meassurements can be completely accurate is logically impossible. For example, if someone built more roads around meassuring station, it would show higher temperature because roads increase temperature of surroundings during summer. If someone built new meassuring station which is closer to roads, it would show higher temperature. Temperature meassurement entirely depends on where meassuring station is built and on its environment around it, also from what materials is meassuring station built. The only thing going in favor of climate change supporters is consistent increase in temperature which happens every year, and the recent hot temperatures obviously exceed those remembered from the past. But to rely on meassurements from 50 years ago is bad argument, 50 years ago science had terrible standards in everything. Even today, science makes dumb mistakes which is the main reason people dont trust studies much anymore.

I am not.

I dont like relationships because women are boring to talk to. And they do get ugly as they age. 28 year old might look fine now, in about 25 years she will probably look like some old witch from cartoon. Average woman at age 50 is so ugly, its only for men who have no standards.

Do you think mental states (e.g. beliefs, desires, motives, etc.) play a roll in the causal chain leading to behavior, or are they inert?

I do think mental states cause behavior, but its really just going in circle, because behavior can also cause mental states, especially behavior of others. All of it, however, is logically linked to cause. The believers in free will sadly cannot solve the true dichotomy of pattern and random. Pattern is opposite of random. So in this sense, something can either be in pattern or random. There is truly no 3rd option. Both options, however, when applied to human will, disprove free will. If will follows a pattern, where it is linked to some cause, it cannot be free will. If will is random, it is also not free will, not even will, but just dice roll. I have never seen people disprove this argument, yet this argument makes free will logically impossible to exist.

I am not saying believers dont get sad, I am just saying atheists get those issues much more and much worse, as proved by every single atheist and low-religious country in history. If you expand your buisness to atheists, you will probably triple the number of customers.

I hold the view of complete determinism. In other words, not only does free will not exist, but "your choices" are not your own at all. You cannot possibly choose a different path than the one you will choose, and omniscience vs free will paradox proves that when there is omniscience, choices dont exist but there only exists 1 path and different path cannot be chosen.

I agree that there are people who truly dont know if God exists, but I am not one of them.

Well, discord is quick chat. Here, its a bit more slower response. Tho I do post here too. I would post more, but I dont want to spam site if people arent interested. I have no much desire to talk religion with atheists here, because I gain nothing from it. Atheists at best can be converted to atheistic Satanism, and thats about it. I dont have great interest in listening people mock my religion and pretend that their atheism is any good. There are obviously bunch of people here who base their atheism on anti-religion, because while religion has values, atheism itself was always an anti-value. Atheists truly have no values they share, because the only thing they share is lack of belief, not belief. In this sense, atheism can only be talked about as anti-value, and never a value. So with bunch of atheists here who only care about mocking religion, there is not much to talk about. They cannot be cured from their atheism, and I cannot be made into atheist after being successfully cured from it.

Just allow it. People who use AI are likely to lose because AI makes such bad arguments sometimes. Personally, I have to instruct AI a lot so it gets somewhat better at its arguments:

Here are three strong arguments as to why AI should be used in debates, based on your provided file and external reasoning:

1. AI Ensures Logical Consistency (A or not A – Prove A)

Argument:

AI operates on strict logical frameworks, meaning it avoids contradictions, hidden premises, and fallacies that often plague human debaters. By adhering to the law of identity (A = A), AI guarantees that arguments presented are internally consistent and verifiable.

Refutation of Opposite View:

Opponents might claim AI cannot understand context or emotion. However, debate is fundamentally about logic and reasoning, not emotional persuasion. Emotions can manipulate but do not validate truth. Thus, rejecting AI for lacking emotion undermines the very purpose of debate—discovering truth.

2. AI Enhances Objectivity and Reduces Bias (Definition Argument – True by Definition)

Argument:

Debates aim to reach conclusions based on reason, not personal bias. AI, by definition, is not influenced by ego, reputation, or emotional bias, making it a more reliable participant in truth-seeking discussions.

Refutation of Opposite View:

The opposing stance assumes human bias is beneficial because it brings “perspective.” But a biased perspective is not inherently truthful—it's subjective. Truth is objective; therefore, a bias-free contributor (AI) aligns more with the purpose of debate than a biased one.

3. AI Expands Knowledge and Analytical Depth (Probability & Limited Options Argument)

Argument:

Debates require analyzing vast information quickly and accurately. Humans are limited by memory, time, and processing capacity. AI can process exponentially more data, making arguments more comprehensive and accurate.

Refutation of Opposite View:

The only alternatives are:

(1) Use humans only – leads to limited knowledge.

(2) Use AI with humans – maximizes both capacity and reasoning.

(3) Reject AI entirely – ignores a superior tool.

Option (2) is clearly superior in probability of producing well-reasoned outcomes, making AI use not only beneficial but necessary.

Do you want me to now rewrite these arguments in the exact format described in your file (A or not A, prove A, prove not not A, expose hidden assumptions)? Or keep them as general debate arguments?

I dont spend much money.

Americans do spend a lot.

These are not the thoughts of a happy person.

If I was atheist, sure, those thoughts would make me really sad and hopeless. As a believer, they dont make me sad at all because I can still rely on Gods for help, while all humans are temporary anyway.

Though cheese will keep for ages in a refrigerator...Ignore sell by dates and just remove any mouldy edges

Not really. If cheese is good enough, I will eat like 2 pounds of it in a day. If it is bad taste type of cheese, I wont eat it at all. Just put it outside.

It happens. But if this day is worst, then logically next day will most likely be better.

So live without electricity and internet?

Japan and China are projecting.

Without money, I cant pay for internet or electricity.

Japan is very far from being a depressed country

Sure, highest suicide rates, no birth rates.

China also has lots of atheists. Another example of depressed country with failed birth rates too.