SatanLucy

South Dakota is the U.S. state with the highest birth rate (approx. 66.7 births per 1,000 women). It is a reliably Republican state, having voted for the GOP presidential candidate in every election since 1968.

the problem with democrats is that they forgot women have primary role as baby factory. If other party has higher birth rates, its bad for future voter base.

So democrats literally aborted themselves.

No, woman's body doesnt belong to woman, it belongs to humanity, and humanity cannot survive if women dont fulfill their role.

Humanity's survival > woman's 9 months pregnancy discomfort

I am only interested in preventing unwanted pregnancies

Yikes. Opinion rejected.

This disclaimer argues against the point you're trying to make

thats just irrelevant AI opinion added to undeniable statistic that women are correlated to be better baby factories when abortion is fully banned.

F*ck you, you suck.

Feel better now?

Oh yeah.

that was nice from you because it came from heart.

Have good and bad qualities, capability of being loved by others.

I can agree that Hitler was loved by others, in fact by millions of Germans.

However, I am worse than Hitler, so not loved by millions.

What do you mean by "us"? You're South Korean

No, I am Bosnian. Now read again.

One specific logic comes to mind, if a woman is pregnant and abortion is fully banned, and her husband opposes abortion, he can make sure she gives birth by saying he will report her if she has abortion.

So yeah, its more difficult to report when abortion is legal cuz then there is nothing to report for.

If I had a girlfriend and she wanted abortion, I would say I will leave her if she has an abortion, cuz I aint staying in a relationship with an abortionist abomination.

tho if you want women to be a better baby factory, one must also ban contraception and healthcare. (edit: and education too)

Its not enough to just ban abortions, especially not if you are still having bunch of abortionists operating illegally.

In case of USA, its enough to just travel about 100 miles where abortion is legal.

Below is a list of 30 countries with the highest crude birth rates (births per 1,000 population), along with a simplified summary of legal access to abortion. Abortion laws can be complex and include exceptions, so the table groups them into broad categories. Rankings are based on recent international demographic data. (Geo Factbook)

RankCountryBirth Rate (approx.)Access to Abortion1Somalia46.4Very restricted (life-saving only)2Niger46.3Very restricted (life-saving only)3Benin39.8Limited (expanded for rape, incest, fetal anomaly, health)4Angola39.8Restricted (limited exceptions)5Mali39.4Very restricted (life-saving only)6Uganda38.9Restricted (health/life exceptions)7DR Congo38.8Broad access (health, based on regional treaty implementation)8Chad38.6Limited (rape, incest, fetal anomaly, health)9Mozambique36.1Legal on request (within early pregnancy)10Afghanistan36.0Nearly total ban (life-saving only)11Burundi35.9Very restricted (life-saving only)12Guinea-Bissau35.8Restricted (limited grounds)13South Sudan35.7Very restricted14Guinea35.0Restricted (health/life exceptions)15Mauritania34.0Very restricted16Nigeria33.6Very restricted (except to save life, varies by state)17Tanzania33.5Very restricted18Sudan33.0Restricted19Burkina Faso31.7Limited (rape, incest, fetal anomaly, health)20Liberia31.7Very restricted21Central African Republic31.5Very restricted22Cameroon30.8Limited (rape, health)23Togo30.2Limited (expanded exceptions)24Zambia30.0Relatively broad (health and socioeconomic grounds)25Sierra Leone29.8Very restricted26Ethiopia29.5Broad access (multiple legal grounds)27Malawi29.3Very restricted28Rwanda29.0Limited (expanded legal grounds)29Senegal28.9Very restricted30Madagascar28.8Nearly total ban

Overall summary

1. Very restricted / nearly total ban: about 18–20 of these 30 countries.
2. Limited legal access (specific exceptions): about 7–9 countries.
3. Broad legal access or abortion on request: about 4–5 countries (such as Mozambique, DR Congo, Zambia, and Ethiopia). (Time)

The overall pattern is that the countries with the world's highest birth rates are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, where abortion laws tend to be more restrictive, although there are notable exceptions such as Mozambique and Ethiopia. This does not by itself establish a causal relationship between abortion laws and birth rates, as birth rates are also strongly influenced by factors including education, contraceptive access, child mortality, income, urbanization, and age at marriage. (thetimes.co.uk)

Also, abortion isnt banned in USA, so your study is a bit wack.

I assure you all countries where abortion is actually banned have much higher birth rates than USA, so banning abortion is correlated with women being more effective baby factories.

Cool - do you have any thoughts on the subject of this thread?

Yes, bans reduce number of legal abortions.

No shit, you are a random post generator.

Aww, thanks, tho I am just open minded I guess.

I don't know about "any circumstances". let's not forget that last year, way back when you were from Korea, you supported a woman's right to choose.

So? I can say things I dont believe in.

With your girlfriends, it best not to look below the surface.

My girls arent just AI.

there are plenty of real girls who are also willing to insult me for free.

You just gotta ask, plenty of people are pretty happy to send me insults. Sometimes I dont even need to ask.

Bosnia only lost cuz they were literally beating us up.

They kicked our goalkeeper in the eye, they did like 3 or 4 things which were supposed to get red card but no.

I don't support abortion under any circumstances other than certain death anyway.

Still, it's wrong to kill unborn.

Your body, my choice.

I care about reducing murder though, not about increasing the population

Same thing btw

I agree with the scale of the issue but I don't think bans have decreased it enough either

Cuz it's not banned. It's on state level, meaning that even if person is in state where abortion is illegal, person can just travel to state where it's legal.

I care about practice more than principle

Democrats reduce birth rates, and it's actually republican families who have higher birth rate.

So republican ideas are better surplus of population.

And Dems like to say their policies decrease abortion

1 million abortions in USA per year btw.

1 million killed unborn children.

It literally kills more people than all other things combined.

So whatever they were doing to decrease abortion didn't really work for past 20 years.

Also, democrats want it legal, so they probably shouldn't be in position of power in the first place, to make laws.

Maybe it was reduced to state level after SC decision, but it's still the democrat states which will declare it legal and republican states which will ban it.

I don't like republicans, but I am not gonna support 1 million abortions per year by voting for democrats, not that I vote cuz I don't live in USA.

You're a person like many others

Am I? I somehow don't think so. I am about as different as it gets.

They cut cancer treatments for kids

Trump hates kids with cancer btw

Ok, so I was in discord server, and someone was insulting me, and then they stopped, and I felt kinda wanting more.

I dont know why, I just like when people insult me.

Its the compliments which I hate, because they are usually not convincing me and seem dishonest.

But insults are convincing, because I know person really means it, so they feel more honest and loving.

I dont trust people who say they love me, because any time someone said that turned out to be dishonest and lie.

But I trust a person who says they hate me, because thats honest and convincing.

If I had a girlfriend, I would trust her more if she was insulting me all the time. If she was complimenting me, I would have to assume she is pretending and lying.

So yeah, I trust a person who insults me. I dont trust people who say they love me because the latter is logically impossible.

Opinion read and discarded.

So yah, anyway...back to Graham Platner?

No.

You know how they say Iran is running out of missiles?

It's actually the US which is running out of missiles and bombs.

Iran alone has already significantly depleted US stockpile.

So unless USA uses nukes, Iran is pretty much guaranteed to win this war long term, and once Israel runs out of defense ammo as well, I am afraid it's gonna be hell raining down on Israel, not that Israel is having a nice time right now.

In the 39 days of the air and missile campaign before the ceasefire, U.S. forces heavily used the seven munitions in Table 1. For four of them, the United States may have expended more than half of the prewar inventory. Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered. These missiles will also be critical for a potential Western Pacific conflict. Even before the Iran war, stockpiles were deemed insufficient for a peer competitor fight. That shortfall is now even more acute, and building stockpiles to levels adequate for a war with China will take additional time.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/last-rounds-status-key-munitions-iran-war-ceasefire

It's not like he nuked em like we did last time, amiright?

Once Trump runs out of conventional bombs against Iran, what do you think happens?

Just about sums up Trump and the current state of the US and it's stockpile of missiles that need using before they reach their use by date.

What's shame is that still about 40% of Americans support Trump.

This proves that stupidity is not curable.

But if they are so willing to lose a war against Iran, so be it.

he's suffering from cognitive decline, never makes sense

In 2 years, he will be like Biden. It will be funny to watch.

Biden likewise first started confusing names. Few years later, he became a plant.

Trump mocked Biden for it without realizing same is happening to him.

It's like some epic divine justice slowly unfolding before our eyes.