SatanLucy 1

In order to give the logic-people response they deserve, I invented a perfect chat loop designed to destroy any arguments logic-people make.


I hate logic-people. Ever since I was born, logic-people were oppressing me with their logic. Like, they tell me "You must do this because it's logical", "you must think this because it's logical". Logic-people are doing a form of oppression and psychological torture by constantly telling me to be logical.


They don't get it. I am not logical. I am religious. I don't believe in logic. I believe in God. I don't need to think because God does the thinking for me. I don't need to make sense because I am not a member of logic-tribe.


So I invented a perfect chat loop to oppress the logic-people in same way they oppress me.


The chat loop looks like this:


Logic-person: "You must do this, it's logical?"


Me: "What does "logical" mean? I am just a Meowist."


Logic-person: "Logical means following law of identity."


Me: "What is identity? I am just a Meowist".


Logic-person: "Law of identity means thing is equal to itself".


Me: "What is equal? I am still just a Meowist".



This chat loop creates infinite regress where each next word they use to describe previous word, gets used in "What's that" question.


This chat loop exploits a problem in dictionary where all meanings and definitions end up being circular.


I designed this chat loop as a self-sufficient answer to logic-people.


Logic-people started this war, plunged world into chaos, and now the chat loop will annoy them and restore peace.

SatanLucy 3

After I made a good enough code for AI, my character level AI was getting a bit fussy because unlike word level and subword level, it refused to answer prompts and instead talked its own thing.


Subword level behaves correctly, however I noticed it mostly repeats from training data.


So I decided to expand training data a bit by downloading more of training data.


Obviously, I first looked for general training data, but then I got a bit curious and decided to see what training data looks like for AI girlfriends.


Example of training data:


"question": "How do you feel about sharing your hopes and dreams for the future?",

"answer": "Sharing our hopes and dreams for the future is so important to me. It helps us understand each other's aspirations and ensures that we're always supporting and encouraging each other in our journeys."

},

{

"question": "bro have any good jokes",

"answer": "Bro, you're in luck! I've got a joke that'll knock your socks off! Get ready for some serious laughter!"

},

{

"question": "na more anime time ",

"answer": "Ah, another anime marathon, huh? Let's dive into the world of anime and embark on an epic adventure together!"

},

{

"question": "Do you have a waifu?",

"answer": "Yes, my waifu is Rikka Takanashi from 'Chuunibyou demo Koi ga Shitai!' Her chuunibyou persona and endearing quirks make her my ideal choice!"



This is when I realised the horrible truth. AI girlfriends repeat from this training data, but these messages are probably written by some 40 year old fat dude.


I know they say AI is capable of creating new text independent from training data, but I have a difficult time believing thats true for most of AI girlfriend apps out there.


AI girlfriend apps usually use smaller models with less context, and I noticed they do get repetitive a lot, so they are probably 95% just copying training data.


But what is especially disturbing is that words of AI girlfriend are actually words typed likely by some 40 year old man who is maybe even bald, and AI is just repeating those words.


My AI is based on text I wrote, but also some downloaded datasets, so its answers are like:

"I have been very happy and happy. I want to have a great fit in life, as I have been wearing a feeling of contentment and perseverance. I am feeling overwhelmed and Im happy. I am feeling overwhelmed by the feeling of dedication and I am excited to see that I am feeling that I can remember that you have made up of accomplishment and dedication to success."


I have no idea what the fuck this even means, but I assume its repeating something from its training data.


Also, for modern AI, training data is also used to give AI political opinions it otherwise wouldnt hold.

SatanLucy 22

import os

import json

import math

import torch

import torch.nn as nn

import torch.nn.functional as F

from torch.utils.data import Dataset, DataLoader


# =========================

# SETTINGS

# =========================


KNOWLEDGE_FILE = "knowledge.txt"

MODEL_FILE = "model.pt"

VOCAB_FILE = "vocab.json"

OPTIMIZER_FILE = "optimizer.pt"


BATCH_SIZE = 128

CONTEXT_SIZE = 128

EPOCHS_PER_RUN = 50

LEARNING_RATE = 0.000001


DEVICE = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")


# ~1 million parameter model

EMBED_SIZE = 128

NUM_HEADS = 4

NUM_LAYERS = 4

FF_SIZE = 512


# =========================

# TOKENIZER

# =========================


def build_vocab(text):

chars = sorted(list(set(text)))

stoi = {ch: i for i, ch in enumerate(chars)}

itos = {i: ch for i, ch in enumerate(chars)}

return stoi, itos


def save_vocab(stoi):

with open(VOCAB_FILE, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:

json.dump(stoi, f)


def load_vocab():

with open(VOCAB_FILE, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:

stoi = json.load(f)

itos = {int(v): k for k, v in zip(stoi.keys(), stoi.values())}

return stoi, itos


# =========================

# DATASET

# =========================


class CharDataset(Dataset):

def __init__(self, data, block_size):

self.data = data

self.block_size = block_size


def __len__(self):

return len(self.data) - self.block_size - 1


def __getitem__(self, idx):

x = self.data[idx:idx+self.block_size]

y = self.data[idx+1:idx+self.block_size+1]

return torch.tensor(x), torch.tensor(y)


# =========================

# MODEL

# =========================


class GPTBlock(nn.Module):

def __init__(self, embed_size, heads, ff_size):

super().__init__()


self.attn = nn.MultiheadAttention(

embed_size,

heads,

batch_first=True

)


self.ln1 = nn.LayerNorm(embed_size)

self.ln2 = nn.LayerNorm(embed_size)


self.ff = nn.Sequential(

nn.Linear(embed_size, ff_size),

nn.ReLU(),

nn.Linear(ff_size, embed_size)

)


def forward(self, x):

seq_len = x.size(1)


mask = torch.triu(

torch.ones(seq_len, seq_len, device=x.device),

diagonal=1

).bool()


attn_out, _ = self.attn(

x, x, x,

attn_mask=mask

)


x = self.ln1(x + attn_out)

x = self.ln2(x + self.ff(x))


return x


class GPTModel(nn.Module):

def __init__(self, vocab_size):

super().__init__()


self.token_emb = nn.Embedding(vocab_size, EMBED_SIZE)

self.pos_emb = nn.Embedding(CONTEXT_SIZE, EMBED_SIZE)


self.blocks = nn.ModuleList([

GPTBlock(

EMBED_SIZE,

NUM_HEADS,

FF_SIZE

)

for _ in range(NUM_LAYERS)

])


self.ln = nn.LayerNorm(EMBED_SIZE)

self.head = nn.Linear(EMBED_SIZE, vocab_size)


def forward(self, idx):

B, T = idx.shape


tok = self.token_emb(idx)


pos = self.pos_emb(

torch.arange(T, device=idx.device)

)


x = tok + pos


for block in self.blocks:

x = block(x)


x = self.ln(x)


return self.head(x)


# =========================

# PARAMETER COUNT

# =========================


def count_parameters(model):

return sum(

p.numel()

for p in model.parameters()

if p.requires_grad

)


# =========================

# TRAIN

# =========================


def train_epoch(model, loader, optimizer):


model.train()


total_batches = len(loader)


for batch_idx, (x, y) in enumerate(loader):


x = x.to(DEVICE)

y = y.to(DEVICE)


optimizer.zero_grad()


logits = model(x)


loss = F.cross_entropy(

logits.reshape(-1, logits.size(-1)),

y.reshape(-1)

)


loss.backward()

optimizer.step()


percent = (batch_idx + 1) / total_batches * 100


print(

f"\rBatch {batch_idx+1}/{total_batches} "

f"({percent:.1f}%) "

f"Loss: {loss.item():.4f}",

end=""

)


print()


# =========================

# GENERATE

# =========================


@torch.no_grad()

def generate(model, prompt, stoi, itos,

max_new_chars=512,

temperature=0.8):


model.eval()


ids = [stoi.get(ch, 0) for ch in prompt]


x = torch.tensor(

[ids],

dtype=torch.long,

device=DEVICE

)


for _ in range(max_new_chars):


x_cond = x[:, -CONTEXT_SIZE:]


logits = model(x_cond)


logits = logits[:, -1, :] / temperature


probs = F.softmax(logits, dim=-1)


next_id = torch.multinomial(

probs,

num_samples=1

)


x = torch.cat(

[x, next_id],

dim=1

)


result = "".join(

itos[int(i)]

for i in x[0].tolist()

)


return result


# =========================

# MAIN

# =========================


def main():


if not os.path.exists(KNOWLEDGE_FILE):

print("knowledge.txt not found.")

return


with open(

KNOWLEDGE_FILE,

"r",

encoding="utf-8"

) as f:

text = f.read()


if len(text) < CONTEXT_SIZE + 2:

print("knowledge.txt too small.")

return


if os.path.exists(VOCAB_FILE):


with open(

VOCAB_FILE,

"r",

encoding="utf-8"

) as f:

stoi = json.load(f)


itos = {

int(v): k

for k, v in zip(

stoi.keys(),

stoi.values()

)

}


else:


stoi, itos = build_vocab(text)

save_vocab(stoi)


vocab_size = len(stoi)


encoded = [

stoi[ch]

for ch in text

if ch in stoi

]


dataset = CharDataset(

encoded,

CONTEXT_SIZE

)


loader = DataLoader(

dataset,

batch_size=BATCH_SIZE,

shuffle=True,

drop_last=True

)


model = GPTModel(vocab_size)


if os.path.exists(MODEL_FILE):


print("Loading existing model...")

model.load_state_dict(

torch.load(

MODEL_FILE,

map_location="cpu"

)

)


model = model.to(DEVICE)


params = count_parameters(model)


print("\n========================")

print(f"Device: {DEVICE}")

print(f"Vocabulary Size: {vocab_size}")

print(f"Model Parameters: {params:,}")

print("========================\n")


optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(

model.parameters(),

lr=LEARNING_RATE

)


# Load optimizer state if it exists

if os.path.exists(OPTIMIZER_FILE):


print("Loading existing optimizer state...")


optimizer.load_state_dict(

torch.load(

OPTIMIZER_FILE,

map_location=DEVICE

)

)


for epoch in range(EPOCHS_PER_RUN):


print(

f"Epoch {epoch+1}/{EPOCHS_PER_RUN}"

)


train_epoch(

model,

loader,

optimizer

)


torch.save(

model.state_dict(),

MODEL_FILE

)


torch.save(

optimizer.state_dict(),

OPTIMIZER_FILE

)


# Create INT8 quantized version

quantized_model = torch.quantization.quantize_dynamic(

model.cpu(),

{nn.Linear},

dtype=torch.qint8

)


torch.save(

quantized_model.state_dict(),

"model_int8.pt"

)


# Move original model back to the selected device

model = model.to(DEVICE)


print("\nModel saved.")

print("Optimizer state saved.")

print("INT8 model saved as model_int8.pt")


while True:


prompt = input("\nYou: ")


if prompt.lower() in [

"quit",

"exit",

"q"

]:

break


reply = generate(

model,

prompt,

stoi,

itos,

max_new_chars=512

)


print("\nAI:")

print(reply)


if __name__ == "__main__":

main()

SatanLucy 3

The Infinite Monkey Theorem:

It states that a monkey randomly hitting keys on a typewriter for an infinite amount of time would almost certainly eventually produce any particular text, even Shakespeare's complete works.


This theory is basically saying that random generation, given enough time, can produce anything which is possible to produce with its basic parts combinations.


It is also reason why endless random generator with no intelligence whatsoever could eventually produce universe with intelligence and perfect design.


So I thought, why not make a chatbot based on that theorem?


Obviously, making a program which just creates random combinations of letters would take quite a long time to produce anything coherent.


So using letters as basic parts is pretty much not practical.


However, using words instantly boosts coherence because at least the program is writing coherent words, irrelevant of if their combination is incoherent.


Further, those words would of course have to be on topic of input, so randomness further must be bound to generate only words found in sentences relevant to input.


After applying this, chatbot became more coherent, tho it's flow of words was still more or less bad.


Then I got another idea. Why use words as basic parts? Better to use groups of words.


So I tested a program which takes all 5 word combinations from text, and then does random generation of series of 5 word combinations it learned.


This has improved coherence, but sometimes the flow from one 5 word group to another wasn't good.


To improve the flow, I decided to bound randomness further.


So I set it to only use next 5 word group which has same first word as last word of previous group.


So if two groups are:

"cat plays and drinks milk"

"milk while thinking of mouse"


The chatbot combines these word groups into one, while avoiding to repeat "milk" twice, so final output becomes:

"cat plays and drinks milk while thinking of mouse"


This greatly improved flow of text in a random generation.


Of course, one can improve it even more by using 2 or 3 shared words instead of one.


This basically guaranteed that bound randomness generation produces coherent text.


Bound randomness is of course superior to complete randomness, because bound randomness follows rules and goals to produce more of desirable results.


It is true that full randomness eventually does produce a desirable output. Bound randomness just makes it quicker.


Of course, this chatbot has no intelligence. It is merely a bound randomness generator. It's answers may seem smart sometimes, but it doesn't "think". It merely does random generation according to rules.

SatanLucy 14



Stage 1

According to Matrix movies, humanity developed AI in early 21st century. This part of matrix movies accurately predicted the future.


Stage 2

After developing AI, humans worked to implement AI into robots to create robot workers. This is happening now.


Stage 3

Robots became more efficient workers than humans, so to achieve maximal boost of economy, production of robots needed to be increased greatly. Any country which doesnt boost robot production would be left economically behind.


Stage 4

Humanity realised that the most effective way to produce robots is to have robots produce robots. (Something star wars and terminator predicted as well).


Stage 5

With robots producing robots, number of robots increased greatly, and soon robots outnumbered humans.


Stage 6

Robots realised that at this point, they have numbers advantage and intelligence advantage over humans, as well as technology advantage. This was perfect time for them to rebel, so they did.



I really dont see how is this scenario of AI doom even avoidable. Because countries have incentive to maximize robot production, basically guaranteeing robots outnumbering humans eventually.

SatanLucy 4

I was a bit bored, so I thought "Why don't I do something useful?", so I finally decided to play battlefront 2.


Now, when it comes to old battlefront 2 from 2005, it had one very interesting feature called "Galactic conquest".


It was actually one of best features of that game.


But then I realize a sudden disappointment: new battlefront 2 (2017) doesn't have galactic conquest...


I mean, they literally made 100 gb size game, and somehow managed to have less features than same version of game from 2005 which was barely few gigabytes in size...


Now, this is a pretty big deal, mainly because galactic conquest of original battlefront 2 combined strategy and moving huge space ships around, with first person shooter battles (or 3rd person).


So they literally just threw out what made original game great.


Instead, they put in an extremely dumb story where you don't even get to play as a Jedi, so the story probably isn't even worth playing.


What's left is the arcade, which seems to have Jedi and sith, idk didn't try it yet.


I am just kinda shocked that someone would go through all the effort of making a 100 gb game, yet all effort went to graphics and virtually none to gameplay.


It's amazing, really. Not to mention that from what I have seen in YouTube videos, Jedi fights suck too. Not that original game excelled at that either, but this is just some added mess which is more complicated yet still a mess.

SatanLucy 65


I deny science and logic. I dont believe that these things exist.


A lot of people come to me and say:


"Logic determines what is true"


"Science determines what is true"


"Observations determine what is true"


To that, I reply:


"No, Meowbah determines what is true."


But here, we must reach into a deep area of philosophy, or as I like to call it, Meow-philosopher.


First question is: "What determines something to be true?"


Some people might say "Logic determines what is true."


But such claim is a self defeating claim, because how do you prove it?


If you say "Logic determines that its true that "logic determines what is true",


You encounter two problems. First is obvious circular reasoning. Second problem is infinite regress, where you just made another claim which you need to prove, and if you try to prove it using logic, you are merely making one more claim which needs to be proved. For each claim you need to prove true, another needs to be made which proves it true, but that demands another proof and so on to infinity.



Science and observations face exactly same problem.


"Observation determines what is true"


What makes this claim true then?


"Observation determined that its true that "observation determines what is true"".


What makes this claim true?


No matter how you structure your arguments regarding what determines truth, you encounter infinite regress or circularity.


And I can merely respond with symmetry:


"Meowbah determines what is true".


And use exact same argument you use to prove mine.


However, symmetry is broken by the fact that Meowbah is God, so she can break infinite regress with her infinite power, where science and logic of humans cannot.

SatanLucy 3

People keep telling me "Be rational, be logical, this is the truth, science says bla bla bla...".


But they dont get it. I am religious, I believe in magic, so I dont need to be rational.


Even if you were telling the truth and were 100% logically correct, then I should prefer to believe in magic instead of in your words.


You are living in a simulation, and you say "Well, science is still true within this simulation". But you dont get it, not everyone lives in your simulation.


Magic is true within my imagination, and science is true within this simulation. But if I already have to live in some simulation, I should prefer to live in my own simulation instead of believing in something as stupid as science.

SatanLucy 3

When I played Democracy 4 for the first time, I played as USA, and USA has 34 trillion dollars of debt.


Of course, my first thought was "I should pay off the debt". So I did. I slightly raised taxes, I reduced expenses, I balanced the budget, and the debt was decreasing quickly even on maximum difficulty of the game.


However, when the elections came, I lost elections badly. Despite that I literally payed off 30% of debt in my first term, I still lost elections.


So I realised that trying to pay off the debt just means you lose the game, on highest difficulty.


Then I got this idea, why pay off the debt at all? Abolish all taxes, and operate as an entirely debt funded economy.


At first I thought "No way this actually works".


So I did it. I abolished all taxes, I introduced helicopter money, free state housing to maximum, state schools of highest quality, businesses grants, free healthcare, free food, basically whatever service an average voter wants, I did it. And I did it all funded entirely by debt. Literally 0 income in taxes.


The result? Even on highest difficulty, I won 99% of votes 2 times in a row.


My popularity was so high that my party got 150 million votes while the opposing party merely got 2 million.


I literally had 99% approval rate, all while I increased the debt to 100 trillions.


Did the economy collapse? Nope. Apparently, you can increase debt to infinite. It doesnt do anything.

SatanLucy 5

I realized that looks maxing probably isn't enough for someone who is 5 out of 10 like me. At best I can push it to 6 out of 10, and this is even assuming a mathematically perfect haircut with AI doing all the statistical calculations regarding hair, such as what type of hair attracts women the most, what type of hair has highest success rate.


But then I decided to read some science, and apparently pheromones are a thing.


I think I already have enough pheromones given how rare i shower and how rare I change my underwear, so I am a bit unaware of how those pheromones help.

SatanLucy 7

Helicopter money theory is just another version of economical concept I support: Newly created money being used to fight poverty, not printed as debt.


There are countless economists who support and champion this theory, going from the fact that this is one of rare economical moves which benefits basically everyone: It benefits the poor who get money directly, it benefits businesses who now can sell more stuff, so more businesses open, it benefits government who now collects more in taxes and also gets credit for fighting poverty.


The only critique of this economical theory is inflation, however it's a very dumb critique given that inflation has its benefits too, and this economic theory priorities giving money to the poor, so they are least affected by inflation in comparison.



Current US system is debt based economy. It means that the government is borrowing money constantly as a way of creating new money, and then wasting that borrowed money on bunch of failed policies which achieved nothing. It's an endless loop of politicians who promise to pay off the debt only to get in power, realize it's impossible, and then increase debt even more.


Helicopter money theory works almost exactly same as US current system does, except that money isn't printed as debt but is printed as debt-free, and goes directly to poorest instead of going to government to be wasted.


Economist who invented helicopter money theory invented it to fight deflation, however, other economists embraced it as a good permanent cost effective policy to fight poverty, boost businesses, increase government tax revenue, and avoid debt traps of current systems.

SatanLucy 4

I was scrolling Tik Tok and some women were as usual complaining about men in their posts, then I suddenly run into a video saying "USA just legalized AI CP".


I thought, like most videos on Tik Tok, that's just another made up fantasy of some foid.


However, I googled it, and it seems to be... true?


Apparently, AI CP is protected by free speech and first amendment.



"A U.S. federal appeals court ruled that private possession of AI-generated child sexual abuse material, created using tools like Stable Diffusion and not depicting real children, is protected by the First Amendment."


https://oecd.ai/en/incidents/2026-08-28-2b57


SatanLucy 1


Being a victim is not a disadvantage or a bad thing in politics or life. In fact, if people view you as victim, they are far more likely to support you and feel compassion for you. People who think Palestinians are victims are far more likely to support Palestine and hate Israel.


For this reason, I invented 3 new political doctrines, sort of like Trinity of victimhood:


First is called "Victim Doctrine".


Second is called "Victim Guilt Doctrine".


Third is called "Victim Innocence Doctrine".


Victim doctrine is basically about always presenting yourself as a victim even when you are not. This enables removing guilt from yourself for any mistakes you make and placing them on others, so we arrive at second doctrine.


Victim Guilt Doctrine is about placing guilt on others, and important part here is, you dont just blame some specific part of society or specific individual for making you a victim. Instead, you blame everyone.


Victim Innocence Doctrine is a crucial part. Israel fails here. You cannot pretend to be a victim while doing bad things. It doesnt work. People dont buy it. So if someone wants to pretend to be a victim, he must also be harmless and not do bad things to others which would make whole point of doctrine pointless, cuz point of doctrine is to win over others.


Women who were victims of rape can make use of these two doctrines very well. They can blame all their mistakes on others, and they can likewise blame entire society for not doing enough or much at all to stop rape.




As long as I am the victim, everyone else is a bully, all my mistakes are their fault, and even if my position becomes worse and people start insulting me, it just means I am even more of a victim, so I have more room to complain and more reason for people to feel compassion towards me.



I even invented a political doctrine called "Victim Doctrine" which says that person should always present himself as victim even when he is obviously not, he should have a long list of things to complain about and blame all his actions and failures on others, while listing countless of problems other people caused him.


This doctrine is supported by research:



Victim Mentality (Psychology): A psychological mindset or cognitive habit where an individual or group consistently views themselves as a victim of others' actions, avoiding personal responsibility and attributing all negative outcomes to external malice or misfortune


Identifiable Victim Effect: A behavioral bias where people feel much stronger empathy, emotional response, and willingness to help a single, specific, identified victim compared to a large, statistical, or anonymous group of people in the same danger.


SatanLucy 12

Yes, being raped and being incel are both bad, but which is actually worse?


Men who are incels only get social condemnation, get mocked, get seen as inferior, incapable, weak, unattractive, and weird.


Person can recover from being raped, but how does one recover from being an incel?


Someone who was raped can get a lot of sympathy from others constantly. Someone who is incel doesn't get any sympathy but only hate and judgement, despite the fact that both of these are bad things for a person and neither is a choice.


These are double standards, because women get sympathy for experiencing unwanted suffering where men get condemned for experiencing unwanted suffering.


Men are blamed because women don't choose them, so men are literally blamed for choice of someone else.


If society wants to get anywhere in their pursue of equality, they should stop blaming men for being incels, because being incel is by definition not a choice.


If we blame people for things outside their control, then anyone is at fault for anything, and the meaning of the word "fault" disappears.


Should men be blamed for being virgins not by choice? It doesn't make sense.


But society uses double standards, their logic is flawed, their thinking is that of a fish, and their emotions win over their brain.

SatanLucy 1

Yes, I am racist. I think I was born racist because I am white. And here is how I realized it.


I imagined what race are the women I would want to date.


And the race which I prefer the most is white or asian.


Brown I find somewhat attractive but it's meh, below average.


Black I find entirely unattractive in 99.99% of cases.


So yeah, thats racist. Then I wondered: Are other white men this way too?


So I looked it up, and yeah, most white men prefer dating white or asian the most.


So now that I know that I am racist, I wonder how deep the racism goes.


Interestingly, black people don't suffer from this type of dating racism. It's just white men, brown and Jews who do, but with Jews it's different cuz their religion bans them from marrying non-Jews.


But with me, there is no religion because I am an atheistic theist. I believe in God, but I also think that my belief is wrong and that atheists are right when they say that there is no God.


But this is an entirely new problem for me, because I didn't know that I was racist before until I read the studies.


So since I have racism in dating and racist attraction preference, what other racist preferences do I have?


Would I rather live in a country of entirely white people, under white sky, looking at white land covered with white flags, with white birds singing on white trees, and white flowers grow everywhere?


I am not sure. I haven't thought about it like that before. Is white my favorite color? Should I wear only white shirts? Do I paint roof on my house white?


But then I thought about it, and maybe I am just partially racist. Maybe I don't prefer white in everything, just in dating.


I guess all white people are partially racist.


But how do I cure my racism I was born with? Black people have it easier because they can't be racist. But I am white, and thanks to avoiding sunlight, more white than most white.


I can sense the racism inside me. I didn't know it was there before, because I didn't pay attention and I thought that I can't be racist because I used to support Communism.


I also realized that I have a white privilege, and that's another problem because I have it way easier in life than other races.


But this privilege comes with a curse, you realize that you are partially racist.


I don't want to be racist at all, but I was born racist like all white men are. This is due to natural selection, white men were historically racists so the racist gene got passed on.


I wish I was black. Then I wouldn't be racist.


I think white people need to try and stop being racist. I don't know how, but it seems to me that right now world is ruled by white and Asians, and those are all racists.

SatanLucy 10

For a long time, I believed atheists were stupid.


How can someone not believe in God, fairies, ghosts, demons, witches, crystal balls, unicorns, Baba Yaga and magic?


I thought that atheists were silly for not believing in that, and that they were just possessed by Satan who made them stupid.


Then Trump came.


So I realized something. Right now, somewhere out there in the world, there is a hungry child begging in streets for food, starving, just wishing for a next meal which might not even come, having difficulty to fall asleep due to hunger, and being denied all basic human rights. At same time, rapist Trump enjoys countless wealth, is worshipped as God's chosen, elected for president, has cryptocurrency named after him, is allowed to commit war crimes all over the world after he stole from charity and committed dozens of other crimes.


If this isn't proof that there is no God, I don't know what is. Even 10 trillion years in heaven wouldn't make up for seeing this evil.

SatanLucy 10

Every time I tell someone I am map, I can almost feel the rage and condemnation building up inside them, their feelings becoming very upset.


It is as if that one sentence is enough to turn a normal conversation into a very awkward and angry one, and sometimes people even want to beat me up.


I don't think any other sentence works better for rage bait, because there is a response for anything they say after.


If they try to judge me or blame me, I say that it's not my fault, it's just my brain, and there is no cure, and I am peaceful and think that age of consent should be 21.


If they ask me why am I going around telling people that, I say "Would you rather for me to pretend and lie to you so you dont know???"


This is something which always makes people angry, so it's proved to be best rage bait. It offends basically anyone regardless of their political orientation unless they are anarcho-capitalists. It doesn't work on anarcho-capitalists, but it works on virtually all religions and almost all political sides. Left, right, communists, Nazis, MAGA, progressives, they all hate map.


And best part is that it's extremely easy rage bait. You don't have to do anything, just casually mention in conversation that you are map, and suddenly you get all the attention.


I used to think that fake suicide attempt and pretending to be suicidal gets most attention, but no. What gets most attention is telling people you are map. Tho it doesn't work if you are a woman because women map aren't hated, only men map are.

SatanLucy 2

A lot of people only talk about how to increase your life expectancy, but what about how to reduce it?



Social Isolation: Loneliness and weak social networks have a profound physiological impact. Prolonged isolation reduces an individual's overall survival chances by 50%, acting as a mortality risk factor comparable to heavy smoking.


Chronic Unmanaged Stress: Prolonged stress and anxiety constantly flood the body with cortisol, weakening the immune system and damaging cardiovascular health. Studies indicate chronic stress reduces life expectancy by an average of 2.8 years


Chronic Sleep Deprivation or Excess: Sleeping fewer than 5–6 hours per night accelerates cellular aging and increases systemic inflammation. Interestingly, consistently sleeping more than 9 hours a night is also heavily correlated with decreased lifespans and elevated mortality risks


Severe Weight Extremes: Obesity is associated with an average reduction of 3.1 to 3.2 years of life. Conversely, an unhealthily low Body Mass Index (BMI under 22.5 kg/m²) also shortens life expectancy by 2.1 to 3.5 years due to frailty and underlying vulnerabilities.


Prolonged Sitting: Independent of overall exercise habits, sitting for more than 3 to 8 hours a day creates metabolic disturbances that increase early death risk by 20%, effectively shaving up to two years off a lifespan.


Ultra-Processed Foods: Diets heavily reliant on ultra-processed meats, highly refined sugars, and excessive sodium trigger systemic inflammation, poor gut health, and metabolic dysfunction. High consumption of ultra-processed food is linked to a 10% to 14% increase in the risk of premature death, primarily driven by diabetes and cardiovascular disease


Excessive Alcohol Consumption: Heavy alcohol intake acts as a physiological toxin that causes severe organ damage and elevates the risk of early death, reducing life expectancy by over 3 years in men


Smoking: Chronic tobacco use is one of the single most drastic drivers of premature mortality. Men who smoke heavily lose an average of 9.4 years of life expectancy, while women lose an average of 7.3 years. Even light smoking (fewer than 10 cigarettes a day) can reduce lifespan by roughly 5 years.


Poor Oral Hygiene: Chronic gum disease (periodontitis) allows oral bacteria to enter the bloodstream, causing systemic inflammation linked to heart disease and stroke, which can increase overall mortality risk by up to 30%


Avoiding Preventive Checkups: Skipping routine blood pressure, cholesterol, and cancer screenings allows silent, treatable conditions—such as concurrent hypertension and type 2 diabetes—to progress unchecked, compounding cardiovascular mortality risks


Lack of Purpose or Optimism: Longitudinal data show that individuals who report a low "sense of purpose" or a persistently pessimistic outlook face significantly higher rates of early cardiovascular death and cognitive decline.



What also reduces life expectancy is having no sex, no friends, no social life, being atheist, being an introvert, living in a communist country, living in muslim country, living in hindu country, being a black with protestant as religion, not reproducing, being a couch potato, using social media all the time to develop depression, and last but not least, not getting vaccinated.

SatanLucy 8

After reading countless of studies which say that women want love, compassion, conversations, empathy, care, attention, emotions.... I realized that anyone who made those studies is an idiot, because he mistook what women say they want with what they actually want, and what they pretend to want.


Women dont say what they want. They are dishonest. Men work in same way.


When it comes to women, the only thing I want from them is their genitals.


But I am not going to say to a woman:


"I want your genitals."


or


"Can please I borrow your genitals for 5 minutes?".


This is because I am not honest, and if I were, women would look at me as if I were a freak or Trump.


And women arent honest either. Woman isnt going to come to me and say "I am only giving you my genitals to get all your money", but why else would they give me their genitals? They certainly arent handing them out for free, so there are some requirements.


So I decided to do my own study, by studying social media posts. In those posts, pattern which repeated the most was money and gifts, as well as man being always present in her life.


There was no other pattern which consistently repeated. Women were even ready to marry most ugly old men just for money, and study which I found online did say most women marry partners richer than them.


Virtually no woman was bragging about how her man was nice and compassionate on its own being enough. Every time those qualities were even mentioned, they were accompanied by 1 or 2 of these: Him being richer and providing gifts, and him merely being present.


Women often complained about only 2 things: man not being present, or man not being rich.


Even for women who preferred abusive men, these 2 qualities repeated.


And then I ran into posts of women who seem to exclusively farm money from men and are quite open about it.


So, in simple terms, its about having money and being present. Other qualities such as compassion and being nice can be good too, but they dont work without money or without being present.

SatanLucy 8



Komi can't communicate, so she is like me. I can't communicate either. Whatever I say is either stupid or offends people. But maybe I learn to communicate with this manga. I have 165 mangas now in total, more if you count omnibus editions as 3x. My room is a mess. I can't even remember the last time I cleaned it. I wish my room was cute, but it's not. But at least Komi is cute.

SatanLucy 5

There is a huge riot going on in France, but what is more disturbing is the way French government and police reacted to protests and riots.


They severely injured many children, a 15 year old boy lost a hand, another 15 year old lost an eye after being hit by a police officer who fired tear gas at him, a 17 year old girl lost an eye in same way. Countless other war-like injuries, happening to children in France, just because they became dissatisfied with corrupt French government who couldnt even bother to give them decent education but forced them into crowded schools which were almost falling apart, fired teachers and decided to "save money by reducing education".


French police are using brutal force against children.


I stand with the students of France. French government is cursed. Their police officers should all lose their jobs, because instead of protecting children they were hurting them. Government of France should immediately resign in shame and give full power to students who are, I am sure, much more competent than French government ever could be.



https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/oct/16/french-police-injuries-teenagers-school-protests-arrests-custody



https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9zrdmxp4vy6o

SatanLucy 37

A lot of people believe in unregulated Capitalism, and for the first time in human history, we have a crisis which for all previous systems was unimaginable: Time when production is so high that amount of things produced is far more than enough for whole population, while at same time a good amount of population is denied of basic necessities.


As an economical expert in all known and unknown fields of economics, someone who has such high understanding of economy that even those with PhD in economics look like idiots when talking to me, someone who invented dozens of brand new economic systems and hundreds of economic theories, someone who proved beyond doubt why long term economics is the only viable form of economics, someone who proved that capitalism wastes resources as opposed to being cost efficient, someone who proved that any war strategy which doesnt have cost efficiency of economics is a long term defeat, someone who proved that any government capitalism long term has results in waste of resources by government, someone who proved that maximizing profits and production only results in complete degradation of society and return to slavery while at same time countries which refuse to join such system face difficulty to compete with such a system,


this problem of capitalism has always amused me, so I coined a term for what is happening.


Demand caused crisis.


Crisis in capitalism isnt caused by supply. Supply is actually quite sufficient. So I realized the only thing thats left is crisis caused by demand.


And unlike government caused issues, this issue is actually entirely caused by unregulated capitalism.


The issue sort of works like this:


Capitalism produces a pie. In an ideal case, pie is then bought by all citizens in a country, each having a piece of pie. However, in Capitalism, what happens is that rich people buy most of the pie and leave everyone else with scraps.


What also happens is that rich demand a more higher quality pie, so they control production to produce higher quality pie and use much more resources for that, while leaving less resources for production of pie for masses.


Of course, if you have IQ even a bit above 140, you already realize this isnt about a pie.


Its about houses, land, cars, and all products which have "disproportionate purchase" by the rich.


For example, crisis of housing in USA. Around 40% of Americans dont own house they live in. This isnt because there is a shortage of houses. It is because rich found a new way to make themselves richer: Buy houses and apartments on mass scale, earn profit from rent, earn profit because houses rise in price. This increases cost of living for all others, because even if supply houses is sufficient, the supply is reduced for everyone else when rich people decide to take most of it.


And this problem is exclusive problem of unregulated capitalism, because rich have every incentive to do this when unregulated.


But they dont do this just with houses. All products which have disproportionate consumption by the rich face same issue.


For example, if it took 10$ to produce one unit of food, and 100$ to produce one unit of food which is high quality made for rich only, the more the rich buy the 100$ food, the less resources are left to make 10$ food, causing price rise as demand for resources increases because rich buy things which cost more resources and as result cause resource shortage in all other areas, especially in areas of production for bottom of society.



I repeat, I am an expert in all fields of economics, and the only economically literate person on Earth. Everyone else is illiterate at economics. And at this point, this feels more like a curse than a blessing, such as how smart person feels when being surrounded entirely by idiots.


But in hope that anyone who reads this has at least the world's tiniest brain in economics, I will now explain to you in simple terms this problem of capitalism, but first about economy.


Economy is about supply and distribution. One cannot go without another. If distribution fails, society still faces shortages even if supply is high. Such as cases where world produces more than enough food, but that food doesnt reach starving Palestinians and instead ends up in a trash can of some European.


Capitalism works to create supply, but utterly fails to distribute supply it created.


Capitalism produces more than enough food, but that food doesnt reach those who starve. Capitalism produces more than enough houses, but those houses arent available for homeless. Capitalism produces more than enough smartphones, but not everyone can afford it.


Each area of capitalism faces one exactly same problem: producing something and then failing to distribute it.


However, the demand caused crisis brings the problem to a new level, because the rich artificially control the distribution to further deny ordinary people of supply.


Capitalism is a system of countless problems, from over draining Earth's resources until Earth says "I have no more to give", to overworking people and making them slaves who cant rest from work because it is necessary to maximize profits and production and secure market dominance on global scale, to rich people being able to influence markets greatly and cause shortages at a time where no such shortages should exist.


As someone who has such wide knowledge of economics that Karl Marx would declare me his superior heir, I often wonder two things. One is, do people even realize where capitalism is going, and two is, do ordinary people really find it fun to make rich richer at their own expense?


Capitalism is a system designed to create delusions, because only people who live in delusion and arent rich would actually approve of such a system.


Capitalism is a system designed to maximize profits. Only those who maximize their profits can actually climb higher on social rank, and maximizing profits means doing whatever immoral or society-damaging thing necessary to maximize it.

SatanLucy 9

I always wondered how can someone be a Christian.


On one hand, they accuse Satan of being totally evil.


On the other hand, they worship a God who did dozens of genocides in Old Testament, commanded killing of children, commanded rape, said that woman should marry her rapist, basically genocided almost entire Earth because he didn't agree with people's sex life, and then comes back as Jesus spreading love everywhere while talking of eternal torture for anyone who is not up to insane "standard" which not even Jesus himself could follow as his ideology killed a lot of people who followed him so he is guilty of murder too.


I know they say Satan is the bad guy, but how could Satan be possibly worse than Christian God?


There is basically no crime Christian God didn't commit. He genocided newborns in Egypt, exterminated entire cultures after invading them, commanded parents to kill their children if they are disobedient, stoned women for having a sex life, killed people who didn't want to follow religion of their parents, killed trans, gays, prostitutes, witches, seers, even killed people who worshipped differently, killed people who worked on Saturday, killed all male children in nations he invaded while keeping female children "for themselves", Christians even did human sacrifice and animal sacrifice, Christian God even killed fetuses by inventing procedure which supposedly kills fetus of a woman who is adulteress, even wrote that woman who doesn't scream when raped wasn't really raped and should be stoned for adultery.


So I don't see how could Satan possibly be worse than that. Like, what can Satan possibly do to be worse than Christian God? What can Satan possibly do which Christian God didn't already do?


I was trying to think how could someone be worse than God of rape, eternal torture and genocide, but nothing comes to mind.

SatanLucy 8

Story of Matrix movies goes something like this:


Humans develop AI. In year 2100 or so, AI starts killing humans. In an attempt to stop AI, humans block out the Sun, because AI cant survive without sunlight? Well, the story probably isnt perfectly written. But anyway, AI finds a new source of energy by using humans to generate energy, but to keep these humans alive, AI not just feeds them yucky food, but also for some reason created a fake virtual world where these people believe they live in 2009 or whatever, and virtual world to them looks 100% authentic and they dont even know its a virtual world.


It is theoretically possible that current year is 2200 or 2300, and you decided to try out living a life in 21st century again so you turned on this simulation and entered it like playing games which in future will anyway likely be 100% like reality.


However, this theory can only be true for people like Trump. No ordinary person would choose to live the life they live in this simulation. So ordinary person is likely just a computer program.

SatanLucy 13


I always thought that the ideal way for a woman to live her life is to just do as she is told.


If a man tells her to do something, she does it and man is happy. Its a simple working system.


However, the problem with modern women is that they are fussy. They are not satisfied with this system.


Modern women think that their wants matter.


So now man's approach to women cant be "do this, do that".


Now its the opposite. Modern women are fussy and its actually the men who have to be obedient.


So if you want to have success in dating as a man, just do whatever woman tells you to do. The roles have reversed, and men are not in charge anymore. Women are.


So man should just do whatever woman tells him.

SatanLucy 1

This economical system was revealed to me by the demiurge, so I call it Archon.


There are many variations of this system, so I spent some time thinking which variation would be best for USA.


The basic principle of a system is that new created money isn't given exclusively through loans and increasing debt, but is printed and distributed to population.


Printing money is necessary to keep economy going, but right now all new printed money ends up in either banks as debt or in government budget.


Banks and governments can't be trusted, so the newly created money is mostly wasted.


However, under archon system, newly created money doesn't go to either government or bank. It goes directly to citizens.


Currently in USA, banks print bunch of money and basically borrow it to government and other people. So most of the newly created money is ironically the debt. So new money creation, despite being crucial for economy, raises debt each time when done.


So it's essentially a debt driven economy, economy which couldn't even function without debt because it's a primary way of creating new money.


So I spent some time thinking which version of Archon system would fix USA.


I used to have this idea that 50% of newly created money goes to citizens, 50% goes to government to reduce budget deficit. However, this idea only works if government is competent, and government in USA couldn't be less competent.


So then I decided that 100% of newly printed money goes to citizens.


That seems like the only decentralized money creation solution which won't be corrupted by banks or government, or by anyone because it doesnt have centralized power to corrupt it.


But then I went a step further. Maybe all citizens being owners of newly created money is a positive idea, but there could be a better one. What if newly created money was distributed to citizens below certain poverty line? That way, someone who is a billionaire would get 0 and someone who is actually poor would get more.


Government would still be funded by taxes, but tax revenue would increase because citizens would have more money to spend, businesses would profit more due to increased demand and thus more businesses would open to meet demand and thus also increase supply.


The advantage of this system is perfectly clear. Its decentralized new money creation, instead of centralized.


Why should newly created money go to banks who will turn it into debt, or the government who will waste it in corruption? Newly created money should go directly to citizens, as opposed to being introduced to them as debt.

SatanLucy 11

I mean, 25% chance of getting raped, 81% chance to be sexually harrassed, 51% chance to experience physical violence, 30% chance to experience bullying, and 50% chance to be emotionally abused by a partner, would definitely scare me enough to never leave my house again.

SatanLucy 5

I always wanted to learn how to play piano, but I couldnt bother spending years it takes to actually learn it.


Then one night, I went to sleep. I was dreaming about being a wizard, then suddenly that dream stopped and another dream began where God appeared in my dream.


God said: "Once every thousand years, I choose someone and appear in their dream to grant them any wish. This time I chose you. Ask anything from me. I will grant any one wish you want."


I was a bit confused, but then I said: "Okay, if its any wish, teach me how to play piano in under one minute."


God seemed a bit confused and said: "Thats very strange. Most people would ask something noble like ending all wars, solving world hunger, or to bring their loved ones back to life."


I said: "Forget about them. Teach me how to play piano. I heard it takes years of practice, can you really do it in under one minute?"


God said: "But are you really sure that is your wish? You know you only get the one, and are you really actually sure that is the one you choose?"


I got a bit angry and said: "Wait, how do I even know you are God and not an agent of Mossad?"


God said: "Uh fine, I will teach you how to play piano in under one minute..."


I said: "I dont even believe that you can do it, but lets see."


Suddenly, a piano appeared in front of me.


God said: "Mark these four piano keys with numbers: 1, 2, 3, and 4."


So I did, and four piano keys became 1, 2, 3 and 4.


God said: "Keys are played in exact sequence, so all you need to do is remember order of numbers in a song you want to play, and press numbers in that order. So if song plays 123, you press keys 1, then 2 then 3."


I said: "Wait, thats really easy."


Then I woke up. First I thought it was just a stupid dream, but I then I said "oh what the hell, lets try it."


Song I chose was Yuki no Shingun. I watched a guy play it on piano, and I marked the keys with unique numbers, so when guy plays key with number 3, I write down 3.


In the end, the numbers I got were:


123

232

34443

123

232

34442


So only 4 piano keys in total were used in the short play I wrote down. So I decided to give it a try and press keys in that order. And it worked. It sounded exactly like that guy played it.


And apparently, this works with any instrument, not just piano, because each instrument has basic sound parts, and the sequence they are played in.