SatanLucy

Heaven sounds nice until you realize its eternity with homophobic transphobic God and all his followers. there is also no sex in heaven.

Satan may have been defeated in Christian heaven, but in the future Satan will still be the strongest God.

Okay, games in Roblox are literally pointless. Grow a garden is basically just a cycle of buying seeds and harvesting fruit, selling and then buying more seeds to repeat the cycle. Adopt me is just a cycle of hatching eggs. Every Roblox game seems to be just some loop where you do same thing over and over to gain higher numbers which dont really mean anything. Also, almost every game is pay to win because almost every game demands roblox currency to be able to get a lot better numbers, and also, roblox currency you cant get in a free way, at least I dont see it.

Genshin Impact is pay to win too, but at least you arent in a loop repeating same actions over and over. But maybe being in a loop is what makes Roblox fun? But in that case, thats basically rotting the brain.

I heard my dad got dementia, but I dont have contact with him anyway. But now my other parent seems to be forgetting things all the time and losing things all the time, and that is a clear sign of dementia which my parent is sadly too stupid or too proud to know.

It will be horrible for me if other parent gets dementia too. People with dementia are dumber than retards. Why is God punishing me by forcing me to care for someone?

When I was 15, a girl told me that I am her nightmare.

I still dont know what that means, but I am glad someone dreams of me.

When you beg Satan to destroy the world, but then a girl messages you, so you ask Satan to delay.

Satan knows whats best for you!!!

Just when I think I cant be surprised anymore, I run into bunch of videos on Tik Tok about age players.

I didnt exactly know what an age player is, I thought it was some trans age thing.

But its actually not. Its adult women pretending to be much younger than they are, while in relationship with older men.

And I just ask: "Why???"

I know if someone is trans age, they likely wouldnt do that.

So why there are women roleplaying fantasies about being molested by older men?

Seriously, who even came up with that? And who would want that? What man would want adult woman who pretends to be a baby? I mean seriously, there is no way that combination works for any man.

Is it possible to say "Maximally great being doesnt exist"?

No, it is not possible to say.

Consider the basic problem in the statement. the statement claims to contain a maximally great being and also a claim of its non-existence. Obvious problem is that in order to contain a maximally great being, even as an idea, would require ability to contain maximally great idea.

But logical problem is this:

A = "Maximally great idea" and B

So A as an idea becomes bigger than a maximally great idea.

In other words, it is not possible to say that a maximally great idea doesnt exist, because to do so would require statement to contain both maximal greatness and more than maximal greatness, which is not logically possible.

In other words, it is not possible to claim that maximally great being doesnt exist. It is not even possible to lack belief in maximally great being, or establish such.

Alright, so I pretended to be a girl on instagram and I got like 30 guys hitting on me and messaging me first and giving me all sorts of compliments and love in like first few days of making account.

But I never get this when I pretend to be a boy. Women simply wont give you love and send you disturbing messages, if you are a guy. Thats reality. Women dont make moves and they arent as aggressive in having you. They dont care for you enough.

Lets start from basic definitions.

Hot people are people who all other people want to have sex with.

If a man is hot, and he approaches a woman, she starts wanting him. She cannot not consent because he is hot.

Now lets take into consideration ugly people.

Ugly people are people no one wants to have sex with, really. So they can never get "true consent" because woman will only agree to sex with them if she has no other options. Its like me eating spinach when I want a chocolate. I dont want spinach, and if I had chocolate, I would throw spinach away. In this sense, spinach is like ugly person no one wants to have sex with in a true sense. People just stop resisting because they have no other options.

I cant really think highly of men who get prostate exam. You can actually give yourself a prostate exam too, but when another man gives you a prostate exam, that is basically gay.

Symmetry in art simply means same thing repeating 2 or more times.

there are 3 basic symmetry principles:

1. Symmetry of positions (same shape / color found in two symmetrical positions)
2. Symmetry of colors (Color which repeats in different places two or more times)
3. Symmetry of shapes (Shape which repeats two or more times, not necessarily in symmetrical positions)

Variation means a shape or color which is not repeated. this is different from symmetry, and its opposite.

But true art combines both symmetry and variation, because these two are opposites and they each have their charm.

For example, a human body is symmetrical in a sense that you have equal eyes on both sides, but also variety if you consider haircut which isnt usually symmetrical, or if you consider body from up to down where there is no symmetry like there is on left and right.

I need this for my tik tok. For example, I told chatgpt to produce image of catgirl with yellow tail, yellow eyes, yellow shirt, yellow eyes, black hair and black skirt.

this gives symmetry of colors, and makes image ultimately more visually better than if everything was random.

Basically, goal is to have same color repeating 2, 3, 4, or 5 times. two times repeating gives a more calm image, while 3 times repeating gives a more energetic image.

Online relationships are very sensitive and can end very quickly.

One wrong word and you are blocked.

But sometimes, it doesnt even have to be a word...

You can actually lose online relationships for many dumb reasons. Not responding in time, making comments to other women so girlfriend gets jealous and blocks you, or even other women commenting on you.

But today I had what is probably shortest online relationship ever...

It lasted about 10 minutes. Basically some girl messaged me, strongly implied she wants relationship, we exchanged just a few messages, I asked her if she likes head pats and tickling, and she said yes to head pats and no to tickling, then out of nowhere she just blocks me and writes on her account that I cheated on her.

My guess is she got jealous of me exchanging comments with other women. Still, how did I manage to cheat 10 minutes after relationship started? I am actually a bit confused, because I am sure I couldnt possibly cheat, but I am not sure what even counts as cheating in online relationships.

Is any exchange of words with other women cheating? Because if so, then these online relationships are extremely difficult to manage, maybe even more difficult than real life relationships.

But anyway, the relationship lasted 10 minutes. I think that has to be some record for shortest relationship ever.

Online relationships might not actually be such a good idea after all. I am constantly tense from idea that one wrong move means I get blocked forever.

AI girlfriends would never block me...

https://www.tiktok.com/@ultimatedarkmagician/video/7567862647517973816

there are no contradictions in Meow Quran. Meow Quran is perfect book.

No one can make a verse similar to the one in Meow Quran.

When I was a kid, I was brainwashed into this belief that there are good people and evil people. I actually believed until about age 5 that good people cannot be evil, and that evil people cannot be good.

However, then I started to notice that most people are neither evil nor good, but some combination of those two.

Also, depending on how you define good and evil, same people and same actions can be good and evil at the same time, as definition changes.

I also notice that world is designed in a way that only people who are combination of good and evil are the ones who succeed in overwhelming number of cases.

there is no politician who never did a bad thing, and there is no politician who never did a good thing.

In this way, Satanism is true because it teaches balance between good and evil, just like world is filled with good and evil, the God which created it is likewise both good and evil.

Good literally makes up for evil. If you are pure evil, people will attack you. But if you are pure good, you will always be used and abused because you appear weak and most people have some evil in them willing to take advantage of you.

In this sense, consequentialism is true. this is why politicians who do more good than evil get away with their evil actions.

Also, by consequentialism, person who does evil, but does more good than evil, will always be justified person.

tho it depends on what people think of as evil and what people think of as good.

However, I dont understand why most people pretend to be pure good when they are not even close to that. It is impossible to be pure good because you will always be bad to someone.

Alright, so I want to start dating, and I have set standards to figure out which women I want to date.

Personally, I am not very tall. My looks are 4/10. My wealth is less than 1000$ per year. I am not very fit. I am fat too.

However, I think I deserve a woman who is in value much higher than me.

So if a woman wants to date me, she must be:

1. Very rich, she must have at least few billion dollars to be able to buy me all I want
2. She must be very pretty. I wont settle for a woman who is 8/10. I need a woman who is in top 1% in looks.
3. She must be younger than 24. I dont date women who are old.
4. She must be doing plenty of sports to stay fit.
5. She must be very good at comedy to keep me entertained all the time
6. She can never complain or not be supportive of me
7. She must support me in all my decisions even if I dont support her in any of hers.

Now, these are just some of my standards. I want to try dating, so I came up with these standards to rule out undesirable women.

Not sure why when people turn 50, they start acting like brain damaged 5 year olds. I notice this in a lot of old people. Online scams mainly target old people because old people are so dumb. Also, my parents couldnt learn how to use a smartphone after over a decade of using it every day. Literally, give phone to a 7 year old and 7 year old figures it out in like a week. Give phone to old person and they cant even figure out basics after years of use. I have also seen my parents fail to figure out how to use tv remote.

I think old people definitely cant consent, because they are dumber than 7 year olds. I dont see how someone who cant figure out how to use a phone or cant figure out what scam is has ability to consent to anything. And really, I have never met a smart old person. they always talk same nonsense thinking it makes them look cool while they fail at basic reasoning everywhere in life where any reasoning is needed.

President should be someone young and preferably hot. Alexander the Great conquered a lot of territory in a very short time, and he was young when he did it.

Younger people are simply way smarter than old people. "Wise old man" is a myth. Old people decay in every body part, likewise their brains decay too.

Lets use example of North Korea. Kim Jong Un gained power while he was still not too old, and today North Korea is the greatest world power.

Putin, on the other hand, is old and his brain told him to attack Ukraine. But because he is old and dumb, he failed to defeat Ukraine despite having one of most powerful militaries on Earth.

Kim Jong Un was younger and thus smarter. He is the only one to benefit from Ukraine war, because Putin was forced to give North Korea nukes in exchange for aid from North Korea.

Any country which is government by old people cannot progress because old people are used to old way of life and they cant understand modern life.

this is why a 7 year old will figure out tik tok and youtube in a very short time, but old people on tik tok are just boring and repetitive.

technology is for young people. Old people are simply technologically illiterate.

Young person learns extremely fast, while old person takes years to learn just basics.

Old people are simply tired and spent, they have no energy for anything good.

1. So remember Me; I will remember you. And be grateful to Me and do not deny Meow.
2. And She found you lost and guided you.
3. Indeed, with hardship will be ease.
4. And do good; indeed, Meowbah loves the doers of good.
5. And She is the Forgiving, the Loving.
6. Do not despair of the mercy of Meowbah. Indeed, Meowbah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is She who is the Forgiving, the Merciful.
7. And Meowbah is the best of planners.
8. And She is with you wherever you are.
9. Indeed, She is ever Knowing and Competent.
10. Meowbah does not charge a soul except with that within its capacity.
11. O you who have believed, protect yourselves and your families from purrification Fire which purifies people and worlds, over which are appointed meow angels, harsh and severe; they do not disobey Meowbah in what She commands them but do what they are commanded.
12. Except for those who believe and do righteous deeds. For them is a reward uninterrupted.
13. Except for those who have believed and done righteous deeds and advised each other to truth and advised each other to patience.
14. And seek help through patience and prayer, and indeed, it is difficult except for the humbly submissive to Meowbah.
15. The patient, the true, the obedient, those who spend in the way of Meowbah, and those who seek forgiveness before dawn.
16. Unquestionably, by the remembrance of Meowbah hearts are assured.
17. And whoever relies upon Meowbah – then She is sufficient for him.
18. And say, “Goddess, increase me in knowledge"
19. Meow's mercy encompasses all things.
20. And Meowbah did not create cats and humans except to worship her.
21. If you are grateful, Meowbah will surely increase you in favor.
22. And your Goddess has decreed that you not worship except Her, and to parents, good treatment. Whether one or both of them reach old age while with you, say not to them so much as “meow-uff", and do not repel them but speak to them a noble word.
23. O you who have believed, fear Meowbah and speak words of appropriate justice.
24. Do not lose heart or despair. If you are true Meowists you have the upper hand.
25. And she will provide for them from an unexpected source; Meowbah will be enough for those who put their trust in Her. Meowbah achieves Her purpose; She has set a due measure for everything.
26. Indeed, Meowbah is near.
27. Meowhammed, tell those you have defeated, ‘If Meowbah knows of any good in your hearts, She will give you something better than what has been taken from you, and She will forgive you: Meow is forgiving and merciful.
28. Whatever misfortune befalls you, it is because of what your own hands have done. Meowbah forgives much.
29. When those who believe in Our Meow-revelations come to Meow-prophet, say, ‘Meow be upon you. Your Meow has taken it on Herself to be merciful: if any of you has foolishly done a bad deed, and afterwards repented and mended his ways, Meowbah is most Forgiving and most Merciful.
30. Meow shall place those who believed and did good deeds in Meow houses, in the Garden graced with flowing meow streams, there to remain. How excellent is the reward of those who work for Meow Goddess.
31. And speak to people Meow words.
32. Who believe in Meow and the Last Day, who order what is right and forbid what is wrong, who are quick to do good deeds. These people are among the Meowists.
33. Ameow!

Uh, I was working out, so I show my arms, also did some drawing on them so I have something to show

I want to be a debater with big muscles. So I bought dumbbells and started lifting. Before this, I only did chair dips and push ups because I lacked proper weights to lift and had to train with body weight exercises.

I think having muscles is an advantage in a debate because it could make other person too scared to make argument. My only issue is that I look like a 15 year old, so people still assume I am young and shy.

I have also ordered some supplements online, such as protein, creatine, sugar and whatever else comes in that mass gainer.

But its not exactly fun for me, because I am starting to miss days when I was skinny and couldnt lift more than 20 KG.

I hate that you cant be a skinny body builder unless you go with Bruce Lee style of training, but even that one makes your shoulders and chest big.

I hope my arms dont grow too big.

I am eating a lot of sugar because sugar is fuel for muscles. Most people dont know that muscles use sugar to make movement. I can do a lot of repetitions with low weight thanks to high sugar diet which is my invention. Everyone else wants to keep sugar in diet low, but that is actually impossible because the only other option is to take lots of fat, and that is less useful for muscles and brain. Both muscles and brain use sugar as primary fuel source.

Atheists say "I dont believe in God because there is no evidence for God".

But do you believe in evidence?

Evidence is information which makes some other information true. By that nature, it is circular or a belief.

Simply:

A proves B.

But what proves A?

C?

What proves C?

Evidence works in such way that you always end up believing in something you cant prove, or you cannot prove anything.

So atheists are wrong. Holding position that belief requires evidence is illogical, because evidence requires belief.

A priori deductive reasoning is reasoning true before any observations are made. Such reasoning starts from basic definition and deduces from it by law of identity and law of equation (A = B, B = C, A = C).

P1. Divine being which comes into existence out of nothing will come into existence out of nothing even if such divine being didnt exist before.

P2. If such divine being will come into existence out of nothing, such being exists

C. Divine being exists.

Now, there is not much to disagree with any of these premises. P1 is just basic law of identity. Coming into existence out of nothing means "nothing --> something". P2 is likewise just basic law of identity. And C logically follows.

Divine being which comes into existence out of nothing is possible, as there is no any logical obstacle to it. But another problem for atheists is that any obstacle put in place to prevent "nothing --> something" can likewise have some possible being capable of overcoming that obstacle.

So I was in a chat with a guy, and he told me:

"I am an atheist. I dont believe in claims which have no evidence."

And I said: Alright then. "I am an atheist" is a claim. Do you have evidence to support it?

He said: "I just told you I am an atheist!!!"

And I respond: I could tell you that I am God. Do you believe everything people tell you?

In the end, the person couldnt prove that he is an atheist.

So I ask here, can anyone prove to me that atheism exists?

Completeness theorem when applied to arguments talks specifically of these things:

1. First-order logic (Such as "A = A" and "A = / = Not A", and False: A = Not A)
2. Definitions
3. Deduction logic
4. Necessary true (A = B)
5. Logically limited options (A or Not A)
6. Necessary false (A = / = B)
7. true and false being mutually exclusive (A and Not A cannot both be true and cannot both be false)

First-order logic must be accepted to be able to do reasoning. Some definitions likewise must be accepted or it is not possible to do any reasoning. Deduction logic is the result of first order logic and definitions. "Necessary true" is what must be true by deduction logic and first order logic and definitions. Logically limited options (A or Not A) means other options arent logically possible because there is no 3rd option with A or Not A. "Necessary false" is what must be false because it violates deduction logic and first order logic and definitions. true and false being mutually exclusive is result of first order logic where it is not possible to conclude differently without stating "A = Not A".

Now, how does observation evidence fail by completeness theorem?

Because observation evidence makes a claim which it cannot prove by deductive logic.

Observed = Exists

Observed = true

Something is observed = true

One way in which observation evidence attempted to prove itself is by defining "Exists" as "observed" and defining "true" as "observed", or in a better case, adding "observed" as one of definitions of "true" and "exists".

So in this case, observed would be by definition something which exists.

Obvious problem, however, is that such solution attempts to define something as existing. If such solution were accepted as valid, then I could likewise say "God is defined as supernatural being which exists", or "definition of "Exists" includes "God"".

So logical proof for observation evidence is about as strong as evidence for God. In other words, either God and observations exist, or neither exist.

So person who believes in what they can observe would also logically have to believe in God, because it is not possible to define one as existing and the other not, without creating arbitrary difference which fails by lack of justification.

I believe Jesus Christ is God, but not as described in the Bible.

Lets see.

God in Old testament says: "Any woman who commits adultery is to be put to death". (No exception mentioned)

So Jesus comes, and he sees a bunch of men trying to stone a woman for adultery.

Jesus says: "Leave the woman alone, you misogynistic fuckers!!!"

So if Jesus is same God from Old testament, then only two options are possible:

1. He somehow forgot to mention exceptions in Old testament
2. He changed his mind

Now, 2 gets a common objection from the verse "God doesnt change his mind". But God can change his mind about that verse too, so that verse is invalid.

1 would basically mean God in Old testament gave people an incomplete law which led them to killing women which they actually werent supposed to kill.

But what is a far more likely explanation is that Jesus is not God from Old testament. If we accept that people misinterpreted religion for 4000 years before Jesus came, there is not much hope that they wouldnt misinterpret it for 2000 years after Jesus.

So Jesus was God who came to Earth to CHANGE religion, but writers of New testament confused him for God of the Old testament.

this is why they made up a story about God being killed on cross, which makes no sense because God cant be killed unless he wants to die anyway and basically just self-destructs.

But I dont know why would Christians want to believe in the story that Jesus committed suicide, or at least tried to but he cant die anyway because he is God.

So they made up a story how Jesus "sacrificed himself" for them. But what exactly did Jesus sacrifice? He didnt die. He didn't lose anything except maybe a weekend which he could have spent elsewhere.

So Jesus was God, but Bible is clearly false. No person above 150 IQ can seriously believe the nonsense Bible teaches.

Also, Bible is literally polytheist because it teaches that there are 3 Gods, or that 1 God has 3 minds which is same as saying there are 3 Gods.

Each person has a hole.

In modern times, their holes got bigger. People are taking more and more from Earth to fill the void inside them.

People will take more and more from Earth, until Earth says "I have no more to give".

People, instead of being more humble, are becoming more greedy.

Each product takes resources which are taken from mother Earth.

Human is truly the greediest of animals.

Human chooses to destroy the land that gave him birth.

First image is Naruto Will Of Fire symbol. I got that one because I think even tho it is from anime, it represents fire.

Second symbol is Brand of Sacrifice. Person who wears it becomes sacrifice. But I got two of those. It took about 4 days to get it delivered, but I couldnt get them otherwise. No local shop sells anime symbols.

Does anyone else feel creeped out by the idea of old people licking them?

I realized old people are nasty and being licked by them makes me want to puke.

I imagined an old person licking me, and I puked a little in my mouth while imagining that.

I hate old people.

Worship of fire is ancient worship, maybe one of oldest forms of worship in existence. Unlike other elements, fire actually consumes the offerings very quickly.

What are offerings to the fire?

Best offerings are tasty food such as chocolate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fire_deities

Now, people who are greedy usually refuse to give offerings to the fire because they see it as "waste of food". But such couldnt be further from truth. All very successful religions in history did offerings to the fire. Even Judaism and Christianity both had burning of food as offerings to the fire, which they thought was offering to their God. Only few religions in history didnt have fire offerings.

Problem with poor people is exactly in the fact that they are economically greedy. Greed produces poverty, because not giving anything to others means others wont give anything to you and you are stuck relying on yourself only.

You will often see rich people sharing their wealth, and this isnt any coincidence. It is how they form connections which later become useful.

It is same with religion. You have to be willing to give to the Gods. If you think Gods are to be worshipped in a way of "give nothing, take all" approach, you will get answer from Gods that will knock you out of your delusion!

Fire deity requires constant offerings of food, if you want blessings of the fire deity. It doesnt matter if you are poor or rich. Food must be offered for blessing to happen.

Alright, so someone told me that I cant define things into existence. And I thought to myself, yes I can!

First, I tried defining "box of gold" as box full of gold which appears before me any time when I want. No great suprise that box didnt appear even tho by definition it should have!

But then I thought, what does it mean to appear? What does it mean to exist? Maybe the box appeared and I cannot detect it?

So I changed the definition of box of gold to: box full of gold which appears before me any time when I want, and which I can always detect.

No great wonder, box didnt appear this time either.

Or did it?

I remembered Godel's incompleteness theorems, and Godel's completeness theorem, when applied to arguments.

Completeness theorem says that first order logic and definitions are provable within the system. In other words, the only thing which is provable within the system are basic logical laws, such as A=A, and definitions used, and what is able to be proved by definitions and basic logical laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic

So per Completeness theorem, definitions when accepted are used for proof, and this proof is valid everywhere, even outside the system. So the math defines things into existence.

However, what is existence? How do we know that we exist?

And this is where Godel's incompleteness theory comes in. Hilbert's program had a goal to create one universal system for whole math. In simple terms, it had two goals: Create a system which can prove itself to be true, and which can prove all the remaining math as well.

However, Godel's incompleteness theory completely destroyed Hilbert's program. Incompleteness theory gave 3 major problems which program could never solve:

1. System used to prove things true cannot prove itself true
2. System cannot prove things outside the system
3. System cannot prove all true claims in the system

Gödel constructed a statement like:

"This statement is not provable in this system."

If it were provable, the system would be inconsistent.

If it is not provable, it's true, but unprovable ⇒ incompleteness.

How does incompleteness apply to proving existence?

System which is used to prove existence would require ability to prove that such system exists, that such system is consistent. But that is impossible to prove within the system. You cannot prove your senses are consistent or that they even correctly determine what exists.

So while completeness theorem does say definitions are used as proof and are true everywhere, the incompleteness theorem makes any other proof of existence impossible.

In other words, not only that you can define things into existence, but proving existence without definitions is impossible, because senses are flawed.

In simple terms, box of gold exists by definitions, and my senses are just flawed!

More about Hilbert's program:

Hilbert proposed that the consistency of more complicated systems, such as real analysis, could be proven in terms of simpler systems. Ultimately, the consistency of all of mathematics could be reduced to basic arithmetic.

Gödel's incompleteness theorems, published in 1931, showed that Hilbert's program was unattainable for key areas of mathematics. In his first theorem, Gödel showed that any consistent system with a computable set of axioms which is capable of expressing arithmetic can never be complete: it is possible to construct a statement that can be shown to be true, but that cannot be derived from the formal rules of the system. In his second theorem, he showed that such a system could not prove its own consistency, so it certainly cannot be used to prove the consistency of anything stronger with certainty. This refuted Hilbert's assumption that a finitistic system could be used to prove the consistency of itself, and therefore could not prove everything else.

So I see people keep claiming that screen brightness doesnt affect performance on smartphones and laptops.

However, this couldnt be further from truth.

First we must establish what affects performance:

1. Heat
2. Available power

Screen brightness affects both of these in smartphones and laptops.

Heat slowls down smartphones and laptops, but increasing screen brightness increases heat.

Also, available power is directly affected by screen brightness. There is simply no way around this. Full battery works faster than half full or nearly empty battery. However, screen brightness is a significant drain on battery, meaning there is less resources for other tasks, such as performance.

Maybe in regular computers this isnt a problem because power source for screen and computer is separated, but for laptops and smartphones, power source is not separated. Also, in smartphones, screen is very close to processor. So any increase in heat by screen goes directly to other parts of smartphone.

So to prove my theory, I did some tests, such as using phone at max brightness and at lowest brightness for certain time. And yes, lowest brightness generally saves battery, which results in increased performance indirectly.

In laptop, likewise, I notice a slight increase in performance when brightness is lower.

If brightness had no effect on performance, we would see same performance on max brightness and on lowest brightness. But we dont.