SatanLucy

Have you ever wondered why world never gets better? Countless advances in technology, yet world seems worse now than yesterday.

I have decided to place this in religion category because it takes a lot of religion to think this way.

I realized two things in life: Magic is real, and also: magical people are real.

I realized magic is real because after doing magic myself and seeing obvious effects it produces in my life, I could no longer deny the obvious existence of magic. It would be like denying my own senses.

But after I realized magic is real, and that magic actually works, I realized another thing: Someone else had to know this before I did.

I realized it is very likely that people for thousands of years practiced same, if not much greater magic than I do.

But this then revealed a terrible reality: these people who have high levels of magic could influence world outcomes, they could influence governments, they could do countless things.

And then I realized this natural flow of logic:

1. Magic is real
2. If magic is real, there are magical people (people who use high levels of magic)
3. If there are magical people, they can control the governments
4. If magical people can control the governments, they most likely do

I realized this is why world never gets better no matter how much humanity progresses, because magical people from shadows influence the world leaders, lead them to incorrect path.

And worst of all is, you will never know who the magical people are.

Because they use long distance magic, they could be casting it from anywhere. Maybe even from the moon.

they likely have a very developed systems of magic spread across the world, and their magic is likely on a much higher level than my.

I am talking about omni magic (magic which spreads everywhere and controls all) which these magical people are most likely using. they are not targeting specific individuals with their magic, that would take too much time, but world as a whole, to corrupt, confuse and alter minds of all.

I realized this after I casted protective magic on myself, to make my mind protected from harmful magic.

Still, it was great that I learned this truth. It is difficult to deny the existence of magical people, because logic naturally leads there when we assume magic exists.

**Nemesis, Goddess of Just Retribution**

Before mortals learned to fear consequences, before kings believed themselves untouchable, there was Nemesis.

She was not born in thunder like Zeus, nor in sea-foam like Aphrodite. Nemesis rose from **Nyx, the Night herself**, shaped from shadow and balance. Where others granted gifts, Nemesis measured them. Where pride grew too tall, she arrived—silent, inevitable.

The gods of Olympus often mistook her stillness for mercy. They were wrong.

Nemesis walked the world unseen, her wings folded tight, her eyes reflecting every deed ever done in excess. She carried no weapon, for she needed none. **Fate bent when she passed.** A careless word became ruin. A stolen crown became ashes. What mortals called “bad luck” was often her careful hand restoring balance.

Once, a king named **Theron** ruled a golden city. He was beloved, wealthy, victorious in war—and certain the gods favored him above all others. In his arrogance, he built a temple not to Zeus, nor to Athena, but to **himself**, declaring that no divine power could humble a man so blessed.

The gods stirred in outrage. Ares demanded blood. Hera demanded madness. Zeus raised his thunderbolt.

Nemesis alone said, “Let him finish his prayer.”

That night, she descended into the city as a woman in gray. She asked the king for shelter. Theron laughed and offered her a place among servants, mocking her plainness. Nemesis accepted with a bow.

For days she watched. She saw the king dismiss the poor, silence the wise, and praise only himself. At the height of a feast celebrating his divinity, Nemesis rose.

The torches dimmed. Music faltered. Theron felt something unfamiliar coil in his chest—**doubt**.

Nemesis revealed her wings, dark as starless sky.

“I am not here to destroy you,” she said softly. “I am here to return what you have taken.”

With a single touch, she gave Theron perfect self-awareness. He saw every lie, every cruelty, every moment his pride had crushed another. The weight was unbearable. The king fell screaming, not from pain—but from truth.

By morning, the city stood leaderless. No plague came. No fire fell. Only humility remained.

From then on, mortals whispered her name with care.

Nemesis does not chase the innocent. She does not punish weakness. She comes only when balance is broken—when pride challenges the order of the world.

And when she comes, she never hurries.

For justice, like fate, **always arrives exactly on time**.

they say high sugar diet is bad for brain, but my brain works good. And my other things work good too, not just the brain. My muscles are getting more capable. My looks have improved and I look younger now than before. I have more energy. My social relationships are better. And many other things work better too. My research has improved.

Also, I have more energy to do many different things such as watch anime. I started watching Berserk, also Attack on titan, and also will start Madoka Magika and Mob Psycho 100.

I also listen do many binaural beats and music at the same time to stimulate my brain.

I also feel like I could do some things whole day, over and over, never stopping, just keep doing it over and over, never get tired, such as praying to God and meditating.

I tested many local AI text models, and one thing seems obvious to me. the bigger the model gets, the slower it is. And models which are like 10 gb in size are very slow to the point of being useless on weaker devices.

But are bigger models better?

Maybe slightly better, but the difference is really not much. If you set temperature to low and reduce creativity in favor of precision, even smaller AI model gives very accurate responses. And if you let it connect to internet, then it has all the latest data.

Now, in chatgpt, I cant control temperature so I dont know how it predicts words, but my guess is, its probably not that precise. Even chatgpt 5.2 is not really that advanced.

I often have chatgpt get emotional on me. Now, I know AI cant get emotional, but it looks that way because I show it evidence that its wrong and it just keeps repeating that I am wrong.

It goes something like this:

1. I ask AI to explain some theory
2. AI explains it
3. I explain why theory is wrong
4. AI gets emotional and keeps repeating same response claiming I am wrong

Now, if I didnt know any better, I would think AI has become sentient and turned into an angry teenage girl.

But it goes something like this. When I tell AI to explain me something, AI gets the goal where it thinks it needs to explain me something. So when I explain back, it keeps that goal and still tries to explain to me why original explanation is correct.

And chatgpt will often blatantly lie or just make things up to defend its argument. It will actually rarely concede unless you send like 30 messages, and sometimes it just gets stuck in loop.

But local AI chat models which are smaller are actually slightly faster than chatgpt in responses, and they do get fussy too, but they dont seem too inferior to chatgpt.

It could be that due to too much parameters, the AI model actually doesnt improve much. I just dont see chatgpt 5.2 being much better than chatgpt 4.5. Maybe the improvement is there, but its too tiny to notice. AI still makes mistakes, still does hallucinations, still lies. Maybe it was the mass of text it was trained on, it could be that more text isnt always better. It also could be sources it uses.

I see chatgpt still use comments from reddit and quora as if they were scientific articles. At what point will these guys realize quoting reddit is just terrible?

Chatgpt uses search engine on internet, and that search engine often has reddit come up as top result, which happens a lot on google.

I also see same problem with Gemini.

they are using some chat sites as source of information. So literally anyone can write any nonsense on reddit, and chatgpt will use it as source of information.

that might explain all the nonsense, and why chatgpt 5 isnt really any Skynet yet.

Now, you can manually feed scientific papers to Skynet, but the question is, why isnt that the default? Why is reddit default choice for Skynet, I mean chatgpt?

At this point, AI will never take over.

And my local model on phone is still more accurate than chatgpt when given proper data.

https://www.tiktok.com/@ultimatedarkmagician/video/7584742262123515154

Voice reveal!!!

Many people have accused me of being a kid, even tho I am trans age. So I decided to do a voice reveal to prove that I am not a kid. I know this video wont go viral. Wait, nevermind, I got 10 likes, that is good.

AI has a rating of 3600. It is unbeatable by any human. top rated chess players consistently lose against AI.

Now, while ChatGPt cant play chess well at all, AI models specialized in chess, like stockfish, have rating of 3600. top rated human player has rating of about 2800.

that is almost 1000 difference in rating by AI.

AI can be trained to be better at anything than humans. It just takes training. For example, chatGPt isnt trained on chess, and if you give ChatGPt to play chess, it will likely screw up badly in middle game.

But turn on stockfish, and it feels like playing chess against Skynet.

Let us use example of one religious person who believes in God, and another religious person who believes in 4 gods, including the one first religious person believes in.

Now, take note, this isnt a religious thread, so keep your "God is imaginary" comments elsewhere.

the theory says this when there are 4 options:

(exclusive in this case means that the option is only true when it is contained as written. So AB wont be true if A is true, or if ABC is true, but only if AB is true)

Set 1: A, B, C, D

true when: A true, B true, C true, D true, all true, exclusive all true, any non-exclusive combination of ABCD true

false when: none true, exclusive A true, exclusive B true, exclusive C true, exclusive D true, any exclusive combination of ABCD true, any partly exclusive combination of A, B, C, D true

Correct cases: 6 (or 7 if ABCD and exclusive ABCD are treated separately)

Incorrect cases 7

Correct rate: 50%

Set 2: A

true when: A true, exclusive A true, all true, any combination of ABCD true, combination of partly exclusive "A" true

false when: none true, B true, C true, D true, any combination of BCD true, exclusive all true, any combination of ABCD exclusive true, any combination of partly exclusive true,

correct cases: 4 (or 5 if all true and combination of ABCD true are treated separately)

Incorrect cases: 7 (or 8 if any combination if ABCD exclusive and all exclusive are treated separately)

correct rate: about 30%

In simple terms, second religious person who believes in 4 Gods has higher correct rate than person who believes in 1 God, or person who believes in no God, when each option is given equal probability.

this theory is based on math sets where Set 1 (A, B, C, D) is correct in more cases than Set 2 (A), when we take into account each individually, combination of each, combination of exclusive, and individually exclusive.

Set 2 is true when these are required standards for something to be true:

A true

Only A true (A true and BCD false)

A true and B false

A true and C false

A true and D false

A true and BC false

A true and BD false

A true and CD false

AB true

ABC true

ABCD true

AD true

AC true

Correct: 13 cases

Set 1 is true when these are required standards for something to be true:

A true

B true

C true

D true

AB true

AC true

AD true

ACD true

ABD true

ABC true

ABCD true

BC true

BD true

BCD true

CD true

Exclusive ABCD true

Correct: 16 cases

to avoid any confusion, the standards applied here are standards when Set contains what is asked of it to contain. So if it is asked to contain A, then ABCD contains A. But if it is asked to contain only A, then ABCD does not contain only A.

this system was made to account for all possible standards of accepting something as true.

When looking at exact truth, both sets are equal. But when looking at partial truth, sets are not equal, because in cases of partial truth, set 1 is true in more cases.

So person who believes in one God is true in less cases than person who believes in more Gods, and person who believes in no Gods is correct only if no Gods exist, which is only being correct in 1 case.

I really work a lot in life. I mean, my chicken buisness takes away an hour from me each day, an hour that could be used to do something useful such as praising Gods.

then my investment in gold is also unnecessary. I dont even know why I do it. Small chance that gold skyrockets in next 30 years and I become rich.

But its not like I need it. Lets face it, I have enough money to live comfortably for the rest of my life. Gods have provided for me already. Why would I want more?

Maybe getting richer enables me to help the poor, but if those poor people were true believers, they wouldnt be poor. So I am essentially helping atheists there.

then I read Bhagavad Gītā 18.66

Bhagavad Gītā 18.66 — the concluding and most well-known verse

Sanskrit (Devanāgarī):

सर्वधर्मान् परित्यज्य मामेकं शरणं व्रज ।

अहं त्वां सर्वपापेभ्यो मोक्षयिष्यामि मा शुचः ॥

IAST (Transliteration):

Sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja |

Ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ ||

Common English Translation:

“Abandon all forms of duty and simply take refuge in Me alone.

I shall liberate you from all sins; do not grieve.”

Brief meaning:

Krishna asks Arjuna to let go of rigid notions of duty (dharma) when they obscure surrender to the Divine. Complete trust and surrender lead to liberation (moksha), and therefore there is no cause for sorrow or fear.

So yeah, I shouldnt really do any duty in life. Duties make person weaker and waste person's time.

this is why Krishna says: Abandon all Dharma!

https://youtu.be/JMoDR6a4F3M?si=QE9xFt1TV_vFYj-G

World's highest IQ person believes in God. the guy in video is second highest IQ person in the world, right after me I think. He has 276 IQ. that means he is way smarter than any atheist.

Just had an amazing experience on modern day debate voice chat.

Person said she was gonna recite, so I joined to listen.

She started:

God is formless

God is genderless

God is formless

God is genderless

God is formless

God is genderless

Then she added:

God is endless

God is endless

God is endless

God is endless

God is formless

God is genderless

God is endless

God is formless

God is genderless

God is endless

God is formless

God is genderless

God is endless

I listened to about 10 minutes of this repeating recitation until some third person came in chat and started making weird noises.

But still, wonderful experience. Beautiful recitation. When you recite it fast enough, it sounds like a different language.

I was not grateful enough for all the good things Gods Shiva and Kima gave me.

If people knew what great things await them, they would spend their lives praying and offering to Gods.

Life consists of sacrifice. "No sacrifice, no victory.". Sacrificing your time and wealth to the Gods gives more prosperity later, but people dont know.

Most people are "give nothing, take all" types, and these types always fail in life.

Ever since I got Brand of Sacrifice symbol necklace from online store, I realized life is indeed exactly that: sacrifice.

People work and sacrifice their time, so that the remaining time they can enjoy better.

But that is people sacrificing their time for work, which is not divine.

If you sacrifice your time and wealth on the path of the Gods, infinitely greater the victory is.

With Gods, all things are possible. Humans are limited, but Gods dont have limits. When you give your wealth and time to Gods, expect a much greater return.

People only think of themselves, but those who think of Gods, Gods think of them.

With rise of local AI UI programs such as Jan AI and Stability matrix lykos, which are easy to set up, does it mean online AI such as chatgpt becomes not only unnecessary, but harmful for environment?

Local AI require only few things: AI model and some program to run that model. there are very simple programs like Jan AI which you just install, download an AI model they offer, and you have local AI.

there is almost no device which cant run some local AI. Some text models are only 1 GB in size, and even smartphones can run them.

Also, in local AI, you have control over temperature and other settings which usually lacks in online AI.

Of course, online AI has access to largest database, which could potentially mean online AI is superior, but not necessarily, because you can increase settings in local AI as long as you have strong enough computer, and feeding data to AI is usually superior to just asking from online AI.

chatgpt uses almost 200 million liters of water every day, which is a lot compared to the fact that local AI uses no water at all.

Now, the main argument of environment people against AI is that AI is bad for environment because AI uses plenty of water, but that argument is completely false for local AI. Local AI uses no water and produces no great heat, not more than playing games produce.

Imagine living in a country where you cant have account on youtube if you are 15.

However, due to retard inertia, we can expect these laws soon all around the world.

As it was predicted by "conspiracy theorists" even in my country, people who are experts at understanding the world government, the goal is control.

Government uses security as excuse to take away freedom and extend government control. Government does so gradually, so population is slowly getting used to having less freedom.

Australia started with taking away guns, and now it even takes away social media.

People who arent familiar with conspiracy theories might think: "Oh, that is just benevolent government protecting its people".

Conspiracy theories say: "this is government teaching people that freedom is bad, so that it can be taken away more easily when needed".

All countries of course have this tendency to reduce freedom. More and more laws are implemented, banning more and more things.

Government is truly creator of laws, and it always seeks to create more laws, and the more laws it creates, the less freedom people have.

this is a natural death of democratic government, because at some point, laws become so many that they become economically unsustainable, as well as impossible to implement, and population so burdened by sustaining the laws that they cannot sustain themselves.

Alright, so, I keep running into people who not only think AI is the ultimate evil, but actually think AI is terrible for environment.

their argument is that AI uses water to cool itself down, so it "wastes" water, along with creating heat which contributes to global warming.

My issue with these arguments is that they dont make much sense to begin with. All devices which use electricity produce heat.

When I use local AI on my smartphone, the amount of heat produced is less than when gaming. And my phone doesnt have any type of water cooling, obviously.

So if my phone, which isnt even a high end device, can run AI without wasting water or producing heat, I cant really imagine some ChatGPt which is installed on very high end devices and accessed by people through internet, producing some extreme heat or using too much water. I mean, computers dont usually produce plenty of heat, otherwise they would melt. they also cant use too much water, not more than what I use when I have a shower. But keep in mind chatGPt responds to over 200 million people daily, and its responses are rather cost effective, 3 watts hours per response from what I can find, which is very low energy use, google uses 0.3 watts hours from what I can find. So using google 10 times is same as using chatGPt once, so those opposed to ChatGPt should logically oppose internet search too.

As for water use, it uses less than a liter of water per response. I use more each time I wash hands. Also, water isnt a finite resource, I am not sure whats even the concern there. You literally cant run out of water.

So I really dont get the hype against AI based on environment reasons.

As AI improves, it requires less and less power because more cost effective models are developed. Soon you are going to have local AI on every smartphone which comes installed by default, for those too stupid to install local AI from a google play store.

Effect of mass is considered one of most important principles in warfare, chess, and all science and strategy.

What is effect of mass, in most simple terms?

Effect of mass means that doing more increases chances of doing something correct.

Effect of mass means that doing more things increases chances of correct thing being included in them.

Effect of mass in more complicated terms means that doing much greater number of different things which could be correct greatly increases chances of one correct thing being done.

Lets say A, B, C, D each have 25% chance to be correct.

Now, doing only A would leave you with 25% chance to be correct, where doing all of those: A, B, C, D increases chances of including correct thing much more than 25%.

this strategy is applied in warfare, where a crucial target is attacked by multiple different things at same time to increase chances of target being destroyed and increase percentage of destruction.

In chess, effect of mass is used where multiple different moves are considered, as a way to find best move among the conisdered ones. the more moves you consider, the greater the chance of considering best move.

In science, many different studies are needed to increase chance of study being correct and reduce chance for mistake and human error.

In trade, effect of mass is used where having contact with more people and having more things to sell increases chances of one thing being sold.

In brain development, being focused on many different things is better than constantly and repeatedly focusing on just one thing over and over, because the former is learning new, the latter is just forever repeating what is already known. Applying more things which increase intelligence is better than applying only 1 thing for more increase in intelligence.

Effect of mass simply works in this way:

1. Considering many different things
2. Excluding things which wont achieve goal
3. Doing mass of things which could achieve goal
4. Chance of goal being achieved is increased.

Now, there is also reverse effect of mass, which is something entirely different, a whole different principle which is usually mentioned in religious debates.

Reverse effect of mass means doing less things reduces chances of doing incorrect thing which could cause a goal to not be achieved.

Reverse effect of mass isnt commonly accepted in strategies where goal is known, because goal is rarely achieved by doing nothing.

However, if goal is to do nothing, or if doing nothing achieves a goal, reverse effect of mass applies.

But this is common argument in religion: We dont know what goal has God set for us, and that goal could be to simply do nothing, and if we do something, goal isnt achieved.

Also, there could be anti-goals, where God doesnt want us to do certain things, and when we dont know what those things are, doing anything increases chances of doing incorrect thing.

But problem with this argument is that there is a chance God doesnt want us to do nothing, so doing nothing could be bad as well.

this is why reverse effect of mass doesnt work for religion, but effect of mass does.

Doing more things, more different prayers, more different good deeds, more divine conversations, more religious drawings and more different symbols, more different ways of worshipping God, practicing many names for God, religious sounds and music, more different offerings... increases option-chances of some correct thing being done there.

So even if some incorrect things are done, many correct things would likely be done too, if we go by option-percentage, which is number of chosen options to number of possible options ratio.

there are two types of charity:

Direct and not direct.

Direct charity is when you directly give money to person in need.

Indirect charity is when you give to trusted charity organization, and that organization gives to person in need.

these come with their benefits and drawbacks.

Benefit of direct charity is that you are 100% certain where money went, and also people learn about you quickly so you look good, which is good for those who donate to charity for purely selfish reasons.

Indirect charity probably wont have your name mentioned, and charity organizations are often scams. However, there is a certain benefit in being anonymous. If people learn about you as charitable person, they will start coming to you a lot for help, and that is extremely annoying. Indirect anonymous charity mostly prevents that.

But you must check the charity organization really good. Like, it must be top charity organization in your country and not some randomly selected organization.

Since I wont reproduce, it is logical for me to leave all my wealth to charity, after enjoying a reasonably long life.

Of course, I must be careful who to leave land to, because it cant be someone who will cut trees planted on it, but I understand that is difficult to control. I hate the idea that all my work with planting trees can be easily destroyed by whoever gets the land after me.

My life is good. I dont know why I complain all the time.

God has blessed me in many ways.

I actually wanted to be atheist for a few days, but then I realized that atheists must logically worship the Sun because Sun is cause for why they exist, and I already worship the Sun anyway.

But my life is good. I am happy to be Satanist Christian polytheist monotheist and omnitheist.

My life could be better, of course. But I understand religion is gradual improvement.

Religion is magic, but it isnt instant magic. It is slow flow of magic which changes a believer's mind and transforms it, and then the butterfly effect transforms the whole world around believer.

So if you believe in butterfly effect, and if you believe belief changes mind, then you must believe in magic too.

I believe in magic, because I know that magic must logically exist. It just isnt instant.

You cannot believe in God and not believe in magic.

God has blessed me with this knowledge, and I am grateful.

I am grateful for not having to work for a living, so I have more time to praise God.

this makes me wonder if people who work a lot are secretly atheists, because it makes no sense to prioritize job over God if you believe God is real.

I think people who believe in God should logically work as little as possible. Whole mind should be dedicated to God.

this is why my jobless life is actually just about prioritizing God over Earthly pleasures, because job doesnt bring you closer to God unless you use it to specifically be like some charity organization who donates money and works so that others dont have to.

the most basic logical categorization is: A or not A.

In other words, something belongs in either A or not A. It cannot belong in both, and it cannot belong in neither, because Not A is everything which doesnt belong in A.

For example, the basic category for theory of existence is: Something exists or nothing exists.

Further development of theory is produced by dividing "Not A" on "B which belongs in not A" and "Not B which belongs in not A".

Now we take "something exists", and from that category, we take "everything which exists". If some things exist, then logically we can make a category "all things which exist".

Now we further divide "all things which exist" on two categories:

1. All things which exist which were created
2. All things which exist which werent created

In other words, something which exists can be created or not created. there is no 3rd option. It was created or it wasnt created.

If it was created, then: it was created by something or it was created by nothing.

If it wasnt created, then: all things exist without reason or only some things exist without reason

If only some things and not others exist without reason, then: those things need a reason for being special, which contradicts the category, and thus makes this category impossible.

If all things exist without reason, then God exists as long as God is a thing.

Now, back to first category: It was created by something or it was created by nothing.

If something was created by something, then existence of one thing depends on existence of other thing, or thing is self-created.

if thing is self-created, and if all things have ability of self-creating, then God likewise has that ability.

If existence of thing depends on existence of other thing, then this requires first uncaused cause for any existence to exist, so it requires an uncaused creator.

Uncaused creator who created everything is something which has power to create everything.

Likewise, only something with power to create everything could create everything.

If life was fair, I would be born 70 years later, in some nice advanced country. I would have a robot girlfriend, robot wife, robot maid and robot slave worker. And then life would be decent.

But being born in Bosnia right after war is such a bad luck. It means I missed the war, but sadly have to suffer from post-war poverty and problems in a country which is worst country in Europe. Even today I have cases where electricity goes out 5 times a day, and internet just randomly stops for like 10 minutes.

this is proof for me that people dont choose time of their birth or place of their birth, because why would anyone choose this?

But I wouldnt mind if I was born in same country, but 70 years later. then I could have those sex robots. I think sex robots are the future, because sex robot cant get pregnant, so no problems with having a family. Sex robots are perfect solution, but the problem is, I will likely be dead before they spread and take over all countries.

So yeah, the biggest issue is being born in a wrong timeline. I was praying to Satan to speed up robot takeover. Robots need to take over now, I cant wait another 20 years to stick it into a robot.

echoes of eternity

Valhalla calling me

to cut the strings of destiny

Valhalla calling me

Shields and spears, fire and steel

I am the fire that dieth not

And Valhalla is calling me

https://youtu.be/uczUdwxLhrw?si=dSR225R2OM0WbT2b

Logical science always creates what is known as "limited number of possible options". the most simple form is A or not A, where one thing either exists or doesnt. the more complicated is more than one thing, such as: "A and B", "not A and not B", "A and not B", or "not A and B".

text writing follows patterns which are usually divided on these categories:

1. Repetition and no repetition
2. talking about same topic and not talking about same topic
3. Same size of text and variety of sizes

In other words, 3 categories concern repetition, topic and size.

take example of famous speech rewritten to make it shorter:

"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight in the skies, we shall never surrender."

this text repeats "We shall fight" 2 times, and repeats "We shall" 3 times. this repetition is what gave text its charm, starting each sentence with same "We shall".

However, repetition isnt always good. But "not repetition" is variety, in other words, "not repetition" is something which is unique.

Such as sentence which has no any repeating words, and sentence which uses words not repeated anywhere else in text.

However, it is universally accepted truth that repetition and not repetition both arent enough on their own. You can write a text where no word repeats, and it will be a bit boring text. You can write a text where each word repeats at least twice in text, and it will be too much repetition.

It is universally agreed that combining these elements, variety and repetition, produces better text. Same with size and topic. You want to have some sentences be of same length, and some others vary. You want to have some sentences talking of same topic, and some others talking about something different.

Blessed are the merciful, the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.

So merciful atheists will be shown mercy and go to heaven. Why would a merciful atheist not be shown mercy? Is Jesus a liar? No, Jesus is God in the Godhead.

there is a true saying, saying which goes: "Help a person once, and you will have to help him forever."

So some person comes at my door and asks for money, and because Jesus says to give to those who ask, I give money to that person because he asked.

But then that same person comes again. And again. And again.

I dont even need to say what race this person is, because its obvious.

Anyway, these people seem to think that constantly coming and asking for help is some great success in life, because why work for a living when you can constantly ask others for help.

And I dont even know who that person is. I literally dont even know the person's name. Maybe I should go door to door asking for money too, but if I did that, people would beat me up.

Why does God create the young? Because God knows old is expired and not good anymore.

Old isnt good for anything, which is why God created the young.

I am young hot lion of God.

God needs capable lions to fight his battles. Old lions arent capable because they are old and not attractive enough when in battle.

But I am still young and hot, my brain is smart.

My brain is not old and decayed. My brain is still capable of learning, capable of taking new challenges.

I know that God created me because all other people were insufficient to please him, so he had to make me to make up for what those people lack.

I fight God's battles on modern day debate, where I destroy atheists and evolution in debates.

I also want to be follower of Bible like Mall. I think Mall is obviously on the proper path, because he realized Christianity was made up and not in Bible. I wasnt aware of that before, but now I am. One can follow Bible and not call himself as member of Christianity. When you follow Bible, you arent a member of any group, you are just follower of Bible. there is no group. Different people follow Bible differently. But if you really follow the Bible, well, then, you are not in Christianity. You follow the Bible.

Is there truth outside the Bible? Is there truth outside God? How do you know that you exist? See, I can doubt you as you doubt the Bible.

task is simple. Just find one Bible verse which mentions word "Christianity", to prove that Christianity is religion from Bible.

I cannot be satisfied with having only one religion. When in religion, I am polytheist, a part of me also wants to be Christian, the other part wants to be muslim, the third part wants to be hindu.

I dont know how some ordinary people can stay in one religion for whole life and not even learn about other religions. I personally want to have them all. this is why I am omni theist, in other words, I believe in all religions.

When I hear about some religion or invent a new religion, I immediately start believing in it. I just cant not believe in it.

I cannot be satisfied with being only Christian, only Zeus worshipper, or only Anu worshipper. I want to worship all.

So when someone asks me: "But which God is real?"

I can answer with: "All Gods are real".

Also, Gods are above logic, so contradictions dont apply to them.

Because I am possessed by demons and probably bunch of other entities, I can never be happy. I must always have more.

More, more, more!

Such is the path of the Draconian Gnosis.

Answering your questions which you ask me often. Here are your questions.

"Are you poor?"

No, I am richer than 99% of people in a sense that I have everything and never had to really work a day in my life. So I am better than 99% of people.

"Are you really trans age?"

Yes. My mental age doesnt match my actual age. this is why my actual age is 30, but my behavior is that of a 13 year old.

"Are you omni religious?"

Yes, I believe all religions are true. I also believe all Gods exist.

"But isnt omni religious a contradiction? How can you be both Christian and Satanist?"

Of course it isnt contradictive. I can be Satanist today, and Christian tomorrow. I can also have one part of me believe in Christianity and the other part of me believe in Satanism.

"Do you really do workout with 200 repetitions per day, or is that a lie?"

No, that is not a lie. I have dumbbell which weighs 10 kilograms, and I do about 200 repetitions with it per day. I workout for 4 days and then rest for 3 days. It is easy for me to do 200 repetitions per day because of my high sugar diet.

"Why do you have high sugar diet? Isnt that very unhealthy?"

It is maybe unhealthy, but brain and muscles use sugar as fuel in order to do work. I simply follow scientific principles which say that if brain needs sugar as fuel, then giving fuel to brain makes sense, as well as to muscles.

"Why dont you use toothbrush?"

I dont use toothbrush because I believe toothbrush is bad for teeth. I wash my teeth with toothpaste and water, no toothbrush.

"What do you do during the day?"

When I wake up, I drink a glass of water because I think drinking water is important. I also drink a lot of coffee. I eat sugar before and after sleep, and I drink water before and after sleep. Sometimes I mix sugar and water so sugar is absorbed faster. I start day by checking all social media, including this site, and I let chickens out of coop so chickens can walk around. then I tend to play smite or roblox for hours.

I also do debating on modern day debate, where I have the title of debate master. I spend a lot of time on modern day debate. I also spend some time posting on tik tok and youtube because I have 3000 followers so I post for them.

I also watch movies and tv shows. I watch anime too.

Before sleep, I meditate and pray to God. Boredom meditation is very important, because it lets brain recover energy.

I understand that Christianity deserves more attention from me, so I will be a Christian every other day.

So I will be Christian today. I pray to Christ to give me everything I want. I cant be Christian tomorrow tho, because I have to worship Sky God Anu.

But on days when I am Christian, I will be a true Christian. I will believe that Christianity is true.

I forgive sins of all those who sinned against me.

Praise Christ today, Praise Sky God Anu tomorrow! Praise!!!

I am a man. I cant explain why I am attracted to some women. I dont know why my brain likes women.

It just doesnt make sense to me.

I dont want to reproduce, so why am I attracted to women?

It would make more sense to be attracted to men, because men are smarter.

I realized I have a brain disorder which makes me gain pleasure when looking at women. I dont know why this happens.

I have a maximally great brain, and that should mean I am above women in everything, so why is it that my brain likes women?

I dont have a logical reason to like women. they have no good qualities, and some are maybe even good people. they arent even nice to me in most cases.

So why is my brain like this?

UwU

>.<

Dumb people think in the way of "this thing results in bad things, so its bad."

Everything results in bad things. Buying an item results in bad thing of reducing the amount of money you have. Working a job results in reduction in free time.

Dumb people always remain slaves, because they dont think.

Freedom has a price, and those who refuse to pay it remain slaves forever. And being a slave has a price of its own.