Sidewalker

That's not "chatbot", do "chatbot".

The term often used to describe a person too foolish to realize they are being trolled is 

someone suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect, a cognitive bias where they are incompetent at something and lack the ability to recognize their own incompetence. They are overconfident, which prevents them from seeing the humor or the manipulation in a situation. 

you just earned a new title.

That's not a word, and that's not what it means.

Now do chatbot.

Is there a word that means "A person that is too fucking stupid to know when they are being trolled"?

American women like winning cases against pussy grabbers. Trump is a self declared pussy grabber.

Here is photographic evidence of Trump grabbing a pussy.

Which came first: culture or language?

Neither one, they evolved together as two aspects of the same development.

Six Demos ion. Congress have a PSA-type "ad" claiming Trump is committing unconstitutional crime,

That is not true, they did not claim that Trump is committing unconstitutional crime, what they did was remind soldiers that legally, they must follow the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) which mandates the refusal of unlawful orders.

but none will cite the crime, as if breathing is criminal. Why are they so shy?

You want them to cite the crime they didn't mention?

Maybe because the allegation is a myth, like Russia, Russia, Russia?

Trump responded by throwing a conniption, which raises the question of what illegal orders does he intend to give. Can you cite the crime he wants to order the military to commit?

General anesthetic shows that the mind is not separate from the body.

When you turn off a radio the music stops, does that prove the radio was the source of the music?

You just now realized you have a brain disorder?

Sheesh, I guess you are the last to know, the rest of us already knew you have a brain disorder.

I prefer to call it a winter festival in honour of the Sun, our GOD and life giver, as it makes it's way back north again.

It doesn't matter what you call it, they both celebrate renewal and rebirth, essentially, they are two aspects of one and the same celebration, in terms of meaning, they have more in common than they do differences.

And fortunately my wife and I have similar views on the subject of Christmas and all the associated commercial tosh that goes with it these days.

Everything is commercialized, that's just an aspect of our culture of materialism, if you can think of a major celebration that hasn't been commercialized, let me know so we can monetize it.

Ignore it.

Do you decorate an evergreen tree? How about Yule logs, candles, a winter feast, those all originated in winter solstice celebrations before Christianity embraced them.

I even visit a cave this time of year in honor of the Calling of the Bears, went to Ruby Falls in Chattanooga last week.

Wisdom does not exist in old people. 

I'm old as dirt and I'm so full of wisdom it's coming out my pores.

Your ideas don’t fit well with the time period.

Mocking (older) siblings wouldn’t have been considered acceptable back then.

Admitting it is a symbolic and spiritual act admits that Mary is our spiritual mother.

The Bible says that prior to the resurrection, Jesus's brothers and family did not believe in him and thought he was mentally unstable, I think that would explain their disrespectful behavior.

If they were his actual siblings, Jesus would not have given Mary to John at the cross.

Jesus gave his mother to John to ensure she would be cared for after his death, as Joseph had likely already died. His own siblings were not present at the crucifixion, and they were not yet believers. I think it was a symbolic act that established a spiritual family based on shared faith, rather than biology.

Also, if they are younger siblings, it would make no sense why they give advice and rebuke him as if he is below them.

Of course they were younger, and they were mocking him because that's what siblings do.

My dual invaginated, space and time torus has 18 vertices, however, and not sure how many equaltorial bisectional planes. 

For some reason, that sentence sounds dirty to me.

How do you know they were biological siblings? They could have been adopted or been step-siblings.

Matthew 27:56 suggests they weren’t even brothers at all but instead cousins.

I don't know, but I have no reason to think they weren't His biological siblings.

Anyway, today is November 20th, so still a month to go before the solstice celebrations.

Christmas creep was really bad this year. I love Christmas, but I'm usually sick and tired of it by the time it gets here.

My wife started with the 24/7 Hallmark Christmas movies like 3-4 weeks ago, I already want to kill myself and there's still four more weeks to go,

Jesus was the only son of Mary. That’s why Jesus gave her to John at the cross.

According to the Bible, Jesus had four brothers and two sisters, the brethren's names were James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas, the two sisters are not named.

Since Trump is an autocratic dictator, it will be one of his children who will replace him.

Sure, he'd like it to be Larry, Curley, or Moe, but he's not even going to last for his full term, no way he gets to pick which one succeeds him.

If he did get to pick, my guess, is he'd go with Moe, since he thinks she's so hot, "If Ivanka wasn't my daughter, I'd be dating her"

Where did you get that idea? I'm not an atheist by any stretch of the imagination.

Oh, well. Glad to see you're not atheist.

Checking on your posts, you seem to have an ambiguous position. Your comments in the religion forum are unintelligile.

Actually, my comments are fucking genius, you just aren't enlightened enough to understand them.

How do you identify yourself?

I'm a theist, but unlike most around here, I'm not a literalist, and I'm most comfortable expressing my encounter with the transcendent reality using Christian symbolism, because that is what I know best.

But seriously, my posts probably seem unintelligible because I reject any and all exclusivity of religious beliefs, which is to say that I believe that all the major religions are culturally influenced manifestations of the one and the same transcendent reality. To a biblical literalist, that would be unintelligible.

Fact is, there is currently no reliable or substantial evidence for the existence of life elsewhere.

True that, I think the probability that it's out there is enormous, but because of distance and time constraints, the probability that we would be able to get reliable or substantial evidence is almost zero.

Assuming that there should be is a reasonable assumption.

Science's primary method of reasoning is inductive reasoning, which moves from specific observations to general principles, and it yields probabilistic conclusions. Estimates of the number of planets with conditions similar to earth, are mind bogglingly large, billions in the milky way alone, and in the quintillions in all the galaxies in the visible universe. Let's go with statistical probability, we have only been able to observe one, and what we observe on that one is a natural process that included the creation of life which steadily progressed towards greater complexity and higher forms of sentience, going from inanimate matter, to life, to thought, to self-reflective consciousness, culminating in intelligent life. Out of a possible quintillion, we have observed intelligent life on 100% of those sampled, scientifically speaking, the probability that there are others is mind bogglingly high.

And suggesting that there might not be, is a reasonable suggestion.

I suppose it's reasonable, but I've never seen an argument that logically arrived at that conclusion scientifically.

Just like bigfoot, we see the indefinite photos, but it never strolls down the high street.

So if ET's are clever enough and have the technological ability to get here, then why keep fu*king about with all the sketchy unidentifiable introductions.

Yep, Fermi's Paradox, I think it's easy to come up with reasons why we wouldn't be able to detect life on other planets even if there are trillions and trillions of planets with life. I have a strong background in signal transmission and there's no fucking way you can get any known signal from there to here. I would think that it's even more impossible to get a vehicle from there to here, and yet, I saw one almost 60 years ago, and despite how unlikely or unreasonable the conclusion is, I have always believed it was evidence of extraterrestrial intelligent life. The whole point of a UFO is it's "unidentified", it's much more reasonable to conclude what we are seeing is some kind of terrestrial phenomenon that is merely unidentified and misunderstood.

Nevertheless, I'm going with little green men.

I thought you were going to make fun of this thread as the atheist that you are.

Where did you get that idea? I'm not an atheist by any stretch of the imagination.

I don't think the Fat lady would ever sing with Hitler. Until now.

Trump will call her piggie.

I saw a UFO when I was around 13-14 years old, sort of uneventful story, three friends and I saw it in the distance moving slowly, nobody believed us but the next day the Cincinnati Enquirer reported that hundreds of other people had reported seeing it.

I believe they are evidence of extraterrestrial intelligent life.

Hmmm, I wonder what David Bartel and Jack Szostak think.

I understand that they think extraterrestrial life is relatively common, but they don't know about "intelligent" life.

UFO/UAP is not a theory, it's something real that certain people are reluclant to accept because it clashes with their beliefs.

UFO/UAP are clearly real phenomenon, the belief their origin is extraterrestrial intelligent life is a theory.

Mamdani crushed it, after 911 only Trump could get a Muslim elected mayor.

How do you feel about them being best buddies on camera?

Amazed by it.

If a month ago, you told me Trump and Mamdami would be buddies while Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene would not be, I'd have thought you were nuts.

In the OP I said, "Between now and the midterms it's gonna be fun watching Republicans scramble to put distance between them and Trump, stay loyal and the voters destroy you, don't stay loyal and Trump will destroy you, they earned it."

But I sure never imagined it would be MTG leading the exodus...I guess Trump sees it coming too, so he needs to reach out to democratic socialists for allies now.

For months they said Tariffs don't raise prices, now they are saying they are reducing tariffs to bring prices down.

Trump's approval ratings are in the toilet, and he has tanked the economy yet AGAIN, but his solution is to just claim his approval ratings are the highest ever (He said, “I have my highest poll numbers that I’ve ever had.” And he said, “I have the best numbers for any president in many years – any president.”, and he keeps saying that this is the best economy in the history of the world LOL, the core MAGA folks are dumb enough to buy it too.

First term, Trump lost 41 house seats in the 218 midterms, republicans wish they could do that well in the 2026 midterms.

The fat lady is singing for MAGA.

Trump called Epstein file demands a hoax but now urges Republicans to release them, saying he has nothing to hide.

He stalled the release to give his people time to remove him from the files, now he has nothing to hide because he already hid it.

I found an interesting article from Fox News about 6-7. I think you should read it.

That is interesting, but I seriously doubt that is where the middle school kids got it.

The link does not add clarity to the expression 6-7

I thought that was the whole point of it, it's meaning is supposed to be unclear.