He's degenerate, impulsive and not a good leader either.
And then some.
Admittedly he's having a superior management of the 2 more well-known wars than Biden.
What do you mean? In what way does the US President "manage" a war between two other countries? What has Trump done that is "superior"?
Got one of those bread machines didn't ya
No, a neighbor shared her Sourdough starter and taught me how to make the bread, I'm loving it, and I see my first loaf being great as incontrovertible evidence that I am a world class bread baker. Hey, it's a hundred percent success rate.
I even have my wife's full support on this, she said "If I get fresh baked bread out of your next OCD thing, then I'm all for it".
You and Sidewalker both spell Prostate as Prostrate.
OK, let me get this straight, one is a male gland located below the bladder, and the other is like, when you are getting arrested, the cops are putting handcuffs on, and you are praying?
->You are just mad because I have a normal, intimate relationship with a woman.
I don't care about your sex life (although I would recommend less of it because it's addicting). I'm mad because you are a strawmaner, and I RageBait Strawmanners.
If it just makes people laugh at you, it isn’t ragebait, it’s comedy, sad pathetic comedy.
->It's not my fault you can't get laid.
I could get laid if I wanted too. But I don't want too. I think sex is bad for you, so I don't do it.
LOL, yeah right, I suppose if you couldn’t get laid if your life depended on it, that would be the thing to say.
->It's not the bear's fault women would rather be eaten than have sex with you.
If you prefer death to rape, then you are too thin skinned to be in political office. I wouldn't prohibit someone from voting for being that thin skinned, but I don't want them in government (meaning not as I wouldn't ban them from office, I just wouldn't vote for someone that prefers murder to rape and would encourage others to vote against individuals that prefer getting murdered to getting raped because politics is a thick skinned job).
So women shouldn’t be able to hold public office because you can’t get laid, got it, oh yeah, that's logical.
.
->It's not women's fault you make them want to puke; it's a visceral reaction.
I don't care if women puke when they look at me or not. Women's feelings don't matter, and men's feelings don't matter either. Logic > Lust.
If feeling don’t matter, then why are you always screeching like a banshee with how much you hate women.
->Just try not to be so grotesque.
Being right wing makes you grotesque, so I have no problem being grotesque.
You are just desperate to blame politics for why you can’t have a normal relationship with women, or men for that matter. What a freak.
You are a liberal "man".
Of COURSE you are SOUR and your stomach is DOUGH.
You are just mad because I have a normal, intimate relationship with a woman.
It's not my fault you can't get laid.
It's not the bear's fault women would rather be eaten than have sex with you.
It's not women's fault you make them want to puke; it's a visceral reaction.
Just try not to be so grotesque.
Just a week.
It was an intensive course then?
Yes, my sourdough bread perfection is even more amazing when you consider I've only made one loaf so far, but I do have another one "proofing" right now.
I figure Bon Appetit Magazine will be showing up for an interview soon.
Usually get mine from the supermarket.
Yeah, that's what I did up until last week when I became a master sourdough bread maker.
But if I'm ever in town I will pop in for a superior sandwich.
Just let me know when.
Looks like Death23 either doesn't have any kids, or he doesn't have any money.
Canada produces and sells
over 1,050 varieties and brands of cheese. Including imports, the total number is even higher.
Canadian cheeses are classified into six main categories based on their moisture content:
Firm
Soft
Semi-soft
Fresh
Blue-veined
Hard
Is that what that rubbery crap you put on poutine is, cheese?
None of the 12 Jesus disciples were bakers.
Then who made the bread for feeding 5,000 people.
Just so you know, I am a master sourdough bread baker, quite possibly the greatest sour dough bread baker in the world.
As far as sourdough bread is concerned, I look down upon you inferiors with disdain.
Perhaps it isn't actually dementia, maybe they are just trying real hard to forget about you.
Can consensual physical manipulation be rightly be referred to as abuse?
Yes, especially if she wears a leather nightgown and does the "physical manipulation" with a whip.
Just impose a MAGA tariff.
Don't need a tariff, there will be a 100% MAGA ban, and MAGA affiliation will be classified as illegal aliens. It will be necessary to send paramilitary groups in masks to the trailer parks, rural bars, NASCAR venues, and all known fishing spots to arrest and deport illegal MAGA aliens.
AI thinking, as a conceptual process, is implemented through
complex algorithms and computational models [1, 2]. These algorithms dictate how AI systems process information, learn patterns, make decisions, and generate outputs [1, 3].
Sadolite is right, AI “thinks” in a linear, mechanical way, responsive rather than adaptive, always lacking context. AI will never be able to simulate the more holistic mental adaptive and contextual thinking processes of human beings like sarcasm. AI will always lack the context of lived experience necessary to process the kinds of subjective interpretations involved in things like sarcasm, humor, skepticism, doubt, moral reasoning, creativity, and in the end, consciousness. AI can generalize information from a large number of sources; it will never be able to generalize from a single integrated experience the way humans do.
When i was 15 a girl was talking sweet to me, then physically abused me when she was angry.
Good thing i got away from her that day. she was very attractive though.
It just wasn't a good match, but don't complain about it, FLRW pays hundreds of dollars to have attractive women physically abuse him, you just got a freebie.
You didnt even use the right verses. That was commandment to adam and noah/his family respectively.
Yes, I did.
1 corinthians 7:1-5
1 Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
Also you can refuse to have sex. But its not for everyone.
1 corinthians 7:7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.
9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
That's all Paul, and the consensus of biblical scholars is that when it comes to sex, Paul had issues and needed therapy.
Jesus himself talked about this
Matthew 19:10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.
12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Well yeah, when Jesus heard his disciples quote Paul, he was saying, "Oh no, don't listen to Paul on that, that definitely wasn't for us, he has no command of the Lord on that, he didn't mean us, he was actually talking to...ummm...eunuchs, yeah, that's it, eunuchs, he was talking about eunuchs.
LOL, what a great post, well done Sir.
BTW, what's the policy on immigration? I live in Georgia, but I'm coming with you guys, is borden crossing just a matter of buying a house in Colorado and moving?
Once all the immigrants from the Red States are in, we will need to secure the borders. When the Red States send their people, they won't be sending their best. They'll be sending people that have lots of problems, and they'll be bringing those problems with them. They’ll be bringing guns. They’ll be bringing pick-up trucks. They’re racists. And some, I assume, are good people.
We should build a wall. and the Red States will pay for it with the federal money we don't have to give them anymore.
Build the wall, build the wall, build the wall.
Plus, it feels great.
...and when it's sinful, it feels even better.
English researchers surveyed the sexual frequency of 918 reasonably healthy male residents of the Welsh village, Caerphilly, who were 45 to 59 when the study began (1979-83). A decade later, they checked back with the men, when they were aged 55 to 69. Of the group studied, 150 had died—67 from heart attack and 83 from other causes. The researchers then correlated the men’s sexual frequency as reported in the original survey with their death or survival 10 years later. Compared with men who had had sex just once a month, those who reported having it twice a week had only half the death rate. For the entire group, as an individual's sexual frequency increased, his risk of death decreased.
Yeah, that...plus without sex we go extinct.
Plus, it feels great.
The Bible commands us to have sex
Genesis 1:28:
"And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it..."
Genesis 9:1:
"And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth."
Don't you even get a semi when you watch the sprint relay teams in action.
Isn't that amazing, it sure has changed over time, nowadays nine out of ten Olympic sprinters look like supermodels.
It wasn't always that way, I split track into two beauty eras, BFJ and AFJ, because I think it was Florence Griffith-Joyner who changed it into a glamour sport.
Watching her run took my breath away, and the way she looked doing it, well, I usually had to take a cold shower after she ran.
Also, I realized that I am racist. I dont find black women attractive, or indian women. Chinese are fine tho.
I thought you didn't find any "adult" women attractive.
Do you guys not know how sum works?
Yes, I do, and there is no such thing as a maximally great sum, you can always add one more to any so called maximally great quantity.
What do you get when you sum everything?
Aristotle and about a thousand philosophers since, demonstrate why a maximally great sum can only exist potentially, not actually. A potential infinity is an unending process, in terms of existence in the real world you can never arrive at the actual maximum. An actual infinity, which would be a completed, infinite quantity, cannot exist in reality, and even if it did, we could never know that to be the case.
You get maximal greatness. Also, saying that maximally great idea doesnt exist is impossible, same for maximally great being.
The ontological argument is circular reasoning, which is logically invalid, the premises of the ontological argument are demonstrably false, and the conclusion is not derived logically from the premises. The argument is semantic gamesmanship at best, and it confuses epistemology and ontology, which is not valid,
A finite mind cannot conceive of an actual infinite, which negates the first premise, "greatness" is a subjective term, and it is not established that existence is a quality of greatness, as Immanuel Kant pointed out, "existence" is not a predicate or property, it is a necessary precondition for having properties.
You can't just define something into existence, if you could, you certainly don't need to use the invalid reasoning of the ontological argument, you could simply define God as existing. If you were to define a three-sided square as geometric shape that exists, that doesn't make it exist.
Here is the conclusive refutation of the ontological argument:
A maximally great argument refuting the ontological argument is defined as an argument to which no greater argument can be conceived, this argument must exist because existence is a necessary attribute of greatness. Anyone who denies this refutation’s existence can conceive of this greatest argument, and thus, it must exist.
Therefore, the ontological argument for the existence of God has been conclusively refuted.
Because racism/bigotry has no positive construct to it whatsoever.
I don't think the Ontological Argument is logical, but it is certainly not my intent to denigrate people who do think it is logical.
For those of you who think it is logical, "denigrate" means "put down"
The Ontological argument has been refuted by smart people.
Not really. Maximal being is a sum of all things. It is maximally great sum.
The Ontological argument is nothing but a semantic parlor game, you can't just define something into existence.
If you could, the Bible would have said, "In the beginning was the word"...oh wait, never mind.
Gary Player is 90 years old.
She already knows that if she is using AI.
I meant don't tell her she can sue me for being a disappointing sex object.
