Just noticed a typo, I wrote 'no' instead of 'know' in the very last para.
My first point is, abortion isn't murder by CONVENTION i don't know what's wrong with this auto correct
I used line gaps
Like this
To make the description appear more sequential, unlike a pile of paragraphs
But the site's code just decided to put it all together
I didn't even put any periods(.)
It makes the 1. 2. 3. a. b. c. Illogical
I am sorry to the people who had a stroke reading the description
False, absolutely pathetic. You tempered with facts, seriously. Bhadvad Gita 9:32 was tempered with, any voters can search it up. And yes, my style is this. I use emojis, I use Rheotoric. And I think that it's a person's right to free speech that enables it. Absolutely pathetic, news paper cuttings are 'social media' for this person. I bet he didn't even look at all sources, only the 1st source was a social media handle. You clearly, very cowardly dodged the Godmen argument. And 9:32, it seriously pisses me off, there has to be a reason that it mentions women and lower castes and not upper caste men ? Why so? What's the reason. Pathetic, if something is stupid, there is nothing wrong in calling it stupid. This verse says that women and lower castes should submit to upper caste men. That's it !! It's a power system !! Brahmins(upper castes) are somewhat like A passage to God. Lower classes and Women, those of sinful birth, those born inferior, pamper brahmins and brahmins give them salvation !! The refuge was never in a sky daddy, but in brahmins !! Pathetic, you just searched up something, that on a LLM, just so you can sound more grounded. And that too, tempered with. It's upto the voter's will.
And I was clearly stating that I will replace it with nothingness. What happened in USSR was cruelty and rise of atheism, cruelty wasn't the result of atheism but dictatorial regime. And that was imposed atheism. I have never mentioned imposed atheism, dying out because of a cultural change is completely different.
That's it, you join a debate knowing not a single thing, you don't even google facts. Cook your own story and prove it wrong. Constantly deny facts so I have to take the burden in establishing literal facts which are as fundamental as 2+2, castism is there, Brain Washing by Godmen is there, Misogyny is there. Just for the sake of debate you refuse to believe facts. Accusing the other person of being homophobic and spamming brain rot after writing the most stupid things(you haven't yet replied on justifying burning of women, you are a man to female person. I can't imagine there are such people, man calling themselves women, I am fine with, totally fine, as long as you don't cause any harm. Yet you justify cruelty against women... disappointing... pathetic)
Either you are SOMEWHAT LIKE a Flat Earther, or you are a genius. Either way I can't debate you. That's my response to the challenge, in short....
I am not down for debating scientific facts. It would have been cool if the claim was earth is flat or something like that. It would have been really cool if you have a PhD in this topic, or you are an expert. My scientific knowledge is definitely not enough if you have a scientific background. I didn't study science after grade 12. If you don't have a scientific background then I probably won't be able to take you seriously, or even if you are from a scientific background and unlike flat earthers ur theory makes sense, I would really love to learn about it if you can explain it in simple words. Or refer to any credible sources. Whether you are a flat earther, or a genius, either way I am not a good match
I am not down for debating scientific facts. It would have been cool if the claim was earth is flat or something like that. It would have been really cool if you have a PhD in this topic, or you are an expert. My scientific knowledge is definitely not enough if you have a scientific background. I didn't study science after grade 12. If you don't have a scientific background then I probably won't be able to take you seriously, or even if you are from a scientific background and unlike flat earthers ur theory makes sense, I would really love to learn about it if you can explain it in simple words. Or refer to any credible sources. Whether you are a flat earther, or a genius, either way I am not a good match
I have made a mistake, I mentioned RamcharitManas in the text. It's Actually Gita, BhagvadGita in It's place. The verse is indeed, gita 9:32. Paap = sin, Yoni = Birth. Stri = women. The verse has phrase 'paap yoni stri' and goes on to include lower castes in it. I am just providing some context. If someone is following the debate, and is genuinely curious. Then you can ask , Godmen Culture in India in Hinduism. Baba Worship, 'Asha Ram and Ram Rahim case'. To understand my next argument better. I can definitely provide enough context in next argument, but it would be genuinely good if you have knowledge about what's actually happening.
Doesn't still make a fetus a human. Fetus would be still, potential human. The debate of Abortion ultimately falls down on how much human do you consider a fetus. And for me, because I read it in a book. A Fetus, till half ounce, is a bunch of cells. No different from a sperm or ova. There's little to no evidence that it can feel pain even in the last stages of pregnancy. I assert that feeling pain and being conscious is an essential quality a human must possess. Without these 2, a human can become a corpse. And a human yet to have these 2 is called a fetus. It has a brain, but no mind. I has neurons but can't feel pain. You can kill me, because I have a mind. You can't kill a fetus, because it's already dead, or yet to become alive.
Hmm makes sense... But I think that I did my analysis... Con was Emotional, rather than logical. So that's my point.... the rest was my argument... there wasn't really much to analyse, it was a very short debate...
I would replace it with NOTHING. I Would have argued for removing all religions, but then it would have been too much messy. I would likely Do Islam one next. You see, The West has already removed Christianity. Being a Christian has now become a synonym for being white, or MAGA. People don't really worship jesus, they just want to be a part of the community. The West has become mostly atheist. Or should I say, religion has become irrelevant generation by generation. It's called Apatheism. The Father Went to church, but his daughter went to school and then to a coaching at the time he went to church. She didn't had the time to go to a church, so she became a Christian, but she didn't become someone who goes to a church, the daughter grew up to become an adult and had 2 kids. Science has already advanced a lot, she is actively busy with handling her job and house, her 2 sons go to school and other classes, they don't see there mother doing anything Christian, other than calling herself one. The term Christian will die the day any of the kids actually watches a single Alex O connor Video. So does it happen, one of her son become an atheist by watching some content against Christianity. The other son likes Trump, cause his friends Father was a MAGA. So he spends his time with that environment, and continues calling himself a Christian. On paper that's a Christian. But in reality he's just a normal guy who is just fitting in the community. Here in India, most people are at stage 1. The Daughter's father. Doing Rituals and Ceremonies, and superstitions. I am not advocating for mass forceful conversion, but the need to make an environment where apatheism can catch pace.
Your vote is not factually correct, or I would say that it doesn't convey the right message. Pro says Abortion = Murder, and you said that Abortion= not miscarriage but willful termination of human life. It has many problems with it, 1. fetus isn't human, it doesn't meet the very definition of Termination of HUMAN life. 2. Abortion is not murder if it's not natural. It can cause health and psychological risks to the mother. Financial Risks to the parents. Just Like Prosecution isn't murder but punishment. Abortion is necessarily health care or a choice, no where near willful termination of a human life
Ummm.... I am a new member, but maybe I can debate with you. I need a single line on my side.
'Facts are not negotiable'
