-> By arguing in good faith.
How is it possible that a socially conservative person in your view argues in good faith? Because I think (whether you admit to this or not) that all socially conservative views are backwards and therefore in bad faith. Any response you give is either going to be a dodge or an example of a socially conservative view that you think can be argued in good faith. The truth is, all socially conservative views (to you) are ALWAYS in bad faith, but you care too much about your image to say that.
"RM is #3 on the leaderboard."
Are you going to ban #1 and #2? No? Then why does it matter?
I'm quoting you:
"
5 likes in the moderation thread for the ban
Mag1cman: "I’m all for free speech but if someone’s spamming the same topic over and over again, can we get rid of them? I say this with regards to RemyBrown." Also noted (as I have noted as well) how "It’s just the same topic over and over again with this guy"
Sidewalker: "Especially if "same topic over and over again" is advocating a violent crime, rape for instance," Also pointed out multiple times that he's desperate for attention.
GreatfulGoy: RemyBrown is back and immediately pushes misogyny and lowering the age of consent to 0. This is extremely legally and morally problematic to be enabling. Just permanently ban him or something.
Alyssa: "Ngl, I don't think I've EVER seen a Remy comment that didn't immediately give me the ick."
Myself across multiple moderation chats and private discussions.
"
Dang; you just LOVE to do defamation. Your links don't even go to what I said.
Read posts 94 and 95 on this thread. This debate only got so many likes because it's labeled as, "featured" and nobody really dislikes debates (unless I'm jinxing it).
->Act like the grown man you are, know you can damage the world with your words.
Have you SEEN the online world recently? TikTok and X have white people using the N word (hard er) on a regular basis. I have not used the N word ever on the internet. I'm TAME compared to the online world in 2026; DART seems to be isolated from the real world digitally.
I don't agree with Stalin there.
I would also say while both debaters are Jewish, one of them is gay. Gays are very much into censorship because Queers are obsessed with identity (and that means, being as anti-conservative as they can be while being socially accepted). It doesn't matter if they're pretty centrist in ideology, as long as they're on the left team; they're happy, although many are far left as well. Gays in 2015 loved Hilliary Clinton more than Bernie Sanders. It's like the suburban kid who hates the top 1% even though they're in the top 5%. Queers love censorship while flowering up the censorship in a good way, so I'm unsurprised Kohai of all ppl is wanting me banned.
That's why Kohai is trying to claim that offensive speech is fine, but Rage Bait isn't (even though they're the same thing). Queers try and find all of these irrelevant differences to make them feel better and while it should be legal to be gay, their patterns should be observed.
It's 2026; if you check out TikTok and X, then you will see my views are pretty normal. We aren't in 2021 anymore.
Double R has the left's politics, so they're fine with it.
->You created threads non stop that pissed off many members here and continued even after the moderators intervened. The problem was never your conservatism, it was your conduct.
How can someone be socially conservative (by X/TikTok standards) while not pissing you off? Is it even possible?
->I am a manager by profession
You don't talk politics at work; so your manager experience is irrelevant here.
Do you want to repeal the 1st amendment? I mean, you don't want your enemy having words.
->It never ceases to amaze me how people will post things like “Why rape is better than DUI”
Are you going to be curious as to why I believe that or do you want to virtue signal?
I can say, "Murder is worse than rape"; nobody cares. Rape causes genital violation; DUI causes broken ribs and punctured heart and lungs. I know which one is worse. My Uncle is a DUI victim so I know.
->A perma ban is warranted because the moderation team has already issued previous correction actions and is still primarily using identity-based rhetoric to provoke instead of creating actual debate.
If you comment on Israelis or Palestinians, then that's identity based rhetoric. If you have the Israel flag in your bio or the star of David and talk about being Jewish, then that's identity based rhetoric. Identity rhetoric isn't wrong.
-> This debate is whether or not RB has crossed a line when offensive ideas cease to be a valid debate and instead become a tool for rage bait and provocation
Offensive = Rage Bait = Provocation.
You believe that then. The person you're attacking isn't me, so I don't really care.
Read post 71 on this comment section.
1. as a way to create shock content.
Shock content is by definition offensive.
2. Accounts operating chiefly to provoke through identity‑based rhetoric
Anytime people say, "Texas is a red state", it is Texan identity based rhetoric.
3. RemyBrown was banned for 1 month for advocating sexual violence and spam
I never advocated that.
4. Women and rape is his largest target: Woman / women used over 500 times, Rape / raped / rapist used over 200+ times
I have focus issues; so do you. 17% and 8.5% of posts aren't big percentages.
5. He often portrays women as being stupid.
There are plenty of groups that you find stupid as well.
6. Women and rape: Women who don't want to get raped should just not leave the house.
Do you have a better idea? Telling men to not rape is futile; they will do it regardless.
7. Jews and abortion: Jew are too supportive of abortion
Same thing with Californians. You've never heard of a GOP talk bad about California.
8. Why do Jews really love American blacks? Jews treat blacks too nicely
How was I calling for blacks to be treated?
9. Throughout his posting he has personally attacked users across multiple threads and accuses one person of pedophilia.
BestKorea admitted to it 2 posts down.
10. "It’s just the same topic over and over again with this guy"
I just can't find too many other decent topics. Maybe I can bring up annexing Canada.
11. RemyBrown is back and immediately pushes misogyny and lowering the age of consent to 0. This is extremely legally and morally problematic to be enabling.
He doesn't cite.
12. Codex was used to build new moderation tools and to quickly parase his content. Codex was also used to produce the info graphics and give data on his content.
I don't use AI when arguing. I knew of Chat GPT, Copilot, but I never even heard of Codex. Maybe there can be a way for me to prove that. Got any ideas?
I'm used to a time when many people used their real name. The prosecution's real name is David. Why would the cops (who BTW lean CONSERVATIVE) arrest me? Did you see my location? There are 0 Remy Browns in Apex, North Carolina.
I hope that you have a "Back the Blue" flag if you're considering trying to get me arrested for original right wing political speech. Otherwise, it does kind of come across as hypocritical.
Extreme for you is right wing + original; so by that definition, yes, I'm extreme. It's not illegal to be extreme.
->You're expecting the Jewish people who read your post to do all the work of interrogating/cross-examining you to find out what you really mean
If they like acting as lawyers, then yes. The people debating this trial sure act like lawyers.
That stereotype about, "Jews being good lawyers", THAT made me willing to say things like, "Jews should do better". Actual lawyer brains would be curious as to why they should do better. If someone made a call out thread about me, then I'd welcome it.
Lawyers DEBATE for a living (and this is DEBATE Craft). If the people here hate debates, then probably change the name to, "Mafia craft". It seems to be what the new people want, and it's a good transition for the post Trump society that's inevitable.
I like White flame (just because of this debate; otherwise I wouldn't ignore him, but if not for this debate, then I'd be neutral on him). I really don't like Skywalker, I like Savant. SatanLucy (you) are a bit weird, but very creative. I liked Kohai until he did this debate, I don't see myself liking Kohai after this.
This website (besides the stuff I post) has just turned into Mafia games. If the people here don't like debates, then maybe call the website, "MafiaCraft" or something like that. It's what yall prefer doing.
Why would the Jews be so against general stereotypes about them if not Hitler PTSD? It's not like you see Indians get mad about people saying they stink; they just shower.
It's funny how Kohai thinks I don't like him for being Jewish. I don't like KARENS; turns out, a lot of Jews are Karens. A lot of Jews will equate a mean comment about their group with wanting them dead; that's just retarted. Hitler was bad because he MURDERED millions; not because he said "MeAn WorDs" about millions. If Hitler ran for POTUS, then I'd vote against him.
I could say, "Jews are over 1 meter tall" and people like Kohai will take it as anti semetism (as if being over 1 meter tall is bad). There's nothing wrong with being over 1 meter tall; it's a fact.
I'm glad you didn't vote for that option. You can say it's democratic, but if the democracy votes against me, then I think it's safe to say they perceive brutally honest conservative speech as hate speech.
I'm a little stressed about it, but I would at least hope that Craft takes my side. I think they probably will. My attorney is very left wing and he has a good Elo.
On your poll, you said, "Ban Remy; he's annoying". You can't find anything hateful I said, but I annoy you (and most conservatives as most of them have been banned previously). A debate website with mods eventually leads to the liberals remaining after all the conservatives have been banned. A debate website without mods leads to only conservatives remaining after all the liberals have left because their brains can't handle the stress. A site with a fair amount of both is a new debating website.
I think it's safe to assume that because you have been a mod for so long and have grown abusive with power that it's time for you to step down. Mods should become generic users of this website with zero special privileges. There should be no mods on this website and while the private sector is allowed to censor; they are not obligated too; this website should be as free-speech absolutist as the US federal government.
https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/politics/posts/113/my-trial.
I'm not, but I also play Devils Advocate. Liberals HATE pedos now because of Trump.
Should pedos get the death penalty?
The bible says to sell all you have and give to the poor. A theocracy forces this. Sounds like Karl Marx doesn't it?
I'm evolutionist.
Is this drawing, or like a tie?
