SatanLucy

Try accepting the debate.

"looks like I scared Pro away with my awesome logic."

Why does this sound like sarcasm?

Your opponent isnt a serious debater.

As I said, you follow your programming. Your suffering doesnt exist for me. Its just your programmed goals, not mine, which you fail to achieve. And what your programming tells you that "suffering" is, is irrelevant. I wont accept your programming, because I am not NPC (Non-player character). So just because you subjectively think that suffering exists because your goals arent achieved, to me, that is irrelevant. All my goals are achieved always.

Draconian religion is about becoming God yourself.


What is God? God is supreme being and everything happens as God wants.


But becoming a God yourself is about overcoming duality.


Most people have duality: their goals, and reality.


their goals rarely match reality, which causes reality to not be according to their will.



Draconian God solves duality in one of 4 ways:


One, he makes reality bow to his goals. (alter reality)


two, he adjusts his goals, so whatever reality exists, it matches his goals and thus his will. (alter goals)


three, he has no goals, so naturally he cannot have any goal not matching reality. (abandon goals)


four, he abandons belief in reality as a whole, thus his goals become fulfilled in other worlds created by his mind (abandon reality).


these are 4 ways of the true Dragon God, 4 ways which any individual can practice, and any individual can be made successful with them.



And becoming a living God is irrelevant to belief in other Gods. Even if other Gods exist, person can still be a living God. And even if no Gods exist, person can still become a living God.


taoism teaches something similar, and taoism is truly one of greatest religions as well.


Once you learn how to discipline your mind and hack reality, you become someone so powerful, so unaffected by anything.


You become a living God.

If you change goals, then whatever made you sad now makes you happy. this is objectively true. Of course, maybe you personally cant do it due to being NPC (Non-player character, programmed bot who cant change programmed goals), but it doesnt really change the fact that suffering is entirely voluntary product of mind, and whatever you see as "suffering", I see as the world as it should be, so no suffering exists. Of course, in order to reach the level I talk about, you must be well familiar with Draconian religion and becoming a living God yourself who cannot suffer because whatever happens is his realized will. But judging by your so far debates, I really doubt you will ever reach the status of anything close to "living God". this isnt any insult. this is reality which you are enslaved by.

Any situation is victory when one changes his goals.

I dont need to join anything.

I don't need to respond to your arguments, tho next time better bring them in debate instead of trying to do whatever you are doing here.

Agree to disagree.

those are just more assumptions. Heh I can do this all day.

So you don't know how likelihood works. Alright.

Now, that seems like a very long response, which ignores that it's just bunch of assumptions.

And likeliness is determined by repetition. If we see something benefiting adults, and no proved reason to think it wont benefit children as well, the likeliness moves in favor.

Your arguments are basically unproved assumptions and irrelevant things which have no relations to benefits. My arguments are about benefits of cursing. I always used curse words when I was a kid, and the benefits of them are same as in adults, if not even better. Of course, I could have made more effort in a debate and expand it to personal freedoms as well, but what is repeatedly true is that making effort in debates doesnt matter much because most people are NPC (non-player characters). I am basically wasting my time explaining things to people who are programmed not to understand, instead of doing more important things in my life, such as research.

Suffering doesnt exist.

"I gave you way too much credit as a debator, my bad lol"

So you insult anyone who disagrees with you? that should bring some fun to the site.

You have right to opinion, of course.

I can't say I care much about voting outcome. But don't vote on your own debates. That is literally cheating, and if everyone starts doing it, then might as well abolish voting system because then it's all about who makes the most alts.

He still didn't define key terms?

I appreciate your flawed opinion.

Also, description is basically just nonsense. "it does not restrict reproduction" - how would you know? Are we debating some fairy tale stories here where real world doesnt apply? Education has consistently reduced reproduction.

thank you for obviously correct vote.

thank you for obviously biased vote.

this site has forum too. More fun there.

Now be a good boy and vote Pro.

So basically taking a short course on how to be parents. this is the "useless small improvement" I talk about. Its basically "solve nothing, but pretend to do something" which politicians do all the time. I have full trust voters will vote Pro here, even tho spending billions to create a small improvement still wont achieve anything, even when assuming perfect government doing a perfect course. there is a reason why improvements such as these exist only in society of failure. Contrary to popular belief, small improvements dont benefit society, they drain resources, and when you increase costs of having kids, then you can expect lower birth rates.

Debate doesnt even define key terms. there is nothing to debate there. Honestly, its like saying "there is some form of "whatever test" parents must pass". Yeah, that explains everything. the solutions like this which dont improve anything significantly are reasons why parents today raise most depressed, least socially capable generations with lowest birth rates and highest suicide rates.

Anyone can easily win this debate by merely pointing out this would waste billions while giving very small improvements, and billions for small improvements arent really worth it. Also, the amount of parents who pass competency tests and arent actually competent is huge. this is like suggesting a driving license makes someone a responsible driver.

tho I dont think anyone will accept this debate, because Pro's obvious argument is that this would create incentive to be better parents (it wouldnt actually) and voters would of course believe it because they believe false promises easily.

Well, my parents cant be described as competent in any sense of that word, but I wouldnt object to them getting benefits anyway.