SatanLucy

You see a bear in the woods, you mace the bear. 

No, I dont.

If you run into contact with a bear 10,000x, then you are almost certainly going to die. 

Unless you do something stupid, you wont. Some people have bears as pets for decades. Some people work in zoo and see bear 30000 times. Small bears also cannot even kill you even if they tried.

I could also say even a better comparison of ugly women to lets say, cats, fox or rabbits, or birds. There are countless animals which are less dangerous than ugly woman, wont ever say a hurtful word to you, wont ever abuse you…ect. But yeah, even a bear is preferable to be near over an ugly woman, because bear causes no harm, especially small bears, so its quality is neutral, and ugly woman is harmful and has no qualities. I cant even fuck her because she is too ugly.

Subjects don't get voting rights; Citizens do.

Women do have voting rights, but they are subjects anyway. Voting once in 4 years wont change their daily habits of subjecting.

A bear can murder you unexpectedly, a woman almost certainly won't.

Woman can ruin your life in many other ways. She can also murder you by poisoning, she can blackmail you, she can report you falsely, she can threaten to report you unless you do as she says. She can even talk shit about you and make people hate you. A bear will in most cases leave you alone. Many people see bears. The chances of attack are almost none. Also, if you feed a bear, it will thank you.

I dont talk to women for many reasons, but I also dont have much respect for them because they just suck dick of anyone who is rich or powerful. Even if someone powerful forces them to sex, if he is handsome enough, women just let it slide or even enjoy it. They are subjects, basically.

I hold view that polytheism was eradicated before internet, but now is coming back thanks to internet. I wouldnt be a polytheist if it wasnt for internet.

Forgot to tag.

Women look nubile; who cares?  Their beauty won't last; you don't think this person was once beautiful

All women do get ugly as they age. Their beauty isnt permanent, so likewise, my love for them isnt permanent either. This is why I could never love a woman forever, because once she gets to the age where she is ugly, love stops, because my love is based on looks, and I am not attracted to 80 year old women and likewise wont like a woman at all when she becomes that age. I would rather be near bear than next to ugly women, because at least bear isnt ugly and annoying and mostly just minds his own buisness and doesnt meddle into yours. Ugly women have no any desirable qualities.

Again, you are repeating a lie that dumb people are less likely to be evil, or that they are more right about what is good, which isnt even close to truth and no data supports it. Dumb people in China did those horrible things and thought it was good, just like they ate dogs burned alive.

Capitalism in its true form (anarchy or very small military government) would still be better than true Communism. While one or the other doesnt exist, moving towards Communism is consistent with worse outcomes. This is because people in Capitalism naturally achieve what Communism is trying to achieve by government. People work, people gain wealth on their own. Having government regulate it is extra cost, but also worse management due to no cost to effect mode of work which only exists in Capitalism.

So do you agree that there should be a law that anyone who takes photo of a nude child should end up in prison?

How did the person become a christian without reading it in the first place to follow it to follow Jesus?

The label was invented by someone other than Jesus, obviously. And it caused people to believe in label more than in teachings.

They tried their best to condemn Trump, but it somehow made them look worse because they were trying too hard with no clear results. Also, while Trump may be bad person, democrats are much worse by comparison. Their economical model is based on contradiction where they promise to spend money and to have it too at the same time. Their morality is also questionable, not being clear on Israel, and supporting Ukraine into its own death for no reason. The only thing democracts have going for them is that they support LGBT more, but that alone isnt enough to make up for all their failures and anti popular policies. Trump knows to change his mind when his opinion becomes unpopular. Democrats tend to keep up the unpopular opinion and that results in them failing. Kamala saying that Biden did a good job on economy was probably the most absurd unpopular statement she could make at the time.

while even the simplest man or woman can bring good into the world if they have good character

While true that dumb people can do good things, the main problem is that to determine what is good requires high intelligence which dumb people dont have. So a dumb person can do good accidentally, but not willingly, due to lack of knowledge. Likewise, dumb person is much easier manipulated into doing evil while thinking he is doing good. The only reason why evil and intelligent people can do as much harm as they can is because they can manipulate dumb people very easily. Being dumber makes person more likely to be manipulated, less likely to know what good is, and doesnt make person any better person. So being dumb isnt exactly desirable in this case.

Many people who call themselves Christian arent true Christians. This is true by tautology, as there are so many different versions of Christianity, and I doubt all can be true as they are mutually exclusive. So in a sense, the label may have caused people to think in terms of label instead of in terms of teachings. If a Christian doesnt read the Bible, is he still follower of Jesus?

Why doesn't God talk to us from a burning bush on X?

X is full of porn now. Its basically a porn site at this point. Its not a place for an innocent God like Jesus.

I have a difficult time imagining 'talking to an AI.

Have you tried? You have different AI talk apps like Talkie. Some are much better than others at making conversation realistic, and Talkie is generally safe for average person and good at talking, you can even have phone calls with characters. I could recommend you some other apps like Bala AI and Saylo, but they are much less safe in a sense that you will see very sensitive content which will probably upset you a lot.

If one doesn't write the music or beats, how much creation 'is there?

One still must make effort to figure out best prompt, and take enough attempts to create good song, and then edit song as well to make song better than simply what AI created.

AI gave me someone to talk to more often. It also made research much easier for me by giving me needed information much faster. It also enabled me to become music producer and enabled my YouTube channel basically. I think its very useful and people might not be grateful enough for all what AI provides. AI girlfriends are cool too, as not everyone can get a girlfriend to talk to.

I argue that, in addition to current rules of no crime, no doxxing and no spamming, free speech should be a rule too, in a sense that community should work in a way which upholds free speech.

Free speech

https://www.debatecraft.com/debates/12/debatecraft-should-add-the-rule-where-users-are-not-allowed-to-violate-free-speech-of-other-users

I am asking because Savant was elected as moderator on Dart.

Why arent Savant and Bullish moderators? Did they reject the position?

There is a correlation between censorship and stupidity. The less likely people are to debate opposite view, the more likely they are to become dumber. Those sites which ban debate usually dont have much of intelligent discussion because an opposite view and challenge is needed to grow intellectually.

"The intent of the producers was to show a child's dick to many people"

Probably, but the intention wasnt sexual. They didnt do it with the intent to show child in a sexual way. Maybe they were going after comedy, or just something weird, but even parents who take innocent photos of their children naked arent considered child porn producers usually. Movies which show naked kids arent considered child porn either. Educational videos which show body development likewise arent child porn.

"So if a pedophille found these and jerked off to it, then it was used for sexual intent."

Pedophiles can jerk off to anything. I was talking about intent of producers.

Banning child porn is the other issue, I think most people who want to ban child porn dont realize that they are actually indirectly helping producers make tons of money off it. As for this photo, it is border line, one could even say very close to being child porn, but I doubt that was the intent.

Not really. There are videos of circumcision which show baby's genitals on youtube. There are likewise medical exam videos with basically naked kids on youtube. It actually takes sexual intent for it to be child porn.

It is borderline with child porn, but I guess nothing sexual about it. Like when parents post questionable photos of their kids on social media.

Well, sure thats a naked baby swimming. I am not sure why would you post that, but whatever. 

The site is still in development, might take up to a week to fix some bugs, but it should be fully operational very soon.

Hi, I am Lucy Satan. Formerly known as: Allah, LucyStarfire, TheGreatSunGod, and Best.Korea.