Browse active challenges, live debates, and finished matchups.
There are 221 debates.
Resolution: Islamic View and explanation about Universe is more acceptable while Atheism do not provide enough information about origin of universe or universe as a whole. Pro: My stance is Islamic, where I consider Islamic explanation more compelling and acceptable. Con: He must provide whether his stance or explanation is more compelling and acceptable being an atheist. Burden:shared
Origin of Universe: Islam Vs Atheism
Some people argue AI computers could one day really feel and think as humans do inside. Others say no way, because only living brains with special parts can have real feelings—computers just pretend super well.
A debate on fine tuning
This debate involves fundamental questions about state legitimacy, historical justice, self-determination rights, and the relationship between state conduct and the continued right to exist under international law.
Should schools take further action into safety drills for school shootings?Should they be able to have a lethal or non-lethal weapon?
Debate on modal ontological argumetn
Assuming, for the sake of argument, that theism is true and that there exists a God, polytheism (the worldview that there are multiple Gods) is more probable than monotheism (the worldview that there is just one God).
This debate covers the core conflict between public health and civil liberties.
Con is the latter of the question for those that are confused. Affirmative is always first or the former.
According to the US Constitution, once a person is appointed a Supreme Court justice they are appointed for life. In recent years, several proposals have been made to limit the amount of years a person is able to serve as a justice.
Strict scriptural debate
Is animal testing truly necessary? Can we justify the suffering of animals for scientific progress? Are there viable alternatives, like advanced computer models or cell cultures, that can replace animal testing? How accurate are these alternatives in predicting human outcomes? Shouldn’t we prioritize ethical methods that minimize harm? As we advance scientifically, is it possible that we can move beyond animal testing altogether?
Does the bible provide an outline for Scripture as the highest authority, or is the institutional church higher/equal?
No description has been provided.
