It looks like pro is simply using ad hominem attacks. It’s not a debate about life in general but instead trying to point out inconsistencies in con’s arguments when pro is doing it more.
A nonsense debate
it's been too long, at least it's not like debate art
no one wants this
hahahahahahahahahha
Funny thing is mal was so ready to accept a debate that wasn't even his
over
This debate might be over, idk
You ignore the gift of the Holy Ghost in the passage.
You also disobey Jesus in Matthew 28:19.
You’re so low you now have your own page on the leaderboard. 😜🤭
Looks like we agree on this one
You made severial points, which I will answer.
Him chosing her doesn’t mean it’s not important. God chose the Cross. Is this Cross not important? No, it is a symbol of Christianity.
The book of Judith is deuterocanonical. Even if you don’t believe it’s scripture, it still shows how the phrase is used.
Yeah, anyone can claim that. This is how gnosticism starts.
Saying you have the spirit is just begging the question.
I did check with the Church.
“We say, pronounce, sentence, and declare that you, the said Galileo, by reason of the matters adduced in trial, and by you confessed as above, have rendered yourself in the judgment of this Holy Office vehemently suspected of heresy, namely, of having believed and held the doctrine—which is false and contrary to the sacred and divine Scriptures—that the Sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west and that the Earth moves and is not the center of the world; and that an opinion may be held and defended as probably after it has been declared and defined to be contrary to the Holy Scripture; and that consequently you have incurred all the censures and penalties imposed and promulgated in the sacred canons and other constitutions, general and particular, against such delinquents. From which we are content that you be absolved, provided that, first, with a sincere heart and unfeigned faith, you abjure, curse, and detest before use the aforesaid errors and heresies and every other error and heresy contrary to the Catholic and Apostolic Roman Church in the form to be prescribed by us for you.”
Anyone?
I looked back and saw the translations vary between whether it is future or present. The “movement” of the Earth in this case is just from earthquakes and God’s judgment, not a rotation or revolution around the sun.
This verse is talking about end times and God’s judgment on the world. It says what will happen not what does happen. You need to read the verse.
Prove it then.
Are you a Christian who rejects the Virgin Birth?
Science got many things wrong that it corrected later.
Vatican II doesn't really give any new doctrines or dogmas, it just takes different approaches.
I don't believe the Earth is flat, I believe it is in the center of the universe, motionless.
The Church never taught the Earth was flat.
Can you cite the verse you're talking about? The Bible only says the Earth moves at the end of the world.
All scientists agree geocentrism is possible, they just don't prefer it.
I can see you don’t believe in reality.
Hmmm
Mal must be getting tired of me.
In one of my debates, Mal says you can’t add “ity” to the end of Christian. It is against sola scriptura.
Yeah, you’re gonna need to say whether you accept the former or the latter? Does con always mean the second one and pro is the first one when it’s not a yes or no question?
Are you able to get in? Your password should be the same.
Anything you can do?
