What's the plan for this debate?
Yes
Thank you for voting!
I'm not yet sure what I believe on this issue, nor do I think I stand much of against you but I'd like to try
No worries, that's definitely more important that an internet debate
Strange I thought the resolution favored con when I first saw it
Ping me when this debate is done Ill vote on it
I swear you make these resolutions as confusing as possible
Pro establishes a teleological framework, and this framework is not disputed by Con.
Pro's arguments sufficiently uphold their teleological framework by establishing that Somaliland fits all four criterion of the Montevideo standard. (Permanent population, defined territory, functioning government, foreign relations) None of these pillar are taken down by or even attacked by Con during the debate. Con even says he has no rebuttals against them. Thus, Pro's case upholds their burden of proof and wins the debate.
Additionally, Con effectively drops the entirety of the debate in the last round, solidifying Pro's victory, even if we were to weigh this debate under the framework of utilitarianism, which seems to be what Con was using. The only utilitarian arguments left standing at the end of the debate were that made by Pro in their constructive. (Security and economy)
Sorry for the short argument, I'm in a bit of a time crunch right now. Nonetheless I think I hit everything important.
Can you extend the voting period?
Thanks for voting and welcome to the site!
Is this another one of your alt accounts
Thanks for voting!
Thank you everyone for the feedback.
America can be defined as both continents, but another completely valid and used definition is just the United States, and I feel I made it fairly clear which one I was referring to. While it is appreciated, I do not think I deserve the vote.
Yes, thank you.
Didn't realize this was AI. Obviously would have voted otherwise had I known.
It doesn't matter too much who wins, Novice is my alt account.
That's good advice. I've had people cite sources that actually refute their case but have relevant sounding titles
"To make a stronger case, it would be more effective to focus on the actual points raised by 'SomeDebatePerson"'
Bit strange you're talking about yourself in third person now
Well you didn't refute any of my studies, which is understandable as they're flawless
You don't think circle racism is serious? That is deeply disheartening
Thanks for voting!
Seems my links went to the wrong place, but as you never would have guessed they were mostly Rick rolls. I am deeply disappointed in myself for squandering this oppurtunity
Would you like to vote on the debate?
I'm not quite sure. It's and adventure.
Using AI in an argument is not cheating. AI being your argument is.
I cited studies for evidence to prove the points that I wrote. Your argument came back 95%+ AI on several different detectors. You seriously don't see the difference?
Sorry my first argument is a little under baked. I forgot their is no review screen on this site. The argument has sufficient depth to start though.
I can't access the account I accepted this debate on. If you create another challenge I will accept
