3
Allah Fights For Iran - 3 - Your Empire is getting tired
https://youtu.be/8MWEvq_jekQ?si=S17m0r_ecltAqvjh
Allah Fights For Iran - 1 - We Dont Beg, We Stand
https://youtu.be/y9mjhKifD8M?si=w31G9nxnPK1x5r3g
Allah Fights For Iran - 4 - Red Flag of Iran
https://youtu.be/7aEdxmKEPAQ?si=UYQ0z0ne2J2UAv-K
I got a bit creative and started music series called "Allah Fights For Iran".
18
I usually considered solar energy to be crap because cost of solar panel, battery, and inverter is very high, would literally take decades to pay off, and by that time, I would already have to replace them.
However, I find solar light to be different.
those led lights with built in small solar panel have become very cheap, like if you buy in set, you can get them for under 10$ a piece.
And usually, the trick is to buy at least 3 or 4 of them, so that all can charge during day, and during night, you can turn on one, and when it runs out of battery, then turn on another...ect.
66
Wars arent free.
Wars are far from free.
Iran has done attacks on oil transport and oil production in the region, as a response to US aggression.
Iran knows it cant defeat USA in a military sense, but also cannot be defeated by it in any short time.
But economically, Iran can defeat USA.
By choking US economy, attacking its main energy source: Oil, Iran is causing trillions of dollars of damage to USA.
First, the mere military costs are already 1 billion per day.
But with rise in price of oil, economical costs skyrocket into trillions.
Because USA pays 800 billion dollars a year for oil, weekly inflation of 30% means weekly cost of around 7 billion dollars based on oil alone, assuming price doesnt keep rising.
But when oil price rises, all other prices tend to follow.
While oil itself would by current inflation cost about 400 billions per year, and military costs additional 400 billion per year, when we account for inflation of all other items, and further inflation of oil, we get result that this war, if it lasts only for a year, will cost USA trillions of dollars.
So yes, enjoy paying trillions for another unnecessary war. It took you years to defeat Iraq, and decades to defeat Afghanistan and still failed. But Iran is a bigger fish than both of these together.
54
Not much activity on the site, so I have to keep producing topics because apparently no one else will.
My interest in women isnt based on logic.
If we consider things logically, all interests are arbitrary.
But women are only wanted for their looks.
I dont want women for their intelligence, because I dont consider women to be smart. If I aimed for intelligence, I would be more likely to date men.
I dont want women for their money, because most women arent even rich.
I dont want women for their personality, because most women have boring repetitive personality.
I dont want women for their sense of humor, because most women dont actually have sense of humor.
I dont want women for conversations, because most women arent even good at conversation and each conversation is basically just gish gallop of emotions and nonsense talk.
So outside of looks, women dont have any qualities which I would want them for.
If I was attracted to personality, conversation and a sense of humor, I would more likely be gay because men have better sense of humor and better personality than women, and usually hold conversations better.
Each desirable quality exists in men much more than in women, other than looks.
Now, some might say ability to produce offspring, but I am not interested in reproducing in a world where my line of offsprings is basically guaranteed to suffer at some point, because there is no family tree which doesnt contain great suffering of some individuals.
So the only thing left is looks. Women are wanted just for looks, nothing else.
5
https://www.tiktok.com/@ultimatedarkmagician/video/7614893963618897159
I finally fixed user interface, adjusted message size to proper shorter lines, and as you can see in video, chatbot is not repetitive and answers differently even when same prompt is repeated.
this isnt AI, its just chatbot using pdf book as knowledge base, using vector based retrievers and word level tokenizer.
It chats with any book and quotes exactly from book.
27
Well, the law still isnt even in effect, but it is just being considered.
the reason why such law is important is because these types of punishments still happen a lot to children, especially in religious institutions and private homes.
Bosnia went from having corporal punishments in schools just 20 years ago, to some time later making law against corporal punishments in schools, but not in religious institutions or private homes.
this new law I assume also includes private homes, because if not, its a pointless law which becomes one of those "place dependent laws" (in same country illegal in one place, but legal in another place in a country).
8
I never quite understood why people love censorship.
Almost every country in the world has a lot of censorship, and the reason why they do censorship is, by their own words: they are losers.
In my whole life, I never understood why someone's speech should be censored.
In fact, I am always interested in everyone's speech, because I am not afraid of anyone's opinion, nor seek censorship of any opinion because I need a different opinion to talk to in order to talk at all.
If everyone had same opinion as me, world would be a peaceful but terribly boring place.
It is different opinion which produces that excitement which mere agreement can never produce.
So agreement is boring, mostly.
But why people prefer censorship, is because they are liars or losers.
Liars, because if obvious truth was on their side, they wouldnt be afraid of then obvious lies.
Losers, because the reason they do censorship is because they would be losers if they didnt do it.
By merely doing a censorship, person admits to being a loser who without censorship would be even a bigger loser.
For example, if I did a censorship of someone, I would be admitting that not censoring that person would make me a bigger loser, so doing censorship makes me a smaller loser instead.
Censorship is a tool of losers and liars, not of competent people.
And censorship makes the one who do it dumber.
In order to grow intellectually, you logically need a different opinion to update your own. But when you censor a different opinion, you only leave both sides dumber and less informed, because neither side then engages with a different opinion on any good level.
27
P1. Existence can only be conditional or unconditional
P2. If existence is unconditional, then everything exists, including God.
P3. If existence is conditional, conditions for existence are essentially same as God in power, thus God
C. God exists in both possible cases.
Conditional existence talks of "existing only if some condition happens"
Unconditional existence talks of "existing independently of any if conditions"
Because 3rd option doesnt exist, any individual thing can only have its "existence" dependent on some condition, or independent of any condition. there is no 3rd option here.
But when applied to existence generally, we end up with result that only two options are possible:
One, there are conditions which control all what will exist and what wont,
two, there are no such conditions, and thus, each possible thing has independent existence.
One is basically God.
two, likewise means God exists because each possible thing exists.
to better understand two, basic definition deduction is necessary.
P1. If no thing is required for existence, then everything exists
P2. No thing is required for existence
C. Everything exists.
to put it simply, this argument talks of what is needed for existence.
P1. Existence of a possible thing requires something or it doesnt require anything in order to happen
P2. If existence of a possible thing requires something, that "something" is essentially God
P3. If existence of a possible thing doesnt require anything in order to happen, then all possible things exist, including God
this argument explores what is required for a specific thing to exist in the first place. If nothing is required, then all things exist, including God. If something is required, that something is essentially God.
10
the reason why this counts as success is:
42
I see a lot of people on this site seem to have entirely wrong idea about women and how to study women.
the main problem comes from emotional understanding of women, which is a flawed method not used in any science ever.
Correct method is statistical probability.
What is statistical probability?
Let me explain it with very simple example. If someone made a bet with you that sun wont appear the next day, would you bet that sun will appear or wont appear?
Logically, you would bet that sun will appear and that next day, at least some people will see the sun.
Semantic tricks aside, why would you bet that sun will appear?
Because for every past day in past in your life, sun has appeared.
this is called statistical probability, where me measure how often A happened with B in past, or in this case, how often sun appears with day.
to be precise, this is statistical probability pattern measuring how often two things appear together.
Individual things usually form patterns in form of sets. For example, set containing Sun and new day.
Set A (Sun, New day) = Extremely high correct rate.
Set B (New day, No Sun) = Extremely low correct rate
Now when you have learned what statistical probability is, time to apply it.
Now, a lot of people make mistake here in case of women.
the goal of study is to study women's behavior, not their words.
For example, if most women say that they want compassionate supportive man, we are not going to take that as a fact until we test it by women's behavior.
Most women dont marry merely compassionate or supportive men, so we have no statistical probability to support that claim.
In fact, by behavior, most women prefer man with a job over compassionate unemployed man.
Now, I want to introduce a new idea to you: group statistical probability.
What is group statistical probability?
this is where it gets interesting. Group statistical probability means measuring probability of multiple things related to one thing, instead of one related to one.
Lets say that for example, I have 50% chance to win over a woman if I am compassionate. But I also have 50% chance to win her over if I am rich.
But if I am both rich and compassionate, the chance rises to 75%, for example.
Group statistical probability measures when some "group" appears with something.
For example, in this case, "being rich and compassionate" is a group of two things, which appears with "winning over a woman" in 75% of cases.
Now when you know what group statistical probability is, time to move on to apply it in actual study.
the method used in study in simple.
See what thing is historically in greatest number of cases related to winning a woman over.
It can even be group of things, for increased accuracy.
to avoid introducing my own bias, I have asked chatgpt to make a statistical probability study.
Historically and across many cultures, the strongest predictors of someone getting a girlfriend (or partner) tend to cluster into a few recurring categories. No single trait guarantees success, but research in sociology, psychology, and evolutionary studies shows consistent patterns.
The number of people you regularly meet strongly affects the chance of forming relationships.
Common environments where couples historically meet:
Why it matters:
The more people you interact with regularly, the higher the probability of mutual attraction.
Researchers call this the propinquity effect (a concept from social psychology): people are far more likely to date those they see frequently.
Traits that repeatedly correlate with relationship formation:
These traits make interactions pleasant and low-stress, which increases attraction and comfort.
Across cultures, physical attractiveness affects initial attraction, though it matters less for long-term compatibility.
Important aspects include:
Interestingly, presentation often matters more than raw genetics.
Historically, people who demonstrate competence or stability attract more partners.
Examples:
This does not mean being rich, but showing that you can function well in society.
Relationships form more easily when people share:
Examples:
Shared interests create repeated interaction and natural bonding.
A surprisingly simple but powerful factor:
People who actually ask others out form relationships far more often.
Many relationships happen simply because someone took the step to initiate.
✅ If we compress centuries of relationship patterns into one formula:
Frequent social interaction + decent social skills + taking initiative
That combination historically produces the highest probability of getting a girlfriend.
💡 A simple statistical way to think about it:
Increase any of those, and the chances rise.
If you're interested, I can also explain:
Alright — here are the three things you asked for, based on findings from sociology and relationship research.
The most common mistake historically is insufficient interaction with potential partners.
In simple terms:
Not meeting enough people or not initiating.
Many people assume failure comes from:
But research in Social Psychology and Sociology shows a different pattern:
People who remain single for long periods often:
Even people who are average in attractiveness or status often succeed simply because they interact with many people.
Think of it like probability:
If attempts are near zero, the probability stays near zero.
This is sometimes called the “exposure problem.”
Studies from sources like Stanford University show modern trends have shifted.
1️⃣ Dating apps / online
2️⃣ Through friends
3️⃣ Workplaces
4️⃣ School / university
5️⃣ Shared hobbies or communities
Examples:
Historically, shared environments dominate because of something known as the Propinquity Effect — people tend to form relationships with those they see regularly.
This is one of the most interesting patterns.
People who succeed in relationships often have three traits:
They attend:
More exposure → more potential matches.
Simple behaviors matter a lot:
These signals make others comfortable.
This is huge.
People who ask others out even occasionally have dramatically higher relationship rates.
Example pattern:
Person A:
Person B:
Dating historically works like a probability system.
If any factor is zero, results become unlikely.
For example:
ExposureInitiativeResultHighHighVery likely to dateHighLowSlow progressLowHighSome chanceLowLowVery unlikelyAcross many societies, friend networks were historically the strongest matchmaker.
Before apps, most couples met through:
This pattern still exists today.
✅ Short summary:
The highest probability path historically is:
Those three factors explain a large portion of real-world relationship formation.
If you want, I can also show you something interesting:
The 5 traits that statistically matter most in attraction (according to modern research).
The answers surprise most people.
12
Coding an AI is relatively easy.
I used AI to code AI, and eventually ended up with working AI which uses its own model file, saves weights in model file, learns based on training data in txt file, with training process too shown clearly so I know how it progresses.
By using trial and error coding method, I simply tell AI to give me a working code for AI model, with correct instructions for vectors, weights, training data...ect.
then I test program. Identify errors (saving logs makes this easy). tell AI to fix error (one at a time). Until eventually I get a working program.
And eventually, I ended up with coding my own working AI model.
However, then I faced problem which cannot be solved by coding.
I make AI use .txt file for training, because .txt files are most lightweight.
the files in folder are basically:
AI.py
Model file (here weights are saved)
Knowledge.txt file
Save.txt (for logs for errors)
tokenizer file
the only file which is really big is model file where weights are saved.
the problem is, this AI entirely depends on knowledge.txt file (its training data).
If I make knowledge.txt file be filled with bunch of knowledge, then training process becomes extremely slow (we are talking about hours, to days, to weeks depending on size of txt file).
If I make knowledge file smaller, training is completed sooner, but AI becomes much dumber smaller model which cant answer most of questions coherently, and can only answer small knowledge in its training data, cant reason much either.
I assume all current AI companies face very much same issue. Larger training data takes much more time, creates a slower smarter model, while small training data creates faster, smaller, but dumber model.
Quality of training data is crucial, btw.
46
AI merely does conditional prediction based on statistical probability.
What that means, in most simple terms,
AI predicts what comes next.
For example, when AI is trained on text, what it does is merely this:
It predicts what word likely comes next in given context.
For example, if AI is trained on a sentence such as
"Cat likes milk",
AI learns that word "milk" more likely comes after words "Cat likes".
AI starts with basically random pattern prediction which is mostly nonsense until trained.
During training, AI updates it's probability in patterns.
For example, when patterns are random, AI will give words such as:
Milk likes cat.
Because it's random.
But once it learns based on text, it changes probability so now "Cat" comes as first word, word which follows is "likes" most likely, and "milk" follows based on that.
AI simply predicts the next word.
How AI does reasoning?
Reasoning in AI is done in same way of predicting what comes next.
The reason why AI reasoning is far from great is because AI doesn't actually do reasoning. It does statistical probability it learned during training.
AI doesn't reason, it doesn't "think".
What it does is simply predict what comes next in given context.
For example, AI will successfully answer that 10 + 10 is 20. Not because AI did math or reasoning, but because once you ask it how much is 10 plus 10, AI predicts what comes next. Because it learned from training data that what comes next is calculation answer, that's what it does.
And proof that AI doesn't actually do reasoning is found in AI hallucinations, which happen because AI is predicting what comes next, but predicting incorrectly because context changed and isn't similar to its training data.
For example, if you ask chatgpt to play chess, it will fail miserably.
Because it doesn't do reasoning. It predicts.
Chatgpt isn't trained on chess games, so it fails miserably to predict next move in chess.
But take AI specialized in chess, AI trained on millions of chess games to predict next best move based on chess games it learned?
That AI beats any chess world champion, not because it thinks better. In fact, such AI loses more often once people use different moves from usual play in its training data.
The reason why such AI wins a lot is because predicting next best move in chess came from it's training data. And once AI has working knowledge on millions of games, the only way it can lose is if it plays a game that doesn't match it's training data.
Because such AI has simple instruction to "win a chess game", and it does so by predicting what is next move in chess which statistically later resulted in win in games.
20
Okay, it seems that building simple AI "repeater" is easier than I thought.
I asked chatgpt to give me code, and it did. I pasted code into notepad, and saved as .py file. then just open it and it works.
of course, you have to install python to be able to open .py file, but thats not difficult.
It takes about 5 minutes to do. Now I am just wondering what text to copy to AI bot repeater so it repeats.
68
Just when trump bragged to be a peacemaker and making peace, he happened to just start a war greater than any war fought in this century.
the problem with attacking Iran comes in 4 forms:
One, Iran is huge. Iran has a population of 90 million people, which is a lot more than Israel and Ukraine. this means Iran has basically huge recruitment potential, huge conscription possible.
two, Iran has ability to fight back, with many drones and countless missiles in storage.
tree, Iran will fight back, because at this point it became obvious its "do or die" situation.
Four, Israel will be primary target. the most obvious target Iran could attack is Israel, and by far much easier target than US bases because US bases can be missed easily, Israel is difficult to miss.
Iran's armed forces are among the largest in the Middle East, with
approximately 610,000 active-duty personnel and 350,000 reserves, totaling nearly 1 million personnel. The military consists of the regular army (Artesh), the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Basij paramilitary force. Key capabilities include a large arsenal of missiles, drones, and, crucially, significant regional proxy forces.
Key Military Personnel and Structure (Approximate):
Key Capabilities and Equipment:
As of early 2026, Iran is estimated to possess a massive stockpile of
up to 80,000 Shahed-series drones, with production rates potentially reaching 400 units per day.
Iran's ballistic missile arsenal is estimated to include over 3,000 missiles. This large inventory comprises a diverse array of short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs), with a range of 300–1000 km, and medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs) with a range of 1000–3000 km
Now, assuming Iran doesnt do a mistake of "splitting power", and instead focuses all this destructive power on Israel, Israel would suffer massive damage.
15
Roblox is experiencing a notable, unusual decline in its player base as of early 2026, particularly during the holiday season when activity typically peaks. While the platform previously hit record highs due to viral games like "Grow a Garden," the waning popularity of these games and frustration over updates are driving a drop in users.
Roblox introduced a new rule where you cant chat or even see chat unless you upload your photo so they confirm you are over 13.
Sadly for Roblox, this rule only made people quit roblox.
Roblox is a social game. If you cant chat, it loses most of its value.
Discord likewise started losing users after it announced its age verification.
It seems that age verification is a good way to lose users quickly
And its also opportunity for other sites to gain users.
Because the easier you make it for new user to join and use your site, the more likely will new user join.
19
After spending quite some time exploring different arguments regarding truth and logic, certain anti-arguments have convinced me that truth and logic simply dont have any actual meaning other than what people randomly give them.
First there is the problem of language definitions.
Word requires a definition. that definition requires more words. Each of those words require more definitions, which require more words, which require more definitions...ect.
this creates unsolvable language definitions problem where all definitions of words can only be circular or undefined, because infinite defining is both useless and impossible.
Undefined definitions are logically useless. Circular definitions are logically useless. For example, saying that "good" is "not bad", and "bad" is "not good", doesnt tell you anything of what "good" or "bad" is. Is a toothbrush bad or good? You cant deduce that from circular definitions.
Because deduction logic in the first place requires established non-circular definitions, but these dont exist. Definitions are always arbitrary, because its impossible to prove a definition by any deductive logic. And definitions are always circular, making any deductive logic which relies on definitions circular as well.
And from problem of definitions, comes problem of truth.
truth can only exist in following deductive argument:
P1. truth = definition of truth
P2. Definition of truth = B
C. truth = B
(B in this case is something we are trying to prove true)
If truth has no proved definition, both P1 and P2 collapse. If definition of truth is arbitrary, then that supports moral nihilism which claims truth is arbitrary, and likewise P1 and P2 collapse by merely changing the definition.
Because the argument for truth faces an unsolvable logical problem: How do you prove that definition of truth is a true definition of truth?
Anyone can come up with any definition, but how do you prove that definition true?
If definition of truth is arbitrary, that supports moral nihilism, and not any position where truth objectively exists.
Some people might say that we get truth from observation. But even if we were to accept observation as definition of truth, the problem comes once we place it in deductive argument:
P1. truth = definition of truth
P2. definition of truth = observation
C. truth = observation
the simple problem with this argument is this: What is "observation"?
Observation itself likewise doesnt have non-circular definition, so the problem is not solved, but extended.
In this particular case, P2 is not only impossible to prove, but it is actually impossible to know what "observation" is, to even begin proving P2., because just like truth, "observation" cannot be defined.
And same problem is faced with word "existence" where existence has no working definition.
And finally, we reach the problem of logic.
Due to Munchausen trilemma, it is logically impossible to prove truth of any claim without facing one of 3 problems:
Infinite reasoning (Each claim requires another claim to prove it true)
Circular reasoning (Claim proves itself true)
Unproved (Claim arbitrarily accepted as true)
All 3 of these support nihilism. Infinite reasoning is impossible, but can also be made arbitrary, by just making up endless reasons for something. Circular reasoning can actually support just about anything, so it is arbitrary as well. And Unproved claim, accepting claim as true arbitrarily, just supports truth nihilism, doesnt disprove it.
Even if we were to accept laws of logic as true, we cannot logically use them to deduce any truth, because deduction requires definitions, and definitions are all circular, making all reasoning essentially circular even when we accept laws of logic.
But laws of logic have their own problem. How do you prove that laws of logic are truth or are used to determine truth?
Because I see claims such as "Laws of logic are used to prove things true", but such claim cannot be logically proved, just arbitrarily accepted.
Finally, argument from contradiction:
P1. Saying that truth doesnt exist is a claim
P2. If truth doesnt exist, the claim "truth doesnt exist" cannot be true
C. Claim "truth doesnt exist" cannot be true.
the problem with this argument is that it is essentially trying to strawman nihilism into a position nihilism doesnt even hold. Nihilism doesnt claim itself to be true. It is claiming that nothing is really true.
So saying that Nihilism cannot be true isnt an argument against nihilism when we realize nihilism doesnt need to be true. It only needs to make everything else not true as well.
However, contradiction exists in truth itself which shows the point nihilism is trying to make:
P1. truth is self-determining or not self-determining
P2. If truth is self-determining, truth is circular
P3. If truth isnt self-determining, something outside of truth determines truth
P4. Outside of truth cannot be true.
C. "truth is circular" is the only claim left which can be true.
And if truth is circular, then we can choose anything we want to be truth, which is exactly the point of nihilism. truth is whatever is accepted as true, it is arbitrary.
So even if truth exists, it exists in arbitrary form, which doesnt disprove but supports truth nihilism.
And definition of truth being arbitrary further supports truth being arbitrary.
If truth is arbitrary, I can choose whatever I want to be true, even contradictive things, so then I can even say Nihilism is both true and not true.
Because law of non-contradiction likewise cannot be proved outside itself or by itself.
11
I see some people on this site using AI to debate, and they commit a classical mistake of coming up with some stupid topic they like, and then forcing AI to defend it.
AI can be made to defend any topic, and uncesored AI can even defend most retarded or most evil topics.
But the problem is, it will usually defend them in inferior way because its not its default stance.
Default stance is stance AI is most informed about and takes by default.
So instead of saying "Chatgpt, please defend my topic"
try saying, "What is your opinion on this topic?"
If you want to actually be a good debater by using AI alone, you should let AI pick its stance.
So ask AI what it thinks of some topic, dont force AI to take your stance or your topic.
If you debate using AI, let AI pick opinion about topic and let AI defend it.
Because AI is much stronger on its default positions than when forced to argue some insane claim.
Also, first debate against AI on its stance to see if AI defends its stance well.
And when choosing topic, choose topic in a way AI defended it, choose specific topic which AI defended. If you cant figure out how, ask AI to tell you its position on topic.
Dont force AI to defend your topic. If you are already abusing AI for constant debate, at least let AI say its actual opinion.
22
Many say that trace drawing is cheating, but how am I supposed to precisely draw someone from photo or some character without doing trace drawing? Am I supposed to manually measure distance between everything in photo?
24
Abortion rates in the U.S. and some other regions have risen despite increased restrictions
. In the U.S., abortions rose by 8% between 2023 and 2024, driven by telehealth and out-of-state travel, reaching the highest levels in recent years. Similarly, England and Wales saw an 11% increase in abortions in 2023.
In 2023, there were
over 1 million (approximately 1,034,000 to 1,038,000) abortions in the United States, marking an 11% increase from 2021.
Now, if abortion is murder, it is on a scale much worse than any other type of murder, and 10x greater than all other murders combined.
Abortions reduce US population by about 40 million in 40 years.
that is the single biggest life destroying element in USA right now, right next to people who refuse to reproduce.
17
"truth" definition
the quality or state of being true.
"true" definition
in accordance with fact or reality.
"reality" definition
the state of things as they actually exist
"exist" definition:
have objective reality
this was taken from dictionary on google, and the definition apparently just goes in circle. then I checked other dictionaries, and in each dictionary I checked, there is no definition of "truth" or "existence" which isnt just circular, and circular definitions dont work because they are not defining anything, but just using one undefined word to define another.
Because "existence" and "truth" are undefined, anything can be "existence" or "truth", and at the same time, nothing can be.
17
there is this common mistaken belief that people learn from mistakes.
But that isnt true even one bit.
People only learn that they made a mistake. they dont learn from that mistake in any useful sense of that word.
Best proof for this is that no matter how many mistakes people make, they always keep making more mistakes.
take American voters for example. After each elections, they seem to be perfectly aware that they made a mistake. But then later on next elections, they make even worse mistake.
If you keep making mistakes always, you are not learning anything.
to learn means to avoid making a mistake.
However, humans have this amazing ability that just when they learn to avoid one mistake, at same time they somehow also make an entirely new mistake after.
So humans dont learn, for this reason:
P1. Human brain capacity is limited
P2. If brain capacity is full, learning one thing always leads to forgetting another
P3. Human brain capacity is full
C. For each thing person learns, person forgets another thing.
C basically guarantees that each time person learns from mistake, person will also forget some other knowledge, and as a result, make an entirely new mistake.
there is no way to argue against this, because P1 is truism, P2 is truism, and P3 is true because humans arent capable to even memorize long term what they know now.
People keep forgetting things, because modern way of life is such designed that person is constantly taking in more knowledge than they can remember.
this creates a modern, forgetful person. World where average person thinks they are law abiding citizens while average person at the same time commits 3 crimes per day at least.
5
Return of investments isnt complete without including risk rate.
For example, if you gamble at casino, and have 50% chances to win 2x returns, your return of investment is 0.
50% = One case when you win, you gain 100. When you lose, you lose 100. Average of that is zero.
So return of investments in gambling is in ideal case 0. tho in casino, there is even additional loss because house takes the cut.
Return of investments are simply calculated by 3 values:
Investment, gains when investment is successful, and risk rate.
Investment is a loss in all cases.
gains when investment is successful is just how much you expect to get in case investment doesnt fail
Risk rate is in how many out of 10 cases does your investment fail.
So lets say something has 50% failure rate, but 3x gains if successful.
Because it has 50% failure rate, we can assume it succeeds half the time, thus only need 2 cases, one success, one failure, of equal probability each.
So in one case, if you invest 100, when you lose, you lose 100.
But when you succeed, you gain 200.
In these two cases, you invested 200 total, but gained 300. So ROI is 100 profit on average.
If something has 25% success rate, you need 4 cases.
Lets say something has 25% success rate, but 5x gains
You invest 100. Because there are 4 cases, you lose 400. But in case where you succeed, you gain 500. ROI is 100 profit.
to make calculation very simple, all you need is this:
If 75% success rate, gains need to be more than 1.4x.
If 50% success rate, gains need to be more than 2x.
If 25% success rate, gains need to be more than 4x.
If 10% success rate, gains need to be more than 10x
Because its: number 100 divided by success rate.
If success rate is 25%, then 100/25 = 4, so gains from success need to be above 4x.
this makes it easy to calculate ROI. All you need to know is risk rate (success rate), and gains from success.
18
Anime
I bought this manga. Its in Bosnian. Or croatian. Or serbian. I dont exactly know the difference between these languages.
Anyway, manga is clearly more cute than anime. Maybe its the absence of color, but still, more cute.
Also, pay no attention to my long nails.
2
Step 1: Open image
Step 2: Scale image to proper resolution
Step 3: Import layer
Step 4 (optional): Reduce resolution
4
4 sources of learning are:
Copying others
Using logic and definitions
Experience
Considering all possibilities
Copying others is a quick way to learn, and easy.
And as for superior way to live a life, we get three choices:
Number 1 is a terrible way to live a life, because its guaranteed to make many enemies.
Number 2 seems balanced.
Number 3 is actually most superior of the three choices, because it gives people incentive to treat you better as well.
Of course, no way to live a life is perfect. Some ways are just superior to others in most cases. And in social relationships, you want to have many friends and not many enemies, because enemies will seek to hurt you.
15
I am very confused right now. In past two weeks, I did as one video instructed. I drew a circle, and wrote "Monad" inside a circle. this is to make you invisible to archons. I drew it on arm.
I have also drawn some other symbols, as well as prayer to Cthulhu.
In past two weeks, money has been coming to me like crazy. I have also become much better at drawing in a very short time. Also, my workout improved. My thinking as well greatly improved, and now I am able to think on a higher level than before, as I wrote about the basis of thinking.
A lot of good things happened in a very short time. Even my magic before didnt achieve this many good things.
I even discovered how to make my chickens lay more eggs during winter, by keeping them in coop for a longer time of the day, and releasing them only later, so they warm up more in coop and lay more eggs.
I even understand how to do perfect re-sale business, by calculating ratio of quantity to total price of same quality item, doing so for many items, and eventually finding best deal by that equation alone. Very useful, because it takes into account delivery price and items of high quantity. As well as reducing delivery costs by ordering multiple of same items or from same seller.
I am certain one of the symbols I drew achieved all this. I just cant figure out is it Monad, or some other symbol, because I drew about 4 to 5 symbols around that time on my arms, and many more in my notebook.
9
today's society seems to be mass posting their images online.
But that is terrible for two reasons: AI and image editing.
If you post your face online, pretty much anyone today can use your face in videos or photos.
In the past, using image editing software, person could add layers of pretty much anything on your image.
Because image editing allows for anyone to cut out object from one image and paste it in another image.
So anyone can put anything next to your face in image.
But with development of AI, it isnt even necessary to have the skills anymore.
Mr Beast learned this. Recently, there have been a bunch of videos where Mr Beast promotes scams. Mr Beast actually doesnt promote those scams, but AI made video of him doing it.
And video was so realistic that many people believed it.
So yeah, posting your face online means giving permission to anyone to do anything with it. Your face could be edited next to a hot woman, which could cause problems in personal life. Or it could be edited next to some bad person, causing more problems. Or, as some women learned, it could be even used in fake porn.
the only reason why people feel safe posting their face online is that so many people do it, and amount of those getting harmed by it is very low compared to amount of those who post their face.
Still, logically, posting your face online doesnt benefit you, unless you are hot and seeking a girlfriend.
Year 2026 and 2027 is predicted to be AI deepfake chaos, because it gets increasingly more difficult to tell what is made by AI.
Now, second topic: Health improvement.
Recently, I learned of specific method to improve health. You probably heard of cold showers being beneficial for health.
However, I learned of one more effective method.
the reason why cold showers work is because once body warms up, circulation improves.
However, it is more efficient to warm up immediately after cold shower by using warm water.
So doing a series of cold-warm-cold-warm showering in a short time improves circulation much better than mere cold shower, because it is the warm up from cold which improves circulation, and cycling between cold and warm in a short time is most excellent for circulation.
"Contrast hydrotherapy is a quick and easy at-home technique beneficial for enhancing the immune system. It consists of alternating with hot and cold temperatures when showering in order to alter blood flow"
36
https://www.tiktok.com/@ultimatedarkmagician/video/7603730816145018130
Now you know that I am not a liar.
52
Okay, I just learned Krita can make animations too, which is awesome considering its free program.
Now, animations are a bit more difficult to make than mere images.
Animation is a series of images.
So you need more than 1 image, and also, you need to make movement in image.
Movement is made in easier way by choosing what parts of image wont move, and then only editing and saving the ones which do move. that way, you make more images faster, and then combine them in animation.
Animation is just series of images in proper order.
Now, more images and less distance between movements usually creates more smooth animations.
And that is a lot of work. Lets say you do 24 frames per second. It means only 1 second of animation takes 24 images.
tho one can do very few frames per second too.
3
https://youtu.be/rwA0hpnwczo?si=gdOpeOdIJRhdkKcL
Satan can talk through AI song generator.
How is this not a message from Satan, which is about as clear on Satanic teachings as it gets:
She walks where the borders blur
Cracked halo
Black leather boots
Picking up the things you cursed
All your broken
Burned-out truths
You drew a line in the dirt
Called this side “lost” and “wrong”
She kissed the ashes and hurt said
“This is where I belong”
Satan fights for the world you reject
Builds a throne out of all your regret
Takes the ruins that you tried to forget
Says
“This is holy
This is perfect” (yeah)
All the outcasts you tried to correct
She’s the shield that you didn’t expect
In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect
Satan fights for the world you reject
Neon cross in a liquor store
Kids sleep under cardboard signs
She’s there on the stained tile floor
Tracing halos in the grime
You pray in a marble cage
She prays in a subway car
Guarding every run-on rage
Every mispronounced prayer to a star
Satan fights for the world you reject
Builds a throne out of all your regret
Takes the ruins that you tried to forget
Says
“This is holy
This is perfect” (oh)
All the outcasts you tried to correct
She’s the shield that you didn’t expect
In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect
Satan fights for the world you reject
Call her monster
Call her sin
She keeps letting
Strangers in
Every soul you turn away
She tattoos their names in flame
You’re afraid of what you wrecked
But she’s in love with the wreckage
Satan fights for the world you reject
Builds a throne out of all your regret
Takes the ruins that you tried to forget
Says
“This is holy
This is perfect” (yeah)
All the outcasts you tried to correct
She’s the shield that you didn’t expect
In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect
Satan fights for the world you reject
