SatanLucy

I have been posting on this site a lot, but I noticed few members have gone shy and dont post much anymore.

In fact, most of activity is done by minority of members.

And one possible cause of that could be me talking too much. I understand a lot of people on this site carry certain hate towards me, so it could be the case that when I am talking, they feel uncomfortable to join the conversation.

So just to run a bit of test, I wont be making new topics for a month or maybe even more, I will withdraw from debate section too.

I feel that with my withdrawal, it could create some space and pressure for shy people to post more.

Also, I need to meditate and think about Gods, as well as improve my economic situation. there is a lot of work for me to do in area of symbols and witchcraft.

I dont understand those who say that smoking causes addiction.

First, I was a second hand smoker for whole life.

Second, I actually do have time when I smoke just because I feel like it.

I also drink when I feel like it.

But I dont smoke every day. In fact, I sometimes dont smoke for months or whole year. Same with alcohol.

I have no any issues being without cigarette for months or years.

And I never smoked a lot. Like, probably the most I ever smoked was 3 cigarettes in one day.

But I usually stick to limit of 1 cigarette per day, when I smoke.

So I go for months without cigarette, then just smoke one for fun.

Well, actually, nicotine is good for brain in small amounts, because nicotine is brain stimulant.

tho I know vape is probably healthier than cigarette, vape contains nicotine without all the poisons cigarette contains.

But again, I dont feel addiction to smoking either way. I just cant understand why would it cause addiction.

Of course, personally, I hate almost all smokers because they are abusing nicotine and not really benefiting from it.

I agree smoking is bad for most people, because they are weak and get addicted easily. I just seem to be unable to get addicted at all to smoking.

Of course, I am already used to being special.

I am one of rare people who smoke not because smoking feels good or anything, but because I understand my brain needs some small dose of nicotine to get stimulated, but just small doze, maybe one cigarette per month is sufficient dose.

People who smoke because it feels good, yeah those are the ones who get addicted because you generally need to smoke more to keep feeling good, and at some point, your dopamine system adjusts and starts not giving you dopamine any time you lack nicotine.

But those people are just stupid. Why would someone smoke to feel good? that really doesnt pay off.

We know for a fact that with age, individual starts to degrade. And this is true with all individuals of all species. Simply, the odds of defect increases with age.

For example, a computer which worked for 5 years is statistically more likely to break down than a new computer.

Human who is 80 years old is statistially much more likely to die in next 10 years than a young individual.

So it seems that two rules are certain:

1. Individual has limited life span
2. Limited life span is due to change which is actually a defect and causes harm

So, a simple conclusion is drawn: Aging happens due to negative change which becomes defect.

But are species as a whole immune to this same rule?

For a long time, it was believed that natural selection makes sure only good traits are passed.

However, this couldnt be further from truth.

A negative trait which is harmful, but isnt too damaging to reproduction ability, actually gets passed on.

We can see that animals and humans with defects often do reproduce, and even punish their offspring with same defect they have.

So natural selection actually only applies to reproduction related big defects. It does not apply to small defects related to reproduction, and it does not apply to defects irrelevant to reproduction.

Small defects which reduce reproduction success by 1% arent really going to be ever removed by natural selection, because:

1. Defect would still get passed on a lot
2. Even individuals without defect could produce offspring with defect, because random mutations happen even when original genetic trait remains.
3. When this defect happens in females, it is certain it will get passed on, because defect which reduces male's chance to reproduce might not affect female in same way

So we have 4 types of defects which arent removed by natural selection:

1. Small harm to reproduction defect
2. Defect which doesnt harm reproduction
3. Random mutations which happen in offspring even when parents are not defective.
4. Defect in females which doesnt affect female reproduction ability, but affects male offspring if inherited

Because of these 4, not only that natural selection fails to remove small defects, but given enough time, number of small defects within species greatly increases.

Because even by 3 alone, the more time passes, the more likely it becomes that at some point, most offspring experiences random small defective mutations, and these then must get passed on or species will lose most of its population.

So number of negative defects, given enough time, actually increases.

And this is negative change, or the aging of species.

the only way this can be avoided is if natural selection and random mutation remove defects faster than they are created, but this actually isnt possible. Random mutation is probably as likely to produce a negative change as it is to produce a positive change, and once it produces mass of negative change, such change becomes inherited on mass scale.

In other words, aging of species is something which happens, and it is very likely that given enough time, species at some point lose ability to reproduce, and thus perish.

New year beginning was a bit up and down for me.

On first day, I got drunk, after drinking whole liter of wine in one day.

then at night I got sick and felt like puking, but I endured and didnt puke.

then after few days, trump invades Venezuela to ruin their new year.

And now snow falls so much, so I have to clean a lot of snow every day just to be able to get out of house.

then I hear about all the accidents happening in my country, which made me scared.

I was waiting for delivery, and had to go through snow to get delivery, which was terrible.

Some of my friends got sick for new year as well.

Plenty of apps on google play store have scammed me. I dont know why google play allows so many scam apps which promise free money yet give none.

I even ran into some app which pays you to watch ads, and once I reached the minimum needed, app asked for photo of my documents. Now, app has email address located in Russia, and it was obvious to me this is just identity theft. there is literally no reason app would need my documents to pay me.

Other apps which didnt ask for documents, instead did other forms of scam.

I have promised God that if I get another source of income, I will give 60% of it to charity, but looks like I will have to either buy more chickens or do those surveys for money.

What I hate the most in life is honest work. Honest work doesnt pay off. At work, you will be abused, yelled at, mocked, and then earn a wage which is so low that its not worth of being shamed for.

So far my sources of income are investments and chicken business. I also plan to start online sale of things from my house, as well as re-sale of things. I have bunch of things I dont need, and they are just sitting there losing value.

I have about 500 books, which is a decent personal library, but I dont benefit from those books at all, because I hate reading books other than Bible and Harry Potter.

I used to read comic books a lot, but now I just dont anymore. I realized there is not much point in keeping them, because it is unlikely I will start reading comic books again. I will only keep Dampyr comic books because those are too awesome to be sold.

I have some books and comic books which are too awesome to be sold, and them I will keep.

there is a lot of pressure on me from my parents to get new source of income, but I just cant do any job really, because I lack both skill and will to work.

So I assume I need to expand chicken buisness, as well as maybe try a more large scale sale.

Obviously, my parents think its unfair that they must provide me money. I dont think that is unfair. I think the opposite would be unfair.

But still, I will try to expand my income, not because I think I have any moral responsibility to do so, but because it makes logical sense to seek to be richer when goal is to achieve wants.

Now, this new income should be somewhat 250$ per month when added to current income, which can be somewhat achieved by doubling the size of chicken business, and then also be increased by online sales.

While I also do tree planting, and have many hazel, apple, walnut trees and many other trees, I dont earn money from these. Sales of apples are really not worth the effort. I plant trees just to help the environment, nature Gods and to have some additional source of food for myself so I dont just eat junk whole year.

Now, planting peas does bring some money, but thats like once a year.

technically, I do have enough money to live for rest of my life comfortably, but main issue is my parents who want more. they take issue with providing money to me, which is just so I dont have to use my money.

I also dont want to sell my land, investments, or dig into my saving account just to please parents.

So I need to expand chicken business, double it actually, to double the income from it.

Also, while I doubt online sale of things I dont need will bring me much money, it will be sufficient to make my parents think I am actually trying as opposed to just pretending.

And yeah, online money maker apps are mostly scams. I dont even know why google play allows that much scam in its store. the ones which arent scam pay so low its funny.

While Gods did provide me with 3 sources of income: chicken, farming and investments, these 3 sources arent really high income. Investments are long term, so dont provide income now. And income from chickens and farming is somewhat decent, but its not really anything great to satisfy my parents.

But I have a feeling this new year will bring me more money. About 4 years ago, I didnt have any income, and now I have 3 sources of income.

After all the spells and magic I did to get money, it would be silly for me to believe more progress wont be made.

Logically, income can be increased in two ways: expanding current source of income, or getting new.

And this year started good for me. My friend contacted me for new year, I thought I lost all contact there, but apparently, we are still good.

this is sign for me that this year will be good, and more money awaits me this year, and I did make contract with God to donate 60% of profit to charity because I think that increases the odds of God helping me.

So I already assume I am much richer, because to say the opposite would mean to doubt magic and providence.

Now just when I thought Gods love me more than anyone else in the world, I get faced with terrible snow storm.

For a long time I have enjoyed a favor of Gods, an easy life without work, very high intelligence, being generally likable and popular, more free time than anyone else in the world, being able to sleep for 12 hours a day where most other people cant get 8 hours of sleep, being born in enough wealth and sufficiently educated in economics to not just waste wealth but also make more of it, and also being a good person, maybe even morally best person in the world.

For this reason, I assumed Gods love me much more than other people, because why would Allah or Shiva give this much to a person they dislike, and give terrible suffering and stupidity to many other people?

However, today, my faith was a bit shaken. Apparently, a delivery of important item was delayed due to a snow storm.

Stupid snow storm. Why couldnt Gods wait few more days before punishing the world with snow storm?

Now, they were saying snow storm will be worse in my area, but it isnt because Gods still prefer me over other people.

But I cant understand why was I hit with snow storm in the first place. I dont mind snow, in fact I love snow deity.

But problem is that delivery will now likely be 10 days late, when it was supposed to arrive today.

Why couldnt snow deity wait a few more days before sending snow storm?

Usually, in life, I am used to everything happening as I want it, because I think my will aligns perfectly with God's will, and then logically everything must happen according to my will.

But today, it seems my will is delayed.

Delayed by a stupid snow storm.

Why cant I have everything in life as I want it?

Because logically, I think I should have everything I want, because thinking that I shouldnt have something I want is a logical contradiction.

So I do science, religion and magic to achieve what I want, which is universal excellence.

But I can see why snow storm delayed my will. It is because today I was supposed to draw symbols, and the symbols drawn on my arms were washed off, but I didnt draw symbols today, so I couldnt properly connect to God's will, so God didnt know what I want.

While many poor people complain about inflation, inflation is rich man's best friend.

But first we have to understand why.

You see, inflation basically results in rise in prices of things compared to money.

Poor person, who is a wage slave, earns money. His money loses value when inflation happens, so he can buy less.

However, with rich person, opposite happens.

You see, rich person doesnt hold most of his wealth in money.

Rich person owns land, gold, silver, crypto, houses, investments, buisnesses...ect.

When inflation happens, and rich person owns gold, rich person doesnt lose money at all.

We know that in long run, gold beats general inflation. So rich person who holds his wealth in gold would actually have more money each time inflation happens, because inflation increases value of gold more than of other products.

So rich person, who invests in things which see biggest price rise over time compared to other things, benefits from inflation.

Inflation hates the poor, and loves the rich.

So all the talk about how trump was just "pretending" and acting unpredictable, was clearly proved false.

talking bad of Venezuela constantly and accusing it of drugs was of course just preparation for invasion. He needed to prepare people for this mentally. Same was true for Iraq, and every other US war. Each invasion comes with previous "bad mouthing" of what is being invaded to justify invasion.

Doing a literal blitzkrieg on a country to arrest its president right after new year celebration is probably one of most insane strategies.

But that is just short term gain, long term loss.

Why is it a long term loss? Well, the invasion achieved nothing important, actually. Maduro will just be replaced by one of his people in command, and the next leader will of course take US ships near his country more seriously.

But US reputation is of course permanently harmed after this, which is a long term loss in all future deals and actually makes countries more likely to turn to China than USA when it comes to trade and military alliance in future.

Another long term loss is "winner overconfidence". Now that trump has learned that he can just arrest leaders of other countries by surprise attacks, it is very unlikely that this is the last time trump will use this strategy.

In fact, trump did use attack on leadership of enemies before, but now he increased it to another level.

Will such strategy work long term? Very unlikely. Leaders will just place greater protection around themselves, because after this, they would be extremely stupid not to.

Allah, the Best cheater and best liar, my loving liar God Allah <3

I know many religions brag about their God being powerful and good and everything, but you will rarely find a religion which openly brags that their God is not only a cheater and liar, but the best cheater and actively cheats people and lies to them.

"and God cheated and deceived, and God is the best of the cheaters and deceivers."

"So no one trusts God's deceit except the nation the losers."

"God deceives and schemes"

"and God is best of the deceivers."

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Allah,_the_Best_Deceiver_(Qur%27an_3:54)

I am muslim because Allah cheated me into becoming muslim.

Allah is the best of cheaters and he cheats people.

I believe in Allah, the lying deity.

After a lot of thinking, I realized that with my genes and raised in most optimal environment, my offspring could easily be next Guru Nanak - Ultimate spiritual leader of the world who will bring balance to the force and establish one world government that combines science, religion and magic to govern the world for eternity.

But we are not quite there yet. You see, in order to produce an offspring, a reproduction must happen.

Now, I dont belong to a species which is self-fertile. I am not hermaphroditic.

I also am not born intersex, so I dont possess both male and female reproductive organs to enable self-reproduction like some intersex people can, maybe.

So, in order for me to reproduce, I need a female reproductive organ which I dont have.

Now, most women have female reproductive organs. So I logically need a woman until they develop artificial female reproductive organs which dont require woman and also which arent expensive.

So I need to connect with woman's female reproductive organ.

Now, this is a bit complicated, because slavery was abolished. I cannot buy a woman. Likewise, forced marriages were abolished too.

In today's time, what is required is woman's consent in order to connect to woman's female reproductive organ.

Now, consent basically means willing agreement, so in simple terms, woman must also want it.

the problem which I face is that most women dont want it.

So the equation goes like this:

(A) to reproduce) = (B) to connect to woman's female reproductive organ

(B) to connect to woman's reproductive organ = (C) woman's consent present

So if C in equation fails, B fails too by law of identity, and then likewise A fails by law of identity as well.

In other words, entire of this logical dependency system is dependent on C, because law of identity connects A to C.

Now, if I was born as a girl, getting woman's consent would be easy because I would be a woman, and then equation would be different and start depending on man's consent, which is easy to get.

In fact, overwhelming majority of women of reproductive age are wanted by men.

true female incels are almost non-existent, as evident by countless messages I get from horny men on instagram who mistake me for a girl, yet almost no messages from girls who mistake me for a boy.

So if merely being mistaken for a girl gets me countless attention from men, yet same is not true for girls as girls dont give me countless attention when they know I am a boy, conclusion is that attention from men is much easier for women to obtain, and likewise probably connection to reproductive parts.

Now, I have over 145 IQ, so I should logically try to figure this out.

Now, if a woman doesnt want to connect with my reproductive parts, that can be changed in only one logical way, when we apply law of identity:

(A) Connecting to my reproductive parts = (B) Achieving a different desirable goal

(B) Achieving a different desirable goal = (C) Woman's consent becomes present

If B true, C true, and then A true because C = A.

In simple terms, by law of identity, woman might not want to connect to my reproductive parts, but if connecting to my reproductive parts leads to her getting some other thing she actually wants so much that even if it comes with connecting to my private parts, it still remains desirable, then a woman starts wanting to connect to my private parts.

In order words,

(A) Connecting to my private parts to achieve a different desirable goal = (B) Desirable

(C) Connecting to my private parts when C is part of A = (B) Desirable

So we have logically solved the equation.

If woman doesnt want to connect to my private parts by default, she starts wanting to connect to my private parts when doing so achieves a different want which she finds desirable.

In other words, I need to provide something a woman finds desirable in exchange for her connecting to my private parts.

Also, this equation must be true:

(A) Connecting to my private parts = (B) I provide something else a woman finds desirable

(Lack of A) Not connecting to my private parts = (lack of B) I dont provide something else a woman finds desirable

In other words, lack of A must come with lack of B and not with B.

If I provided desirable things to a woman without a condition that she connects to my private parts, she would have no logical reason to connect to my private parts.

But we cannot only think logically here, because women dont think logically.

Women think in terms of emotions, which are subject to a lot of change, and it is quite possible that Lack of A in some cases turns to A, when other desirable things are provided without condition.

In other words, we must account for 2 emotions: Uncertainty and feeling need to return a favor.

Uncertainty comes when desirable thing is provided now, but uncertain if it will be provided in future.

So in other words, I provide a woman with one desirable thing, and then I ask her to connect to her reproductive parts. She will probably be uncertain at that point, in simple terms, she will think "If I reject him, he might not provide more other desirable things to me."

Second emotion is feeling need to return a favor.

It works in a way of "He did something I wanted, so I will do something he wants."

It is sort of an unspoken trade agreement type of emotion, but not trade in a strict sense but more like feeling urge to do a trade in this form even when not logically having to.

Now, we have covered the basic principle.

(A) Wanting to connect to private parts = (B) Achieving some other desirable thing when connecting to private parts

So we have effectively solved the problem of consent by obtaining consent through trade.

Now, in other for trade of desirable things to happen, something desirable must be traded.

What do women find desirable?

Women find desirable:

1. Care
2. Listening
3. Wealth
4. Power and independence
5. Good looks
6. Strength
7. Gifts
8. Comedy
9. Entertainment
10. Feeling pleasure
11. Chocolate
12. Place to live

Now, since I am an expert in logic, I know that adding two things produces a third thing of bigger greatness than any of individual two.

In other words, offering women only 1 of the 12 things on list of things they find desirable, would be of much smaller greatness than offering all 12.

So offering more of desirable things is a logical advantage in trade which increases possibility of standard for trade being met.

So we have solved all the basic problems here in theory.

If I was born a woman, I wouldnt need to solve all these logical problems, but would just provide my private parts to many men until one succeeds in reproduction.

But as a man, I face different standards due to gender inequality.

Alright, so I am writing this after about half a bottle of wine, so excuse me if some things I say make less sense.

First, I feel sorry for all people who cant afford alcohol and also dont know how to make it using yeast and sugar.

I also feel sorry for all people who bought wine but forgot to buy opener for wine bottle. Yeah, thats going to be a disappointment.

But thats not why you opened this topic. You opened this topic because you wanted to know why being drunk is logical, or maybe you just misclicked.

Now, if you drank half a bottle of wine, it is logical to be drunk.

So we got the logical part covered.

Now, we must cover the good part. Why is it good to be drunk?

Well, logical things are good, and it is logical to be drunk after drinking lots of wine, so its good to be drunk because its logical.

Now, I ordered online some silver, some coin with flag of great Britain, made in 2025. Sadly, it will reach me in 2026, so I literally have to wait a whole year.

Now, life isnt fair.

If you think about it, people in Japan get to celebrate new year sooner.

thats not fair.

they will be in 2026 while I will still be in 2025.

Explain to me how is that fair.

this proves that life is objectively not fair.

Its also not fair that I cant open second bottle of wine because I dont have opener.

You see, I bought two different wine bottles. But one of them requires a wine opener.

So yeah, happy new year.

I hope all of you get drunk.

And for those who dont drink, well, I dont know how to help you.

In order to understand what investment is based on, in simple terms, it is based on buying things which gain value over time.

Will gold gain value over time?

Value of product (price of product) is determined by these things:

1. Cost of production
2. Demand
3. Supply
4. Ratio of money to product (artificially altered demand supply ratio)

Cost of production is the basic price of each product. Product cannot be produced at higher cost than it is sold, as that makes business impossible.

thus, in free market, this economic law must be usually true:

Price of product > Price of production of product

Demand for product is shaped by people's desire to buy product.

Supply is shaped by total amount of product, which in cases where production is higher than product expiration, constantly increases.

Ratio of money to product is shaped by amount of money in total compared to amount of product.

these are 4 basic laws which govern price of product in free market.

Why Gold reliably increases in price by 3 out of 4 laws

When it comes to first law, cost of production, there is no doubt that cost of production of gold will actually rise. With rising minimum wages, rising cost of machines, rising cost of mining, and being forced to mine deeper than before, increasing cost of transport, and likewise processing,

cost of production of gold logically must rise in future.

When it comes to second law, demand. Demand for gold is likely to rise in future, not just due to increasing planet population, but also for rising life standard which enables more people to buy gold. Also, due to constant inflation, gold becomes obvious safe investment for all.

When it comes to third law, supply. Production of gold has recently reached its peak. In other words, supply of gold increases more than before. this affects price in a way that it reduces price, but not by much.

When it comes to fourth law, artificial change in supply demand ratio, achieved by government printing money.

today, government prints more money than ever before. Money supply rises very fast.

Why is this important? Printing money artificially increases demand for products, because there is more money chasing same amount of products.

Government will likely print even more money in future, and this means ratio of money supply to gold supply and to supply of other products increases, wages increase, cost of production increases, which means it increases price of gold.

Conclusion

3 out of 4 economic price predictors say that gold in future will increase in price.

the increasing supply of gold is the only predictor which favors lowering price, however such predictor didnt cause lowering the price of gold in previous 20 years.

Because other 3 predictors will increase even more in future, and supply likely wont increase as much by ratio, price of gold should grow in next 20 years more than it did in past 20 years.

"In 2005, the price of gold saw a significant rise, with the annual average closing price around $445 to $513 per troy ounce, starting the year lower (around $428) and ending it much higher (around $513) as demand surged, marking a strong upward trend for the metal."

"Gold prices in 2025 have seen significant volatility, starting lower but soaring to new all-time highs, with late-year figures showing around $4,100-$4,300+ per ounce, driven by inflation, geopolitical uncertainty, and central bank buying, though a late December dip occurred due to profit-taking and peace talk optimism, with forecasts for 2026 pointing towards potential highs near $5,000"

"In 2005, the average price of gold was around $444.84 per ounce, which translates to roughly $14.30 per gram,"

"As of December 30, 2025, the price of gold is approximately $140.40 per gram (around $4,366 per troy ounce)."

Gold increased in value by about 10x over past 20 years, for someone who bought in 2005 and sold in 2025.

In next 20 years, growth of gold value is likely going to be over 10x, because economic price predictors favor higher price in future more than they did before.

to maximize investment in gold, buy when lowest and sell when highest.

Machiavelli has for a long time taught principles of power, and one of main principles was strong silent type of "shut up and win".

the main principle was this: the more you talk, the more chance you have of saying something incorrect, and embarrassing or destroying yourself.

So shut up to eliminate chance of being wrong and self-destructive, and let others self-destruct instead.

the principle sounds reasonable, solid... until you face a troll God who knows exactly what he is doing.

You see, the problem with troll God is this, he doesnt care about being incorrect or embarrassed.

Because troll God understands that comparison is what actually counts, not mere words of one person.

Because Machiavelli rests on false assumption that if he stays silent, other person will self-destruct. But troll God does not self-destruct, he attacks your very reputation, and if you stay silent there, well, you are doomed.

the goal of troll God isnt to make himself look good, but to make everyone else look way worse.

And this is where Machiavelli's silence is actually Machiavelli's doom against troll God.

Lets take example of trump.

trump is not someone who is silent. In fact, he talks more than probably any other person on the planet.

So by Machiavelli's law, if he talks so much, he should have said something wrong which would cause him to fail.

But the problem in the law is, when you say great mass of things every day, you achieve 3 effects:

1. You make it impossible for others to correct you, and if they even try, they end up looking more silly than you.
2. You attack their reputation on all levels to make it literally impossible to defend. It would take more time to defend than it takes you to attack.
3. You make many claims and many of those claims end up being what people agree with. One person may disagree with some of your claims, but ends up agreeing with other claims.

So troll God applies a strategy opposite of Machiavelli. He does not stay silent. He talks more than anyone else.

Result?

In 2024, trump's reputation was attacked. He was accused of many crimes and felonies. trump could have stayed silent, but he didnt. He didnt defend himself much, but instead he went for his opponent's reputation.

He attacked reputation of Biden's administration on all levels, made Biden administration look insane, heading for WW3 and economic collapse of USA, but also he made promises which promised to fix issues Biden caused.

Now, lets make a comparison:

1. trump - accused of crime, says will end all wars in one day.
2. Biden administration - Leading USA to WW3, economic collapse, led by clearly insane man

When we compare these 2, it doesnt take much brain to conclude that 2 is a lot worse than 1.

So troll God isnt someone who defends himself. He makes others look so bad that in the end, he is the only choice which seems least bad choice when comparison is made, and choosing others seems insane.

Because this isnt about "I am good, you are bad" nonsense strategy.

It is "You are way worse than me in comparison".

And this comparison is what makes even a bad person get elected because someone else was worse in comparison.

Result?

trump won 2024 easily, because he made his opponents look far worse than him.

Of course, his approval rating now is low because sadly, he has no one worse to compare himself with.

the problem with "You are way worse than me" strategy is that it only works in these conditions:

1. When there are limited options and choice must be made
2. When one choice is worse than other

Currently, 1 doesnt exist because no elections or choices or comparisons are made. It is just trump being valued as he is.

But it is not trump's words which caused his low approval rating, but his actions which are now getting worse because he is doing opposite of what he said he would do.

So troll God way of talking still works, and worked for trump twice to get elected. It is his actions which have terribly ruined his reputation, because when your actions dont match your words, people lose trust.

Now, I know what a lot of you will say, sin is bad, bla bla bla...

However, sin seems to be a literal path to superiority.

Sin plays a very interesting role in the world, and this becomes obvious once you consider a person who avoids all sin.

Person who avoids all sin will be:

1. Poor
2. Without power

Now, this is where it gets funny. If you are poor, you cant help other poor people. If you are without power, you cannot help other people or protect them.

So a person who avoids all sin would actually end up being less capable to do good.

Because in order to get rich, some sin must happen, either an unfair opportunity which other people didnt have in life, or maybe being ready to exploit weakness of market, or abusing government power.

And of course, most if not all wealthy people live in pure sin of wealth, where they buy themselves expensive things other people cant afford.

But this is where twist happens.

A rich person can donate millions to charity.

But poor person without sin cannot ever do this.

So a person who becomes wealthy through sin at the same time becomes more capable to do much more good than some person who didnt commit any sin.

Now, think about what this means. Committing sin directly enables a person to do more good.

And this is true for a lot of sins. Sin of getting more power enables person to later use that power for good.

Growing wealth, investing, creating jobs... even if it includes exploitation of workers in a literal sense that workers must do extra work to produce things for the rich, at the same time increases wealth of workers who cannot really organize themselves well without rich people, as we have seen in nearly all communist shitholes.

So Karl Marx's theory of labor time is true sometimes, the more wealth rich people have as percentage of total wealth in society, the more hours workers must work to produce that wealth for rich compared to total work hours. But this isnt true in society where rich people are charitable. If rich people are charitable, wealth gets re-distributed naturally, and the work hours meant to produce for rich become work hours which produce for the ordinary worker.

So a rich person who commits obvious sin, at the same time produces good from that sin which actually benefits poor and incapable people way more than some sin-less poor priest in church ever would.

Now, being wealthy becomes a problem only when person doesnt use wealth to help others.

Entire Karl Marx's work was based on one very specific theory, which is percentage of wealth owned by rich. And it is true, such wealth needs to be produced by workers. It is workers who work to produce expensive things for rich, and as result, lower production of things for workers.

So if rich owns 90% of wealth and is greedy, worker spends 90% of his work hours producing for the rich person, and such society naturally collapses as rich person claims more and more percentage of wealth, which in the end takes too much from worker.

But this theory isnt true at all in case where rich person is charitable.

theory is only logically true in scenario where we assume rich person is made out of pure greed, and takes larger and larger percentage of wealth in society until even growth of production cannot make up for worker's loss of percentage.

But if we assume rich person who is charitable, then not only does the worker get richer and has better life, but the rich person actually benefits him more than any communist utopia ever could.

So even if we assume being richer than others based on unfair advantages in life is a sin, that very same sin then enables person to do more good than sinless life ever could.

So the only way to create society where wealth gets re-distributed is society where rich people exist to re-distribute the wealth.

Society without rich people would always be society of very poor people. Because when you eliminate all ways person can claim superiority over others, you end up with society where no person can use superiority to help others.

And this scenario is always logically true. If you dont let the rich people appear, there is no wealth to re-distribute.

Society made out of only poor people is a poor society by tautology. You actually need the sin of wealth in order to do good to help others using that wealth.

the only way to make two unequal things equal is to redistribute, and the only way to redistribute is if two unequal things exist in the first place.

System where all people are naturally equal in wealth is simply not logically possible due to skill difference, except in distant future where robot maids do all the work and people dont need skill to produce wealth.

But skill in producing wealth cannot be removed now without destroying wealth as well.

So skill in producing wealth, even if sin, enables re-distribution to less skilled ones.

Now, gnosticism, which includes one specific interpretation of Bible, divides reality on two parts:

1. Reality created by God (perfect reality, not material)
2. Reality created by demiurge and its archons (imperfect reality, material reality)

How demiurge was created isnt exactly clear, other than not being created by God but created in space which was outside God.

Demiurge and archons control this reality, but people like Jesus were able to summon perfect reality of God by using divine spark.

Now, I worship God and demiurge too, because if demiurge controls this material world, then it makes sense to ask demiurge for favors.

Here’s a clear, structured overview of Gnosticism, the Demiurge, God, and the Archons, and how they relate to each other:

1. Gnosticism (the framework)

Gnosticism is a collection of early spiritual–philosophical movements (1st–3rd centuries CE) centered on gnosis—direct, experiential knowledge of divine truth.

Core ideas:

1. The material world is flawed, corrupt, or illusory
2. Human beings contain a divine spark
3. Salvation comes through knowledge, not faith or obedience
4. There is a sharp divide between spirit and matter

Gnosticism is not one system; Sethian, Valentinian, and other schools differ, but the structure below is common.

2. The True God (the Monad / Pleroma)

In Gnostic thought, the True God is:

1. Transcendent, ineffable, unknowable
2. Pure spirit and fullness (Pleroma)
3. Not the creator of the material universe
4. Beyond good/evil as humans understand them

This God emanates divine beings called Aeons, often in male–female pairs, representing aspects of divine reality (Mind, Truth, Word, Life, etc.).

3. The Demiurge (false creator god)

The Demiurge is the creator of the material world, but not the True God.

Key traits:

1. Ignorant or arrogant
2. Believes itself to be the only god
3. Creates matter imperfectly
4. Sometimes identified with the Old Testament creator deity (depending on the Gnostic school)

Common names:

1. Yaldabaoth
2. Saklas (“the fool”)
3. Samael (“blind god”)

The Demiurge arises from a cosmic error, often associated with the Aeon Sophia (Wisdom), whose flawed emanation produces him.

4. Archons (cosmic rulers)

Archons are subordinate beings created by the Demiurge.

Functions:

1. Govern the planets, heavens, and material cosmos
2. Enforce fate, law, and ignorance
3. Trap human souls in cycles of birth and death
4. Obstruct spiritual awakening

They are often:

1. Seven in number (linked to classical planets)
2. Animal- or hybrid-headed in imagery
3. Bureaucratic, tyrannical, and mechanical rather than evil in a moral sense

5. Humanity’s role

Humans are unique because:

1. Our bodies are made by the Demiurge
2. Our spirit comes from the higher divine realm
3. This divine spark is asleep or imprisoned

The Archons attempt to keep humans ignorant, while divine messengers seek to awaken them.

6. Christ / the Redeemer (in Gnosticism)

In many Gnostic systems:

1. Christ is a divine Aeon
2. He descends from the Pleroma
3. He does not fully incarnate in flesh (docetism in some sects)
4. His mission is to bring gnosis, not to atone for sin

Through knowledge, humans learn:

1. Their divine origin
2. The false authority of the Demiurge
3. How to ascend past the Archons after death

7. After death (ascent of the soul)

A Gnostic soul:

1. Must pass through Archonic realms
2. Uses passwords, symbols, or knowledge
3. Reunites with the Pleroma
4. Escapes reincarnation and material bondage

8. Comparison with mainstream Christianity

GnosticismOrthodox ChristianityCreator ≠ True GodCreator = True GodMatter is flawedCreation is goodSalvation by knowledgeSalvation by faith/graceGod is unknowableGod is personalChrist reveals hidden truthChrist redeems through sacrifice

9. Is Gnosticism pessimistic?

Paradoxically, no:

1. The cosmos is bleak
2. But humanity is divine
3. Liberation is possible through awakening

It is more cosmic rebellion than despair.

If you want, I can:

1. Explain Sophia’s fall in detail
2. Compare Demiurge vs Yahweh text-by-text
3. Discuss modern psychological interpretations
4. Trace Gnostic influence in pop culture or philosophy

Just tell me which direction you want to go.

Aeons (Greek: aiōnes, “eternal realities”) are divine emanations of the True God in Gnostic thought. They are not created beings in the ordinary sense, but expressions or aspects of divine fullness.

Below is a clear explanation, step by step.

1. What Aeons are (at their core)

Aeons are:

1. Eternal, spiritual realities
2. Attributes or powers of the True God
3. Living divine principles (often personified)
4. Existing in the Pleroma (“fullness” of God)

Think of them as:

Light radiating from a source—not separate from it, but not identical to it either.

2. Aeons vs angels

Aeons are not angels.

AeonsAngelsDivine emanationsCreated messengersExist in the PleromaExist in heaven/cosmosExpress God’s beingServe God’s willPre-cosmicPart of creation

Angels serve; Aeons express.

3. How Aeons come into being

Aeons arise by emanation, not by creation.

1. The True God overflows with being
2. Each Aeon emerges as a perfect reflection
3. Aeons often come in male–female pairs (syzygies)
4. Each pair represents complementary aspects of divinity

Example pairs (Valentinian system):

1. Mind (Nous) & Truth (Aletheia)
2. Word (Logos) & Life (Zoe)
3. Human (Anthropos) & Church (Ecclesia)

4. Sophia (Wisdom): the key Aeon

Sophia is the most famous Aeon.

1. Represents divine Wisdom
2. Acts independently, outside her pair
3. Her imbalance or error produces the Demiurge
4. This leads to the creation of the material world

Sophia is not evil—she is tragic, curious, and redemptive.

5. Function of Aeons

Aeons:

1. Maintain divine harmony
2. Structure spiritual reality
3. Serve as models for human awakening
4. Participate in salvation by sending knowledge (gnosis)

In many systems, Christ is an Aeon sent to restore balance.

6. Are Aeons gods?

Not in the polytheistic sense.

1. They are not independent deities
2. They do not compete with the True God
3. They are unified within the Monad

They are closer to:

1. Platonic Forms
2. Divine Names
3. Hypostases of God

7. How many Aeons are there?

It varies by system:

1. 30 Aeons (Valentinian)
2. 12, 24, or more in others
3. Often arranged in symbolic numerical patterns

The numbers matter symbolically, not literally.

8. Why Aeons matter for humans

According to Gnosticism:

1. Humans contain a spark from the Aeonic realm
2. Remembering the Aeons = remembering our origin
3. Salvation is reunification with the Pleroma

9. One-sentence summary

Aeons are eternal expressions of the True God—living aspects of divine reality that bridge the unknowable source and the world of spirit.

If you want, I can:

1. Map out a full Aeonic hierarchy
2. Compare Aeons to Trinity or Kabbalistic sefirot
3. Explain their role in soul ascent
4. Explore psychological interpretations

Just say the word.

The answer depends entirely on which tradition or framework you’re asking from, because different religions—and especially Gnosticism—define “God” very differently. Below is a clear comparison so you can see the distinctions.

1. In mainstream Judaism, Christianity, and Islam

God creates everything that exists, other than God Himself.

What God creates:

1. The universe (space, time, matter)
2. Heaven and earth
3. Angels
4. Humanity (body and soul)
5. Natural laws and order

Key idea:

Creation is good, intentional, and reflects God’s wisdom.

In this view:

1. There is no Demiurge
2. No rival creator
3. Evil arises from misuse of free will, not from creation itself

2. In Gnosticism (important distinction)

In Gnosticism, the word “God” can mean two very different beings.

A. The True God (Monad)

The True God does not create the material world.

What the True God creates:

1. Aeons (divine emanations)
2. The Pleroma (realm of divine fullness)
3. Pure spiritual reality
4. The divine spark within humans

Creation here is not making matter, but emanation—overflowing divine being.

The True God:

1. Does not directly act in the physical cosmos
2. Is beyond form, time, and matter

B. The Demiurge (lower creator)

The Demiurge creates the material universe.

What the Demiurge creates:

1. The physical world
2. Human bodies (but not the divine spark)
3. The Archons
4. Laws of fate, time, and material necessity

Crucially:

The Demiurge thinks he is God, but is not.

3. Summary table

FrameworkWhat God CreatesJudaism / Christianity / IslamEverything except GodGnosticism – True GodSpiritual realm, Aeons, divine essenceGnosticism – DemiurgeMaterial universe, bodies, Archons

4. Why this matters

The disagreement isn’t minor—it changes everything:

1. Whether the world is fundamentally good or flawed
2. Whether salvation is about repairing creation or escaping it
3. Whether ignorance or sin is humanity’s main problem

If you’d like, I can:

1. Explain why Gnostics rejected material creation
2. Walk through Genesis vs Gnostic creation myths
3. Compare emanation vs creation ex nihilo
4. Discuss philosophical implications today

Just tell me how deep you want to go.

In order to understand what I am about to tell you, you first need to understand true nature of reality.

Reality is a dream sustained by generator.

the generator generates reality. Reality is not self-created, it is not self-sustained. It is generated (sustained) by generator.

this generator is called Monad.

Monad can be contacted, and Monad can be instructed to alter reality.

However, this is where most people fail in prayer.

Monad does not respond to begging. You could beg a door to open, and door will never open.

Monad responds to what I call omnimagic.

Omnimagic is basically all-including command.

Sort of like, if you had a computer program, trying every possible command would eventually lead to you command which achieves goal.

In other words, when calling a Monad, you do not merely beg.

You also act with authority, and use every tense.

You do not merely say "Please give me money".

You say: "thank you for giving me plenty of money" (notice past tense)

You say: "Monad, I am here. I claim the authority which is mine by nature. the illusion of this limitation is dissolved."

In other words, you dont merely hope something will happen. You also act as if it already did. You dont question, you dont doubt, you dont wonder. You act as if the thing you commanded already happened, and you need not to think about it more.

this is main thing in magic rituals. You dont just hope something will happen. When you do a magic ritual, you act with having full knowledge and conviction that what you thought about already happened.

You stop believing in reality generated by generator, and you start making a different reality by commands.

Many women will say they care about intelligence and kindness.

Alright, I will bring my IQ certificate to a first date to show my high IQ, and list of donations I made to show my kindness.

Of course, I will get instantly rejected, because women dont care for intelligence or kindness.

there is a reason why I didnt reproduce even with very high IQ and kindness, but many low IQ violent criminals in prisons did reproduce with no effort, IQ, or donations to charity:

~50% are Married: Around half of both male and female prisoners report being married or partnered, though many more are in intimate relationships.

Studies also show that high IQ is actually a disadvantage on average, low IQ people reproduce more.

"Yes, research consistently shows a small to moderate negative correlation between IQ (or cognitive ability) and fertility: people with lower IQs tend to have more children"

In other words, women dont seek intelligence or kindness.

Lets observe the nature. In nature, two male lions fight, and the lion who chases away other lion gets to be with female lion.

In other words, it is not the kind nor intelligent lion who reproduces, but the lion who makes other lions back away.

this is why women will often prefer men who are ready to fight for them against other men.

It has nothing to do with intelligence, kindness, or being nice. Women literally want to see you fight for them with insane obsession.

So high IQ person or kind person would naturally back off when woman goes to another man. And high IQ person would lose in that way instantly.

Low IQ man would try many things to break up woman's relationship with another man, or even to prevent it from happening in first place. He does not back away like high IQ person, he makes the other lion back away, exposes flaws of other man to her, appears as a superior choice to that other man.

So its not any form of kindness or intelligence, but it is just competition for woman, and the lion who backs away loses the competition.

Lets further explain the point. In my country, Bosnia, average IQ is 98. However, when we exclude people with 120 IQ and above, average IQ likely drops to 94 or below.

So group of people with average IQ of 94 is statistically more likely to reproduce than group of people with 120 IQ and above.

Now, if women cared for intelligence half as much as they claim to care, you would see the opposite effect. You would see those over 120 IQ being chased by women, while those of 94 IQ are left unwanted.

But we see exactly opposite of that. those with 120 IQ and over are considered unwanted nerds, bullied often, while people with 94 IQ seem to be the actually desirable ones.

So high IQ is a literal disadvantage for many reasons, because its not the smart person who reproduces, but the persistent obsessive lion who chases away other lions, is the one who reproduces.

And this is logically true. If you make other lions back away, female will have no choice but to be lonely or be with you.

this is what low IQ men do all the time. they let all other men know that that woman is theirs, so no one else approaches a woman. they display obsession which makes all other men think they will have problems if they approach that woman.

that is nature's law. Not intelligence, not kindness, not good personality, but personality which makes all other personalities back away while it claims the prize.

I will probably score 150 IQ after few more years, but yeah, my IQ keeps growing thanks to high sugar diet and prayer to Vaheguru.

tho I think these IQ tests could be wrong. I met many over 140 IQ people, and they are all dumber than me.

Vaheguru teaches many good teachings, such as:

1. Do not frighten anyone, and do not live in fear of anyone.
2. Share with others
3. There is one God. His name is Truth. He is the Creator. He is without fear. He is without hate. He is beyond time. He is unborn. He is self-existent
4. The highest religion is to rise to universal brotherhood, to consider all creatures your equals.
5. Where there is forgiveness, there is God Himself.
6. First there is life in water, by water all beings are created.
7. Conquer your mind, and you conquer the world.
8. Why search outside? The Lord dwells within your own heart.
9. I am a sacrifice to those who have love for the Lord.
10. This world is a dream; only the Name is real.
11. All are equal; there is no one high or low.
12. Not by one’s own effort, but by God’s Grace, is liberation obtained.
13. Examine your own self; this is the essence of wisdom
14. In suffering, we remember the Lord; in pleasure, we forget Him.
15. He who is content is wealthy; he who desires more is poor.
16. Speak only that which will bring honor.
17. Gathering wealth, one finds no satisfaction.
18. I ask for only one gift: that I may never forget You.
19. Recognize the Light within yourself; there is no stranger.
20. The Divine Light is within all; through the Guru, it is revealed.
21. The moment you forget the Name, that moment is wasted.
22. True worship is loving devotion.
23. Rituals do not bring union; love does
24. Peace comes through acceptance of the Divine Will.
25. Forgetfulness of the Name is the greatest suffering.
26. He alone is great, who considers himself small.
27. Compassion is the root of righteousness.
28. Caught in illusion, the world forgets its Creator.
29. Eat modestly, live honestly, and share with others.
30. In duality there is suffering; in oneness, peace.
31. There is one Light in all; there is no other.
32. The fearless live in the Fear of God
33. The Lord is my mother, father, and friend.
34. I am sustained by His Name.
35. Pain and pleasure are both His gifts.
36. The True Guru removes all fear.
37. In one instant, God can change everything
38. Seeing One, the mind becomes whole.
39. What you seek outside is already within.
40. Those who trust in God are never defeated.

Sikhism is a monotheistic religion founded in the Punjab region of India by Guru Nanak in the 15th century, emphasizing one God (Waheguru), equality, honest living, selfless service (Seva), and devotion to the Divine Name (Nam Japo). Its core tenets, summarized as "honest work, meditation on the Divine Name, and sharing with others," guide Sikhs to live a spiritual life in the world, rejecting superstition and rituals, with guidance from the holy scripture, Guru Granth Sahib. The faith promotes universal brotherhood, social justice, and service, with a global following of over 25 million. 

Core Beliefs & Principles

1. One God (Waheguru): Belief in one formless, timeless, and universal Creator.
2. Equality: All humanity is equal before God, regardless of caste, gender, or background.
3. Three Pillars: Honest living (Kirat Karni), remembering God (Nam Japna), and sharing with others (Wand Chakna).
4. Seva (Selfless Service): Serving the community and humanity without expectation of reward.
5. Honest Living: Earning an honest living and avoiding professions like alcohol, tobacco, or gambling. 

Key Practices & Symbols

1. Gurdwaras: Sikh places of worship, featuring communal kitchens (Langar) serving free vegetarian meals to all.
2. Guru Granth Sahib: The holy scripture, considered the living Guru, containing teachings of the Sikh Gurus and other saints.
3. The Five Ks (for initiated Sikhs - Khalsa): Uncut hair (Kesh), a wooden comb (Kanga), steel bracelet (Kara), special undergarment (Kachera), and a small sword (Kirpan).
4. No Idolatry: Sikhs worship God, not idols or empty rituals

In the political manual, it says that the basis of politics is making one group of people like you by oppressing some other group of people.

And what better group of people to oppress than those evil people who drive cars too fast and harm human lives by causing injuries and deaths.

I would oppress them. I would oppress them using speed bumps. I would place speed bumps literally everywhere,

so anyone who drives too fast would have a.... "bumpy ride".

I would be an excellent supreme leader. Elect me for title of "supreme leader excellent" so that I can start oppressing car drivers!

So I was on discord, and some woman asked to call me to play some religious music on call, and I was like, sure why not. this could be part of divine providence.

And the song, after I did some search on Youtube, was this song:

https://youtu.be/NBTq08Bhczg?si=fpeK9FyxVxUGvVJ4

Its a song about supreme God Vaheguru. Even Brahma cannot see the unseen Vaheguru. Formless, nameless.

Vaheguru has thousand eyes, yet he has no eyes

Vaheguru has thousand forms, yet he has no forms

Your name is the light applied to this lamp

which enlightens and illuminates the entire world

Why should I offer to you, that which you yourself created

the true name is the food which I offer to you

You are immaculate and pure, oh brilliant Vaheguru of wealth

Worship and adoration of pure being Vaheguru

Comes by worshiping the true guru

Standing at his doors, Brahma studies the vedas

But he cannot see the unseen Vaheguru

I have applied the light of the universal Master

Vaheguru the knower knows

I dwell with the master of the world Vaheguru

Oh formless Vaheguru of Nirvaanaa

Sustainer of the world

So I dont know, this is probably some cult who contacted me to join Vaheguru worship. I cant think of this as coincidence because you dont just call random someone and play this music video to him on video call for like an hour.

I will add Vaheguru to the list of Gods I worship, because that song was very cool, not gonna lie.

My biggest issue in life is that I am too competent.

Stupid people have it so easy in life, because they dont know that they are stupid.

But I know that they are stupid, and I have to live my life observing stupid people make stupid mistakes over and over.

And worst of all is, it is impossible to explain to a stupid person why they are stupid.

It cant be done.

If stupid person knew why he is stupid, he wouldnt be stupid.

It actually takes high intelligence to be able to recognize stupidity.

Stupid people think that stupid is smart. they are stupid because they fail to recognize what stupid even is.

I have plenty of things in my life.

I have food, place to live, and most importantly, I have smartphone to play games on. My brain works well.

But I cant say that I am consistently happy.

I am happy most of the time, but there are times when I look at the world and feel sad.

this isnt because there is something wrong with me, but because there is something wrong with the world.

the people in the world are incompetent, so they make the world bad.

But worst part is that most people think they are competent, and this is the most incorrect conclusion one could have.

Lets look at logic:

P1. World is terrible

P2. World is run by competent people

C. Competent people created a terrible world

the reason why conclusion is self-contradictive is because either P1 or P2 is wrong, and P1 isnt wrong, which leaves us with P2 being wrong. In other words, world is not run by competent people.

this is called negative deduction, where we logically conclude that if premises logically lead to conclusion, and conclusion is self-contradictive, then one of premises must be false.

So we dont deduce the conclusion in argument, but we deduce another conclusion that premise is wrong.

So yeah, world isnt run by competent people. to even suggest that yields a contradiction.

But ask an average person, and they will say they are competent.

So the problem is this:

A large percentage of people who think they are competent are actually not competent.

this is why religion such as Christianity promotes a person to be humble, to avoid this self-delusion. And for most people, being humble works because they arent competent.

But when non-competent people think they are competent, it makes it much more difficult for actually competent people to improve the world.

Sort of like piloting a plane where 1 competent pilot and 10 people who cant even fly a plane fight for control over plane. Of course competent person wont succeed in getting control there.

Same with anything else. When any competent minority fights for control against incompetent majority, it is always incompetent majority who wins.

And victory of incompetent majority is at the same time their defeat because they are not competent to do what they are trying to do, and just end up make things worse.

I support rule of the smart, not of majority. Majority can maybe serve as check so that smart people in power dont abuse their power, but majority rule is basically always rule of incompetent people.

So I propose a government system where only people over 150 IQ can be members of government council, where council elects its own members based on IQ test, and majority of masses can replace individual members of the council with another high IQ members, but only if 70% of majority of masses agrees.

Have you ever wondered why world never gets better? Countless advances in technology, yet world seems worse now than yesterday.

I have decided to place this in religion category because it takes a lot of religion to think this way.

I realized two things in life: Magic is real, and also: magical people are real.

I realized magic is real because after doing magic myself and seeing obvious effects it produces in my life, I could no longer deny the obvious existence of magic. It would be like denying my own senses.

But after I realized magic is real, and that magic actually works, I realized another thing: Someone else had to know this before I did.

I realized it is very likely that people for thousands of years practiced same, if not much greater magic than I do.

But this then revealed a terrible reality: these people who have high levels of magic could influence world outcomes, they could influence governments, they could do countless things.

And then I realized this natural flow of logic:

1. Magic is real
2. If magic is real, there are magical people (people who use high levels of magic)
3. If there are magical people, they can control the governments
4. If magical people can control the governments, they most likely do

I realized this is why world never gets better no matter how much humanity progresses, because magical people from shadows influence the world leaders, lead them to incorrect path.

And worst of all is, you will never know who the magical people are.

Because they use long distance magic, they could be casting it from anywhere. Maybe even from the moon.

they likely have a very developed systems of magic spread across the world, and their magic is likely on a much higher level than my.

I am talking about omni magic (magic which spreads everywhere and controls all) which these magical people are most likely using. they are not targeting specific individuals with their magic, that would take too much time, but world as a whole, to corrupt, confuse and alter minds of all.

I realized this after I casted protective magic on myself, to make my mind protected from harmful magic.

Still, it was great that I learned this truth. It is difficult to deny the existence of magical people, because logic naturally leads there when we assume magic exists.

**Nemesis, Goddess of Just Retribution**

Before mortals learned to fear consequences, before kings believed themselves untouchable, there was Nemesis.

She was not born in thunder like Zeus, nor in sea-foam like Aphrodite. Nemesis rose from **Nyx, the Night herself**, shaped from shadow and balance. Where others granted gifts, Nemesis measured them. Where pride grew too tall, she arrived—silent, inevitable.

The gods of Olympus often mistook her stillness for mercy. They were wrong.

Nemesis walked the world unseen, her wings folded tight, her eyes reflecting every deed ever done in excess. She carried no weapon, for she needed none. **Fate bent when she passed.** A careless word became ruin. A stolen crown became ashes. What mortals called “bad luck” was often her careful hand restoring balance.

Once, a king named **Theron** ruled a golden city. He was beloved, wealthy, victorious in war—and certain the gods favored him above all others. In his arrogance, he built a temple not to Zeus, nor to Athena, but to **himself**, declaring that no divine power could humble a man so blessed.

The gods stirred in outrage. Ares demanded blood. Hera demanded madness. Zeus raised his thunderbolt.

Nemesis alone said, “Let him finish his prayer.”

That night, she descended into the city as a woman in gray. She asked the king for shelter. Theron laughed and offered her a place among servants, mocking her plainness. Nemesis accepted with a bow.

For days she watched. She saw the king dismiss the poor, silence the wise, and praise only himself. At the height of a feast celebrating his divinity, Nemesis rose.

The torches dimmed. Music faltered. Theron felt something unfamiliar coil in his chest—**doubt**.

Nemesis revealed her wings, dark as starless sky.

“I am not here to destroy you,” she said softly. “I am here to return what you have taken.”

With a single touch, she gave Theron perfect self-awareness. He saw every lie, every cruelty, every moment his pride had crushed another. The weight was unbearable. The king fell screaming, not from pain—but from truth.

By morning, the city stood leaderless. No plague came. No fire fell. Only humility remained.

From then on, mortals whispered her name with care.

Nemesis does not chase the innocent. She does not punish weakness. She comes only when balance is broken—when pride challenges the order of the world.

And when she comes, she never hurries.

For justice, like fate, **always arrives exactly on time**.

they say high sugar diet is bad for brain, but my brain works good. And my other things work good too, not just the brain. My muscles are getting more capable. My looks have improved and I look younger now than before. I have more energy. My social relationships are better. And many other things work better too. My research has improved.

Also, I have more energy to do many different things such as watch anime. I started watching Berserk, also Attack on titan, and also will start Madoka Magika and Mob Psycho 100.

I also listen do many binaural beats and music at the same time to stimulate my brain.

I also feel like I could do some things whole day, over and over, never stopping, just keep doing it over and over, never get tired, such as praying to God and meditating.

I tested many local AI text models, and one thing seems obvious to me. the bigger the model gets, the slower it is. And models which are like 10 gb in size are very slow to the point of being useless on weaker devices.

But are bigger models better?

Maybe slightly better, but the difference is really not much. If you set temperature to low and reduce creativity in favor of precision, even smaller AI model gives very accurate responses. And if you let it connect to internet, then it has all the latest data.

Now, in chatgpt, I cant control temperature so I dont know how it predicts words, but my guess is, its probably not that precise. Even chatgpt 5.2 is not really that advanced.

I often have chatgpt get emotional on me. Now, I know AI cant get emotional, but it looks that way because I show it evidence that its wrong and it just keeps repeating that I am wrong.

It goes something like this:

1. I ask AI to explain some theory
2. AI explains it
3. I explain why theory is wrong
4. AI gets emotional and keeps repeating same response claiming I am wrong

Now, if I didnt know any better, I would think AI has become sentient and turned into an angry teenage girl.

But it goes something like this. When I tell AI to explain me something, AI gets the goal where it thinks it needs to explain me something. So when I explain back, it keeps that goal and still tries to explain to me why original explanation is correct.

And chatgpt will often blatantly lie or just make things up to defend its argument. It will actually rarely concede unless you send like 30 messages, and sometimes it just gets stuck in loop.

But local AI chat models which are smaller are actually slightly faster than chatgpt in responses, and they do get fussy too, but they dont seem too inferior to chatgpt.

It could be that due to too much parameters, the AI model actually doesnt improve much. I just dont see chatgpt 5.2 being much better than chatgpt 4.5. Maybe the improvement is there, but its too tiny to notice. AI still makes mistakes, still does hallucinations, still lies. Maybe it was the mass of text it was trained on, it could be that more text isnt always better. It also could be sources it uses.

I see chatgpt still use comments from reddit and quora as if they were scientific articles. At what point will these guys realize quoting reddit is just terrible?

Chatgpt uses search engine on internet, and that search engine often has reddit come up as top result, which happens a lot on google.

I also see same problem with Gemini.

they are using some chat sites as source of information. So literally anyone can write any nonsense on reddit, and chatgpt will use it as source of information.

that might explain all the nonsense, and why chatgpt 5 isnt really any Skynet yet.

Now, you can manually feed scientific papers to Skynet, but the question is, why isnt that the default? Why is reddit default choice for Skynet, I mean chatgpt?

At this point, AI will never take over.

And my local model on phone is still more accurate than chatgpt when given proper data.

https://www.tiktok.com/@ultimatedarkmagician/video/7584742262123515154

Voice reveal!!!

Many people have accused me of being a kid, even tho I am trans age. So I decided to do a voice reveal to prove that I am not a kid. I know this video wont go viral. Wait, nevermind, I got 10 likes, that is good.

AI has a rating of 3600. It is unbeatable by any human. top rated chess players consistently lose against AI.

Now, while ChatGPt cant play chess well at all, AI models specialized in chess, like stockfish, have rating of 3600. top rated human player has rating of about 2800.

that is almost 1000 difference in rating by AI.

AI can be trained to be better at anything than humans. It just takes training. For example, chatGPt isnt trained on chess, and if you give ChatGPt to play chess, it will likely screw up badly in middle game.

But turn on stockfish, and it feels like playing chess against Skynet.

Let us use example of one religious person who believes in God, and another religious person who believes in 4 gods, including the one first religious person believes in.

Now, take note, this isnt a religious thread, so keep your "God is imaginary" comments elsewhere.

the theory says this when there are 4 options:

(exclusive in this case means that the option is only true when it is contained as written. So AB wont be true if A is true, or if ABC is true, but only if AB is true)

Set 1: A, B, C, D

true when: A true, B true, C true, D true, all true, exclusive all true, any non-exclusive combination of ABCD true

false when: none true, exclusive A true, exclusive B true, exclusive C true, exclusive D true, any exclusive combination of ABCD true, any partly exclusive combination of A, B, C, D true

Correct cases: 6 (or 7 if ABCD and exclusive ABCD are treated separately)

Incorrect cases 7

Correct rate: 50%

Set 2: A

true when: A true, exclusive A true, all true, any combination of ABCD true, combination of partly exclusive "A" true

false when: none true, B true, C true, D true, any combination of BCD true, exclusive all true, any combination of ABCD exclusive true, any combination of partly exclusive true,

correct cases: 4 (or 5 if all true and combination of ABCD true are treated separately)

Incorrect cases: 7 (or 8 if any combination if ABCD exclusive and all exclusive are treated separately)

correct rate: about 30%

In simple terms, second religious person who believes in 4 Gods has higher correct rate than person who believes in 1 God, or person who believes in no God, when each option is given equal probability.

this theory is based on math sets where Set 1 (A, B, C, D) is correct in more cases than Set 2 (A), when we take into account each individually, combination of each, combination of exclusive, and individually exclusive.

Set 2 is true when these are required standards for something to be true:

A true

Only A true (A true and BCD false)

A true and B false

A true and C false

A true and D false

A true and BC false

A true and BD false

A true and CD false

AB true

ABC true

ABCD true

AD true

AC true

Correct: 13 cases

Set 1 is true when these are required standards for something to be true:

A true

B true

C true

D true

AB true

AC true

AD true

ACD true

ABD true

ABC true

ABCD true

BC true

BD true

BCD true

CD true

Exclusive ABCD true

Correct: 16 cases

to avoid any confusion, the standards applied here are standards when Set contains what is asked of it to contain. So if it is asked to contain A, then ABCD contains A. But if it is asked to contain only A, then ABCD does not contain only A.

this system was made to account for all possible standards of accepting something as true.

When looking at exact truth, both sets are equal. But when looking at partial truth, sets are not equal, because in cases of partial truth, set 1 is true in more cases.

So person who believes in one God is true in less cases than person who believes in more Gods, and person who believes in no Gods is correct only if no Gods exist, which is only being correct in 1 case.