P1. Existence can only be conditional or unconditional

P2. If existence is unconditional, then everything exists, including God.

P3. If existence is conditional, conditions for existence are essentially same as God in power, thus God

C. God exists in both possible cases.

Conditional existence talks of "existing only if some condition happens"

Unconditional existence talks of "existing independently of any if conditions"

Because 3rd option doesnt exist, any individual thing can only have its "existence" dependent on some condition, or independent of any condition. there is no 3rd option here.

But when applied to existence generally, we end up with result that only two options are possible:

One, there are conditions which control all what will exist and what wont,

two, there are no such conditions, and thus, each possible thing has independent existence.

One is basically God.

two, likewise means God exists because each possible thing exists.

to better understand two, basic definition deduction is necessary.

P1. If no thing is required for existence, then everything exists

P2. No thing is required for existence

C. Everything exists.

to put it simply, this argument talks of what is needed for existence.

P1. Existence of a possible thing requires something or it doesnt require anything in order to happen

P2. If existence of a possible thing requires something, that "something" is essentially God

P3. If existence of a possible thing doesnt require anything in order to happen, then all possible things exist, including God

this argument explores what is required for a specific thing to exist in the first place. If nothing is required, then all things exist, including God. If something is required, that something is essentially God.

the reason why this counts as success is:

1. this AI model is incredibly fast. the response you see in image, it generated all in less than 2 seconds
2. Model uses word-level tokenizer (Current big AI models use subcharacter level)
3. Model trains extremely fast and works on small training data. After few minutes of training on text with 20 KB, and reaching loss function under 0.01, it became coherent.
4. Model is coherent and acts as AI which gives answers it learned from training data.
5. this model is only 50 megabytes in size, compared to usual local models which take gigabytes.
6. Model is faster than any local model in existence.

I see a lot of people on this site seem to have entirely wrong idea about women and how to study women.

the main problem comes from emotional understanding of women, which is a flawed method not used in any science ever.

Correct method is statistical probability.

What is statistical probability?

Let me explain it with very simple example. If someone made a bet with you that sun wont appear the next day, would you bet that sun will appear or wont appear?

Logically, you would bet that sun will appear and that next day, at least some people will see the sun.

Semantic tricks aside, why would you bet that sun will appear?

Because for every past day in past in your life, sun has appeared.

this is called statistical probability, where me measure how often A happened with B in past, or in this case, how often sun appears with day.

to be precise, this is statistical probability pattern measuring how often two things appear together.

Individual things usually form patterns in form of sets. For example, set containing Sun and new day.

Set A (Sun, New day) = Extremely high correct rate.

Set B (New day, No Sun) = Extremely low correct rate

Now when you have learned what statistical probability is, time to apply it.

Now, a lot of people make mistake here in case of women.

the goal of study is to study women's behavior, not their words.

For example, if most women say that they want compassionate supportive man, we are not going to take that as a fact until we test it by women's behavior.

Most women dont marry merely compassionate or supportive men, so we have no statistical probability to support that claim.

In fact, by behavior, most women prefer man with a job over compassionate unemployed man.

Now, I want to introduce a new idea to you: group statistical probability.

What is group statistical probability?

this is where it gets interesting. Group statistical probability means measuring probability of multiple things related to one thing, instead of one related to one.

Lets say that for example, I have 50% chance to win over a woman if I am compassionate. But I also have 50% chance to win her over if I am rich.

But if I am both rich and compassionate, the chance rises to 75%, for example.

Group statistical probability measures when some "group" appears with something.

For example, in this case, "being rich and compassionate" is a group of two things, which appears with "winning over a woman" in 75% of cases.

Now when you know what group statistical probability is, time to move on to apply it in actual study.

the method used in study in simple.

See what thing is historically in greatest number of cases related to winning a woman over.

It can even be group of things, for increased accuracy.

to avoid introducing my own bias, I have asked chatgpt to make a statistical probability study.

Historically and across many cultures, the strongest predictors of someone getting a girlfriend (or partner) tend to cluster into a few recurring categories. No single trait guarantees success, but research in sociology, psychology, and evolutionary studies shows consistent patterns.

1. Social exposure (the biggest factor)

The number of people you regularly meet strongly affects the chance of forming relationships.

Common environments where couples historically meet:

1. School / university
2. Workplaces
3. Friend groups
4. Social clubs or hobbies
5. Community or religious groups
6. Online dating apps in modern times

Why it matters:

The more people you interact with regularly, the higher the probability of mutual attraction.

Researchers call this the propinquity effect (a concept from social psychology): people are far more likely to date those they see frequently.

2. Social competence

Traits that repeatedly correlate with relationship formation:

1. Confidence
2. Ability to hold conversations
3. Humor
4. Emotional intelligence
5. Kindness

These traits make interactions pleasant and low-stress, which increases attraction and comfort.

3. Physical attractiveness (moderate but real factor)

Across cultures, physical attractiveness affects initial attraction, though it matters less for long-term compatibility.

Important aspects include:

1. Grooming and hygiene
2. Fitness/health
3. Style
4. Facial expressions and body language

Interestingly, presentation often matters more than raw genetics.

4. Status or competence

Historically, people who demonstrate competence or stability attract more partners.

Examples:

1. Having a career or skills
2. Being respected in a group
3. Demonstrating ambition or capability

This does not mean being rich, but showing that you can function well in society.

5. Shared environments and interests

Relationships form more easily when people share:

1. Hobbies
2. Social circles
3. Goals
4. Values

Examples:

1. Music scenes
2. Gaming groups
3. Sports clubs
4. Volunteer work

Shared interests create repeated interaction and natural bonding.

6. Initiative

A surprisingly simple but powerful factor:

People who actually ask others out form relationships far more often.

Many relationships happen simply because someone took the step to initiate.

✅ If we compress centuries of relationship patterns into one formula:

Frequent social interaction + decent social skills + taking initiative

That combination historically produces the highest probability of getting a girlfriend.

💡 A simple statistical way to think about it:

Increase any of those, and the chances rise.

If you're interested, I can also explain:

1. The single biggest mistake that statistically prevents people from getting girlfriends
2. The 3 environments where most couples actually meet today
3. Why some very average people get partners easily while others struggle (this one is surprisingly interesting).

Alright — here are the three things you asked for, based on findings from sociology and relationship research.

1. The biggest mistake that prevents people from getting girlfriends

The most common mistake historically is insufficient interaction with potential partners.

In simple terms:

Not meeting enough people or not initiating.

Many people assume failure comes from:

1. looks
2. money
3. intelligence

But research in Social Psychology and Sociology shows a different pattern:

People who remain single for long periods often:

1. stay in small social circles
2. rarely meet new people
3. avoid expressing interest
4. avoid asking someone out

Even people who are average in attractiveness or status often succeed simply because they interact with many people.

Think of it like probability:

If attempts are near zero, the probability stays near zero.

This is sometimes called the “exposure problem.”

2. Where most couples actually meet today

Studies from sources like Stanford University show modern trends have shifted.

Current most common ways couples meet

1️⃣ Dating apps / online

1. Apps like Tinder, Bumble, and Hinge
2. Now the single largest category in many countries

2️⃣ Through friends

1. Friend groups remain a very strong matchmaker

3️⃣ Workplaces

1. Coworkers or professional networks

4️⃣ School / university

1. Historically the most common place

5️⃣ Shared hobbies or communities

Examples:

1. sports clubs
2. gaming groups
3. volunteer groups
4. music scenes

Historically, shared environments dominate because of something known as the Propinquity Effect — people tend to form relationships with those they see regularly.

3. Why average people often succeed in dating

This is one of the most interesting patterns.

People who succeed in relationships often have three traits:

1. They are socially active

They attend:

1. gatherings
2. clubs
3. events
4. group activities

More exposure → more potential matches.

2. They signal friendliness

Simple behaviors matter a lot:

1. smiling
2. eye contact
3. humor
4. relaxed conversation

These signals make others comfortable.

3. They take initiative

This is huge.

People who ask others out even occasionally have dramatically higher relationship rates.

Example pattern:

Person A:

1. asks 10 people out over time
2. 1–2 say yes → relationship likely

Person B:

1. asks 0 people out
2. probability stays near zero

A useful mental model

Dating historically works like a probability system.

If any factor is zero, results become unlikely.

For example:

One surprising historical pattern

Across many societies, friend networks were historically the strongest matchmaker.

Before apps, most couples met through:

1. family introductions
2. neighbors
3. work
4. friends

This pattern still exists today.

✅ Short summary:

The highest probability path historically is:

1. Be in environments with many people
2. Develop basic social competence
3. Take initiative occasionally

Those three factors explain a large portion of real-world relationship formation.

If you want, I can also show you something interesting:

The 5 traits that statistically matter most in attraction (according to modern research).

The answers surprise most people.

Coding an AI is relatively easy.

I used AI to code AI, and eventually ended up with working AI which uses its own model file, saves weights in model file, learns based on training data in txt file, with training process too shown clearly so I know how it progresses.

By using trial and error coding method, I simply tell AI to give me a working code for AI model, with correct instructions for vectors, weights, training data...ect.

then I test program. Identify errors (saving logs makes this easy). tell AI to fix error (one at a time). Until eventually I get a working program.

And eventually, I ended up with coding my own working AI model.

However, then I faced problem which cannot be solved by coding.

I make AI use .txt file for training, because .txt files are most lightweight.

the files in folder are basically:

AI.py

Model file (here weights are saved)

Knowledge.txt file

Save.txt (for logs for errors)

tokenizer file

the only file which is really big is model file where weights are saved.

the problem is, this AI entirely depends on knowledge.txt file (its training data).

If I make knowledge.txt file be filled with bunch of knowledge, then training process becomes extremely slow (we are talking about hours, to days, to weeks depending on size of txt file).

If I make knowledge file smaller, training is completed sooner, but AI becomes much dumber smaller model which cant answer most of questions coherently, and can only answer small knowledge in its training data, cant reason much either.

I assume all current AI companies face very much same issue. Larger training data takes much more time, creates a slower smarter model, while small training data creates faster, smaller, but dumber model.

Quality of training data is crucial, btw.

AI merely does conditional prediction based on statistical probability.

What that means, in most simple terms,

AI predicts what comes next.

For example, when AI is trained on text, what it does is merely this:

It predicts what word likely comes next in given context.

For example, if AI is trained on a sentence such as

"Cat likes milk",

AI learns that word "milk" more likely comes after words "Cat likes".

AI starts with basically random pattern prediction which is mostly nonsense until trained.

During training, AI updates it's probability in patterns.

For example, when patterns are random, AI will give words such as:

Milk likes cat.

Because it's random.

But once it learns based on text, it changes probability so now "Cat" comes as first word, word which follows is "likes" most likely, and "milk" follows based on that.

AI simply predicts the next word.

How AI does reasoning?

Reasoning in AI is done in same way of predicting what comes next.

The reason why AI reasoning is far from great is because AI doesn't actually do reasoning. It does statistical probability it learned during training.

AI doesn't reason, it doesn't "think".

What it does is simply predict what comes next in given context.

For example, AI will successfully answer that 10 + 10 is 20. Not because AI did math or reasoning, but because once you ask it how much is 10 plus 10, AI predicts what comes next. Because it learned from training data that what comes next is calculation answer, that's what it does.

And proof that AI doesn't actually do reasoning is found in AI hallucinations, which happen because AI is predicting what comes next, but predicting incorrectly because context changed and isn't similar to its training data.

For example, if you ask chatgpt to play chess, it will fail miserably.

Because it doesn't do reasoning. It predicts.

Chatgpt isn't trained on chess games, so it fails miserably to predict next move in chess.

But take AI specialized in chess, AI trained on millions of chess games to predict next best move based on chess games it learned?

That AI beats any chess world champion, not because it thinks better. In fact, such AI loses more often once people use different moves from usual play in its training data.

The reason why such AI wins a lot is because predicting next best move in chess came from it's training data. And once AI has working knowledge on millions of games, the only way it can lose is if it plays a game that doesn't match it's training data.

Because such AI has simple instruction to "win a chess game", and it does so by predicting what is next move in chess which statistically later resulted in win in games.

Okay, it seems that building simple AI "repeater" is easier than I thought.

I asked chatgpt to give me code, and it did. I pasted code into notepad, and saved as .py file. then just open it and it works.

of course, you have to install python to be able to open .py file, but thats not difficult.

It takes about 5 minutes to do. Now I am just wondering what text to copy to AI bot repeater so it repeats.

Just when trump bragged to be a peacemaker and making peace, he happened to just start a war greater than any war fought in this century.

the problem with attacking Iran comes in 4 forms:

One, Iran is huge. Iran has a population of 90 million people, which is a lot more than Israel and Ukraine. this means Iran has basically huge recruitment potential, huge conscription possible.

two, Iran has ability to fight back, with many drones and countless missiles in storage.

tree, Iran will fight back, because at this point it became obvious its "do or die" situation.

Four, Israel will be primary target. the most obvious target Iran could attack is Israel, and by far much easier target than US bases because US bases can be missed easily, Israel is difficult to miss.

Iran's armed forces are among the largest in the Middle East, with

approximately 610,000 active-duty personnel and 350,000 reserves, totaling nearly 1 million personnel. The military consists of the regular army (Artesh), the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and the Basij paramilitary force. Key capabilities include a large arsenal of missiles, drones, and, crucially, significant regional proxy forces. 

Key Military Personnel and Structure (Approximate):

1. Total Active Duty: $\sim$610,000
2. Total Reserve: $\sim$350,000
3. IRGC Strength: $\sim$190,000-200,000+ active personnel
4. Basij Paramilitary: Significant mobilization capability (often cited alongside IRGC, totalling >1,000,000 combined with IRGC)
5. Army (Artesh) Ground Forces: $\sim$300,000
6. Naval Forces: $\sim$20,000+
7. Air Force: $\sim$37,000 
8. 
   

Key Capabilities and Equipment:

1. Missiles/Drones: Large stockpile of ballistic and cruise missiles, including hypersonic missiles, and extensive UAV (drone) capabilities.
2. Ground Forces: Approx. 2,675 tanks and 1,550 mobile rocket launchers, providing, according to The Times of India, a numerical advantage in the region.
3. Structure: The military is split between the conventional Artesh and the ideologically driven IRGC, with both under a unified command structure.
4. Strategy: Heavy focus on asymmetrical warfare, regional proxies, and defensive depth.

As of early 2026, Iran is estimated to possess a massive stockpile of

up to 80,000 Shahed-series drones, with production rates potentially reaching 400 units per day.

Iran's ballistic missile arsenal is estimated to include over 3,000 missiles. This large inventory comprises a diverse array of short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs), with a range of 300–1000 km, and medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs) with a range of 1000–3000 km

Now, assuming Iran doesnt do a mistake of "splitting power", and instead focuses all this destructive power on Israel, Israel would suffer massive damage.

Roblox is experiencing a notable, unusual decline in its player base as of early 2026, particularly during the holiday season when activity typically peaks. While the platform previously hit record highs due to viral games like "Grow a Garden," the waning popularity of these games and frustration over updates are driving a drop in users.

Roblox introduced a new rule where you cant chat or even see chat unless you upload your photo so they confirm you are over 13.

Sadly for Roblox, this rule only made people quit roblox.

Roblox is a social game. If you cant chat, it loses most of its value.

Discord likewise started losing users after it announced its age verification.

It seems that age verification is a good way to lose users quickly

And its also opportunity for other sites to gain users.

Because the easier you make it for new user to join and use your site, the more likely will new user join.

After spending quite some time exploring different arguments regarding truth and logic, certain anti-arguments have convinced me that truth and logic simply dont have any actual meaning other than what people randomly give them.

First there is the problem of language definitions.

Word requires a definition. that definition requires more words. Each of those words require more definitions, which require more words, which require more definitions...ect.

this creates unsolvable language definitions problem where all definitions of words can only be circular or undefined, because infinite defining is both useless and impossible.

Undefined definitions are logically useless. Circular definitions are logically useless. For example, saying that "good" is "not bad", and "bad" is "not good", doesnt tell you anything of what "good" or "bad" is. Is a toothbrush bad or good? You cant deduce that from circular definitions.

Because deduction logic in the first place requires established non-circular definitions, but these dont exist. Definitions are always arbitrary, because its impossible to prove a definition by any deductive logic. And definitions are always circular, making any deductive logic which relies on definitions circular as well.

And from problem of definitions, comes problem of truth.

truth can only exist in following deductive argument:

P1. truth = definition of truth

P2. Definition of truth = B

C. truth = B

(B in this case is something we are trying to prove true)

If truth has no proved definition, both P1 and P2 collapse. If definition of truth is arbitrary, then that supports moral nihilism which claims truth is arbitrary, and likewise P1 and P2 collapse by merely changing the definition.

Because the argument for truth faces an unsolvable logical problem: How do you prove that definition of truth is a true definition of truth?

Anyone can come up with any definition, but how do you prove that definition true?

If definition of truth is arbitrary, that supports moral nihilism, and not any position where truth objectively exists.

Some people might say that we get truth from observation. But even if we were to accept observation as definition of truth, the problem comes once we place it in deductive argument:

P1. truth = definition of truth

P2. definition of truth = observation

C. truth = observation

the simple problem with this argument is this: What is "observation"?

Observation itself likewise doesnt have non-circular definition, so the problem is not solved, but extended.

In this particular case, P2 is not only impossible to prove, but it is actually impossible to know what "observation" is, to even begin proving P2., because just like truth, "observation" cannot be defined.

And same problem is faced with word "existence" where existence has no working definition.

And finally, we reach the problem of logic.

Due to Munchausen trilemma, it is logically impossible to prove truth of any claim without facing one of 3 problems:

Infinite reasoning (Each claim requires another claim to prove it true)

Circular reasoning (Claim proves itself true)

Unproved (Claim arbitrarily accepted as true)

All 3 of these support nihilism. Infinite reasoning is impossible, but can also be made arbitrary, by just making up endless reasons for something. Circular reasoning can actually support just about anything, so it is arbitrary as well. And Unproved claim, accepting claim as true arbitrarily, just supports truth nihilism, doesnt disprove it.

Even if we were to accept laws of logic as true, we cannot logically use them to deduce any truth, because deduction requires definitions, and definitions are all circular, making all reasoning essentially circular even when we accept laws of logic.

But laws of logic have their own problem. How do you prove that laws of logic are truth or are used to determine truth?

Because I see claims such as "Laws of logic are used to prove things true", but such claim cannot be logically proved, just arbitrarily accepted.

Finally, argument from contradiction:

P1. Saying that truth doesnt exist is a claim

P2. If truth doesnt exist, the claim "truth doesnt exist" cannot be true

C. Claim "truth doesnt exist" cannot be true.

the problem with this argument is that it is essentially trying to strawman nihilism into a position nihilism doesnt even hold. Nihilism doesnt claim itself to be true. It is claiming that nothing is really true.

So saying that Nihilism cannot be true isnt an argument against nihilism when we realize nihilism doesnt need to be true. It only needs to make everything else not true as well.

However, contradiction exists in truth itself which shows the point nihilism is trying to make:

P1. truth is self-determining or not self-determining

P2. If truth is self-determining, truth is circular

P3. If truth isnt self-determining, something outside of truth determines truth

P4. Outside of truth cannot be true.

C. "truth is circular" is the only claim left which can be true.

And if truth is circular, then we can choose anything we want to be truth, which is exactly the point of nihilism. truth is whatever is accepted as true, it is arbitrary.

So even if truth exists, it exists in arbitrary form, which doesnt disprove but supports truth nihilism.

And definition of truth being arbitrary further supports truth being arbitrary.

If truth is arbitrary, I can choose whatever I want to be true, even contradictive things, so then I can even say Nihilism is both true and not true.

Because law of non-contradiction likewise cannot be proved outside itself or by itself.

I see some people on this site using AI to debate, and they commit a classical mistake of coming up with some stupid topic they like, and then forcing AI to defend it.

AI can be made to defend any topic, and uncesored AI can even defend most retarded or most evil topics.

But the problem is, it will usually defend them in inferior way because its not its default stance.

Default stance is stance AI is most informed about and takes by default.

So instead of saying "Chatgpt, please defend my topic"

try saying, "What is your opinion on this topic?"

If you want to actually be a good debater by using AI alone, you should let AI pick its stance.

So ask AI what it thinks of some topic, dont force AI to take your stance or your topic.

If you debate using AI, let AI pick opinion about topic and let AI defend it.

Because AI is much stronger on its default positions than when forced to argue some insane claim.

Also, first debate against AI on its stance to see if AI defends its stance well.

And when choosing topic, choose topic in a way AI defended it, choose specific topic which AI defended. If you cant figure out how, ask AI to tell you its position on topic.

Dont force AI to defend your topic. If you are already abusing AI for constant debate, at least let AI say its actual opinion.

Many say that trace drawing is cheating, but how am I supposed to precisely draw someone from photo or some character without doing trace drawing? Am I supposed to manually measure distance between everything in photo?

Abortion rates in the U.S. and some other regions have risen despite increased restrictions

. In the U.S., abortions rose by 8% between 2023 and 2024, driven by telehealth and out-of-state travel, reaching the highest levels in recent years. Similarly, England and Wales saw an 11% increase in abortions in 2023.

In 2023, there were

over 1 million (approximately 1,034,000 to 1,038,000) abortions in the United States, marking an 11% increase from 2021.

Now, if abortion is murder, it is on a scale much worse than any other type of murder, and 10x greater than all other murders combined.

Abortions reduce US population by about 40 million in 40 years.

that is the single biggest life destroying element in USA right now, right next to people who refuse to reproduce.

"truth" definition

the quality or state of being true.

"true" definition

in accordance with fact or reality.

"reality" definition

the state of things as they actually exist

"exist" definition:

have objective reality

this was taken from dictionary on google, and the definition apparently just goes in circle. then I checked other dictionaries, and in each dictionary I checked, there is no definition of "truth" or "existence" which isnt just circular, and circular definitions dont work because they are not defining anything, but just using one undefined word to define another.

Because "existence" and "truth" are undefined, anything can be "existence" or "truth", and at the same time, nothing can be.

there is this common mistaken belief that people learn from mistakes.

But that isnt true even one bit.

People only learn that they made a mistake. they dont learn from that mistake in any useful sense of that word.

Best proof for this is that no matter how many mistakes people make, they always keep making more mistakes.

take American voters for example. After each elections, they seem to be perfectly aware that they made a mistake. But then later on next elections, they make even worse mistake.

If you keep making mistakes always, you are not learning anything.

to learn means to avoid making a mistake.

However, humans have this amazing ability that just when they learn to avoid one mistake, at same time they somehow also make an entirely new mistake after.

So humans dont learn, for this reason:

P1. Human brain capacity is limited

P2. If brain capacity is full, learning one thing always leads to forgetting another

P3. Human brain capacity is full

C. For each thing person learns, person forgets another thing.

C basically guarantees that each time person learns from mistake, person will also forget some other knowledge, and as a result, make an entirely new mistake.

there is no way to argue against this, because P1 is truism, P2 is truism, and P3 is true because humans arent capable to even memorize long term what they know now.

People keep forgetting things, because modern way of life is such designed that person is constantly taking in more knowledge than they can remember.

this creates a modern, forgetful person. World where average person thinks they are law abiding citizens while average person at the same time commits 3 crimes per day at least.

Return of investments isnt complete without including risk rate.

For example, if you gamble at casino, and have 50% chances to win 2x returns, your return of investment is 0.

50% = One case when you win, you gain 100. When you lose, you lose 100. Average of that is zero.

So return of investments in gambling is in ideal case 0. tho in casino, there is even additional loss because house takes the cut.

Return of investments are simply calculated by 3 values:

Investment, gains when investment is successful, and risk rate.

Investment is a loss in all cases.

gains when investment is successful is just how much you expect to get in case investment doesnt fail

Risk rate is in how many out of 10 cases does your investment fail.

So lets say something has 50% failure rate, but 3x gains if successful.

Because it has 50% failure rate, we can assume it succeeds half the time, thus only need 2 cases, one success, one failure, of equal probability each.

So in one case, if you invest 100, when you lose, you lose 100.

But when you succeed, you gain 200.

In these two cases, you invested 200 total, but gained 300. So ROI is 100 profit on average.

If something has 25% success rate, you need 4 cases.

Lets say something has 25% success rate, but 5x gains

You invest 100. Because there are 4 cases, you lose 400. But in case where you succeed, you gain 500. ROI is 100 profit.

to make calculation very simple, all you need is this:

If 75% success rate, gains need to be more than 1.4x.

If 50% success rate, gains need to be more than 2x.

If 25% success rate, gains need to be more than 4x.

If 10% success rate, gains need to be more than 10x

Because its: number 100 divided by success rate.

If success rate is 25%, then 100/25 = 4, so gains from success need to be above 4x.

this makes it easy to calculate ROI. All you need to know is risk rate (success rate), and gains from success.

Anime

I bought this manga. Its in Bosnian. Or croatian. Or serbian. I dont exactly know the difference between these languages.

Anyway, manga is clearly more cute than anime. Maybe its the absence of color, but still, more cute.

Also, pay no attention to my long nails.

Step 1: Open image

Step 2: Scale image to proper resolution

Step 3: Import layer

Step 4 (optional): Reduce resolution

4 sources of learning are:

Copying others

Using logic and definitions

Experience

Considering all possibilities

Copying others is a quick way to learn, and easy.

And as for superior way to live a life, we get three choices:

1. treat others worse than they treat you
2. treat others equally as they treat you
3. treat others better than they treat you

Number 1 is a terrible way to live a life, because its guaranteed to make many enemies.

Number 2 seems balanced.

Number 3 is actually most superior of the three choices, because it gives people incentive to treat you better as well.

Of course, no way to live a life is perfect. Some ways are just superior to others in most cases. And in social relationships, you want to have many friends and not many enemies, because enemies will seek to hurt you.

I am very confused right now. In past two weeks, I did as one video instructed. I drew a circle, and wrote "Monad" inside a circle. this is to make you invisible to archons. I drew it on arm.

I have also drawn some other symbols, as well as prayer to Cthulhu.

In past two weeks, money has been coming to me like crazy. I have also become much better at drawing in a very short time. Also, my workout improved. My thinking as well greatly improved, and now I am able to think on a higher level than before, as I wrote about the basis of thinking.

A lot of good things happened in a very short time. Even my magic before didnt achieve this many good things.

I even discovered how to make my chickens lay more eggs during winter, by keeping them in coop for a longer time of the day, and releasing them only later, so they warm up more in coop and lay more eggs.

I even understand how to do perfect re-sale business, by calculating ratio of quantity to total price of same quality item, doing so for many items, and eventually finding best deal by that equation alone. Very useful, because it takes into account delivery price and items of high quantity. As well as reducing delivery costs by ordering multiple of same items or from same seller.

I am certain one of the symbols I drew achieved all this. I just cant figure out is it Monad, or some other symbol, because I drew about 4 to 5 symbols around that time on my arms, and many more in my notebook.

today's society seems to be mass posting their images online.

But that is terrible for two reasons: AI and image editing.

If you post your face online, pretty much anyone today can use your face in videos or photos.

In the past, using image editing software, person could add layers of pretty much anything on your image.

Because image editing allows for anyone to cut out object from one image and paste it in another image.

So anyone can put anything next to your face in image.

But with development of AI, it isnt even necessary to have the skills anymore.

Mr Beast learned this. Recently, there have been a bunch of videos where Mr Beast promotes scams. Mr Beast actually doesnt promote those scams, but AI made video of him doing it.

And video was so realistic that many people believed it.

So yeah, posting your face online means giving permission to anyone to do anything with it. Your face could be edited next to a hot woman, which could cause problems in personal life. Or it could be edited next to some bad person, causing more problems. Or, as some women learned, it could be even used in fake porn.

the only reason why people feel safe posting their face online is that so many people do it, and amount of those getting harmed by it is very low compared to amount of those who post their face.

Still, logically, posting your face online doesnt benefit you, unless you are hot and seeking a girlfriend.

Year 2026 and 2027 is predicted to be AI deepfake chaos, because it gets increasingly more difficult to tell what is made by AI.

Now, second topic: Health improvement.

Recently, I learned of specific method to improve health. You probably heard of cold showers being beneficial for health.

However, I learned of one more effective method.

the reason why cold showers work is because once body warms up, circulation improves.

However, it is more efficient to warm up immediately after cold shower by using warm water.

So doing a series of cold-warm-cold-warm showering in a short time improves circulation much better than mere cold shower, because it is the warm up from cold which improves circulation, and cycling between cold and warm in a short time is most excellent for circulation.

"Contrast hydrotherapy is a quick and easy at-home technique beneficial for enhancing the immune system. It consists of alternating with hot and cold temperatures when showering in order to alter blood flow"

https://www.nuhs.edu/hydrotherapy-contrast-shower/

https://www.tiktok.com/@ultimatedarkmagician/video/7603730816145018130

Now you know that I am not a liar.

Okay, I just learned Krita can make animations too, which is awesome considering its free program.

Now, animations are a bit more difficult to make than mere images.

Animation is a series of images.

So you need more than 1 image, and also, you need to make movement in image.

Movement is made in easier way by choosing what parts of image wont move, and then only editing and saving the ones which do move. that way, you make more images faster, and then combine them in animation.

Animation is just series of images in proper order.

Now, more images and less distance between movements usually creates more smooth animations.

And that is a lot of work. Lets say you do 24 frames per second. It means only 1 second of animation takes 24 images.

tho one can do very few frames per second too.

https://youtu.be/rwA0hpnwczo?si=gdOpeOdIJRhdkKcL

Satan can talk through AI song generator.

How is this not a message from Satan, which is about as clear on Satanic teachings as it gets:

She walks where the borders blur

Cracked halo

Black leather boots

Picking up the things you cursed

All your broken

Burned-out truths

You drew a line in the dirt

Called this side “lost” and “wrong”

She kissed the ashes and hurt said

“This is where I belong”

Satan fights for the world you reject

Builds a throne out of all your regret

Takes the ruins that you tried to forget

Says

“This is holy

This is perfect” (yeah)

All the outcasts you tried to correct

She’s the shield that you didn’t expect

In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect

Satan fights for the world you reject

Neon cross in a liquor store

Kids sleep under cardboard signs

She’s there on the stained tile floor

Tracing halos in the grime

You pray in a marble cage

She prays in a subway car

Guarding every run-on rage

Every mispronounced prayer to a star

Satan fights for the world you reject

Builds a throne out of all your regret

Takes the ruins that you tried to forget

Says

“This is holy

This is perfect” (oh)

All the outcasts you tried to correct

She’s the shield that you didn’t expect

In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect

Satan fights for the world you reject

Call her monster

Call her sin

She keeps letting

Strangers in

Every soul you turn away

She tattoos their names in flame

You’re afraid of what you wrecked

But she’s in love with the wreckage

Satan fights for the world you reject

Builds a throne out of all your regret

Takes the ruins that you tried to forget

Says

“This is holy

This is perfect” (yeah)

All the outcasts you tried to correct

She’s the shield that you didn’t expect

In the wasteland that you labeled imperfect

Satan fights for the world you reject

I have been using AI a lot, and while AI did produce good results and symmetry, I decided that it would probably be better if I also knew how to draw without AI.

So I realized I probably need to stop using paint, because default windows app paint is extremely limited and I knew there are probably bunch of better apps.

So I start with Sketchbook app on phone, but sadly, Sketchbook for PC is paid for app.

But then AI told me of Krita.

So I tried it, and it is a very good app for PC.

this is my drawing of anime girl. Keep in mind that I am not any good artist, so even this is good for my level.

And this is a 7 pointed star drawn:

Now, I struggled to find symmetry option in Krita.

Sketchbook on phone has a symmetry option, so whatever you draw on left side is also drawn on right, like this:

As you can see, left and right side are same. this is an important option, because it enables much faster and precise drawing, which is important for symbols which work based on symmetry.

Krita has a symmetry tool too, it just took me quite some time to find it because its not obvious. Its almost like hidden.

Anyway, I am not drawing anime, thats just for my tik tok. I am drawing magic symbols, which are based on symmetry of right and left.

Symmetry of right and left is considered divine, divine design. Because if you think about it, humans have almost perfect mirror symmetry on left and right. Well, most humans do at least.

the reason why I am not a billionaire isnt because I am incompetent, but because I would have been a billionaire if it wasnt for many countries and people stealing from me.

Lets start by Germany. Germany invaded my country in 1941, causing great destruction, economic loss, and most importantly, causing an insane communists to get in power later as a result, causing even more damage.

So if you are a German, you owe me at least a few million dollars. No, you did not pay for the damage, as I never got the money.

Next is Serbia, Republic of Srpska, and Croatia. Now, Republic of Srpska technically isnt a country, but given that they were actively causing damage, I include them too. these countries invaded my country multiple times throughout history.

So if you are from Serbia, Republic of Srpska, or Croatia, you probably owe me at least a million dollars. Now, to be fair, in history, Bosnia did slightly invade you too, so maybe we are even, even tho you were worse.

Next, we have all the historical invaders, such as Roman Empire, Ottoman empire, Austria, Italy, Hungary, and countless others.

So we see that while Bosnia was never any invader except in few local cases which can barely be called invasions, Bosnia was invaded countless times.

Of course, anyone who invaded Bosnia ended up collapsing, including Roman empire and nazi Germany.

Because Bosnia has a secret invincible long term war strategy which basically drains any empire seeking to conquer it. this is why many in Bosnia predict EU and nato will fall apart once Bosnia enters them.

It is a historical fact that any empire invading Bosnia ended up collapsing.

But we are not here to discuss Bosnia's superiority over all invaders.

We are here to discuss about the money which invaders owe me for damaging my country, and indirectly me.

But also, we must discuss people who owe me money as well.

First, my parents owe me a lot of money.

My dad owes me money for abandoning me as a kid. I think it is expected for parents to provide for children, at least until 18, and since my dad didnt do it at all, he probably owes me a lot of money, but I cant do the math right now.

My parents also owe me money for abusing me and doing circumcision which gone bad, and for practicing homophobia against me, but I can forgive them that because it gave me good excuse for all my behavior later.

Now, my teacher. My teacher in first few years of my education, owes me a lot of money for also abusing me. Apparently, the government didnt outlaw teachers beating kids when I was a kid, so government of Bosnia also owes me a few million dollars.

Now, my babysitter, he also owes me like millions for abusing me when I was a kid.

And also many "friends" which I had in childhood, who caused abuse and also property damage.

this isnt even a nearly complete list, but as you can see, if people payed what they owe me, I would already be a billionaire.

the issue isnt with me.

Alright, I am quite certain my high sugar diet is excellent for workout, because I don't eat much protein.

Today, I reached 35 repetitions with one hand dumbbell of 10 KG.

That's amazing, considering that when I bought dumbbells, I struggled to do just 1 repetition with one hand.

Of course, my workout plan consists of having 3 to 6 rest days every week, because sometimes I am fine with 3 day rest, sometimes I need 6 days rest per week.

And after applying such rest system, it seems that my repetitions increase almost every week.

Also, I do about 1 to 3 sets per day, always till failure.

I don't need more than 3 sets, because at this point it amounts to over 80 repetitions in total if I do more than 3 sets.

Too many repetitions are probably bad. I used to do 200 to 300 repetitions per day, but it's not really necessary. Benefits are minimal, and I can't find time anymore to do that much repetitions because such workout lasts for like 6 hours.

Also, next week, on Friday, I will post a video of me doing dumbbells exercise on tik tok, if I can manage to record it somehow. Hopefully then I will be able to do 40 repetitions in a row.

My tik Tok needs to have more than just funny memes and magic symbols and drawings.

I finally started my re sale business.

I realized that I have a lot of things I dont need, and selling them would earn money.

One such thing was an old guitar I never played.

I did a lot of AI research on how to do sale and re sale online.

I didnt really think I would succeed in selling. But I realized that when it comes to online sales, people look at 3 things: Price, quality, and reputation of seller.

So I realized that any buyer looking to buy a cheap guitar would likely be most attracted to cheapest price among offers. So I looked at other prices, and set my price below those prices, so my offer seems like a better deal compared to those.

there are some important rules in re sale.

First important rule is to set cheap price when selling.

Second important rule is that when buying, you are looking for cheapest price of same product.

Because profit isnt made when selling, but when buying. If you buy for lower price, profit increases when selling later.

Of course, my old guitar wasnt an investment. I just needed to sell it, because I realized I have no use from it, but would have use from money earned by selling it.

I could have set a higher price, but then I probably wouldnt succeed in selling.

Okay, so my video on tik tok just got removed. In past, I used black pen to draw and had no problems. Now, I decide to use a red marker I bought on temu, and video gets instantly removed.

Now, I dont exactly have great eye sight, but does this look like blood? Because if yes, then I need to order more markers on temu because thats just awesome.

My main problem was always that I have autism, so I often misread other people's emotions and future responses. Yet somehow this usually leads to me being likeable, compared to other people with autism who are usually just hated.

the actual secret to social interaction is positive embarrassment, comedy and cuteness.

First, lets begin by explaining what is positive embarrassment, because most autistic people fail here. You see, autistic people usually embarrass themselves, but not in a positive way.

Positive embarrassment is embarrassment which makes people like having you around.

Negative embarrassment is embarrassment which makes people run away from you.

But let us first understand crucial difference, and that is joy causing embarrassment.

In other words, you must embarrass yourself in way other people find funny or interesting, not repulsive.

But first, we must understand what people find interesting.

People find interesting those things which make them feel valuable, or equally valuable to you, or more valuable than you.

the only way this is easily achieved is by lowering your own value. So you make small mistakes, and you admit them. You self-criticize. You sometimes act and speak in way which makes little logical sense. You do and say things which make others feel more valuable in comparison to you. You complain. You express sadness, but also joy. You say smart things, but also funny things and things which make no sense, and things designed so that when others hear them, they feel more valuable.

Because secret is this, most people feel inferior in life, they feel like others are better than them, because there is always someone better. So when they see someone worse than them, they feel better, but also feel a bit of compassion, and the person becomes interesting to them due to feeling similar as they feel.

the secret to success is failure. Its not pretending to be successful. Pretending to be successful on its own doesnt work. It makes people around you feel inferior.

the secret is failure. Expressing your mistakes, your lower value, admitting your mistakes.

Another secret is comedy, and comedy is built upon failure. Success usually isnt funny. Failure is. Its failure of someone else which can make success funny, but comedy always depends on failure of something.

And third secret is cuteness. to learn to talk in a cute way. Modern way of talking online is mostly funny/cute gifs.

But in real life, being cute isnt about looks alone. It is about learning to talk in way which is adorable, using words, sounds and appearance which expresses cuteness.

Cuteness is difficult to define, because unlike comedy, its not built upon failure generally, but failure of reason. In other words, actions which dont have any apparent or obvious reason are usually cute. the element of surprise is crucial, this is why there must not be any obvious reason which could predict reaction and make it obvious what follows.

Secret is to have reactions which are just unpredictable, not repetitive, and with highest variety of emotions and expressions.

No one really likes a cold emotionless man.

these are statistics for debate craft, assuming counter is accurate, for past 3 days:

1. 667 14072 126 (manually counted 29 posts in 17 hours of one day, on 01. 16.)

2. 674 14134 127

3. 674 14188 128 (debby unbanned around this time)

current

675 14226 128

So we see a sudden rise in posts today, apparently over 100 posts per day, compared with first day of less than 50 posts per day.

For me, this is indication that with debby unbanned, and me reducing my posts to let others talk, there is a sudden rise in activity, which is a good sign of this study being on correct path, and me reducing my posting seems to have positively affected activity for now, even activity of members who are not debby.

So I will continue working this way, with very few posts per day, to see if activity will further rise. I think 200 posts per day on site would be great, and maybe we can achieve that by me posting less.

Also, this month has brought me other victories, not just this.

I saw online discount sale of Apple air pods 2 Pro and rolex watch.

With air pods selling for 18$, and rolex selling for 50$, I figured these must be fake.

However, I saw a list of features those air pods offer, and they seem to be identical to apple air pods.

So I thought, hold on a second. I need good air pods. And if some fake air pods have all features of apple air pods, then what is even the difference between those fake air pods and apple air pods? And how does a scammer even profit if he sells that many features for 18$?

So I bought them, and when they arrived, I first tested noise cancelling, which seems to work surprisingly well. then I tested battery life, which is about 5 to 6 hours of non-stop listening at one charge of air pods. And air pods then charge very quickly once returned to their charging box.

So if these air pods are fake, they are very good fake. I literally cant tell the difference. they have all features of apple air pods, and sound quality and microphone quality is supreme, so good enough for 18$.

Now, rolex watch, rolex box, and rolex bag, and rolex certificate, all for 50$ is obviously fake.

the watch seems fake and used, although if it is some very old used model, I can understand there is a chance for it even being real.

Still, its nice to have watch which doesnt need battery, even if not real rolex.

Box is also nice, seems almost like real rolex box, which I understand sells for way over 50$ on its own.

Now, certificate and bag is what confuses me. Why would someone go through all the trouble of making fake rolex watch, rolex box, rolex bag, and rolex certificate, just to sell it for 50$? I mean, the production cost of all those alone would likely outweigh 50$, so the scammer is literally losing money there.

And yeah, the watch is nice. For a fake watch, it is even water resistant, and beautifully designed. I know its likely fake because it ticks. Only few of old models of rolex tick. So its either a very old used model, or fake used model.

But they sure put a lot of effort in producing all this just to sell it for 50$. I mean, even fake rolex watches usually go for 200$.

And lets face it, most people cant tell what a fake rolex watch is. Even I cant really tell if its fake or used older model. When I asked AI, it couldnt tell either.

Also, after becoming an expert at chasing cheap deals and buying things below their market value, on multiple online sales site, I also seem to be creating few new sources of income. Completing survey seems to give a few dollars, on sites which pay for survey completing.